Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12
-
Item
-
ItemAdjustment of appropriate signal levels in the Spectra 22 and Mini Speech processors( 1995)The Spectra 22 speech processor has been described (Seligman and McDermott, this suppl, section 6). Figure 1 shows the audio signal path and means of mapping loudness in this processor and its predecessor, the Cochlear Pty Limited Mini Speech Processor (MSP). In both processors, following the microphone and preamplification, the signal level is adjusted by a sensitivity control. This control is the equivalent of the input gain of a hearing aid and is quite distinct from a loudness or maximum output level control. As will be explained later in this paper, the setting of the control is crucial to the effective functioning of the speech processor.
-
ItemImpedance measurement of the Nucleus 22-electrode array in patients( 1995)By means of a prototype 22-electrode cochlear implant with a telemetry ability, electrode voltage and impedances have been measured in three patients over a 2-month period. A simple electrical model of the electrode-tissue interface is described to explain the results.
-
ItemEvaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 Processor and New Speech Processing Strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults( 1995)A new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) has been compared with the previous Multipeak (MPEAK) strategy in a study with 24 postlinguistically deafened adults. The results show that performance with the SPEAK coding strategy was significantly better for 58.3% of subjects on closed-set consonant identification, for 33.3% of subjects on closed-set vowel identification and open-set monosyllabic word recognition, and for 81.8% of subjects on open-set sentence recognition in quiet and in competing noise (+ 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio). By far the largest improvement observed was for sentence recognition in noise, with the mean score across subjects for the SPEAK strategy twice that obtained with MPEAK.
-
ItemArchitecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor( 1995)The Spectra 22 is a logical extension in the development of the speech processing for the Cochlear Mini 22 system. It can implement the new coding strategy (Speak) that has provided significant improvement in patient benefit.
-
ItemCoding of voice source information in the Nucleus cochlear implant system( 1995)Two studies are reported in which the effectiveness of explicitly coding voicing and fundamental frequency information for the Nucleus cochlear implant was investigated. ln the first study, the voicing perception of a group of three experienced Multipeak users was evaluated when they were using Multipeak and a modified Multipeak in which the explicit fundamental frequency and voicing cues were eliminated and replaced with a 250-Hz constant rate of stimulation. The results of consonant and monosyllabic word tests showed that there was no significant difference in the subjects' ability to discriminate voicing. In the second study, the ability of a group of five experienced users of the constant rate spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP) strategy to discriminate suprasegmental contrasts was evaluated when they were using the SMSP strategy and a modified SMSP strategy that included a rate-encoded representation of the fundamental frequency on the most apical stimulation channel. The results of intonation, roving stress, and question-statement tests showed that there was no significant difference between the scores recorded with these strategies. Since the temporal voicing cue is not a primary cue to voicing discrimination for Multipeak users, and the provision of an additional rate cue to the SMSP strategy does not improve SMSP users' ability to discriminate suprasegmental contrasts, the results of these studies indicate that in the cases investigated, the coding of voice source information by rate of stimulation does not significantly augment the cues present in the spatially distributed constant rate stimulation pattern.
-
ItemSpeech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy( 1995)The Speak speech-processing strategy, developed by the University of Melbourne and commercialized by Cochlear Pty Limited for use in the new Spectra 22 speech processor, has been shown to provide improved speech perception for adults in both quiet and noisy situations. The present study evaluated the ability of children experienced in the use of the Multipeak (Mpeak) speech-processing strategy (implemented in the Nucleus Minisystem-22 cochlear implant) to adapt to and benefit from the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy (implemented in the Nucleus Spectra 22 speech processor). Twelve children were assessed using Mpeak and Speak over a period of 8 months. All of the children had over 1 year's previous experience with Mpeak, and all were able to score significantly on open-set word and sentence tests using the cochlear implant alone. Children were assessed with both live-voice and recorded speech materials, including Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant monosyllabic words and Speech Intelligibility Test sentences. Assessments were made in both quiet and in noise. Assessments were made at 3-week intervals to investigate the ability of the children to adapt to the new speech-processing strategy. For most of the children, a significant advantage was evident when using the Speak strategy as compared with Mpeak. For 4 of the children, there was no decrement in speech perception scores immediately following fitting with Speak. Eight of the children showed a small (10% to 20%) decrement in speech perception scores for between 3 and 6 weeks following the changeover to Speak. After 24 weeks' experience with Speak, 11 of the children had shown a steady increase in speech perception scores, with final Speak scores higher than for Mpeak. Only 1 child showed a significant decrement in speech perception with Speak, which did not recover to original Mpeak levels.
-
ItemEvaluation of a new Spectral Peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system( 1994)Sixty-three postlinguistically deaf adults from four English-speaking countries participated in a 17-week field study of performance with a new speech coding strategy, Spectral Peak (SPEAK), and the most widely used strategy, Multipeak (MPEAK), both of which are implemented on wearable speech processors of the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System; MPEAK is a feature-extraction strategy, whereas SPEAK is a filterbank strategy. Subjects' performance was evaluated with an experimental design in which use of each strategy was reversed and replicated (ABAB). Average scores for speech tests presented sound-only at 70 dB SPL were higher with the SPEAK strategy than with the MPEAK strategy. For tests in quiet, mean scores for medial vowels were 74.8 percent versus 70.1 percent; for medial consonants, 68.6 percent versus 56.6 percent; for monosyllabic words, 33.8 percent versus 24.6 percent; and for sentences, 77.5 percent versus 67.4 percent. For tests in noise, mean scores for Four-Choice Spondees at +10 and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) were 88.5 percent versus 73.6 percent and 80.1 percent versus 62.3 percent, respectively; and for sentences at +15 dB, +10, and +5 dB S/N, 66.5 percent versus 43.4 percent, 61.5 percent versus 37.1 percent, and 60.4 percent versus 31.7 percent, respectively. Subjects showed marked improvement in recognition of sentences in noise with the new SPEAK filterbank strategy. These results agree closely with subjects' responses to a questionnaire on which approximately 80 percent reported they heard best with the SPEAK strategy for everyday listening situations.
-
ItemPreliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners( 1994)The effects on speech perception in noise of dynamic filtering with bandpass filters centred at the first formant (f1) and second formant (f2) frequencies were evaluated with four normally hearing listeners. Multitalker babble was added to the speech signal with signal-to-noise ratios of-5 to -15 dB, chosen to reduce intelligibility to about 50%. The combined signal was then filtered with two-pole programmable bandpass filters centred at fl and f2 under the control of a real-time speech processor. The f1 and f2 frequencies were estimated from the speech signal before noise was added to avoid hardware processing errors. Closed set vowel and consonant tests (using 11/h/vowel/d/ and 12 /a/consonant/a/ stimuli), the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Monosyllabic Word Test and the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentence Test were carried out for three filter bandwidths (3/4, 1/3 and 1/6 octave) and for unprocessed speech in noise. The processing produced a small significant improvement for vowels in all three processed speech conditions and for monosyllables at the broadest filter setting compared to the unprocessed speech condition. There was no significant effect on consonants. A small negative effect was observed for sentences at the narrowest filter setting.
-
ItemFormant-based processing for hearing aids( 1994)A body-worn hearing aid has been developed with the ability to estimate formant frequencies and amplitudes in real time. These parameters can be used to enhance the output signal by "sharpening" the formant peaks, by "mapping" the amplitudes of the formants onto the available dynamic range of hearing at each frequency, or by resynthesizing a speech signal that is suited to the listener�s hearing characteristics. Initial evaluations have indicated small improvements in speech perception for three groups of subjects: users of a combined cochlear implant and speech processing hearing aid, normally hearing listeners in background noise, and a hearing aid user with a severe hearing loss.