Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 18
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech feature encoding through an electrotactile speech processor [Abstract]
    Cowan, Robert S. C. ; Blamey, Peter J. ; Alcantara, Joseph I. ; Whitford, Lesley A. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1989)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Perceptual independence of pulse rates used in speech coding schemes for a multichannel cochlear implant [Abstract]
    Lai, W. K. ; Tong, Yit C. ; Millar, J. B. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Van Hoesel, R. ( 1989)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Results in children using the 22 electrode cochlear implant [Abstract]
    Dawson, Pam W. ; Blamey, Peter J. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Busby, P. A. ; Rowland, L.C. ; Dettman, S. J. ; Brown, A. M. ; Dowell, Richard C. ; Rickards, Field W. ; Alcantara, Joseph I. ( 1989)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Psychophysical studies on cochlear implant patients deafened prior to 4 years of age [Abstract]
    Busby, P. A. ; Tong, Yit C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Alcantara, Joseph I. ( 1989)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech feature recognition by profoundly deaf children using the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile aid [Abstract]
    Alcantara, Joseph I. ; Whitford, Lesley A. ; Blamey, Peter J. ; Cowan, Robert S. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1989)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Preliminary evaluation of a wearable multichannel electrotactile speech processor [Abstract]
    Cowan, R. S. C. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Alcantara, J. I. ; Whitford, L. W. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1988)
    Speech discrimination testing, using both open-and closed-set materials was carried out with four severely-to-profoundly hearing impaired adults. and seven normally hearing subjects, to assess performance of a wearable eight-channel electrotactile aid (Tickle Talker). The device consisted of a handset composed of nine electrodes, a stimulator-unit, and a speech processor and input microphone. Eight small electrodes were located over the digital nerve bundles on each side of the four fingers of one hand, and a larger common electrode was placed on the wrist. Subjects perceived eight separate channels of information, each corresponding to a stimulus on one side of one finger. The speech processor provided estimates of second formant frequency, fundamental frequency and amplitude of the speech waveform. These features were coded as electrode position, pulse rate and pulse width respectively. This processing strategy (FOF2AO) is similar to that used in an earlier model of the Cochlear Pty. Ltd. cochlear implant.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception with cochlear implants and tactile aids [Abstract]
    Blamey, P. J. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Dowell, R. C. ( 1988)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation of training strategies with an electrotactile speech processor [Abstract]
    Alcantara, J. I. ; Cowan, R. S. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Whitford, L. W. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1988)
    During 1986, seven normally-hearing subjects were trained in the use of an electrotactile speech processor ("Tickle Talker"). Two training methods were used: (a) a combined strategy. in which a variety of training materials ranging from analytic to synthetic level were employed; and (b) a synthetic alone training strategy, in which only synthetic level training materials were used. All seven subjects received 70 hours of training, 35 hours in each training strategy. Subjects were evaluated in the tactile-lipreading (TL) and lipreading alone (L) conditions at: (I) 0 hours training; (2) 35 hours training; and (3) after 70 hours of training. An evaluation test battery was constructed which contained both closed-set and open-set materials. Results indicated differences in performance on the evaluation tests which were dependent upon the training strategy. The differences in performance were greater in some evaluation tests than others. Subsequently; seven severe-profoundly hearing-impaired children (aged 7-11) have been fitted with the Tickle Talker and are presently participating in an ongoing training programme. Evaluation of their performance will help to assess the suitability of the device for young children.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech recognition performance with a two-formant coding strategy for a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis [Abstract]
    Dowell, R. C. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Seligman, P. M. ; Brown, Alison M. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1986)
    Over the last two years, a new speech coding strategy (F0F1F2) has been developed for the Nucleus multi-channel cochlear prosthesis designed to provide information about the first formant, in addition to the second formant and voicing frequency information provided by the “standard” speech processing strategy (F0F2). This strategy uses quasi-simultaneous stimulation of two electrode pairs within the cochlea at the voice pitch rate. The positions of the two sites of stimulation vary independently according to the frequencies of the first and second formants. The amplitude at each site is determined from the first and second formant amplitudes. Seven patients were changed to this strategy and an initial study showed significant improvements in recognition of open set sentence material (from a mean of 30.4% for F0F2 to 62.9% for F0F1F2) and for speech tracking without lipreading (from 11.8 wpm to 30.5 wpm). Phoneme recognition investigations indicated that: 1) vowel identification was improved due to the addition of first formant frequency information in the new strategy, 2) consonant identification was also improved, due to the extra information provided by the independent variation of the amplitude components. These encouraging results led to the use of the F0F1F2 strategy for all new patients from April 1985. Results for recorded speech testing (MAC battery) three months after surgery have been compared for 13 patients who used the F0F1F2 strategy. Significant improvements were observed for the F0F1F2 group on most of the tests. Mean scores for open set testing were as follows: a) spondee recognition: 13.6% for F0F2 and 26.0% for F0F1F2, b) CID sentences: 15.9% for F0F2 and 37.8% for F0F1F2, c) monosyllabic words: 4.9% for F0F2 and 12.4% for F0F1F2, d) phoneme recognition: 23.1% for F0F2 and 33.4% for F0F1F2.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Vowel and consonant perception by pre-lingual subjects using a Multiple electrode cochlear implant [Abstract]
    Busby, P.A. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1986)
    Two speech perception experiments were conducted on three pre-lingually deaf subjects (deafened before 16 months of age), two adults and one adolescent, within the first year of use of multiple electrode cochlear implant. First was vowel identification in the electrical stimulation alone (E), vision alone (V), and electrical stimulation plus vision (EV) conditions. Second was consonant identification in the E, V, and EV conditions. To reveal the underlying structures of the perceptual confusions, data for the first experiment were analyzed using multidimensional scaling, and data for the second using hierarchical clustering and information transmission analysis. The one-dimension solution for vowels in the E condition was interpreted as vowel length. Visual vowel parameters interpreted the one dimension solution for the V condition and two-dimension solution for the EV condition. The E condition consonant results indicated a high degree of perceptual confusion. The minimal differences between the consonant results for the V and EV conditions suggested minor influences of the electrical signal in EV perception. The results were in agreement with the psychophysical data obtained from the subject. These findings suggested that the subjects were unable to effectively use all the information provided by the multiple electrode cochlear implant during the first year.