Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 147
-
ItemElectrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited multiple electrode cochlear implant( 2000)Objective: The aims of this study were to determine whether electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited prosthesis varied at different locations on the electrode array, was influenced by the effects of auditory deprivation and experience with electric stimulation, and was related to speech perception. Design: Difference limens for electrode discrimination were measured in 16 early-deafened subjects at three positions on the array: electrodes 18 (apical), 14 (mid), and 8 (basal). Electrodes were stimulated using random variations in current level to minimize the influence of loudness cues. Assessed were correlations between the difference limens, subject variables related to auditory deprivation (age at onset of deafness, duration of deafness, and age at implantation) and auditory experience (duration of implant use and the total time period of auditory experience), and speech perception scores from two closed-set and two open-set tests. Results: The average difference limens across the three positions were less than two electrodes for 75%, of subjects, with average limens between 2 and 6.5 electrodes for the remaining 25% of subjects. Significant differences across the three positions were found for 69% of subjects. The average limens and those at the basal position positively correlated with variables related to auditory deprivation, with larger limens for subjects implanted at a later age and with a longer duration of deafness. The average limens and those at the apical position negatively correlated with closed-set speech perception scores, with lower scores for subjects with larger limens, but not with open-set scores. Speech scores also negatively correlated with variables related to auditory deprivation. Conclusions: These findings showed that early-deafened subjects were generally successful in electrode discrimination although performance varied across the array for over half the subjects. Discrimination performance was influenced by the effects of auditory deprivation, and both electrode discrimination and variables related to auditory deprivation influenced closed-set speech perception.
-
ItemPitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant( 2000)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemThe development of speech perception in children using cochlear implants: effects of etiologic factors and delayed milestones( 2000)Hypothesis: Speech perception outcomes for cochlear implantation of children vary over a wide range, and it is hypothesized that central pathologic states associated with certain causes of hearing impairment account for a substantial part of the variance. Study Design: A retrospective analysis was carried out to ascertain the relationships between speech perception, etiologic factors, and central pathologic states as indicated by preoperative delayed motor milestones and/or cognitive delays. Setting: Data were obtained from the pre-and postoperative records of patients attending a hospital cochlear implant clinic. Patients: Results for 75 consecutive patients up to age 5 years who underwent implantation were included in the study. Intervention: Patients received a 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis and were seen by the clinic for regular tune-up and assessments. Home-and school-based habilitation was recommended by the clinic. Main Outcome Measures: Speech perception measures were classified on a five-point scale to allow for different evaluation procedures at different ages and developmental stages. Results: The incidence of motor and cognitive delays were fairly evenly spread across etiologic factors, except for cytomegalovirus, which had a much higher than average incidence. Children with motor and/or cognitive delays were significantly slower than other children in the development of speech perception skills after implantation. Etiologic factors did not have a statistically significant effect on speech perception outcome. Conclusions: It is likely that central pathologic states account for a substantial part of the variance among children using cochlear implants. Specific indicators of central pathologic states should be used to assess a child's prognosis in preference to less specific information based on etiologic factors alone.
-
ItemThe relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees( 2000)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemElectrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implants( 2000)Objective: The aim was to determine the efficacy of a child-appropriate procedure to assess electrode discrimination ability in young children using cochlear implants and to investigate the relationship of electrode discrimination ability and speech perception performance in children implanted at a young age. Design: An adaptation of the play audiometry procedure was used to assess electrode discrimination in seventeen 4- to 10-yr-old children. The children were required to respond with a game-like motor response when a repeating stimulation on a reference electrode “changed” to a different electrode. They were also assessed on a speech feature discrimination test, a closed-set word recognition test and a nonverbal intelligence task. Results: Sixty-five percent of subjects demonstrated ability to discriminate adjacent electrodes in mid and apical regions of the cochlea, whilst the remaining subjects needed electrode separations of between two and nine electrodes for successful discrimination. In a forward stepwise regression analysis electrode discrimination ability was found to be the strongest factor in accounting for variance in the speech perception scores. Subject variables such as duration of deafness, nonverbal intelligence and implant experience did not significantly account for further variance in the speech perception scores for this group of children. Conclusions: Electrode discrimination ability was the strongest factor in predicting performance on speech perception measures in a group of children using cochlear implants.
-
ItemThe cochlear implant: a search for answers( 2000)In 1967, when I commenced cochlear implant research, there was little that could be done to help profoundly deaf people. With normal hearing, sound vibrations are converted by hair cells in the inner ear into electrical signals. These produce temporal and spatial patterns of electrical responses in the auditory pathways. With a profound hearing loss the hair cells are absent, and amplifying sound with a hearing aid provides little help.
-
ItemBuilding the bionic ear( 2000)When I began my cochlear-implant research in 1967, one could do nothing to help profoundly deaf people hear. In normal hearing, hair cells in the cochlea, the snail-shaped inner ear, transduce sound vibrations into electrical signals. These signals produce patterns of electrical responses in the auditory pathways that convey the frequency and intensity of the sound to the brain. The profoundly deaf, however, have lost their hair cells, so even amplifying sound with a hearing aid fails to transmit information that the brain can interpret as sound.
-
ItemContributing factors to improved speech perception in children using the nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis( 1997)It has been established that use of multiple-channel intracochlear implants can significantly improve speech perception for postlinguistically deafened adults. In the development of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant, there have been significant developments in speech processing strategies, providing additional benefits to speech perception for users. This has recently culminated in the release of the Speak speech processing strategy, developed from research at the University of Melbourne. The Speak strategy employs 20 programmable bandpass filters which are scanned at an adaptive rate, with the largest outputs of these filters presented to up to ten stimulation channels along the electrode array. Comparative studies of the Speak processing strategy (in the Nucleus Spectra-22 speech processor), with the previously-used Multipeak (Multipeak) speech processing strategy (in the Minisystem-22 speech processor), with profoundly deaf adult cochlear implant users have shown that the Speak processing strategy provides a significant benefit to adult users both in quiet situations and particularly in the presence of background noise. Since the first implantation of the Nucleus device in a profoundly hearing-impaired child in Melbourne in 1985, there has been a rapid growth in the number of children using this device. Studies of cochlear implant benefits for children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant have also shown that children can obtain significant benefits to speech perception, speech production and language, including open-set understanding of words and sentences using the cochlear implant alone. In evaluating contributing factors to speech perception benefits available for children, four specific factors are important to investigate: (1) earlier implantation -resulting from earlier detection of deafness; (2) improved hardware and surgical techniques -allowing implantation in infants; (3) improved speech processing, and (4) improved habilitation techniques. Results reported previously have been recorded primarily for children using the Multipeak strategy implemented in the MSP speech processor. While it is important to evaluate the factors which might contribute to improvements in speech perception benefits, an important question is the effect of improved speech processing strategy, since this will determine what is perceived through the device. Given that adult patients changing to the Spectra speech processor had also shown improved perception in noisy situations, and the fact that children are in general in noisy environments in the classroom setting for a large proportion of their day, it was of obvious interest to evaluate the potential for benefit in poor signal-to-noise ratios from use of the Speak processing strategy and from specific training in the ability to perceive in background noise. The study was aimed at evaluating whether children who were experienced in use of the Multipeak speech processing strategy would be able to changeover to the new Speak processing strategy, which provides a subjectively different output. Secondly, the study aimed to evaluate the benefits which might accrue to children from use of controlled habilitation in background noise.
-
ItemIs age at cochlear implantation in children important? A 2-deoxyglucose study in cats.( 1997)Should one implant prelinguistically deaf children at the earliest possible age or is it better to wait a couple of years? In normally hearing kittens functional auditory development is completed, up to the level of the inferior colliculus (IC), by 30 days after birth (DAB) [1]. However, in deaf kittens stimulation with a cochlear implant can alter the IC map even at ages up to 120 DAB [2]. In normally hearing children the auditory brainstem response approximates the adult form by the age of 2 years. Studies of deaf children with cochlear implants have indicated that implantation by the age of 5-6 yields a high success rate. We implanted neonatally deafened kittens at different ages, stimulated them for long periods, then looked at the spread of 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) in the IC. If age is a factor in plasticity in deaf cats, then the distribution of 2-DG uptake should vary with age at implantation.
-
ItemTraining place pitch perception in cochlear implant users [Abstract]( 1997)The study has aimed at determining whether the ability to use place coded vowel formant information could be enhanced with analytical vowel training in a group of -congenitally deafened patients, who showed limited speech perception skills after cochlear implant experience ranging from 1y8m to 6y11m. It has investigated whether improvements in vowel perception after training can carry over to word recognition. A further objective was to see whether poorer vowel perception was associated with poorer electrode position difference limens. Three children, one adolescent and one young adult were assessed with synthesized versions of the words /hid, head, had, hud, hod, hood/ and a natural version of these words as well as with a closed-set monosyllabic word task. The change in performance after 10 training sessions was compared to the change in performance during a non-training period. Four of the five patients showed a significant gain in synthetic vowel perception post-training on at least one assessment, but only two patients showed gains across a number of tests post-training. For one of these 2 children improvements in vowel perception generalized to word perception. Patients’ electrode limens ranged from 1 to 3 electrodes except for 1 adolescent whose minimal progress post-training could be partly explained by poorer apical electrode discrimination. The findings are discussed with reference to a number of factors, including the notion of a "critical period" for neural plasticity.