Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7
-
ItemSpeech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes.(Informa UK Limited, 2002-03)A group of 102 children using the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant were assessed for open-set speech perception abilities at six-monthly intervals following implant surgery. The group included a wide range of ages, types of hearing loss, ages at onset of hearing loss, experience with implant use and communication modes. Multivariate analysis indicated that a shorter duration of profound hearing loss, later onset of profound hearing loss, exclusively oral/aural communication and greater experience with the implant were associated with better open-set speech perception. Developmental delay was associated with poorer speech perception and the SPEAK signal coding scheme was shown to provide better speech perception performance than previous signal processors. Results indicated that postoperative speech perception outcomes could be predicted with an accuracy that is clinically useful.
-
ItemVowel imitation task: results over time for 28 cochlear implant children under the age of eight years( 1995)With increasing numbers of implanted children under the age of 4 years, numerous researchers have reminded us of the need for valid, sensitive, and reliable tests of developing speech perception.1,2 In addition to studies of the efficacy of implanted prostheses, there is a need to investigate the many variables that influence children's communicative performance, such as changes in speech-coding strategy, updated speech-processing systems, the effects of various training regimens, and the selection of educational and communication modes.
-
ItemCochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception( 1992)A group of 10 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Pty Ltd) at the University of Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic and have used the prosthesis for periods from 12 to 65 months. Postoperative performance on the majority of closed-set speech perception tests was significantly greater than chance, and significantly better than preoperative performance for all of the patients. Five of the children have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores in monosyllabic words ranged from 30% to 72%; word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these 5 children were implanted during preadolescence (aged 5:5 to 10:2 years) and the fifth, who had a progressive loss, was implanted during adolescence (aged 14:8 years). The duration of profound deafness before implantation varied from 2 to 8 years. Improvements were also noted over postoperative data collection times for the younger children. The remaining 5 patients who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted after a longer duration of profound deafness (aged 13:11 to 20:1 years). The results are discussed with reference to variables that may affect implant performance, such as age at onset of loss, duration of profound loss, age at implantation, and duration of implantation. They are compared with results for similar groups of children using hearing aids and cochlear implants.
-
ItemSpeech perception, production and language results in a group of children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant( 1992)Five children out of a group of nine (aged 5.5 to 19.9 years) implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Ply. Ltd.) have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores for monosyllabic words ranged from 40% to 72%. Word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these five children were implanted during preadolescence. The fifth child, who had a progressive loss and was implanted during adolescence after a short period of very profound deafness, scored highest on all speech perception tests. The remaining four children who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted during adolescence after a long duration of profound deafness. Post-operative performance on closed-set speech perception tests was better than pre-operative performance for all children. Improvements in speech and language assessments were also noted. These improvements tended to be greater for the younger children. The results are discussed with reference to variables which may contribute to successful implant use: such as age at onset, duration of profound hearing loss, age at implantation, aetiology, educational program, and the type of training provided.
-
ItemCochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception( 1992)A group of 10 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Ply Ltd) at the University of Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic and have used the prosthesis for periods from 12 to 65 months. Postoperative performance on the majority of closed-set speech perception tests was significantly greater than chance, and significantly better than preoperative performance for all of the patients. Five of the children have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores in monosyllabic words ranged from 30% to 72%; word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these 5 children were implanted during preadolescence (aged 5:5 to 10:2 years) and the fifth, who had a progressive loss, was implanted during adolescence (aged 14:8 years). The duration of profound deafness before implantation varied from 2 to 8 years. Improvements were also noted over postoperative data collection times for the younger children. The remaining 5 patients who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted after a longer duration of profound deafness (aged 13:11to 20:1 years). The results are discussed with reference to variables that may affect implant performance, such as age at onset of loss, duration of profound loss, age at implantation, and duration of implantation. They are compared with results for similar groups of children using hearing aids and cochlear implants.
-
ItemMulti-channel cochlear implants for children: the Melbourne Program( 1991)Although there have been 300 years of deaf education, profoundly-totally deaf children today on average are not able to reach the same level of achievement as their normally hearing peers (Geers & Moog, 1989). This failure of deaf children to develop their true potential is largely due to the difficulty they have in communicating with normally hearing people. During the last 300 years there have been basically two different methods of education used (The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1983). Firstly, one which maximises auditory and lip reading cues (auditory/oral), advocated by Juan Pablo Bonet (1620), and one which uses a series of signs to convey meaning (signing), developed by Charles-Michel (1712-89). In addition, there is a method which endeavours to combine both auditory/oral and signing approaches called total communication. In practice, however, children taught by total communication tend to receive speech more predominantly by one or other of these methods.
-
ItemRevised selection criteria for the multiple-channel cochlear implant( 1991)The criteria of suitability for a cochlear implant have been extended from total deafness to include some individuals with residual hearing. The aim of the initial hearing evaluation is to define whether the speech discrimination is good enough to justify perseverance with a hearing aid. In adults, usually the pure tone audiogram and speech audiometry are accurate and consistent. In children, however, to achieve accuracy, free field testing must be complemented by repeated aided conditioned responses and objective evoked response audiometry. When a child has residual hearing it is more difficult to assess the potential for habilitation using an aid. For both adults and children, it is necessary to make a selection from a battery of tests on the basis of the subjects experience. This development highlights the need for otologists and audiologists to become familiar with the battery of tests used in evaluating severe deafness (Plant 1984) and to review decisions made about the management of people with severe to total deafness. In suitable people, the aim of treatment with the Cochlear multichannel implant and its multipeak speech processor is a significant score for open set speech discrimination tests using hearing alone. This cannot always be achieved but as long as the evaluation protocol has been used to warn patients before the operation, they will be satisfied with a result where the implant complements lip reading resulting in discrimination of running speech and detection of environmental sounds.