Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 35
-
ItemSpeech perception & indirect benefits for severely hearing impaired children using cochlear implants [Abstract]( 1998)The benefits to speech perception, speech production, communication, and quality of life were investigated for severely hearing impaired children using cochlear implants and hearing aids. For the youngest children, assessments of psychological status, and use of a battery of cognitive and language tests were important factors in determining performance benefits prior to the child developing speech. For older children, the effects of increased one-to-one oral habilitation, and systematic encouragement of parental involvement were also investigated. Results suggested that parental support for consistent device use was an important factor in producing outcomes. Children with residual hearing were more likely to achieve open-set perception. Each child was also assessed for changes in quality of life, through use of a standardized health utility instrument. Results from the group were collated, and teamed with a costing assessment for the procedure, which allowed a complete cost-utility analysis to be completed. Results suggested that indirect benefits, such as the effects on speech production, usual activities, lower concentration, and less distress were ranked as more important than changes to hearing in a number of the children. Costs per QALY were consistent with those reported in the literature, and suggested that the cochlear implant is highly cost-effective as a medical technology.
-
ItemObjective hearing level estimation in infants with severe to profound impairment: role of Steady State Evoked Potential threshold testing [Abstract]( 1998)Accurate determination of hearing levels in potential cochlear implant candidates is an important part of pre-operative investigation. This is particularly the case for children younger than two years of age in whom speech perception testing is not possible. We have found the Steady-State Evoked Potential (SSEP) technique to be a reliable and accurate objective measure of residual hearing. Threshold estimation using the click-evoked auditory brainstem response cannot quantify hearing loss in the severe to profound range because of the presentation level restriction (? 100 dBnHL) and the broadband stimulus. The SSEP technique employs modulated tones at levels as high as 120 dBHL and can be used to estimate the audiograms of subjects with little or no residual hearing and absent click-auditory brainstem responses. We have demonstrated a strong relationship between behavioural and SSEP thresholds and believe that the procedure provides an important safeguard in the paediatric selection process. The possible exception is in children with retrocochlear abnormalities such as �Auditory Neuropathy�. In these subjects we have found poorer correlation between SSEP and behavioural thresholds.
-
ItemPerformance benefits and costs for children using cochlear implants and hearing aids [Abstract]( 1998)The value of cochlear implants as an established clinical option for profoundly hearing impaired adults and children has been supported by significant research results over a number of years which has clearly established the benefits available (U.S. National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement 1995). Benefit has traditionally been considered as the direct impact of the cochlear implant procedure on speech perception, or in the case of children, on the use of that auditory information to develop understandable speech and to acquire a knowledge of language. As a consequence of continuing research to improve hardware and speech processing strategies, mean scores on open-set tests of monosyllables or sentence materials for implanted adults using the cochlear implant alone without lipreading have continued to show an upwards trend. In response to the increased mean scores in quiet, perception tests in background noise are now being used as a more accurate direct measure of the potential benefits of cochlear implants to severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired candidates. Consideration should also be given to indirect benefits, such as reduction in the stress of listening and lipreading, improved performance at work, enhanced opportunity to maintain speech, or in children to develop speech which is understandable to the general community, and the social effects of reducing the isolating effects of profound deafness. Measurement of indirect benefit can be combined with an analysis of the costs of the procedure, enabling evaluation of the implant procedure from a cost-utility standpoint, and a comparison of outcomes using other technologies such as hearing aids. This study will present data on direct and indirect benefits for hearing-impaired children using Nucleus cochlear implant systems, and compare this data with benefits shown for similarly hearing impaired children using hearing aids. The significance of these results to cost-effective delivery of services will be discussed.
-
ItemEvaluation of direct and indirect benefits in the selection of cochlear implant candidates [Abstract]( 1998)The value of cochlear implants as an established clinical option for profoundly hearing-impaired adults and children has been supported by significant research results over a number of years which clearly established the benefits available (U.S. National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement 1995). Benefit has traditionally been considered as the impact of the cochlear implant procedure on hearing, and in the case of children, on the use of that hearing to develop speech and language. However, as a result of continuing research, improvements have been realised both in hardware and speech processing. As a direct consequence of these improvements, the mean open-set implant-alone speech perception scores for implanted adults have continued to increase. In response to the increased mean scores shown by adult cochlear implant users in quiet, perception tests in background noise are now being used as a direct measure of the potential benefits of cochlear implants available to severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired candidates. In addition, consideration in candidature should also be given to indirect benefits, such as reduction in the stress. of listening and lipreading, improved performance at work, enhanced opportunity to maintain or in children to develop speech which is understandable to the general community, and the social effects of reducing the isolating effects of profound deafness. Measurement of indirect benefit can be combined with a costing study, enabling evaluation of the implant procedure from a cost-utility standpoint, and comparison of outcomes using other technologies such as hearing aids. The use of new approaches to candidature, including new measures of direct and indirect benefit is reported using data from the Melbourne cochlear implant program.
-
ItemThe use of click-ABR and steady state evoked potentials for hearing assessment in young cochlear implant candidates [Abstract]( 1997)The accurate assessment of hearing thresholds in prospective cochlear implant candidates is essential. As the minimum age of implantation has reduced, audiologists have been faced with the complicated task of obtaining precise audiometric information in children whose immaturity may severely restrict the assessment process. Clearly for these young candidates, there is a place for a reliable, objective measure of residual hearing in the pre-operative test battery. This paper examines the degree of accuracy with which the click-ABR and the steady-state evoked potential (SSEP) techniques can provide estimates of hearing level in subjects with several profound hearing loss.
-
ItemCurrent speech perception benefits for adults using the speak strategy with the nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant( 1997)Present day recipients of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant make use of the SPEAK speech processing strategy in the Spectra 22 speech processor. Introduced in 1994, the SPEAK strategy is based upon research conducted at the University of Melbourne and the Bionic Ear Institute. This paper compares the pre-and post-operative speech perception abilities of adults who have used the SPEAK speech processing strategy since the 'start-up' of their cochlear implant system. Data was analysed from open-set sentence and word tests administered pre-operatively and at regular intervals postoperatively. Patients showed significant improvement in their ability to recognise speech, when listening with the cochlear implant without lipreading, within the first two weeks. Mean scores for open-set sentences were 15% preoperatively and 64% two weeks after initial programming.
-
ItemSpeech perception of hearing aid users versus cochlear implantees [Abstract]( 1997)Recent improvements in speech recognition for profoundly deaf, cochlear implant patients have suggested that some people with a severe hearing impairment would be more successful with a cochlear implant than a hearing aid. Unfortunately, no studies have investigated the speech perception of the severely hearing impaired in order compare their speech perception abilities with those of cochlear implant users. To investigate this area further, a detailed investigation of the hearing aid performance of people with a severe hearing loss is being conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology at The University of Melbourne. The range of hearing losses for this study was defined as a pure tone average of greater than 6OdBHL, but no worse than 100dBSPL in the better ear. At present thirty-five (n=35) participants have been involved in this study. Each participant took part in a series of speech perception tests which included 24 consonant recognition, 11 vowel recognition, CNC words, CUNY sentences, and the connected speech test.
-
ItemLong-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants [Abstract]( 1997)Multichannel cochlear implants have been in use with children for over ten years with an acceleration, in recent years, in the number of young children being implanted. Analysis of speech perception results provides one way of measuring the success of implants in children. The desired outcomes in terms of overall benefit may be better assessed by speech production and language measures. However, in terms of the main aim of cochlear implants, it is useful to look at speech perception initially. This represents a measure of auditory ability which can be compared to normal performance and it is auditory ability that cochlear implants attempt to restore. Language and speech production depend on other factors in addition to auditory ability but it is probably a reasonable assumption that good speech perception is a prerequisite for good speech production and oral language. At the University of Melbourne, we have been able to follow the speech perception of implanted children over the long term. Analysis of results has shown that approximately 80% of implanted children of all ages achieve some understanding of openset speech in sentences (BKB sentences) with a mean score of 32% (n=38).
-
ItemSpeech perception in implanted children: effects of preoperative residual hearing and speech processing strategy [Abstract]( 1997)Since the first child was implanted with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, the number of implanted children world-wide has rapidly expanded. Over this period, more effective paediatric assessment and management procedures have developed, allowing cochlear implants to be offered to children under the age of 2 years. In addition, a succession of improved speech processing strategies have been implemented in the Nucleus implant system, resulting in increased mean speech perception benefits for implanted adults. Research in the Melbourne and Sydney Cochlear Implant Clinics has also demonstrated that young children can adapt to and benefit from improved speech processing strategies such as the Speak strategy. Reported speech perception results for implanted children show that a considerable proportion (60%) of paediatric patients in the Melbourne and Sydney clinics are able to understand some open set speech using electrical stimulation alone. These results, and the upward trend of speech perception benefits to improve over time with advances in speech processing. have raised questions as to whether severely, or severely-to-profoundly deaf children currently using hearing aids would in fact benefit more from a cochlear implant. To investigate the potential effect of the level of preoperative residual hearing on postoperative speech perception. results for all implanted children in the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant programs were analysed. Results showed that as 8 group, children with higher levels of preoperative residual hearing were consistently more likely to achieve open-set speech perception benefits. Potential factors in this finding could be higher levels of ganglion cell survival or greater patterning of the auditory pathways using conventional hearing aids prior to implantation. Conversely, children with the least preoperative residual hearing were less predictable, with some children achieving open-set perception, and others showing more limited closed-set benefits to perception. For these children, it is likely that preoperative residual hearing is of less significance than other factors in outcomes.
-
ItemPre- & post-operative factors affecting speech perception in adult cochlear implant users( 1997)A common feature of published studies of cochlear implantation is a very wide range of performance levels within a group of patients. It is well-established that preoperative factors including duration of deafness, age at implantation, duration of implant use and etiology can have statistically significant effects on speech perception with a cochlear implant, but they do not account for a very high proportion of the variance within groups of implant users. The biological basis for these effects is not well established. For example, it is unclear whether the effect of duration of deafness is due to a decrease in the number of surviving ganglion cells in the cochlea, to the detailed distribution of functional neurons within the cochlea, to degeneration of nerve function at higher auditory centers, to plastic neural effects during deafness, or to a combination of all of these mechanisms. Data for other factors may cast some light on these possibilities.