Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemFricative perception by cochlear implant users( 1992)Three implant users were tested with 45 syllables consisting of[v, f, �, ?, z, s, ?, ?, d?, t ?, ?, , d, n, 1] before the vowels [I ,a,u] with three wearable speech processors. The WSP3 processor coded first and second formant frequencies and amplitudes. The MSP1 processor used a similar scheme with improved measurement and coding of the formants. The MSP2 processor added amplitude information from three higher frequency bands. Average scores were 42% for WSP3, 54% for MSP1, and 57% for MSP2. Perception of voicing, manner, and place of articulation of the consonants was significantly greater for the MSP processors than the WSP3 processor. Place perception was slightly higher for MSP2 than MSP1. The listeners used three perceptual dimensions which were highly correlated with the frequencies and amplitudes of peaks in the low frequency region of the frication spectrum, amplitudes of high frequency peaks, and duration of the frication noise.
-
ItemSpeech perception, production and language results in a group of children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant( 1989)Paper presented at the 118th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
-
ItemElectrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: stimulus induced reductions in neural excitability [Abstract]( 1987)Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve elicits highly synchronised neural activity (Javel et al., in press). As the stimulus current is increased the neural response becomes highly deterministic with every current pulse eliciting a spike even at stimulus rates of 600-800 pulses per second (pps). Our previous acute experimental studies have shown that high stimulus rates (> 200 pps) and high stimulus currents (> 1.0 mA) can result in temporary and sometimes permanent reductions in the excitability of the auditory nerve (Shepherd and Clark, 1986). The present study was designed to examine the mechanisms underlying these stimulus induced reductions in excitability. These results will have implications for the maximum safe and effective stimulus rates that can be employed in cochlear implants.
-
ItemSelection of patients for multiple-channel cochlear implantation(Raven Press, 1985)Only profoundly, bilaterally deaf adults are considered for evaluation. It is necessary to determine that the patient's communication ability cannot be improved to any significant degree with conventional hearing aids currently available. Initial assessment consists of audiometry, hearing aid evaluation(s), otological and medical examination, and for patients with no recent experience with hearing aids, a hearing aid trial. Polytome x-rays of temporal bones is carried out to ensure that cochlea structures are not grossly abnormal. Electrical stimulation of the promontory is used to confirm the presence of residual auditory nerve fibers. Where there is an audiometric difference between ears, the poorer ear is chosen for implantation provided there are no other contraindications. Intensive counselling is carried out to enable patients to make a fully informed decision about implantation. Patients undergo a battery of speech discrimination and lipreading tests with their hearing aid after their hearing aid trial. This is to provide a baseline for comparison with postoperative results and to assess the benefit obtained from the hearing aid. Any significant improvement in test results when using a hearing aid over lipreading alone would be a contraindication for implantation. Medical assessment is carried out as for any major surgery, including pathology, respiratory function tests and cardiovascular assessment. Particular emphasis is placed on infection prevention immediately preoperatively and during surgery.
-
ItemExperimental research into cochlear implants( 1977)The areas of research to be discussed are studies of animal behaviour, cochlear models, multiple electrode arrays and experimental surgery.