Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9
-
ItemA multiple-channel cochlear implant: evaluation using speech tracking( 1981)Two totally deaf patients who had received multiple-channel cochlear implants were tested using a speech "tracking" procedure in which they had to repeat verbatim passages of connected discourse. Their performance was assessed by calculating the tracking rate (words per minute) each session. Testing was carried out under two conditions - lipreading along and lipreading in conjunction with a multiple-channel cochlear implant and laboratory speech processor. Lipreading with the cochlear implant increased the tracking rates by a factor of four for one patient and by a factor of two for the other when compared with lipreading alone.
-
ItemA multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using nonsense syllables( 1981)A study using nonsense syllables has shown that a multiple-channel cochlear implant with speech processor is effective in providing information about, voicing and manner and to a lesser extent place distinctions. These distinctions supplement lipreading cues. Furthermore, the average percentage improvements in overall identification scores for multiple-channel electrical stimulation and lipreading compared to lipreading alone were 71% for a laboratory-based speech processor and 122 % for a wearable unit.
-
ItemA multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using an open-set word test( 1981)Multiple-channel electrical stimulation of the hearing nerve in conjunction with speech reading has helped two post-lingually deaf patients with total hearing losses understand running speech in every day situations. This has been confirmed using open-set phonetically balanced word tests, where the patients achieved 60% and 40% scores with isolated-words and 80% and 73% for phonemes-in-isolated words. The tests also showed that the cochlear implant improved word recognition by a factor of four in one patient and two in another compared with speechreading alone. The speech processor used extracted the voicing frequency and energy and the frequency and energy of the dominant spectral peak in the mid-frequency range. The parameters for voicing determined the rate of stimulation for all electrodes, and the parameters for the dominant spectral peak in the midfrequency range determined the site of electrode stimulation and current level.
-
ItemThe rehabilitation of patients with a total hearing loss using a multiple-channel cochlear implant [Abstract]( 1980)Two profoundly deaf patients who have multiple-channel cochlear implants receive speech information through a speech processor. The speech processor encodes second formant and fundamental frequency information. Rehabilitation is concerned with evaluating the speech processor and training patients to improve speech perception. The patients have scores up to 37% and 27% on AB word lists, and 36% and 34% on NAL Everyday Sentences using the cochlear implant alone and repetition of the stimuli. However, to gain a better insight into the capabilities of the speech processor and to demonstrate its potential for the patients more investigative procedures have been used. These include the speech tracking method described by DeFillipo and Scott (1978) using the cochlear implant in conjunction with speech reading. Results indicate that patients have gained a two-fold and four-fold improvement in tracking rates (words per minute) using speech reading and the cochlear implant as opposed to speech reading alone.
-
ItemClinical results for postlingually deaf patients implanted with multichannel cochlear prostheses( 1987)Clinical results for 24 patients using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis have shown the device to be successful in presenting amplitude, fundamental frequency, and second formant information to patients with acquired hearing loss. For all patients, this has meant a significant improvement in their communication ability when using lipreading and some ability to understand unknown speech without lipreading or contextual cues. Approximately 40% of patients are able to understand running speech in a limited fashion without lipreading, and this ability has been evaluated using the speech-tracking technique for a number of patients. Many patients are able to have limited conversations on the telephone without using a special code. Although the prosthesis has been designed with the presentation of speech signals in mind, recognition and discrimination of environmental sounds has also been very encouraging with patients scoring 70% to 80% correct for closed set environmental sound testing. Follow-up testing has indicated that the ability to understand open set speech without lipreading continues to improve up to at least 12 months postoperatively. Open set sentence test results improved from an average of 20% at 3 months to 40% at 12 months.
-
ItemAcoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant( 1987)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemSpeech recognition abilities in profoundly deafened adults using the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System( 1987)Research in the area of cochlear prostheses to restore a level of hearing sensation to the profoundly deaf has been ongoing at a number of centers throughout the world since the 1960's. 3, 4, 7, 8,. Work on a multichannel cochlear implant that utilizes a speech feature extraction coding strategy and multi-sited, sequential, bipolar stimulation to enhance pitch perception began at the University of Melbourne under the direction of Professor Graeme Clark in the 1970's. Collaboration with Nucleus Limited, a multi-national biomedical corporation from Australia, led to the development of the current version of the prosthesis. The Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System has been described in detail elsewhere. 1, 5
-
ItemA formant-estimating speech processor for cochlear implant patients(Speech Science and Technology Conference, 1986)A simple formant-estimating speech processor has been developed to make use of the "hearing" produced by electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve with a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Thirteen implant patients were trained and evaluated with a processor that presented the second formant frequency, fundamental frequency, and amplitude envelope of the speech. Nine patients were trained and evaluated with a processor that presented the first formant frequency and amplitude as well. The second group performed significantly better in discrimination tasks and word and sentence recognition through hearing alone. The second group also showed a significantly greater improvement when hearing and lipreading was compared with lipreading alone in a speech tracking task.
-
ItemA model of auditory-visual speech perception(Speech Science and Technology Conference, 1986)A mathematical model relating the probabilities of correctly recognizing speech features, phonemes, and words was tested using data from the clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. A monosyllabic word test was presented to the patients in the conditions hearing alone (H), lipreading alone (L), and hearing plus lipreading (HL). The model described the data quite well in each condition. The model was extended to predict the HL scores from the feature recognition probabilities in the H and L conditions. The model may be useful for the evaluation of automatic speech recognition devices as well as hearing impaired people.