Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10
-
ItemThe effect of language ability and residual hearing on speech perception outcomes for older children using multichannel cochlear implants [Abstract]( 2002)Early-deafened teenagers or young adults have shown somewhat disappointing performance with cochlear implants in the past, however, in recent years a proportion of older children have demonstrated excellent speech perception performance. There is a great deal of variability in speech perception performance within this group. It is important to investigate the factors influencing performance so that adolescents and their families can make informed decisions regarding cochlear implant surgery. This study considered a number of possible predictive factors in a group of 25 children implanted in Melbourne between the ages of 8 and 18 years. Subjects completed open set speech perception testing using BKB sentences both pre-and postoperatively, and pre-operative language testing using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Data were collected regarding the type of hearing loss, age at implant, age at hearing aid fitting, audiometric details, and the pre-and post-operative communication mode. Multivariate analysis suggested that three factors were associated with postoperative speech perception performance. Results were improved for subjects with better pre-operative speech perception, better pre-operative language ability, and when the duration of profound hearing loss was shorter. These three factors accounted for 66% of the variance in this group. The results of this study suggest that children who have useful pre-implant speech perception, and higher age-equivalent scores on language measures, would be expected to do well with a cochlear implant. A shorter duration of profound hearing loss is also advantageous. Mean speech perception scores for the older group were not significantly different from younger children.
-
ItemThe effects of post-implant habilitation on long-term outcomes for children using multichannel cochlear implants [Abstract]( 2002)Those working in the cochlear implant field advocate a regular habilitation program for young children receiving implants. Developing auditory skills and the incorporating these into general language development are considered to be key areas for such programs. Investigations of speech perception and language outcomes have demonstrated that the emphasis of spoken language development appears to enhance the results for implanted children. It remains difficult, however, to demonstrate the effect of habilitation as a separate factor and to determine how much individual attention is desirable for each child. This preliminary study considered the long term speech perception and language outcomes for two groups of children who received Nucleus cochlear implants in Melbourne. The first group (n = 17) was identified as receiving regular habilitation from the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic over a four year post-operative period. A second group (n = 11) was identified as receiving very little regular habilitation over the post-operative period. Language and speech perception results for these two groups showed significant differences in performance on a wide range of measures. The group who received regular, formal habilitation demonstrated better performance on all measures. These groups included only congenitally, profoundly hearing- impaired children and did not differ significantly on mean age at implant or experience at the time of assessment. A more comprehensive study is needed to clarify these results on a larger group of children, and to control for additional confounding variables. Nonetheless, these results provide support for the incorporation of regular long-term habilitation into cochlear implant programs for children.
-
ItemPredicting speech perception results for children using multichannel cochlear implants [Abstract]( 2002)It is most helpful in counselling families considering cochlear implantation to have some ability to predict outcomes for individual hearing-impaired children. Speech perception results for open-set words and sentences have been collected for all children implanted with the Nucleus device in Melbourne. Assessments are available at approximately six month intervals following implantation, Data was collected for each child regarding type of hearing loss, duration and age at onset of profound hearing loss, age at implantation, pre and post-implant communication mode, developmental delay, speech coding scheme and implant experience. These data were used as predictor variables in step-wise multiple linear regression analyses with the speech perception scores as the dependent variables. Shorter duration of profound hearing loss, later onset of profound hearing loss, exclusively oral communication mode following implantation, and longer implant experience were associated with significantly (p < 0.00 I) improved open-set speech perception. The use of the SPEAK signal coding scheme was shown to provide significantly better speech perception performance for children (p < 0.00 I). Developmental delay was associated with poorer speech perception outcomes (p < 0.0 I). Over 50% of the variance in speech perception scores was accounted for by these variables. The study suggests that younger implantation for congenitally deaf children leads to improved speech perception results. On the other hand, the development of auditory language skills in implanted children may be as important as age at implantation in enhancing long term outcomes. Regression equations derived from these results can be used to predict outcomes for cochlear implant candidates with a reasonable accuracy.
-
ItemCochlear implants: a personal scientific journey [Abstract]( 2002)Electrical stimulation of the auditory system to reproduce hearing commenced through academic curiosity, and the hope of helping deaf people. It received direction from neurophysiology, and later psychophysics and speech science. In the 1960s and 1970s there were many questions requiring answers before cochlear implants could become a practical reality. Key concerns were: (1) the cochlea was too complex for electrical stimulation to reproduce the coding of sound; (2) multiple electrodes inserted into the cochlea for the place coding of frequency could damage the auditory nerves to be stimulated; (3) speech was too complex to be reproduced by electrical stimulation; and (4) children born deaf would not develop the appropriate neural connectivity for speech understanding. The first questions were addressed on the experimental animal. Speech research on patients was only possible with the advent of silicon chip technology allowing the development of an implantable receiver-stimulator package. Initial research established proof of principle that connected discourse was possible with multiple electrode stimulation of the auditory nerve in severely and profoundly deaf people. The research has been developed industrially for the benefits to be provided on a widespread basis through clinics worldwide. Further research has resulted in continuing improvements so that the average profoundly deaf person can hear as well as someone with severe hearing loss using a hearing aid. There is still much research required to achieve high fidelity sound, hearing in noise, and totally implantable devices.
-
ItemHistopathology of the binaural cochlear implant subject [Abstract]( 2001)Binaural hearing improves speech reception in noise, and is necessary for sound localisation. Normal hearing subjects use both interaural time, and intensity, differences to localise sound. This study investigates why sound localisation in bilateral cochlear implantees is insensitive to interaural time differences (Hoesel 1993). We looked for evidence of neural degeneration in the auditory brainstem involved in binaural sound localisation, since this may have degraded the neural circuitry required to accurately code interaural time delays. Method: The brainstem of a bilateral cochlear implantee was prepared for light microscopy by embedding it in paraffin, sectioning at 10 mm and staining sections with thionine or Luxol fast blue (LFB). The histological sections were digitised with NIH Image and 3-dimensional reconstructions made of the cochlear nucleus (CN) and superior olivary complex (SOC) with AnalysePC. Within the CN and the SOC, cell number and size were estimated by the physical dissector technique following thionine staining, and myelination of the nerve fibres was estimated using the optical density method following LFB staining. Results: A reduction in cell size (from thionine staining) and myelination (from LFB staining) was seen in both the CN and the SOC. Conclusions: These finding are consistent with neural degeneration within the auditory pathways. This may have lead to a degradation of the neural circuitry required to accurately detect interaural time delays.
-
ItemCochlear implants: climbing new mountains (The Graham Fraser memorial lecture)( 2001)This 7th annual lecture was given as a special tribute to Graham Fraser (Figure 1). His enthusiasm, drive and constant search to find new ways to help deaf people, particularly with cochlear implants, has been most impressive. I remember with affection the visit Graham and his wife, Pat, made to Melbourne in 1992. There were lively discussions the past and future of cochlear implants. He would have had much to say about the new directors for the next decade. I hope to summarize some of those possibilities, and will refer in particular to research at our centres in Melbourne.
-
ItemShort-term auditory memory in children using cochlear implants and its relevance to receptive language [Abstract]( 2000)Current work indicates that many children using cochlear implants are able to hear fine differences between speech sounds but are not progressing as wel1 as expected in receptive language ability. There is anecdotal evidence from teachers that some children using cochlear implants have poor short-term auditory memory ability, which may be impeding their language development. Temporal ordering and short-term memory storage capacity involve higher order processing. Severe auditory deprivation prior to implantation may have caused auditory processing deficits at a cortical level. This study aims to assess short-term, sequential, auditory memory ability in children using cochlear implants and to determine the relationship between this ability and receptive language ability. Short-term auditory memory ability has not been previously investigated in profoundly deaf children using hearing aids and/or cochlear implants. Twenty-four children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant were tested on five short-term sequential memory tasks, three with auditory stimuli and two with visual stimuli. There were 8 children in each of the age groups; 5-6 years, 7-8 years, and 9-11 years. Twenty-four age-matched, normally hearing children served as a control group. Al1 children were also assessed on the receptive subtests of the CELF (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals) and on the nonverbal scale of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) which measures nonverbal intelligence. This study assessed short-term auditory memory with tasks that required minimal language ability. Prior to the memory tasks, the child had to demonstrate accurate identification of the stimuli with a similar reaction time to the normally hearing controls. As expected there is a significant effect of age on memory performance for the 24 normally hearing children, with older children performing better than the younger children. The memory performance of the children using cochlear implants is therefore described in terms of its deviation from expected performance for a given chronological age. Preliminary results suggest that it is unlikely that auditory deprivation causes a memory deficit specific to the auditory modality. Performance on visual memory tasks is very similar to performance on analogous auditory memory tasks for a group of implant users. The performance of children using cochlear implants on a variety of memory tasks does not appear to be significantly different to that of normally hearing children who are of similar age and nonverbal intel1igence. In contrast their receptive language scores are substantially inferior.
-
ItemThe cochlear implant: a search for answers( 2000)In 1967, when I commenced cochlear implant research, there was little that could be done to help profoundly deaf people. With normal hearing, sound vibrations are converted by hair cells in the inner ear into electrical signals. These produce temporal and spatial patterns of electrical responses in the auditory pathways. With a profound hearing loss the hair cells are absent, and amplifying sound with a hearing aid provides little help.
-
ItemSpeech perception outcomes for older patients using the nucleus cochlear implant [Abstract]( 2002)With improved medical technology and increased life expectancy, more patients are receiving cochlear implants at a later age. It is important to examine speech perception outcomes for older patients, in order to be able to provide appropriate pre-operative counselling regarding post-operative expectations. Speech perception scores for patients at the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic implanted at age 65 or more were examined, and compared to the adult population implanted under the age of 65. (All of these patients were users of SPEAK or later strategies.) The aims were to see if speech perception scores were significantly different between the two groups as a whole, and to see if a correlation existed between increasing age of implantation above 65 and speech perception scores. Preliminary results suggest that there is a small but significant effect of age on speech perception outcomes. The findings from this study will be used to help clinicians provide more accurate advice and counselling for older patients, regarding the potential outcomes from a cochlear implant.
-
ItemValidation of a technique for establishing maximum comfortable levels for children using cochlear implants [Abstract]( 2002)The aim of fitting a cochlear implant is to establish electrical stimulation parameters that will provide the wearer with comfortable and useful auditory sensations. One parameter that is fundamental to achieving this aim is the Maximum Comfortable Level (C-level). A C-level is the amount of electrical current that produces a loud, but comfortable sound. C-levels need to be established for all channels that a person will use in their speech processor Map. Determining C-levels can be complicated as the person is required to make a judgment about the loudness of a sound. While most adults and older children have the ability to make such a judgment and provide feedback to the clinician, this is rarely the case for young children. Generally, the only way a clinician will be aware a sound could be too loud for a young child is when they observe the child giving an aversive reaction or an involuntary blink. A current level that produces such a reaction is called the Loudness Discomfort Level (LOL). This study examines the relationship between LDLs and C-levels. Testing was performed with a group of adults, using stimulation rates and stimulation modes that are commonly used by children. The LDL/C-level relationship established in this study provides a procedure for selling C-Levels for young children when only loudness discomfort responses can be obtained.