Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A multiple-electrode cochlear implant
    Clark, Graeme M. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Bailey, Q. R. ; Black, R. C. ; Martin, L. F. ; Millar, J. B. ; O'Loughlin B. J. ; Patrick, J. F. ; Pyman, B. C. ( 1978)
    Interest in artificially stimulating the auditory nerve electrically for sensori-neural deafness was first sparked off by Volta in the 18th century. Count Volta, who was the first to develop the electric battery, connected up a number of his batteries to two metal rods which he inserted into his ears. Having placed the rods in his ears he pressed the switch and received "une secousse dans la tete" and perceived a noise like "the boiling of thick soup".
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech processing for cochlear implants
    Tong, Y. C. ; Millar, J. B. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Patrick, J. F. ; Seligman, P. M. (JAI Press Ltd, 1992)
    The cochlear implant is a hearing prosthesis designed to replace the function of the ear. The operation of the prosthesis can be described as a sequence of four functions: the processing of the acoustic signal received by a microphone; the transfer of the processed signal through the skin; the creation of neural activity in the auditory nerve; and the integration of the experience of this neural activity into the perceptual and cognitive processing of the implantee.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The histopathological effects of chronic electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea
    Shepherd, R. K. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Black, R. C. ; Patrick, J. F. (Cambridge University Press, 1983)
    The success of a cochlear implant depends on stimulating an adequate number of viable spiral ganglion cells. The effect of chronic electrical stimulation on ganglion cells is therefore an important consideration when assessing the effectiveness and safety of such a device. The histopathological assessment of chronic unstimulated intracochlear electrodes is now well documented (Simmons, 1967; Clark, 1973; Clark et al, 1975; Schindler and Merzenich, 1974; Schindler, 1976; Schindler et al, 1977; Sutton et al, 1980). These experimental studies have used a variety of electrode designs, materials and surgical techniques. However, all have shown that chronic implantation has little effect on the peripheral nerves and the spiral ganglion cells adjacent to an implant, provided the insertion procedure is free of trauma and infection.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Current distributions in cochlear stimulation
    Black, R. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Patrick, J. F. ( 1983)
    The success of a multiple-channel cochlear implant depends, in part, on localizing the electrical current to discrete groups of auditory nerve fibers. A number of studies are described that were performed to investigate this issue. First, a three-dimensional resistance model of the normal cat cochlea was developed to examine general properties of electrically stimulating the cochlea. The distribution of the excited nerve fibers for monopolar and bipolar stimulation of the cat scala tympani were then determined. In addition certain measurements of the current distribution within the human cochlea for a pseudobipolar electrode array were performed. Finally, measurements were made in saline-solution-filled tube models of current distributions for bipolar and pseudobipolar stimulation, with both single-electrode and coincident multi-electrode stimulation. (From Introduction)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats
    Shepherd, R. K. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Black, R. C. ; Patrick, J. F. ( 1982)
    One requirement for the success of a cochlear hearing prosthesis is that long-term electrical stimulation must not have adverse effects on the residual spiral ganglion cell population. Electrochemically 'safe' stimulation regimes have been defined for the cortex (Brummer &Turner, 1977). However, few investigators have examined the effects of long-term intracochlear electrical stimulation. Walsh et al (1980), stimulating with current densities greater than the 'safe' limits defined by Brummer &Turner (1977), for periods of up to 800 hours at current levels of 4.0-8.0 mA, recorded slight local neural degeneration adjacent to the electrodes.