Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11
-
ItemPotential and limitations of cochlear implants in children( 1995)Multiple-channel cochlear implants have been in use with children and adolescents for 8 years. The speech perception, speech production, and language of many of these children has been investigated in some detail.l-4 There have been many predictions about factors that may affect the performance of children with implants. For instance, it has been suggested that children with a congenital loss of hearing would not have the same potential to benefit from a cochlear implant as those with an acquired loss. Similarly, it has been suggested that younger children are likely to gain more benefit from a cochlear implant because of the effect of various critical ages for language learning.5 As more results have become available, it has been our observation that the performance of any particular child with a cochlear implant does not appear to follow well-defined rules, and that generalizations about the potential of certain groups of children are likely to encounter many exceptions. We now have a large quantity of results for children using cochlear implants, and it may be possible to determine some of the factors that have a significant effect on performance. This paper will attempt to identify some of these factors by reviewing speech perception results for 100 children implanted with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Australia and speech perception results for adult patients. This analysis will use an "information processing" model of a child using a cochlear implant. That is, we will assume that a child will benefit from a cochlear implant in terms of speech perception, production, and language development, if he or she receives a maximal amount of auditory information from the environment, and is able to process this information successfully. This model divides potential limiting or predictive factors into those that affect the information presented to the auditory system (eg, implant technology, surviving auditory neurons) and those that affect the processing of this information (eg, development of central auditory pathways, amount and consistency of auditory input).
-
ItemVowel imitation task: results over time for 28 cochlear implant children under the age of eight years( 1995)With increasing numbers of implanted children under the age of 4 years, numerous researchers have reminded us of the need for valid, sensitive, and reliable tests of developing speech perception.1,2 In addition to studies of the efficacy of implanted prostheses, there is a need to investigate the many variables that influence children's communicative performance, such as changes in speech-coding strategy, updated speech-processing systems, the effects of various training regimens, and the selection of educational and communication modes.
-
ItemImproved electrotactile speech processor: Tickle Talker( 1995)The Tickle Talker, an eight-channel electrotactile speech processor, has been developed from continuing research at the University of Melbourne. 'The development of the device has focused on production of reliable speech-processing hardware, design of cosmetically and ergonometrically acceptable electrode transducers, implementation of acute and chronic biomedical studies demonstrating device safety, design and testing of alternative speech-encoding strategies to provide benefit to speech perception and production, and design and testing of appropriate training methods for optimizing benefits. The Tickle Talker has been shown to provide benefits in supplementing lipreading or aided residual hearing for hearing-impaired adults and children. Improvements in speech processing have resulted in an increase in benefits to speech perception, and open the way for more flexible approaches to encoding speech input. Continuing development of the electrode circuitry has now produced a device that is robust and has an extended battery life. Safety studies have clearly demonstrated that there are no long-term contraindications to device use. The results suggest that the device has a role to play in rehabilitation programs for severely and profoundly hearing-impaired adults and children.
-
ItemSpeech perception, production and language results in a group of children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant( 1992)Five children out of a group of nine (aged 5.5 to 19.9 years) implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Ply. Ltd.) have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores for monosyllabic words ranged from 40% to 72%. Word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these five children were implanted during preadolescence. The fifth child, who had a progressive loss and was implanted during adolescence after a short period of very profound deafness, scored highest on all speech perception tests. The remaining four children who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted during adolescence after a long duration of profound deafness. Post-operative performance on closed-set speech perception tests was better than pre-operative performance for all children. Improvements in speech and language assessments were also noted. These improvements tended to be greater for the younger children. The results are discussed with reference to variables which may contribute to successful implant use: such as age at onset, duration of profound hearing loss, age at implantation, aetiology, educational program, and the type of training provided.
-
ItemComparison of current speech coding strategies( 1993)This paper reports on two studies carried out at the University of Melbourne jointly with Cochlear Pty Ltd. The studies demonstrated substantial speech perception improvements over the current Multipeak strategy in background noise.
-
ItemRehabilitation strategies for adult cochlear implant users(Monduzzi Editore, 1997)This paper summarizes open-set speech perception results using audition alone for a large group of adult Nucleus cochlear implant users in Melbourne. The results show wide variation in performance but significant improvement over the years from 1982 to 1995. Analysis of these results shows that speech processor developments have made the major contribution to this improvement over this time. Recent results for patients using the SPECTRA-SPEAK processor show !hat most subjects obtain good speech perception within six months of implantation and the need for intensive auditory training is minimal for many of these patients. Postoperative care should encourage consistent device use by providing opportunities for success and providing long term technical support for implant users. In some cases, including elderly patients, those with long term profound deafness, and those with special needs, there will still be a need for additional rehabilitation and auditory training support.
-
ItemFactors affecting outcomes in children with cochlear implants(Monduzzi Editore, 1997)Open-set speech perception tests were completed for a group of 52 children and adolescents who were long-term users of the Nucleus multiple channel cochlear prosthesis. Results showed mean scores for the group of 32.4% for open-set BKE sentences and 48.1% for phonemes in open-set monosyllabic words. Over 80% of the group performed significantly on these tas1cs. Age at implantation was identified as a significant factor affecting speech perception performance with improved scores for children implanted early. This factor was evident in the results at least down to the age of three years. Duration.. of profound hearing loss, progressive hearing loss, educational program and preoperative residual hearing were also identified as significant factors that may affect speech perception performance.
-
ItemThe effect of language knowledge on speech perception: what are we really assessing? [Abstract]( 1996)It is a common finding that many hearing-impaired children have poorer language skills than their normally-hearing peers of the same age. It is also logical to assume that the measurement of open-set speech perception in children with cochlear implants could be affected by limited receptive vocabulary and syntactic knowledge. Therefore, we may be significantly underestimating the speech perception abilities of some hearing-impaired children.
-
ItemFuture developments in speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants in children [Abstract]( 1992)The average speech perception score for adult implant patients is now about 60% on an open-set sentence test without lipreading. This is higher than the scores obtained by many profound and severe-to-profoundly impaired hearing aid users. This suggests that some hearing aid users, particularly those who use a hearing aid in one ear only, could benefit from a cochlear implant. As neither the implant nor the hearing aid will provide perfect speech recognition it is to be expected that this group should obtain maximum benefit by using the hearing aid in one ear together with the implant in the other ear. However, experience with this group of patients has shown that many people find the use of two independent devices unacceptable. Furthermore, perceptual interaction of the acoustic and electrical signals makes it desirable to be able to control the two outputs in a more co-ordinated way than is possible with two independent devices. Consequently, a "bimodal" speech processor has been developed with both acoustic and electrical outputs controlled from the same speech processing unit. Feature coding aspects of the implant processing have been applied to the acoustic signal in such a way as to enhance speech perception with the hearing aid and improve compatibility with the implant. Initial testing with the bimodal aid shows promise to help severely-to-profoundly impaired individuals. The device has also been useful as a research tool to investigate the complex interactions of simultaneous acoustic and electrical stimulation. The Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) has also been developed at the University of Melbourne for use with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Studies with adult subjects have shown improved perception of vowels, consonants, words and sentences in quiet and sentences in background noise with the SMSP as compared with the MSP(MULTIPEAK) which is currently supplied for use with this implant. Results for four subjects showed mean scores for open set sentences at a 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio of 78.7% for the SMSP and 50.0% for the MSP. Mean scores for the same group on open set monosyllabic words in quiet were 57.4% for SMSP and 39.9% for MSP. These results suggest that future improvements in speech perception will be possible for children using the Nucleus cochlear implant.
-
ItemFactors affecting speech perceptual performance for children using the 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis [Abstract]( 1992)Speech perception results for all 40 children and adolescents implanted with the. Nucleus 22 electrode cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne (as of February 1, 1992) were used to categorize performance for each child into one of six hierarchical groups: 1: detection of speech including high frequencies 2: discrimination of suprasegmental features of speech in addition to 1,3: discrimination and recognition of .vowel sounds in addition to 1 and 2,.4: discrimination arid recognition of consonant sounds in addition to 1, 2 and 3,5: open set speech. recognition with scores less than 20% for unfamiliar material in addition to 1 to 4,6: open set speech recognition with scores greater than 20% for unfamiliar material in addition to 1 to 5, above.All children demonstrated discrimination of suprasegmentals (level 2) and 58% demonstrated some openset speech recognition (levels 5 and 6). The pattern of results suggested that children who can discriminate segmental features of speech tend to achieve open set speech perception after adequate experience with the prosthesis. The performance level, described above, was used as the dependent variable in a multiple regression analysis to assess the effect of various factors on speech perception performance. The duration of profound hearing impairment and the amount of experience with the prosthesis were shown to contribute significantly to the variance, in performance level. A weaker trend was evident (or recently implanted children which may suggest that those' in oral/aural educational settings progress more rapidly, in terms of speech perception, than those in total communication settings. Age at implantation, cause of deafness, hearing levels prior to implantation, and number of electrodes in use, did not contribute significantly. to the variance in speech perception performance for these children. The results showed that all children with less than seven years of profound hearing impairment and with over one year of experience with the prosthesis have achieved some open-set speech recognition. This is an encouraging result as the trend in clinical application of cochlear prostheses has been towards implanting younger children in recent years. If this sample of hearing-impaired children in Melbourne is representative of the general population, we may expect that most implanted young children will ,develop reasonable speech perception skills after adequate experience and training.