Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12
-
ItemVowel imitation task: results over time for 28 cochlear implant children under the age of eight years( 1995)With increasing numbers of implanted children under the age of 4 years, numerous researchers have reminded us of the need for valid, sensitive, and reliable tests of developing speech perception.1,2 In addition to studies of the efficacy of implanted prostheses, there is a need to investigate the many variables that influence children's communicative performance, such as changes in speech-coding strategy, updated speech-processing systems, the effects of various training regimens, and the selection of educational and communication modes.
-
ItemHabilitation issues in the management of children using the cochlear multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis(Wien, 1994)Since 1985, a significant proportion of patients seen in the Melbourne cochlear implant clinic have been children. The children represent a diverse population, with both congenital and acquired hearing-impairments, a wide-range of hearing levels pre-implant, and an age range from 2 years to 18 years. The habilitation programme developed for the overall group must be flexible enough to be tailored to the individual needs of each child, and to adapt to the changing needs of children as they progress. Long-term data shows that children are continuing to show improvements after 5-7 years of device use, particularly in their perception of open-set words and sentences. Habilitation programs must therefore be geared to the long-term needs of children and their families. Both speech perception and speech production need to be addressed in the specific content of the habilitation program for any individual child. In addition, for young children, the benefits of improved speech perception should have an impact on development of speech and language, and the focus of the programme for this age child will reflect this difference in emphasis. Specific materials and approaches will vary for very young children, school-age and teenage children. In addition, educational setting will have a bearing on the integration of listening and device use into the classroom environment.
-
ItemSpeech perception, production and language results in a group of children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant( 1992)Five children out of a group of nine (aged 5.5 to 19.9 years) implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Ply. Ltd.) have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores for monosyllabic words ranged from 40% to 72%. Word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these five children were implanted during preadolescence. The fifth child, who had a progressive loss and was implanted during adolescence after a short period of very profound deafness, scored highest on all speech perception tests. The remaining four children who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted during adolescence after a long duration of profound deafness. Post-operative performance on closed-set speech perception tests was better than pre-operative performance for all children. Improvements in speech and language assessments were also noted. These improvements tended to be greater for the younger children. The results are discussed with reference to variables which may contribute to successful implant use: such as age at onset, duration of profound hearing loss, age at implantation, aetiology, educational program, and the type of training provided.
-
ItemThe effects of auditory feedback from the nucleus cochlear implant on the vowel formant frequencies produced by children and adults( 1993)Cochlear implants provide an auditory signal with which profoundly deaf users may monitor their own speech production. The vowel production of two adults and three children who used the Nucleus multiple-electrode cochlear implant was examined to assess the effect of altered auditory feedback. Productions of words were recorded under conditions where the talkers received auditory feedback (speech processor turned on) and where no auditory feedback was provided (speech processor turned off). Data were collected over 3 days at weekly intervals. First and second formant frequencies were measured and the data were analysed to assess significant differences between auditory feedback conditions, vowel context, and data collection points. Overall, the results varied across talkers, across the data collection days, and depended on the consonant environment of the vowel. However, two effects of auditory feedback were noted. First, there was a generalized shift in first formant frequencies between the processor on and processor off conditions across three of the five subjects, but the shift differed in direction for each subject. Second, for three of the five talkers, the two front vowels /ε/ and /I/ were more neutralised in the absence of auditory feedback. However, this effect was less pronounced than that noted by previous studies.
-
ItemCochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception( 1992)A group of 10 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Ply Ltd) at the University of Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic and have used the prosthesis for periods from 12 to 65 months. Postoperative performance on the majority of closed-set speech perception tests was significantly greater than chance, and significantly better than preoperative performance for all of the patients. Five of the children have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores in monosyllabic words ranged from 30% to 72%; word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these 5 children were implanted during preadolescence (aged 5:5 to 10:2 years) and the fifth, who had a progressive loss, was implanted during adolescence (aged 14:8 years). The duration of profound deafness before implantation varied from 2 to 8 years. Improvements were also noted over postoperative data collection times for the younger children. The remaining 5 patients who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted after a longer duration of profound deafness (aged 13:11to 20:1 years). The results are discussed with reference to variables that may affect implant performance, such as age at onset of loss, duration of profound loss, age at implantation, and duration of implantation. They are compared with results for similar groups of children using hearing aids and cochlear implants.
-
ItemMulti-channel cochlear implants for children: the Melbourne Program( 1991)Although there have been 300 years of deaf education, profoundly-totally deaf children today on average are not able to reach the same level of achievement as their normally hearing peers (Geers & Moog, 1989). This failure of deaf children to develop their true potential is largely due to the difficulty they have in communicating with normally hearing people. During the last 300 years there have been basically two different methods of education used (The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1983). Firstly, one which maximises auditory and lip reading cues (auditory/oral), advocated by Juan Pablo Bonet (1620), and one which uses a series of signs to convey meaning (signing), developed by Charles-Michel (1712-89). In addition, there is a method which endeavours to combine both auditory/oral and signing approaches called total communication. In practice, however, children taught by total communication tend to receive speech more predominantly by one or other of these methods.
-
ItemRehabilitation strategies for adult cochlear implant users(Monduzzi Editore, 1997)This paper summarizes open-set speech perception results using audition alone for a large group of adult Nucleus cochlear implant users in Melbourne. The results show wide variation in performance but significant improvement over the years from 1982 to 1995. Analysis of these results shows that speech processor developments have made the major contribution to this improvement over this time. Recent results for patients using the SPECTRA-SPEAK processor show !hat most subjects obtain good speech perception within six months of implantation and the need for intensive auditory training is minimal for many of these patients. Postoperative care should encourage consistent device use by providing opportunities for success and providing long term technical support for implant users. In some cases, including elderly patients, those with long term profound deafness, and those with special needs, there will still be a need for additional rehabilitation and auditory training support.
-
ItemFactors affecting outcomes in children with cochlear implants(Monduzzi Editore, 1997)Open-set speech perception tests were completed for a group of 52 children and adolescents who were long-term users of the Nucleus multiple channel cochlear prosthesis. Results showed mean scores for the group of 32.4% for open-set BKE sentences and 48.1% for phonemes in open-set monosyllabic words. Over 80% of the group performed significantly on these tas1cs. Age at implantation was identified as a significant factor affecting speech perception performance with improved scores for children implanted early. This factor was evident in the results at least down to the age of three years. Duration.. of profound hearing loss, progressive hearing loss, educational program and preoperative residual hearing were also identified as significant factors that may affect speech perception performance.
-
ItemPre- & post-operative factors affecting speech perception in adult cochlear implant users( 1997)A common feature of published studies of cochlear implantation is a very wide range of performance levels within a group of patients. It is well-established that preoperative factors including duration of deafness, age at implantation, duration of implant use and etiology can have statistically significant effects on speech perception with a cochlear implant, but they do not account for a very high proportion of the variance within groups of implant users. The biological basis for these effects is not well established. For example, it is unclear whether the effect of duration of deafness is due to a decrease in the number of surviving ganglion cells in the cochlea, to the detailed distribution of functional neurons within the cochlea, to degeneration of nerve function at higher auditory centers, to plastic neural effects during deafness, or to a combination of all of these mechanisms. Data for other factors may cast some light on these possibilities.
-
ItemThe auditory cortex and auditory deprivation: experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf [Abstract]( 1995)The primary auditory cortex (AI) exhibits a topographic representation of the organ of Corti in normal hearing animals. Plasticity studies have shown that this orderly representation of frequency can be modified following a restricted hearing loss or by behavioural trainingl,2. Little is known, however, of the effects of a profound hearing loss on AI, although a number of early studies have suggested an enhancement of activity from other modalities3. Knowledge of the functional status of the central auditory pathway in the profoundly deaf, and the ability of these structures to undergo reorganization particularly following long periods of auditory deprivation - are important issues for the clinical management of cochlear implant patients. In this paper we review our recent clinical and experimental experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf.