Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9
-
ItemSpeech perception in implanted children: influence of preoperative residual hearing on outcomes [Abstract]( 1998)Since the first child was implanted with the Nucleus 22-channel prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, several thousand children world-wide have now benefitted from this technology. More effective paediatric assessment and management procedures have now been developed, allowing cochlear implants to be offered to children under the age of 2 years. Improvements in speech processing strategy have also been implemented in the Nucleus implant system, resulting in increased mean speech perception benefits for implanted adults. Although a range of performance on formal measures of hearing, speech or language has been reported for children using implants, results from the first decade of implant experience consistently show that significant benefits are available to children receiving their implant at an early age. Reported speech perception results for implanted children show that a considerable proportion (60%) of paediatric patients in the Melbourne and Sydney clinics are able to understand some open-set speech using electrical stimulation alone. These results, and the upward trend of mean speech perception benefits shown for postlinguistically deafened adults have raised questions as to whether severely, or severely-to-profoundly deaf children currently using hearing aids would in fact benefit more from a cochlear implant. To investigate the potential influence of the degree of preoperative residual hearing on postoperative speech perception, results for all implanted children in the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant programs were analysed. Results showed that as a group, children with higher levels of preoperative residual hearing were consistently more likely to achieve open-set speech perception benefits. Potential factors in this finding could be higher levels of ganglion cell survival or greater patterning of the auditory pathways using conventional hearing aids prior to implantation. Conversely, children with the least preoperative residual hearing were less predictable, with some children achieving open-set perception, and others showing more limited closed-set benefits to perception. For these children, it is likely that preoperative residual hearing is of less significance than other factors in outcomes.
-
ItemMultichannel auditory brainstem implants: an Australian case study [Abstract]( 1996)The multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is an implantable device designed to restore a level of auditory perception in patients with bilateral acoustic neuromas, where the removal of the tumours is expected to result in a total loss of hearing. As with the cochlear implant, the ABI utilises an externally worn speech processor and headset, together with a surgically-placed receiver-stimulator and electrode array. The electrode array, developed through the collaboration of the House Ear Institute in the United States and Cochlear Corporation, consists of eight electrodes on a carrier, which is placed on the surface of the brainstem in the area of the cochlear nucleus.
-
ItemCurrent trends in speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant patients [Abstract]( 1996)In 1994, Cochlear Pty. Ltd. (Now Cochlear Limited) released a new speech processor, the Spectra 22, for use with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. The Spectra 22 speech processor incorporates a new speech processing strategy called SPEAK, which is based upon research conducted by the University of Melbourne. This paper reports post-operative scores on open-set word and sentence materials for adult patients in the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic who have been started up with the Spectra 22 speech processor.
-
ItemSpeech perception in people with a severe hearing loss: preliminary results [Abstract]( 1996)Recent improvements in multichannel cochlear implants have led to improved speech perception for people with profound hearing impairments. Given this improvement, it has been suggested that some people with severe hearing impairments would be more successful with a cochlear implant than a hearing aid. Unfortunately little research exists to support the suitability of cochlear implants for these individuals. In order to determine this, a detailed investigation of the aided performance of people with severe hearing losses is being conducted at The University of Melbourne (School of Audiology). Severe hearing loss was defined as a pure tone average of greater than 60dBHL, but no worse that 100dBSPL in the better ear. At present, 15 participants have taken part in this study and their results will be discussed. Each participant took part in a standard audiometric assessment which included an audiogram, AB words, tympanometry with acoustic reflexes and an ABR. Each participant’s hearing aids were assessed to make sure that they were optimally aided. Following the hearing aid evaluation the participants took part in a series of traditional speech perception tests which included 24 consonant recognition, 11 vowel recognition, CNC words, CUNY sentences, and the Connected Speech Test (CSTv2). Other tests of speech perception were conducted which looked at the effects of different types of background noise, amounts of reverberation, rates of speech and amount of available context. The aim of this was to better simulate “real-life” listening conditions. Consequently, a range of results for both traditional assessments of speech perception and simulated listening conditions will be presented and compared.
-
ItemSpeech perception for hearing aid users versus cochlear implantees [Abstract]( 1996)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemSpeech perception for children with different levels of residual hearing using the cochlear 22-channel cochlear prosthesis [Abstract[( 1996)Over the past 10 years, since the implantation of the first children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne, the number of profoundly deaf children using this implant system has rapidly expanded. Longer-term experience with implanted children has led to improvements in paediatric assessment and management. Speech processing strategies have also been improved, resulting in a series of increases in speech perception benefits. Results of comparative studies of Speak and Multipeak speech processing strategies have shown that open-set word and sentence scores for a group of thirteen children evaluated over a two year period showed an advantage with the Speak speech processing strategy. The increases were noted particularly in speech perception in poor signal-to-noise conditions. Analysis has shown that consonant perception was significantly increased, due to an improved place perception. Given current speech perception scores for implanted children, it has been suggested that severely-to-profoundly deaf children currently using hearing aids could in fact benefit more from a cochlear implant. Preliminary investigation of results for children in the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant programs has shown that children with higher levels of preoperative residual hearing as a group do score significantly on open-set word and sentence perception tests using the implant alone. In children with lower levels of residual hearing, results were variable across the group.
-
ItemPreoperative residual hearing as a predictor of postoperative speech scores for adult cochlear implant users [Abstract]( 1994)The development of multiple channel cochlear implants has been a significant advance in the rehabilitation of profound hearing loss. Speech perception benefits have been particularly evident for postlinguistically deafened adults, who as a group have shown not only supplementation of lipreading scores but also significant comprehension of words and sentences using an implant alone, without the aid of lipreading. In many cases, patients are able to use their implant for telephone conversation. Speech perception benefits for adult users have increased with advances in speech processing and improved means of habilitation. These improvements in open-set speech benefits for adult users have resulted in a steady increase in group mean scores and a reevaluation of selection criteria for cochlear implantation. In the initial development of cochlear implants, only those with little or no residual hearing were considered as candidates. Current selection criteria now include those with substantial residual hearing, who may score up to 40% in the best-aided condition on word and sentence speech perception tests. In order to provide realistic expectations for prospective cochlear implant patients, it is important to establish the relationship of many preimplant factors to postimplant speech perception benefits. For severely hearing impaired adults, the relationship between preoperative residual hearing, as measured by aided word and sentence speech perception test scores, and postoperative speech perception benefits is of significant interest. Analysis of data collected over a 15 year period for adult patients is presented. The rationale for conducting full speech perception assessments for all potential cochlear implant patients is stressed.
-
ItemSpeech perception differences between adults with a substantial hearing impairment and users of multiple-channel cochlear implant [Abstract]( 1998)Decent improvements in the performance of users of multiple-channel cochlear implants has led to speculation that people with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing impairment, may achieve better speech perception with a cochlear implant than with conventional hearing aids. In order to investigate this possibility a detailed investigation of the aided performance of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing impairment was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology (University of Melbourne). In total thirty-four adults took part in the speech perception tests. To aid statistical analysis and to facilitate discussion, the participants were divided into a severe group (61-80 dB HL) (n = 20) and a severe-to-profound group (81-100 dB HL,) (n = 14). All participants took part in a range of speech perception measures including closed-set vowel and consonant tests, open-set word (CNC) tests, and open-set sentence (CUNY) tests (in quiet conditions and in presence of +10 dB SNR background noise). Comparisons of mean scores were made between the adults with a severe or severe-to profound hearing impairment and a comparable group of multiple channel cochlear implant users. The results indicated that there were significant differences between the groups and that many of these differences were dependent on the types of tests used. Additional discussion will take place regarding the issues involved in providing multiple-channel cochlear implants to adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing impairment.
-
ItemSpeech recognition in adults with a severe hearing impairment [Abstract]( 1998)Adults with a severe hearing impairment comprise between 11.0% and 13.5% of the hearing-impaired population. From the perspective of audiological rehabilitation, understanding their difficulties offers many challenges. To investigate this population, a detailed investigation of the speech recognition of adults with severe hearing loss (N = 34) was conducted at The University of Melbourne. For the purposes of this study severe hearing impairment was defined as an average loss in the better ear of between 61 and 100 dB HL. Each participant took part in a series of speech recognition tasks while wearing their currently fitted hearing aids. The assessments included closed-set tests of consonant recognition and vowel recognition, combined with open-set tests of consonant recognition and vowel recognition, combined with open-set tests of monosyllabic word recognition, sentence recognition and the Connected Speech Test version 2 (CSTv2). Tests at the sentence level were also conducted in background noise (four-talkers superimposed) to replicate environments more typical of everyday listening conditions. Investigation of the results indicated a wide variability in performance between the participants on each of the speech perception measures. There were, however, some general trends which could be observed. As expected vowels were generally well perceived compared with consonants. Monosyllabic word recognition scores for the participants could be predicted from the segmental tests with an allowance for lexical effects. Scores for sentences presented in quiet showed additional linguistic effects and a significant decrease (p < .05) in performance with the addition of background noise. Additionally, the CSTv2 provided further insights into speech perception processes through the addition of further facilitative context. Discussion will also take place regarding the processes involved in speech perception and whether this population, despite severe auditory handicap are able to utilise restricted auditory input for higher level lexical processes.