Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7
-
ItemSpeech perception, production and language results in a group of children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant( 1989)Paper presented at the 118th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America
-
ItemCombining tactile, auditory and visual information for speech perception( 1988)Four normally hearing subjects were trained and tested with all combinations of a highly degraded auditory input, a visual input via lipreading, and a tactile input using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. When the visual input was added to any combination of other inputs, a significant improvement occurred for every test. Similarly, the auditory input produced a significant improvement for all tests except closed-set vowel recognition. The tactile input produced scores that were significantly greater than chance in isolation, but combined less effectively with the other modalities. The less effective combination might be due to lack of training with the tactile input, or to more fundamental limitations in the processing of multimodal stimuli.
-
ItemResults of multiple-electrode cochlear implants in children( 1987)Children in Australia and United States of America are now being implanted with the Nucleus 22 electrode intracochlear prosthesis utilizing the F0/F1F2 coding strategy. A total of 32 adolescents (10-17 years) and 24 preadolescents (2-9 years) have been implanted as of 31 August, 1987. No significant postoperative complications were recorded, the speech processors were successfully programmed, and all are users of the device. For the 56 children, the average length of postoperative stimulation time is 2.8 months. Because the majority of children have such short experience with the device we report herein two children from the University of Melbourne (A) and two children from the United States (U) who have been using the Nucleus system for 12 months or more. Child 1A has only 10 electrodes in the cochlea; therefore, the number of channels programmed for the children is 10, 17, 18 and 18, respectively. Child Al and A2 were deafened by meningitis at 3-3 and 3 years of age, respectively. Child U3 became profoundly deafened from a progressive sensorineural loss at age 11 and Child U4 was deafened by recurrent cochlear hydrops at age 13 years.
-
ItemSignal processing in quiet and noise( 1987)It has been shown that many profoundly deaf patients using multichannel cochlear implants are able to understand significant amounts of conversational speech using the prosthesis without the aid of lipreading. These results are usually obtained under ideal acoustic conditions but, unfortunately, the environments in which the prostheses are most often used are rarely perfect. Some form of competing signal is always present in the urban setting, from other conversations, radio and television, appliances, traffic noise and so on. As might be expected, implant users in general find background noise to be the largest detrimental factor in their understanding of speech, both with and without the aid of lipreading. Recently, some assessment of implant patient performance with competing noise has been attempted using a four-alternative forced-choice spondee test (1) at Iowa University. Similar testing has been carried out at the University of Melbourne with a group of patients using the Nucleus multichannel cochlear prosthesis. This study formed part of an assessment of a two formant (F0/FI/F2) speech coding strategy (2). Results suggested that the new scheme provided improved speech recognition both in quiet and with competing noise. This paper reports on some more detailed investigations into the effects of background noise on speech recognition for multichannel cochlear implant users.
-
ItemA formant-estimating speech processor for cochlear implant patients(Speech Science and Technology Conference, 1986)A simple formant-estimating speech processor has been developed to make use of the "hearing" produced by electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve with a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Thirteen implant patients were trained and evaluated with a processor that presented the second formant frequency, fundamental frequency, and amplitude envelope of the speech. Nine patients were trained and evaluated with a processor that presented the first formant frequency and amplitude as well. The second group performed significantly better in discrimination tasks and word and sentence recognition through hearing alone. The second group also showed a significantly greater improvement when hearing and lipreading was compared with lipreading alone in a speech tracking task.
-
ItemA model of auditory-visual speech perception(Speech Science and Technology Conference, 1986)A mathematical model relating the probabilities of correctly recognizing speech features, phonemes, and words was tested using data from the clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. A monosyllabic word test was presented to the patients in the conditions hearing alone (H), lipreading alone (L), and hearing plus lipreading (HL). The model described the data quite well in each condition. The model was extended to predict the HL scores from the feature recognition probabilities in the H and L conditions. The model may be useful for the evaluation of automatic speech recognition devices as well as hearing impaired people.
-
ItemPsychophysics of multiple-channel stimulation(Raven Press, 1985)Eight patients implanted with multiple-channel cochlear prostheses have displayed good discrimination of sound sensations elicited at different sites within the cochlea. All patients rank the sensations from "sharp" to "dull" in an order which corresponds with basal to apical position in the cochlea. Detailed psychophysical studies have been carried out on two patients. These showed that discrimination of rate of (pulsatile) stimulation is good for frequencies up to 300 Hz and falls off sharply for frequencies above this. Electrode transitions (changes in position along the cochlea) are well discriminated for fast changes (25 msec), whereas rate transitions are not well discriminated for changes faster than 100 msec. From these results a speech processing strategy was formulated where second formant information is mapped to position in the cochlea and fundamental frequency mapped to rate of stimulation. Vowel and consonant confusion studies show consistent results for all patients using this processing strategy. A study involving two electrode stimuli demonstrated the possibility of presenting first formant information in addition to the second formant and fundamental frequency.