Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21
-
ItemBiological safety(Singular Publishing, 1997)Biological safety has been extensively studied at the Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, for cochlear implantation in adults, and subsequently for specific issues in infants and young children. Many of the studies have general applicability to cochlear implantation, but some have specific relevance to the Nucleus (Cochlear Limited) multiple-channel cochlear implant systems, and have been fundamental to their approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Nucleus system was first approved by the FDA as safe and effective for postlinguistically deaf adults in October 1985, and 5 years later, on 27 June 1990, was approved for use in children from 2 years of age and older. The general research questions studied for adults are directly relevant for children and infants, but there are also specific questions that need to be answered when operating on children under 2 years of age.
-
ItemChronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high rates: I. Effect on residual hearing [Abstract]( 1996)In addition to direct excitation of auditory nerve fibres, cochlear implant patients with small amounts of residual hearing may receive important additional auditory cues via electrophonic activation of hair cells 1. Before incorporating electrophonic hearing into speech processing strategies, the extent of hair cell survival following cochlear implantation must first be determined. We have recently demonstrated widespread survival of hair cells apical to electrode arrays implanted for periods of up to three years, the present report describes the effects of chronic electrical stimulation on hair cell survival.
-
ItemChronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high rates: II. Cochlear pathophysiology [Abstract]( 1996)A major factor in the improved performance of cochlear implant patients has been the use of high stimulus rate speech processing strategies. While these strategies show clear clinical advantage, we know little of their long-term safety. Indeed, recent studies have indicated that high stimulus rates at intensities above clinical limits, can result in neural damage as a result of prolonged neuronal hyperactivity. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high rates, using intensities within clinical limits.
-
ItemSpatial representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of neonatally deafened kittens following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve [Abstract]( 1995)The orderly tonotopic representation of the cochlea is accurately reproduced within the central auditory system of normal hearing animals. Any degradation of this representation as a result of a neonatal hearing loss or chronic electrical stimulation during development could have important implications for the use of multichannel cochlear implants in young children. In the present study we have used 2-deoxyglucose autoradiography (2-00) to examine the topographic representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus (IC) of neonatally deafened kittens following periods of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation.
-
ItemCochlear histopatholgic characteristics following long-term implantation: safety studies in the young monkey( 1996)Objective: To evaluate the safety of cochlear implantation in children 2 years of age or younger using a non-human primate model.
-
ItemElectrical stimulation of residual hearing in the implanted cochlea( 1995)The average profoundly deaf person using a cochlear implant can now understand more speech than some severely to profoundly deaf people who use a hearing aid. For this reason there will be an increasing need to consider implanting people with residual hearing. In many of these people there could be significant hearing in the operated ear, as a majority of severely to profoundly deaf people are likely to have a symmetrical hearing loss. When three frequency average hearing thresholds were measured on 219 pensioners from the Australian National Acoustic Laboratories (H. Dillon, unpublished findings), 64% had less than a 10-dB difference between thresholds in each ear.
-
ItemCochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing( 1995)This study was undertaken to find out how new bone is produced in the implanted cochlea, and the effects of fibrous tissue and new bone growth on electrode-tissue impedance. This knowledge is essential, as bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea could account for variations in patients' speech perception performance. The study was also carried out to examine the effects of implantation on residual hearing. This information is also important, as cochlear implant speech perception results in profoundly deaf people are now better on average than severely or profoundly deaf people obtain with a hearing aid. Consequently, more people will need to be considered for cochlear implantation in ears with some residual hearing. In this case we need to know to what extent residual hearing is affected by implantation. (From Introduction)
-
ItemTemporal coding of frequency: neuron firing probabilities for acoustic and electric stimulation of the auditory nerve( 1995)A better understanding of the temporal coding of frequency, and its application to electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers, should lead to advances in cochlear implant speech processing. Past research studies have suggested that the intervals between nerve action potentials are important in the temporal coding of frequency. For sound frequencies up to approximately 500 Hz, the shortest or predominant intervals between the nerve action potentials are usually the same as the periods of the sound waves. The intervals between each nerve action potential can be plotted as an interval histogram. Although there is evidence that the intervals between spikes are important in the temporal coding of frequency, it is not known up to what frequency this applies. It is also not known whether the information transmitted along individual fibers or an ensemble of fibers is important, to what extent the coding of frequency is interrelated with the coding of intensity, the relative importance of temporal and place coding for different frequencies, and finally, how well electrical stimulation can simulate the temporal coding of sound.
-
ItemA physiological investigation of chronic electrical stimulation with scala tympani electrodes in kittens( 1992)A physiological investigation of cochlear electrical stimulation was undertaken in six two-month-old kittens. The scala tympani electrodes were implanted and electrically stimulated using biphasic balanced electrical pulses' for periods of 1000-1500h in four ears. Four ears received implants for same period but without electrical stimulation. The other two ears served as normal control. The results indicated: 1) Chronic electrical stimulation of the cochlea within electrochemically safe limits did not influence the hearing of kittens and the normal delivery of impulses evoked by acoustic and electrical signals on the auditory brainstem pathway. 2) The wave shapes of EABRs were similar to those of ABRs. The aptitudes of EABRs showed a significant increase following chronic electrical stimulation, resulting in a leftward shift in the input/ output function. The absolute latencies and interwave latencies of waves II-III , III -IV and II -IV were significantly shorter than those of ABRs. These results imply that there was no adverse effect of chronic electrical stimulation on the maturing auditory systems of kittens using these electrical parameters and the mechanism of electrical hearing should be further studied.
-
ItemExperimental study on extracochlear electric stimulation [Abstract]( 1992)The efficiency and feasibility of chronic extracochlear implantation and electric stimulation were studied in two adult cats and four 2-month kittens. The first electrode was placed on the round window by fixing the leadwire on the bridge of aditus between the middle ear and bulla cavity; the second electrode was placed on the surface of the tympanic promontory; the third was inserted into the temporal muscle out of the bulla and the forth fixed in transverse sinus with dental cement. ABRs and EABRs were recorded pre-and postoperatively and during electric stimulation.