Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 49
-
ItemAcquisition of a tactile-alone vocabulary by normally hearing users of the Tickle Talker( 1999)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemA comparison of Tactaid II+ and Tactaid 7 use by adults with a profound hearing impairment( 1999)Objective: To evaluate and compare use of the Tactaid II+ and the Tactaid 7, in terms of speech perception, by adults with a hearing impairment. Design: Eight adults used one device daily for approximately 10 wk and attended seven training sessions. Performance was measured with tests of phonetic contrast perception, closed-set vowel and consonant identification, word and phoneme recognition in monosyllabic word lists, word recognition in sentences and speechtracking rate. A questionnaire was also administered. The protocol was repeated with the alternative device. Results: With each device, the group discriminated most phonetic contrasts at better-than-chance levels and demonstrated somewhat enhanced visual or auditory-visual perception when measured in terms of vowel identification, monosyllabic word recognition and speechtracking rate. An increase in speechtracking rate was also demonstrated for some individuals. Subjects generally reported little subjective improvement in speech perception and production, but were satisfied with the physical attributes of each device. Five of six subjects preferred the Tactaid 7. Conclusions: The Tactaid II+ and the Tactaid 7 provided suprasegmental and segmental information, enabling the group to discriminate phonetic contrasts and improve their perception of some speech materials. No consistent advantage was found for either device, thought most subjects preferred the Tactaid 7. Alternatives likely to provide a greater benefit to communication should be considered before Tactaid fitting.
-
ItemStudies of prosody perception by cochlear implant patients( 1998)Prosodic information is conveyed to normally-hearing listeners by variations in acoustic fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and duration of speech segments. This study measured cochlear implant patients' sensitivity to these parameters in electrically coded speech. The psychophysical discrimination of electric parameters used to code prosodic information, were examined, together with prosody perception using speech processing strategies which modified the contributions of these parameters. Patients were implanted with the Cochlear Limited prosthesis and used the MPEAK speech processing strategy. In the psychophysical studies, difference limens were measured for steady-state and time-varying stimuli, of different pulse rates and pulse durations, over a series of different stimulus durations. These limens were obtained using an adaptive procedure which converged on the 50 per cent correct point. In the prosody perception studies, performance was measured for the MPEAK strategy and for strategies which modified the contributions of pulse rate and pulse duration. Data were collected for five tests of prosodic contrasts. Difference limens for steady-state pulse rates were larger at higher rates (17 per cent at 400 pulses/s) than at lower rates (6 per cent at 100 pulses/s). For some patients, limens for the time-varying pulse rates were larger than those for the steady-state pulse rates while for the other patients, the limens were similar. Difference limens for pulse duration were 0.3 dB, corresponding to 4 per cent of the dynamic range, for steady-state stimuli and doubled in size for the time-varying stimuli. Prosody perception performance was generally poorer for the modified strategies than for the MPEAK strategy, suggesting that the removal of information coded by pulse rate and pulse duration reduced the perception of prosodic contrasts.
-
ItemA clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users( 1995)Objective: The aim was to measure the rate of vocabulary acquisition for cochlear implant users and compare the pre- and postoperative rates with published data for other groups with normal or impaired hearing. The hypothesis was that the postoperative rate would be greater than the preoperative rate. Design: The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) was administered to 32 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Age at implantation ranged from 2 y r 6 mo to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 6 mo to 7 yr 8 mo. Results: The group mean postoperative performance at various postoperative intervals was significantly higher than mean preoperative performance. Single-subject data indicated statistically significant gains over time on this test for 13 of the subjects. The mean postoperative rate of vocabulary acquisition of 1.06 times the rate for normally hearing children was significantly greater than the mean preoperative rate of 0.43. Conclusions: These rates of improvement were in accord with previous reports on smaller numbers of implant users, but could not be attributed unambiguously to use of the implant because no control group was used for this clinical work. Variables such as age at implantation, duration of profound deafness, communication mode, and speech perception skill failed to significantly predict rate of improvement on the PPVT.
-
ItemA clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users( 1995)Objective: The aim was to assess articulation and speech intelligibility over time in a group of cochlear implant users implanted at 8 yr or over. The hypothesis was that the postoperative speech production performance would be greater than the preoperative performance. Design: A test of intelligibility using sentences and an articulation test measuring non-imitative elicited speech were administered to 11 and 10 subjects, respectively, who were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Nine subjects received both tests. Age at implantation ranged from 8 yr to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 1 yr to 4 yr 5 mo. Results: For both the intelligibility and articulation tests roughly half of the subjects showed significant improvements over time and group mean postoperative performance significantly exceeded preoperative performance. Improvements occurred for front, middle, and back consonants; for stops, fricatives, and glides and for voiceless and voiced consonants. Conclusions: Despite being deprived of acoustic speech information for many childhood years, roughly half of the patients assessed showed significant gains in speech intelligibility and articulation postimplantation. The lack of a control group of non-implanted patients means that we cannot separate out the influence of the implant on speech production from other influences such as training and tactile-kinaesthetic feedback.
-
ItemVowel imitation task: results over time for 28 cochlear implant children under the age of eight years( 1995)With increasing numbers of implanted children under the age of 4 years, numerous researchers have reminded us of the need for valid, sensitive, and reliable tests of developing speech perception.1,2 In addition to studies of the efficacy of implanted prostheses, there is a need to investigate the many variables that influence children's communicative performance, such as changes in speech-coding strategy, updated speech-processing systems, the effects of various training regimens, and the selection of educational and communication modes.
-
ItemPitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli( 1995)In the electric coding of speech for multiple-electrode cochlear implants, acoustic frequency ranges are mapped onto electrodes. The question arises as to whether the pitches of the electrically evoked hearing sensations are similar to those evoked by the corresponding acoustic stimuli in normal-hearing listeners. Obviously, the sensations are similar enough for many postlingually deaf implant users to understand speech with a minimum of retraining, but it is unlikely that the electric signals sound identical to the acoustic ones. There will also be differences between implant users arising from the variable insertion depth of the electrode array, the number of electrodes in use, and the frequency-to-electrode mapping. The most direct method of determining pitch is to ask implant users to compare electric and acoustic stimuli, but studies of this sort have been hampered by the fact that very few implant users have usable hearing for acoustic signals. In 1978, Eddington et al 1 reported pitch-matching results for one unilaterally deaf volunteer. They concluded that pitch matching was "roughly consistent with electrode position and tonotopic maps of the cochlea derived from basilar membrane motion and hearing loss measurements." Several other studies 2-6 have investigated the relative pitch of electric signals using identification, scaling, and discrimination paradigms. These studies have established that electrode placement, electrode configuration, and rate of stimulation all affect the perceived pitch, and that the pitch increases tonotopically from apical to basal electrode positions. They have not determined the pitch of electric stimuli in an absolute fashion that can be compared with acoustic stimuli, however. A knowledge of the absolute pitch of electric stimuli for individuals, or as a function of position in the cochlea, would be very useful in optimizing the frequency mapping for cochlear implants. The present study directly compared the pitch of acoustic pure tones in one ear with electric signals in the other ear of implant users with some residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear. The main questions addressed were whether the pulse rate of a matched electric stimulus would be equal to the frequency of the acoustic tone, and whether the electrode used in the matched stimulus would correspond in position to the place of maximum basilar membrane motion produced by the acoustic tone in a normal cochlea.
-
ItemPitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis( 1994)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemA review of the biological, psychophysical, and speech processing principles used to design the tickle talker( 1992)The Tickle Talker is a wearable electrotactile speech processor, designed to be used by profoundly hearing-impaired children and adults in conjunction with lipreading and residual hearing. The effectiveness of such a device is affected by an interaction between biological, human engineering, psychophysical, and speech processing considerations. The requirements, the design principles, and the performance of the Tickle Talker in each of these areas will be discussed. Electrical stimulation of the nerve bundles lying along the sides of the fingers was chosen to provide safe, comfortable, energy-efficient stimulation of a well-organised and sensitive part of the tactile sensory system. This is achieved at a small cost to the appearance and mobility of one hand when using the Tickle Talker. The biphasic pulse waveform used to stimulate the nerve bundles has been chosen to ensure a biologically safe stimulus. The electrical parameters (pulse duration, pulse rate, and electrode position) that are used to encode speech information are varied within ranges that are matched to the characteristics of the tactile sense. The usable ranges and information-carrying potential of each of these parameters have been assessed in psychophysical experiments. A comparison of these results with similar experimental data for cochlear implant and hearing aid users is instructive in assessing the possible limitations of tactile and auditory speech processors. The results discussed will include the discrimination and identification of stimuli differing in intensity, duration and pulse rate; the identification of different spatial patterns of stimulation, and the detection of gaps in stimuli. In most respects, the tactile results are similar to the corresponding auditory measures. The resolution of temporal differences such as pulse rate discrimination or gap detection are generally not as good as in the auditory case, but may be as good or better than the corresponding results for some profoundly hearing-impaired individuals. The speech processor used in the Tickle Talker is a "feature extraction" device that explicitly estimates the second formant frequency, amplitude envelope, and fundamental frequency of the voice and encodes them in terms of electrode position, pulse width and pulse rate of the electrical stimulation pattern. Consideration of the psychophysical results and the speech information available from these parameters allows optimization of the Tickle Talker's operation and a broad estimation of its potential performance in speech discrimination. The perception of duration and place of articulation (front/back) of vowels, and the manner and voicing of consonants are expected to be improved by the Tickle Talker. Prosodic variations conveyed by pulse rate are expected to be perceived by some users, but not all. High frequency consonants such as: /s/,/z/./?/, and /t?/ are encoded in a particularly salient manner by the Tickle Talker.
-
ItemClinical experience with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor (Tickle Talker)( 1992)The Tickle Talker is a multiple channel electrotactile speech processor, developed for use by profoundly hearing-impaired adults and children. The device is intended to be used in combination with lipreading and aided residual hearing, to assist the greatest potential range of users. Sound detection and speech reception threshold levels for a group of 14 congenitally hearing-impaired children were shown to be lower when using the Tickle Talker than for hearing aids across the speech frequency range. Tactile-alone feature contrast testing with adults demonstrated that both segmental and suprasegmental speech feature information was available from the tactual display presented by the Tickle Talker. Clinical results from an ongoing program involving fourteen hearing-impaired children demonstrate benefits in speech perception achieved through use of the Tickle Talker. The children have a range of degree of hearing impairment and educational setting. Results show improvements in discrimination scores for vowel and consonant speech features, and increased scores for recognition of closed-set words and for open-set words and sentences. In addition, anecdotal evidence indicates changes in speech production which may be attributed to perceptual input from the device (both from perception of other speakers, and from voice self-monitoring). Results from a group of 4 adult patients show that tactile input may be effectively combined with either aided residual hearing, or aided residual hearing and lipreading to improve speech discrimination across a similar range of closed and open-set word and sentence tests and on speech tracking. The results indicate that some specific tailoring of the speech information provided through the device for the needs of users with differing degrees of hearing-impairment may be required to optimize potential benefits to speech discrimination.
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5