Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Peri-modiolar electrode arrays: a comparison of electrode position n the human temporal bone
    Shepherd, R. K. ; Treaba, C. G. ; Cohen, L. ; Pyman, B. ; Huigen, J. ; Xu, J. ; Clark, Graeme M. (Monduzzi Editore, 1997)
    This paper describes a radiologic evaluation of three types of peri-modiolar arrays, comparing their trajectory within the scala tympani with a standard Mini-22 electrode. All peri-modiolar arrays were found to lie closer to the modiolus for much of their insertion length compared with the standard array. While one design showed evidence for the potential of increased insertion trauma, two designs produced satisfactory results. Although further electrode development, temporal bone and histopathologic studies arE required, it would appear that the benefits of peri-modiolar electrode arrays will be realised clinically.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Siting the receiver-stimulator of the CI-24M model of the Cochlear Limited multiple-channel cochlear implant and fixation of its electrode array
    PYMAN, BRIAN ; Clark, Graeme M. (Monduzzi Editore, 1997)
    The correct siting of the cochlear implant receiver-stimulator package is important. The package should not obtrude significantly above the surface of bone, and should be so that blows to the head do not in damage to the package, skull or brain. The cochlear implant electrode array must be fixed at a site close to the cochlea, so that the electrode will not slide out, or be subject to differential movement with growth changes. Fixation, with Dacron® mesh, platinum-iridium ties, or clips, has been in the region of the posterior root of the zygoma and the floor of the antrum. Our research studies demonstrate that a specially-designed collar around the array can be placed through the cochleostomy and provide the necessary locking to prevent retraction of the array. It has a ceramic surround to encourage union with neighbouring bone, and stress relief to reduce wire fracture at the point where the array leaves the cochlea.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Selection of patients for multiple-channel cochlear implantation
    Brown, A. M. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Martin, L. F. A. ; Pyman, B. C. (Raven Press, 1985)
    Only profoundly, bilaterally deaf adults are considered for evaluation. It is necessary to determine that the patient's communication ability cannot be improved to any significant degree with conventional hearing aids currently available. Initial assessment consists of audiometry, hearing aid evaluation(s), otological and medical examination, and for patients with no recent experience with hearing aids, a hearing aid trial. Polytome x-rays of temporal bones is carried out to ensure that cochlea structures are not grossly abnormal. Electrical stimulation of the promontory is used to confirm the presence of residual auditory nerve fibers. Where there is an audiometric difference between ears, the poorer ear is chosen for implantation provided there are no other contraindications. Intensive counselling is carried out to enable patients to make a fully informed decision about implantation. Patients undergo a battery of speech discrimination and lipreading tests with their hearing aid after their hearing aid trial. This is to provide a baseline for comparison with postoperative results and to assess the benefit obtained from the hearing aid. Any significant improvement in test results when using a hearing aid over lipreading alone would be a contraindication for implantation. Medical assessment is carried out as for any major surgery, including pathology, respiratory function tests and cardiovascular assessment. Particular emphasis is placed on infection prevention immediately preoperatively and during surgery.