Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemDischarge rate-level functions from dorsal cochlear nucleus single units in response to acoustic and electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve( 1995)Discharge rate-level (I/O) functions possessed by dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) units were examined, in response to bipolar electrical stimulation of the cochlea of the barbiturate-anesthetized cat. Spontaneously active units usually possessed nonmonotonic functions with a minimum, and spontaneously inactive units usually possessed monotonic functions or nonmonotonic functions with a maximum (NM+). In response to acoustic high-pass filtered noise, the function relating discharge rate and cut off frequency resembled the same unit's I/O function to electrical stimulation. The I/O functions to acoustic characteristic tones were usually monotonic or NM+. These results suggest that in the DCN, a prerequisite for the generation of acoustic-like responses with an electrical stimulus may be the matching of the cochlear place and spatial extent activated by each stimulus.
-
ItemNeural processes in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised cat investigated from unit responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve( 1994)Extracellular responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus single units were recorded in response to biphasic, bipolar electrical stimulation of spiral ganglion cells and their peripheral processes using a banded electrode array in the scala tympani of the barbiturate anaesthetised cat. The DCN responses to this stimulus were the result of excitatory and suppressive (including inhibitory) processes. The excitatory responses from DCN units were usually within a range of 1.8-2.8 ms and these responses were probably the result of monosynaptic input from the auditory nerve. Latencies > 2.8 ms were most likely due to activation of di- and poly-synaptic pathways from auditory nerve fibres, except that latencies between 3.5-4.75 in hearing animals could have arisen from electrophonic mechanisms. Suppression of spontaneous activity was usually long acting, lasting > 70 ms following each pulse of the pulse train, but short acting suppression with a latency of 3.5-4.75 ms and a duration of < 10 ms was occasionally observed. These suppressive responses probably resulted from synaptic inhibitory input, but neural membrane properties may have contributed. In hearing animals, excitatory latencies within the range 1.8-5.2 ms were similar for units with different response area types or different PSTH patterns in response to acoustic CF tones or noise.
-
ItemThe development of speech processing strategies for the University of Melbourne/cochlear multiple channel implantable hearing prosthesis.( 1992)The speech processing strategies that have been used with the University of Melbourne/Cochlear multiple channel implantable hearing prosthesis have been developed systematically from the inaugural one that extracted the second formant and presented this on a place coding basis and the voicing frequency which determined the rate of stimulation. Speech processing has also depended heavily on biological research to ensure that the stimulus parameters used or the operative approach did not damage the spiral ganglion cells it was hoped to stimulate. The advances in speech processing from Melbourne primarily have been to extract more features and spectral information and present this on a place coding basis. This has led to a progressive improvement in speech perception, and a small number of patients can achieve nearly 100% correct scores for open sets of phonetically-balanced words using electrical stimulation alone.