Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9
-
ItemCochlear implants in adults and children: comment( 1997)This is a well-written review of the NIH Consensus report on cochlear implants for adults and children.
-
ItemControl strategies for neurons modelled by self-exciting point processes [Abstract]( 1995)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemCurrent trends in speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant patients [Abstract]( 1996)In 1994, Cochlear Pty. Ltd. (Now Cochlear Limited) released a new speech processor, the Spectra 22, for use with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. The Spectra 22 speech processor incorporates a new speech processing strategy called SPEAK, which is based upon research conducted by the University of Melbourne. This paper reports post-operative scores on open-set word and sentence materials for adult patients in the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic who have been started up with the Spectra 22 speech processor.
-
ItemThe importance of different frequency bands to the speech perception of cochlear implantees [Abstract]( 1996)It is well known that cochlear implantees exhibit a wide range of speech perception ability. Understanding the reason for this variability may lead to improved speech processors. This study investigates whether implantees rely on different areas of the speech spectrum for speech cues, compared to normally hearing listeners, and whether poor performers rely on different spectral areas than better performers. Six subjects with the Mini System 22 implant and using the SPEAK strategy participated in this experiment. Scores for monosyllabic words were obtained using the full speech spectrum and with selected frequency bands removed from the subjects’ speech processor maps. The Articulation Index (AI) is a measure of the proportion of speech information available to a listener, and the relative contribution to AI from different frequency bands is termed the Importance Function. The five frequency bands studied in this experiment were determined to be of equal importance to normally hearing listeners for the speech material used. The scores for each implantee were transformed into AI values, and hence the relative importance of the bands was determined. This relative importance was compared between the implantee group and normally hearing listeners to determine the way in which speech perception by electrical stimulation varies from that by acoustical stimulation. Comparisons were also made between individual implantees to determine whether correlations exist between their speech perception ability and their use of cues in different parts of the spectrum. Further research will determine whether the differences among implantees are correlated with their ability to perceive changes in stimulation place or temporal characteristics.
-
ItemA training program for use with multichannel speech perception/production tactile devices [Abstract]( 1996)Over the past ten years, there have been remarkable improvements in both conventional hearing aid technology and in the use of multichannel cochlear prostheses. These developments have resulted in improved speech perception for severely and profoundly hearing impaired adults and children. However, a small number of adults and children remain unable to benefit from either of these prosthetic approaches. This may occur as a result of medical/surgical issues, which render implantation unfeasible, or from a decision by the patient or parents that the device is inappropriate for the individual person. In these cases, use of a supplemental speech perception device employing the intact tactile modality has been advocated. A number of single and multichannel devices have been developed, both commercially and in the laboratory. One of these, the Tickle Talker, a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, has been developed and thoroughly evaluated with both adults and children at the University of Melbourne. Benefits to speech perception have been noted on both closed-set phonemic discrimination tests, and on open-set word and sentence scores, where the device was used to supplement lipreading and/or aided residual hearing. Benefits to articulation have also been noted. Recently, improved speech processing and the design of a new electrode handset have been implemented. While these factors are important to device acceptance, the critical factor in improving speech perception and production appears to be the training program which is employed with the device. The program must be based on the information available through the device, but organised to emphasize the integration of tactually-encoded speech information into open-set understanding of words and sentences if communication is to be improved. The important elements of the program will be discussed. At present, no tactile device is able to provide sufficient information for open-set speech understanding using only the tactile input. While this may be an ultimate goal, significant periods of training may be required to achieve this outcome.
-
ItemSpeech perception in people with a severe hearing loss: preliminary results [Abstract]( 1996)Recent improvements in multichannel cochlear implants have led to improved speech perception for people with profound hearing impairments. Given this improvement, it has been suggested that some people with severe hearing impairments would be more successful with a cochlear implant than a hearing aid. Unfortunately little research exists to support the suitability of cochlear implants for these individuals. In order to determine this, a detailed investigation of the aided performance of people with severe hearing losses is being conducted at The University of Melbourne (School of Audiology). Severe hearing loss was defined as a pure tone average of greater than 60dBHL, but no worse that 100dBSPL in the better ear. At present, 15 participants have taken part in this study and their results will be discussed. Each participant took part in a standard audiometric assessment which included an audiogram, AB words, tympanometry with acoustic reflexes and an ABR. Each participant’s hearing aids were assessed to make sure that they were optimally aided. Following the hearing aid evaluation the participants took part in a series of traditional speech perception tests which included 24 consonant recognition, 11 vowel recognition, CNC words, CUNY sentences, and the Connected Speech Test (CSTv2). Other tests of speech perception were conducted which looked at the effects of different types of background noise, amounts of reverberation, rates of speech and amount of available context. The aim of this was to better simulate “real-life” listening conditions. Consequently, a range of results for both traditional assessments of speech perception and simulated listening conditions will be presented and compared.
-
ItemSpeech perception for hearing aid users versus cochlear implantees [Abstract]( 1996)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemThe perception of electrodes by cochlear implant patients who became deaf early in life [Abstract]( 1994)Two separate studies measuring the perception of differences in site of electrode stimulation were conducted with cochlear implant patients who became deaf early in life. The multiple-electrode prosthesis manufactured by Cochlear Pty. Limited was used. Two of the possible mechanisms for the discrimination of different electrodes are pitch and loudness. The first study measured the discrimination of different electrodes using two procedures which minimised the influences of loudness cues on performance. In the first procedure, the stimulation patterns were symmetric sweeps across electrodes. The reference stimuli were apical-basal trajectories and the comparison stimuli were basal-apical trajectories. The electric stimulation levels were the same in the reference and comparison stimuli because the same electrodes were used in the trajectories. In the second procedure, the stimulation patterns used randomised variations in electric stimulation levels on the different electrodes. By randomly varying the loudness of the stimuli in a discrimination task, the patient is required to listen for more salient cues such as pitch. Both procedures gave comparable results. The second study was concerned with the estimation of order in percepts for stimulation on the different electrodes along the array which was related to the tonotopic order of the cochlea. Approximately half of the early-deafened patients tested revealed a tonotopic order in percepts which was comparable to that obtained from postlinguistically deafened adults.
-
ItemSpeech perception differences between adults with a substantial hearing impairment and users of multiple-channel cochlear implant [Abstract]( 1998)Decent improvements in the performance of users of multiple-channel cochlear implants has led to speculation that people with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing impairment, may achieve better speech perception with a cochlear implant than with conventional hearing aids. In order to investigate this possibility a detailed investigation of the aided performance of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing impairment was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology (University of Melbourne). In total thirty-four adults took part in the speech perception tests. To aid statistical analysis and to facilitate discussion, the participants were divided into a severe group (61-80 dB HL) (n = 20) and a severe-to-profound group (81-100 dB HL,) (n = 14). All participants took part in a range of speech perception measures including closed-set vowel and consonant tests, open-set word (CNC) tests, and open-set sentence (CUNY) tests (in quiet conditions and in presence of +10 dB SNR background noise). Comparisons of mean scores were made between the adults with a severe or severe-to profound hearing impairment and a comparable group of multiple channel cochlear implant users. The results indicated that there were significant differences between the groups and that many of these differences were dependent on the types of tests used. Additional discussion will take place regarding the issues involved in providing multiple-channel cochlear implants to adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing impairment.