Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemMeningitis after cochlear implantation: the risk is low, and preventive measures can reduce this further( 2007)Since the 1980s, more than 80 000 people have received cochlear implants worldwide. These implants are designed to enable people who are severely or profoundly deaf to experience sound and speech. Since 1990, implantation has become standard treatment for people who cannot communicate effectively despite well fitted hearing aids. Children who are deaf when they are born can perceive sound and learn to speak if they receive cochlear implants at a young age (ideally under 18 months). The use of cochlear implants has been thought to be safe. But since 2002 the number of patients with meningitis related to cochlear implantation has increased worldwide. Mortality and neurological complications after meningitis are high. We need to investigate the reasons for this and look at measures to reduce them.
-
ItemPredicting speech perception results for children using multichannel cochlear implants [Abstract]( 2002)It is most helpful in counselling families considering cochlear implantation to have some ability to predict outcomes for individual hearing-impaired children. Speech perception results for open-set words and sentences have been collected for all children implanted with the Nucleus device in Melbourne. Assessments are available at approximately six month intervals following implantation, Data was collected for each child regarding type of hearing loss, duration and age at onset of profound hearing loss, age at implantation, pre and post-implant communication mode, developmental delay, speech coding scheme and implant experience. These data were used as predictor variables in step-wise multiple linear regression analyses with the speech perception scores as the dependent variables. Shorter duration of profound hearing loss, later onset of profound hearing loss, exclusively oral communication mode following implantation, and longer implant experience were associated with significantly (p < 0.00 I) improved open-set speech perception. The use of the SPEAK signal coding scheme was shown to provide significantly better speech perception performance for children (p < 0.00 I). Developmental delay was associated with poorer speech perception outcomes (p < 0.0 I). Over 50% of the variance in speech perception scores was accounted for by these variables. The study suggests that younger implantation for congenitally deaf children leads to improved speech perception results. On the other hand, the development of auditory language skills in implanted children may be as important as age at implantation in enhancing long term outcomes. Regression equations derived from these results can be used to predict outcomes for cochlear implant candidates with a reasonable accuracy.
-
ItemCochlear implants: a personal scientific journey [Abstract]( 2002)Electrical stimulation of the auditory system to reproduce hearing commenced through academic curiosity, and the hope of helping deaf people. It received direction from neurophysiology, and later psychophysics and speech science. In the 1960s and 1970s there were many questions requiring answers before cochlear implants could become a practical reality. Key concerns were: (1) the cochlea was too complex for electrical stimulation to reproduce the coding of sound; (2) multiple electrodes inserted into the cochlea for the place coding of frequency could damage the auditory nerves to be stimulated; (3) speech was too complex to be reproduced by electrical stimulation; and (4) children born deaf would not develop the appropriate neural connectivity for speech understanding. The first questions were addressed on the experimental animal. Speech research on patients was only possible with the advent of silicon chip technology allowing the development of an implantable receiver-stimulator package. Initial research established proof of principle that connected discourse was possible with multiple electrode stimulation of the auditory nerve in severely and profoundly deaf people. The research has been developed industrially for the benefits to be provided on a widespread basis through clinics worldwide. Further research has resulted in continuing improvements so that the average profoundly deaf person can hear as well as someone with severe hearing loss using a hearing aid. There is still much research required to achieve high fidelity sound, hearing in noise, and totally implantable devices.
-
ItemHistopathology of the binaural cochlear implant subject [Abstract]( 2001)Binaural hearing improves speech reception in noise, and is necessary for sound localisation. Normal hearing subjects use both interaural time, and intensity, differences to localise sound. This study investigates why sound localisation in bilateral cochlear implantees is insensitive to interaural time differences (Hoesel 1993). We looked for evidence of neural degeneration in the auditory brainstem involved in binaural sound localisation, since this may have degraded the neural circuitry required to accurately code interaural time delays. Method: The brainstem of a bilateral cochlear implantee was prepared for light microscopy by embedding it in paraffin, sectioning at 10 mm and staining sections with thionine or Luxol fast blue (LFB). The histological sections were digitised with NIH Image and 3-dimensional reconstructions made of the cochlear nucleus (CN) and superior olivary complex (SOC) with AnalysePC. Within the CN and the SOC, cell number and size were estimated by the physical dissector technique following thionine staining, and myelination of the nerve fibres was estimated using the optical density method following LFB staining. Results: A reduction in cell size (from thionine staining) and myelination (from LFB staining) was seen in both the CN and the SOC. Conclusions: These finding are consistent with neural degeneration within the auditory pathways. This may have lead to a degradation of the neural circuitry required to accurately detect interaural time delays.
-
ItemSpeech perception outcomes for older patients using the nucleus cochlear implant [Abstract]( 2002)With improved medical technology and increased life expectancy, more patients are receiving cochlear implants at a later age. It is important to examine speech perception outcomes for older patients, in order to be able to provide appropriate pre-operative counselling regarding post-operative expectations. Speech perception scores for patients at the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic implanted at age 65 or more were examined, and compared to the adult population implanted under the age of 65. (All of these patients were users of SPEAK or later strategies.) The aims were to see if speech perception scores were significantly different between the two groups as a whole, and to see if a correlation existed between increasing age of implantation above 65 and speech perception scores. Preliminary results suggest that there is a small but significant effect of age on speech perception outcomes. The findings from this study will be used to help clinicians provide more accurate advice and counselling for older patients, regarding the potential outcomes from a cochlear implant.