Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21
-
ItemHearing restoration with the multichannel auditory brainstem implant( 1997)Restoration of useful hearing is now possible in patients with bilateral acoustic neuromas by direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus. Our first experience with the Multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant is reported. A forty four year old female with bilateral acoustic neuromas and a strong family history of Neurofibromatosis Type II presented with profound bilateral hearing impairment. Translabyrinthine removal of the right tumour was performed with placement of the Nucleus eight electrode Auditory Brainstem Implant. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response monitoring successfully confirmed placement over the cochlear nucleus. Postoperatively, auditory responses were obtained on stimulation of all electrodes with minimal non-auditory sensations. The patient now receives useful auditory sensations using the "SPEAK" speech processing strategy. Auditory brainstem Implantation should be considered for patients with Neurofibromatosis Type II in whom hearing preservation tumour removal is not possible.
-
ItemPsychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects( 1997)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemElectrical stimulation of the auditory nerve with a cochlear implant and the temporal coding of sound frequencies: a brief review( 1997)There is considerable evidence that the brain translates (encodes) the frequency of a sound into both place of excitation (place encoding), and the pattern of intervals between action potentials (temporal encoding). Furthermore, temporal encoding is now thought to be due to a temporal as well as spatial pattern of action potentials in a small group of neurons. This pattern needs to be reproduced with a cochlear implant for improved speech processing. Our recent research has also demonstrated that the timing of excitatory postsynaptic potentials seen with intracellular recordings from brain cells, rather than extracellularly recorded action potentials, correlates better with the frequency of sound. These excitatory postsynaptic potentials are likely to be the link between the patterns of action potentials arriving at nerve cells and the biomolecular activity in the cell. This response also needs to be replicated with improved speech processing strategies.
-
ItemPitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant patients( 1997)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemVariability of amplitude and area of the auditory nerve compound action potential( 1997)The strength of neural response to sensory stimuli is often estimated by measurement of the amplitude of gross neural potentials. These gross potentials reflect the summed activity of a population of neurons. The amplitude of these potentials is dependent upon the synchrony of the contributing neural responses. We compared the variability of the peak-to-peak amplitude of the auditory nerve compound-action potential (CAP) with that of the area under the peaks. The area under the peaks was significantly less variable than the amplitude for responses to low frequency stimuli. Responses to other stimuli showed differences in the same direction, but these were not significant. We conclude that the area under these peaks is a more precise measure of neural response than measurement of waveform amplitude, at least for responses to low frequency stimuli.
-
ItemA clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users( 1995)Objective: The aim was to measure the rate of vocabulary acquisition for cochlear implant users and compare the pre- and postoperative rates with published data for other groups with normal or impaired hearing. The hypothesis was that the postoperative rate would be greater than the preoperative rate. Design: The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) was administered to 32 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Age at implantation ranged from 2 y r 6 mo to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 6 mo to 7 yr 8 mo. Results: The group mean postoperative performance at various postoperative intervals was significantly higher than mean preoperative performance. Single-subject data indicated statistically significant gains over time on this test for 13 of the subjects. The mean postoperative rate of vocabulary acquisition of 1.06 times the rate for normally hearing children was significantly greater than the mean preoperative rate of 0.43. Conclusions: These rates of improvement were in accord with previous reports on smaller numbers of implant users, but could not be attributed unambiguously to use of the implant because no control group was used for this clinical work. Variables such as age at implantation, duration of profound deafness, communication mode, and speech perception skill failed to significantly predict rate of improvement on the PPVT.
-
ItemA clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users( 1995)Objective: The aim was to assess articulation and speech intelligibility over time in a group of cochlear implant users implanted at 8 yr or over. The hypothesis was that the postoperative speech production performance would be greater than the preoperative performance. Design: A test of intelligibility using sentences and an articulation test measuring non-imitative elicited speech were administered to 11 and 10 subjects, respectively, who were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Nine subjects received both tests. Age at implantation ranged from 8 yr to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 1 yr to 4 yr 5 mo. Results: For both the intelligibility and articulation tests roughly half of the subjects showed significant improvements over time and group mean postoperative performance significantly exceeded preoperative performance. Improvements occurred for front, middle, and back consonants; for stops, fricatives, and glides and for voiceless and voiced consonants. Conclusions: Despite being deprived of acoustic speech information for many childhood years, roughly half of the patients assessed showed significant gains in speech intelligibility and articulation postimplantation. The lack of a control group of non-implanted patients means that we cannot separate out the influence of the implant on speech production from other influences such as training and tactile-kinaesthetic feedback.
-
ItemCochlear histopatholgic characteristics following long-term implantation: safety studies in the young monkey( 1996)Objective: To evaluate the safety of cochlear implantation in children 2 years of age or younger using a non-human primate model.
-
ItemExperimental animal model of intracochlear ossification in relation to cochlear implantation( 1995)Histopathologic examinations of the temporal bones of implanted human patients and experimental animals have demonstrated various degrees of abnormal fibrous tissue or new bone formation within the cochlea; in some cases, extensive new bone formation was reported. The presence of new bone following cochlear implantation is undesirable, since it may adversely affect current distributions in the electrically stimulated cochlea. The pathogenesis of intracochlear osteoneogenesis as a direct result of cochlear implantation is unclear. The aim of this study is to use an experimental animal model to investigate some of the factors underlying the formation of new bone and fibrous tissue within the implanted cochlea, especially the role of insertion trauma and bone chips, and also a possible way of inhibiting such a process using an anticalcific agent of the diphosphonate family, disodium ethane-1-hydroxy-1, 1-diphosphonate(EHDP). The local release of EHDP from a polydimethylsiloxane (Silastic silicone rubber, Dow Corning Corp) controlled delivery system has been shown effective in the context of bioprosthetic heart valve. Its application within the cochlea has not been documented, to our knowledge.
-
ItemCochlear implants in children( 1995)Cochlear implants are devices that are used to artificially excite hearing nerves with patterns of stimulation that convey speech information and environmental sounds when a person's inner ear has been destroyed by disease or not developed at birth. In this situation they cannot benefit from the amplification of sound with a hearing aid.