Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11
-
ItemAn analysis of high rate speech processing strategies using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant [Abstract]( 1998)The effects of varying the stimulation rate on speech perception was evaluated in five postlinguistically deaf adult users of the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System. Three different rates of electrical stimulation, 250, 807, and 1615 pulses per second per channel were employed. For the high stimulus rate the analysis frequency was the same as for the medium rate condition. The study investigated the effect of varying rate of stimulation when using the electrode selection technique of the SPEAK strategy. The study used a repeated ABC experimental design, in order to account for learning effects and to minimize ordering effects. Speech perception was evaluated using both monosyllabic words (open-sets of CNC words in quiet) and sentence materials (open-sets of CUNY sentences at signal-to-noise ratios from +20 to 0dB). In addition, the subjects' perception of closed-sets of 19 vowels and 24 consonants, presented in the H/VID and A/C/A context, were also investigated. The recognition and perception of distinctive features were assessed across strategies and patients. Preliminary speech perception results have shown no statistically significant difference in performance between the low and medium stimulation rates. However, significantly poorer results were observed for the high rate condition for some tests with some individuals. Individual differences may be explained by the effects of rate of stimulation on speech features.
-
ItemFactors influencing gap detection in children using cochlear implants [Abstract]( 1998)Two studies on gap detection were conducted with children implanted with the Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode prosthesis. In the first study, gap thresholds were measured at three pulse rates (200, 500, and 1000 pulses/s) and two stimulus durations (500 and 1000 ms) in 15 subjects. Average gap thresholds ranged from 1.8 to 32.1 ms. There was, essentially, no effect of pulse rate and in all but two subjects, no effect of stimulus duration. For these two subjects, thresholds were higher for the 1000 ms stimulus duration. In the second study, the relationships between gap thresholds and subject characteristics, and between gap thresholds and speech perception scores were examined using data from 27 subjects. A significant negative correlation between age at onset of deafness and gap thresholds was found, indicating that subjects with an earlier onset of deafness had larger gap thresholds, and most of the variability in gap thresholds was found for the congenitally deaf subjects. Gap thresholds did not correlate with other subject variables, such as duration of deafness and duration of implant use. Significant negative correlations were found between gap thresholds and word scores for open-set BKB sentences in the auditory-visual condition and the lipreading enhancement scores for the same test, indicating that subjects with poorer gap thresholds had lower speech scores. Gap thresholds did not correlate with word scores for BKB sentences in the audition alone condition, and scores for closed-set monosyllabic word tests.
-
ItemAn analysis of high rate speech processing strategies using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant [Abstract]( 1998)Speech comprehension for a group of five users of the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant system was explored at three rates of electrical stimulation, 250, 807, and 1615 pulses per second per channel. For the high stimulus rate the analysis frequency was the same as for the medium rate condition. The study investigated the effect of varying rate of stimulation when using the electrode selection technique of the SPEAK strategy. This has been undertaken using a repeated ABC experimental design to account for learning and minimize ordering effects. Speech perception was assessed using open-sets of CNC words in quiet and open-sets of CLTNY sentences at signal-to-noise ratios from +20 to 0dB. Closed-sets of 19 vowels and 24 consonants were also presented, in the H/V/D and A/C/A context. The recognition and perception of distinctive features were assessed across strategies and patients. Preliminary speech perception results have shown no statistically significant difference in performance between the low and medium stimulation rates. However, significantly poorer results were observed for the high rate condition for some tests. Individual differences may be explained by the effects of rate of stimulation on speech features.
-
ItemCurrent speech perception benefits for adults using the speak strategy with the nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant( 1997)Present day recipients of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant make use of the SPEAK speech processing strategy in the Spectra 22 speech processor. Introduced in 1994, the SPEAK strategy is based upon research conducted at the University of Melbourne and the Bionic Ear Institute. This paper compares the pre-and post-operative speech perception abilities of adults who have used the SPEAK speech processing strategy since the 'start-up' of their cochlear implant system. Data was analysed from open-set sentence and word tests administered pre-operatively and at regular intervals postoperatively. Patients showed significant improvement in their ability to recognise speech, when listening with the cochlear implant without lipreading, within the first two weeks. Mean scores for open-set sentences were 15% preoperatively and 64% two weeks after initial programming.
-
ItemSpeech cues for cochlear implantees: spectral discrimination [Abstract]( 1997)The ability of cochlear implantees to understand speech varies over a wide range. While some implantees achieve scores close to 100 % open set word tests, other require visual cues to achieve a significant score on these tests. The focus of this research is to investigate reasons for the wide range of ability and therefore to improve the speech processors used by individual implantees. This study first investigated whether the relative importance of various frequency regions of the speech spectrum differs for implantees of different performance levels, and for implantee groups compared to normally hearing subjects.
-
ItemSpeech perception of hearing aid users versus cochlear implantees [Abstract]( 1997)Recent improvements in speech recognition for profoundly deaf, cochlear implant patients have suggested that some people with a severe hearing impairment would be more successful with a cochlear implant than a hearing aid. Unfortunately, no studies have investigated the speech perception of the severely hearing impaired in order compare their speech perception abilities with those of cochlear implant users. To investigate this area further, a detailed investigation of the hearing aid performance of people with a severe hearing loss is being conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology at The University of Melbourne. The range of hearing losses for this study was defined as a pure tone average of greater than 6OdBHL, but no worse than 100dBSPL in the better ear. At present thirty-five (n=35) participants have been involved in this study. Each participant took part in a series of speech perception tests which included 24 consonant recognition, 11 vowel recognition, CNC words, CUNY sentences, and the connected speech test.
-
ItemSpeech perception benefits for implanted children with preoperative residual hearing [Abstract]( 1995)Since the implantation of the first children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, there has been rapid expansion in the number of implanted children world-wide. Improved surgical technique and experience in paediatric assessment and management have contributed to a trend to implant very young children. At the same time there has also been continuing development of improved speech processing strategies resulting in greater speech perception benefits. In the Melbourne program, over 60% of children obtain significant scores on open-set word and sentence tests using their cochlear implant alone without the aid of lipreading. As parents and professionals have become aware of these improved benefits to speech perception benefits in profoundly deaf children, there have been requests to consider implanting severely-to-profoundly deaf children. In these children with higher levels of residual hearing, only those children with poorer-than-expected performance on speech perception tests using hearing aids have been considered for surgery. A number of such cases have now been implanted in the Melbourne program. The speech perception benefits for this group are reported and are being compared with benefits for the profoundly deaf group of children.
-
ItemSpeech perception benefits for children using the Speak speech processing strategy in quiet and noise [Abstract]( 1995)The Speak speech processing strategy, based on the Spectral Maxima Speech Processor (SMSP) developed at the University of Melbourne, has now been implemented in the Spectra 22 speech processor developed by Cochlear Pty Limited, and clinical trials of both patients changing from the previous Multipeak strategy to Speak and patients starting up with. Speak have been conducted. Results in adult patients changing to Speak have shown significant improvements in speech perception in quiet and particularly in background noise as compared with Multipeak. Preliminary studies with children changing from Multipeak to Speak strategy, measured over a 10 month period, have also shown significant benefits from use of the Speak scheme in both quiet and noisy test situations. Results of follow up studies of these children after more than one year experience with the Speak processing strategy are presented. Statistical analysis of performance over time suggests that an increase in benefit is observed in children after additional experience with the Speak processing strategy. In addition, results for children who have used only the Speak processing strategy from the time of implantation are also presented. The results confirm that the Speak processing strategy provides significant benefits in quiet, and particularly in the presence of background noise for both groups of patients.
-
ItemResults of multichannel cochlear implantation in very young children [Abstract]( 1995)Most researchers and clinicians working in the cochlear implant field have assumed that profoundly deaf children will have a better prognosis in terms of speech perception, speech production and language development. if implanted at as young an age as possible. However, it has been difficult to gather direct evidence for this hypothesis due to the problems in assessing children under the age of five years with formal tests. Recent results with older children have supported the view that early implantation may provide the optimal outcome in most cases. The implantation of very young children raises two areas of concern that do not apply in adults and older children: accurate assessment of degree of hearing loss and auditory potential; and postoperative assessment of outcomes. This paper will describe research results from the University of Melbourne which address these issues and present results for children implanted as young as eighteen months of age.
-
ItemSpeech perception benefits for children using the 22-channel Melbourne/cochlear hearing prosthesis [Abstract]( 1993)In 1985; the first child was implanted with the Cochlear 22-channel cochlear prosthesis at the University of Melbourne Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital Cochlear Implant Clinic. There are now 42 children who have received the device in Melbourne. Analysis of patient details for these children show a very heterogeneous group, with a wide range in age, hearing thresholds, duration of deafness and aetiology. The major aetiologies found were either a congenital profound deafness.; or a hearing loss due to meningitis. In all but 3 cases, the children are using 15 or more electrodes in the array. Speech perception benefits have been analyzed according to a six-level hierarchical classification scheme. All of-the children achieved a minimum benefit of discrimination of suprasegmental information (Category 2), and 59% of the children achieved open-set understanding of unfamiliar speech material without the aid of lip-reading (Categories 5 & 6). Detailed analysis suggests that the majority of children achieving open-set speech perception benefits had more than one year of experience with their implant. and less than seven years of profound deafness prior to implantation.