Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17
-
ItemCochlear implants in children: the value of cochleostomy seals in the prevention of labyrinthitis following pneumococcal otitis media( 1995)Cochlea implantation at an early age is important in rehabilitating profoundly hearing impaired children. Given the incidence of pneumococcal otitis media in young children, there has been concern that cochlear implantation could increase the possibility of otitis media, leading to labyrinthitis in this age group. Clinical experience has not indicated an increase in the frequency of otitis media and labyrinthitis in implanted adults or children over two years. However, labyrinthitis has occurred in implanted animals with otitis media. In order to assess the impact of cochlear implants on the occurrence of labyrinthitis, pneumococcal otitis media was induced in 21 kittens. Thirty-two kitten cochleas were implanted, of which 9 had a fascial graft and 9 a Gelfoam® graft. Nine control cochleas were unimplanted. Labyrinthitis occurred in 44% of unimplanted controls. 50% of implanted ungrafted cochleas, and 6% of implanted grafted cochleas. There was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of labyrinthitis in the implanted cochleas and the unimplanted controls. However there was a statistically significant difference between the ungrafted and grafted cochleas, but not between the two types of graft.
-
ItemCochlear implantation in young children: histological studies on head growth, leadwire design, and electrode fixation in the monkey model( 1994)For safe cochlear implantation in children under 2 years of age, the implant assembly must not adversely affect adjacent tissues or compromise head growth. Furthermore, growth changes and tissue responses should not impair the function of the device. Dummy receiver-stimulators, interconnect plugs, and leadwire-lengthening systems were implanted for periods of 36 months in the young monkey to effectively model the implantation of the young child. The results show that implanting a receiver-stimulator package has no adverse effects on skull growth or the underlying central nervous system. The system for fixing the electrode at the fossa incudis proved effective. There was marked osteoneogenesis in the mastoid cavity, resulting in the fixation of the leadwire outside the cochlea. This study provides evidence for the safety of cochlear implantation in young subjects.
-
ItemCochlear implantation in children: labyrinthitis following pneumococcal otitis media in unimplanted and implanted cat cochleas( 1994)Pneumococcal otitis media is frequent in young children and could lead to labyrinthitis post-implantation. To assess the risk and methods of minimizing it by a graft to the round window around the electrode entry point, we have used a cat animal model of pneumococcal otitis media. Twenty-one kittens were used in the study. Thirty-two cochleas were implanted when the kittens were 2 months of age. Fourteen cochleas were implanted without using a graft (12 were available for study); 9 had a fascial graft, and 9 a Gelfoam® graft (7 were available for study). The implanted kittens had their bullae inoculated with Streptococcus pneumoniae 2 months after implantation and were sacrificed 1 week later. There were also 9 unimplanted control ears which were inoculated when the animals were 4 months of age. Labyrinthitis occurred in 44% of unimplanted control, 50% of implanted ungrafted, and 6% of implanted grafted (fascia and Gelfoam®) cochleas. There was no statistically significant difference between the unimplanted control and the implanted cochleas (p < 0.05). There was, however, a difference between the implanted-ungrafted and implanted grafted cochleas, but not between the use of fascia and Gelfoam® to graft the round window entry point. As a result, the data indicates that cochlear implantation does not increase the risk of labyrinthitis following pneumococcal otitis media, but it is desirable to use fascia as a graft to the round window around the electrode entry point.
-
ItemAnimal models of human disease: otitis media( 1991)Otitis media is an inflammation of the middle ear, which may or may not be of microbial origin. Genetic, immunologic, allergic conditions, antecedent viral respiratory infections, and mastoid size are contributing factors for middle ear disease. Dysfunction of the eustachian tube predisposes to acute otitis media. Collection of fluid within the middle ear cavity is part of the disease process and is equally observed in infectious and noninfectious middle ear disease. Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenza, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus aureus are the most common organisms that cause acute infectious otitis media.
-
ItemThe biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant( 1988)Studies have been undertaken to confirm the biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multi-electrode intracochlear implant. The materials used are biocompatible. The electrode array is flexible: it can be inserted with minimal or no trauma, providing the insertion is stopped when resistance is first felt. An atraumatic insertion is facilitated if a good view is obtained along the scala tympani of the basal turn of the cochlea by drilling through the crista fenestrae. The passage of the electrode around the cochlea can be facilitated if the electrode is rotated during insertion (clockwise for the left and anticlockwise for the right cochlea). The electrode can be explanted and another one reinserted with minimal or no trauma. A seal established around the electrode after an implantation period of 2 weeks can prevent infection extending from the middle to the inner ear. The electrical stimulus parameters produced by the Nucleus receiver-stimulator cause no loss of spiral ganglion cells or corrosion of the platinum band electrodes. Long-term stimulation has been carried out for up to 8 years in patients without affecting their clinical performance.
-
ItemThe histopathology of the human temporal bone and auditory central nervous system following cochlear implantation in a patient: correlation with psychophysics and speech perception results( 1988)Cochlear implantation has become a recognised surgical procedure for the management of a profound-total hearing loss, especially in patients who have previously had hearing before going deaf (postlingual deafness). Nevertheless, it is important for progress in the field that patients who have had a cochlear implant, bequeath their temporal bones for research. This will then make it possible to further assess the safety of the procedure, and the factors that are important for its effectiveness. Biological safety has been assessed in a number of studies on animals, in particular, the biocompatibility of the materials used (1,2), the histopathological effects of long-term implantation on the cochlea (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), and the effects of chronic electrical stimulation on the viability of spiral ganglion cells (9, 10, 11, 12). In studying the temporal bones of deceased cochlear implant patients it is possible to help establish that the animal experimental results are applicable to Man. Surgical trauma has been most frequently evaluated by inserting electrodes into cadaver temporal bones. It is important, however, to examine bones that have been previously implanted surgically to ensure that the cadaver findings are applicable to operations on patients. The effectiveness of cochlear implantation can be studied by correlating the histopathological findings, the dendrite and spiral ganglion cell densities, in particular, with the psychophysical and speech perception results. Other benefits also accrue, for example, establishing the accuracy of preoperative X-rays and electrical stimulation of the promontory in predicting cochlear pathology and spiral ganglion cell numbers. For the above reasons it has been especially interesting to examine both the temporal bones and central nervous system from one of our patients (patient 13) who participated in the initial clinical trial of the Cochlear Proprietary Limited (a member of the Nucleus group) multiple-electrode cochlear prosthesis, and who died due to a myocardial infarction following coronary bypass surgery.
-
ItemThe University of Melbourne/Nucleus cochlear prosthesis( 1988)This is a review of research to develop the University of Melbourne/Nucleus cochlear prosthesis for patients with a profound-total hearing loss. A more complete review can be obtained in Clark et al. A prototype receiver-stimulator and multiple-electrode array developed at the University of Melbourne was first implanted in a postlingually deaf adult patient with a profound-total hearing loss on 1 August 1978. A speech processing strategy which could help this patient understand running speech, especially when combined with lipreading was developed in 1978 following initial psychophysical studies. A prototype wearable speech processor was fabricated in 1979, that could provide significant help for the first two patients in understanding running speech when used in combination with lipreading compared with lipreading alone, and it also enabled them to understand some running speech when using electrical stimulation alone. An implantable receiver-stimulator and wearable speech processor embodying the principles of the prototype devices were then produced for clinical trial by the Australian biomedical firm, Nucleus Ltd, and its subsidiaries, Cochlear Pty Ltd and Cochlear Corporation. This cochlear implant was initially clinically trialled on six patients at The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital in 1982, and shown to give similar results to those obtained with the prototype device. In view of these findings a clinical trial was carried out for a Premarket Approval Application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and extended to a number of centres in the US, Canada, and West Germany. This clinical trial confirmed that patients could understand running speech when electrical stimulation was combined with lipreading, and that some patients could also understand running speech when using electrical stimulation alone. Today, more than 600 patients world-wide are using cochlear implants developed from the research described in this paper.
-
ItemMiddle ear infection postimplantation: response of the round window membrane to Streptococcus pyogenes( 1987)The seal of the implanted round window membrane to resist Streptococcus pyogenes invasion from the middle ear was investigated in 12 cats. Results showed that the implanted round window membrane is able to form a barrier for S pyogenes starting 1 week postimplantation. Under normal conditions S pyogenes did not pass through the round window membrane, nor through the gap that existed between the membrane and the prosthesis. Mechanical disruption of the round window seal, however, and severe inflammatory response to S pyogenes caused the infection to extend into the inner ear.
-
ItemSurgery for the safe insertion and reinsertion of the banded electrode array( 1987)Adhering to the surgical technique outlined in the protocol for the Nucleus implant has resulted in over 100 patients worldwide obtaining significant benefit from multichannel stimulation. A detailed analysis of the results in 40 patients shows that it improves their awareness of environmental sounds and their abilities in understanding running speech when combined with lipreading. In addition, one third to one half of the patients also understand significant amounts of running speech without lipreading and some can have interactive conversations over the telephone. It is clear that any insertion trauma is not significant, which is confirmed by the excellent clinical results.
-
ItemA multiple-electrode intracochlear implant for children( 1987)A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant that provides 21 stimulus channels has been designed for use in young children. It is smaller than the adult version and has magnets to facilitate the attachment of the headset. It has been implanted in two children aged 5 and 10 years. The two children both lost hearing in their third year, when they were still learning language. Following implantation, it was possible to determine threshold and comfortable listening levels for each electrode pair. This was facilitated in the younger child by prior training in scaling visual and electrotactile stimuli. Both children are regular users of the implant, and a training and assessment program has been commenced.