Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6
-
ItemElectrical stimulation of residual hearing in the implanted cochlea( 1995)The average profoundly deaf person using a cochlear implant can now understand more speech than some severely to profoundly deaf people who use a hearing aid. For this reason there will be an increasing need to consider implanting people with residual hearing. In many of these people there could be significant hearing in the operated ear, as a majority of severely to profoundly deaf people are likely to have a symmetrical hearing loss. When three frequency average hearing thresholds were measured on 219 pensioners from the Australian National Acoustic Laboratories (H. Dillon, unpublished findings), 64% had less than a 10-dB difference between thresholds in each ear.
-
ItemCochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing( 1995)This study was undertaken to find out how new bone is produced in the implanted cochlea, and the effects of fibrous tissue and new bone growth on electrode-tissue impedance. This knowledge is essential, as bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea could account for variations in patients' speech perception performance. The study was also carried out to examine the effects of implantation on residual hearing. This information is also important, as cochlear implant speech perception results in profoundly deaf people are now better on average than severely or profoundly deaf people obtain with a hearing aid. Consequently, more people will need to be considered for cochlear implantation in ears with some residual hearing. In this case we need to know to what extent residual hearing is affected by implantation. (From Introduction)
-
ItemTemporal coding of frequency: neuron firing probabilities for acoustic and electric stimulation of the auditory nerve( 1995)A better understanding of the temporal coding of frequency, and its application to electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers, should lead to advances in cochlear implant speech processing. Past research studies have suggested that the intervals between nerve action potentials are important in the temporal coding of frequency. For sound frequencies up to approximately 500 Hz, the shortest or predominant intervals between the nerve action potentials are usually the same as the periods of the sound waves. The intervals between each nerve action potential can be plotted as an interval histogram. Although there is evidence that the intervals between spikes are important in the temporal coding of frequency, it is not known up to what frequency this applies. It is also not known whether the information transmitted along individual fibers or an ensemble of fibers is important, to what extent the coding of frequency is interrelated with the coding of intensity, the relative importance of temporal and place coding for different frequencies, and finally, how well electrical stimulation can simulate the temporal coding of sound.
-
ItemA physiological investigation of chronic electrical stimulation with scala tympani electrodes in kittens( 1992)A physiological investigation of cochlear electrical stimulation was undertaken in six two-month-old kittens. The scala tympani electrodes were implanted and electrically stimulated using biphasic balanced electrical pulses' for periods of 1000-1500h in four ears. Four ears received implants for same period but without electrical stimulation. The other two ears served as normal control. The results indicated: 1) Chronic electrical stimulation of the cochlea within electrochemically safe limits did not influence the hearing of kittens and the normal delivery of impulses evoked by acoustic and electrical signals on the auditory brainstem pathway. 2) The wave shapes of EABRs were similar to those of ABRs. The aptitudes of EABRs showed a significant increase following chronic electrical stimulation, resulting in a leftward shift in the input/ output function. The absolute latencies and interwave latencies of waves II-III , III -IV and II -IV were significantly shorter than those of ABRs. These results imply that there was no adverse effect of chronic electrical stimulation on the maturing auditory systems of kittens using these electrical parameters and the mechanism of electrical hearing should be further studied.
-
ItemCochlear implantation in young children: long-term effects of implantation on normal hair cells and spiral ganglion cells in the monkey model [Abstract]( 1992)Recent independent results obtained by profoundly deaf children implanted with the Melbourne 22-channel cochlear implant (1) have provided further impetus. for examining thefeasibility of implanting children under two and children with profound deafness. Safety st1,ldies, in appropriate animal models, must first establish the safety of this procedure.
-
ItemClinical results for children using the 22-channel cochlear prosthesis [Abstract]( 1991)Twenty five profoundly/totally hearing-impaired children aged between 2 and 18 years have been implanted with the 22-channel cochlear prosthesis (Cochlear Pty. Ltd.) at The University of Melbourne over the last five years. Speech perception, speech production and language development have been monitored for these children both pre- and postoperatively. Results have shown improvements for all children in speech perception, postoperatively. The younger children (< 12 years) and those with an acquired (postlinguistic) profound hearing loss, have demonstrated some open-set speech recognition without visual clues. In general, older children with a prelinguistic profound hearing loss have not attained this level of performance. Improvements in speech production and language have also been demonstrated and tend to occur faster in younger children. Importantly, a number of congenitally deaf young children have shown significant improvements in speech perception, production and language. Important factors in the success of cochlear implants in children appear to be: educational environment - it is vital to have a strong auditory component (i.e. non-signing); careful attention to correct programming and maintenance of the prosthesis; support of family and other professionals.