Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 70
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The effects of electrode position and stimulus period on the hearing sensations in a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient [Abstract]
    Tong, Y. C. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1981)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Perceptual dissimilarity and discrimination studies using two-electrode stimulation with a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient [Abstract]
    Dowell, R. C. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1981)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Pitch and loudness studies on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient [Abstract]
    Blamey, P. J. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1981)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Cochlear implants in adults and children: comment
    Clark, Graeme M. ( 1997)
    This is a well-written review of the NIH Consensus report on cochlear implants for adults and children.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The Bionic ear towards 2000 and beyond: The William Carey Lecture 20th August 1998
    Clark, Graeme M. ( 1999)
    I consider it a great honour to have been invited to give the William Carey Lecture, especially when one considers how much Carey contributed to the welfare of people in India. He was an outstanding man with many gifts and wide-ranging interests and influence --in fields as diverse as botany, economics, medicine, print and communications technology, libraries, engineering, conservation, agriculture, social reform, astronomy and Indian religions. All his work was done in the name of God, and his Christian belief. My address is entitled The Bionic Ear: Towards 2000 and beyond. I want to emphasise from the start that research directions beyond the year 2000 are built upon the achievements of the past and the present. Furthermore, although we have made great progress with the Bionic Ear, we have some distance to go before we can give most people near normal hearing.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception in implanted children: influence of preoperative residual hearing on outcomes [Abstract]
    Cowan, R. S. C. ; Barker, E. J. ; Pegg, P. ; Dettman, S. ; Rennie, M. ; Galvin, K. ; Meskin, T. ; Rance, G. ; Cody, K. ; Sarant, J. ; Larratt, M. ; Latus, K. ; HOLLOW, RODNEY ; Rehn, C. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Pyman, B. ; Gibson, W. P. R. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1998)
    Since the first child was implanted with the Nucleus 22-channel prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, several thousand children world-wide have now benefitted from this technology. More effective paediatric assessment and management procedures have now been developed, allowing cochlear implants to be offered to children under the age of 2 years. Improvements in speech processing strategy have also been implemented in the Nucleus implant system, resulting in increased mean speech perception benefits for implanted adults. Although a range of performance on formal measures of hearing, speech or language has been reported for children using implants, results from the first decade of implant experience consistently show that significant benefits are available to children receiving their implant at an early age. Reported speech perception results for implanted children show that a considerable proportion (60%) of paediatric patients in the Melbourne and Sydney clinics are able to understand some open-set speech using electrical stimulation alone. These results, and the upward trend of mean speech perception benefits shown for postlinguistically deafened adults have raised questions as to whether severely, or severely-to-profoundly deaf children currently using hearing aids would in fact benefit more from a cochlear implant. To investigate the potential influence of the degree of preoperative residual hearing on postoperative speech perception, results for all implanted children in the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant programs were analysed. Results showed that as a group, children with higher levels of preoperative residual hearing were consistently more likely to achieve open-set speech perception benefits. Potential factors in this finding could be higher levels of ganglion cell survival or greater patterning of the auditory pathways using conventional hearing aids prior to implantation. Conversely, children with the least preoperative residual hearing were less predictable, with some children achieving open-set perception, and others showing more limited closed-set benefits to perception. For these children, it is likely that preoperative residual hearing is of less significance than other factors in outcomes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Control strategies for neurons modelled by self-exciting point processes [Abstract]
    Irlicht, Laurence S. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1995)
    Abstract not available due to copyright.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Multichannel auditory brainstem implants: an Australian case study [Abstract]
    Hollow, Rod ; COWAN, ROBERT ; BRIGGS, ROBERT ; KAYE, ANDREW ; DOWELL, RICHARD ; Shaw, Stephanie ; Clarke, Graeme M. ( 1996)
    The multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is an implantable device designed to restore a level of auditory perception in patients with bilateral acoustic neuromas, where the removal of the tumours is expected to result in a total loss of hearing. As with the cochlear implant, the ABI utilises an externally worn speech processor and headset, together with a surgically-placed receiver-stimulator and electrode array. The electrode array, developed through the collaboration of the House Ear Institute in the United States and Cochlear Corporation, consists of eight electrodes on a carrier, which is placed on the surface of the brainstem in the area of the cochlear nucleus.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Current trends in speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant patients [Abstract]
    Hollow, Rod ; Plant, Kerrie ; Whitford, Lesley ; Skok, Marisa ; DOWELL, RICHARD ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1996)
    In 1994, Cochlear Pty. Ltd. (Now Cochlear Limited) released a new speech processor, the Spectra 22, for use with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. The Spectra 22 speech processor incorporates a new speech processing strategy called SPEAK, which is based upon research conducted by the University of Melbourne. This paper reports post-operative scores on open-set word and sentence materials for adult patients in the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic who have been started up with the Spectra 22 speech processor.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The importance of different frequency bands to the speech perception of cochlear implantees [Abstract]
    Henry, Belinda A. ; McKay, Colette M. ; McDermott, Hugh J. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1996)
    It is well known that cochlear implantees exhibit a wide range of speech perception ability. Understanding the reason for this variability may lead to improved speech processors. This study investigates whether implantees rely on different areas of the speech spectrum for speech cues, compared to normally hearing listeners, and whether poor performers rely on different spectral areas than better performers. Six subjects with the Mini System 22 implant and using the SPEAK strategy participated in this experiment. Scores for monosyllabic words were obtained using the full speech spectrum and with selected frequency bands removed from the subjects’ speech processor maps. The Articulation Index (AI) is a measure of the proportion of speech information available to a listener, and the relative contribution to AI from different frequency bands is termed the Importance Function. The five frequency bands studied in this experiment were determined to be of equal importance to normally hearing listeners for the speech material used. The scores for each implantee were transformed into AI values, and hence the relative importance of the bands was determined. This relative importance was compared between the implantee group and normally hearing listeners to determine the way in which speech perception by electrical stimulation varies from that by acoustical stimulation. Comparisons were also made between individual implantees to determine whether correlations exist between their speech perception ability and their use of cues in different parts of the spectrum. Further research will determine whether the differences among implantees are correlated with their ability to perceive changes in stimulation place or temporal characteristics.