Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemSpeech perception in implanted children: effects of preoperative residual hearing and speech processing strategy [Abstract]( 1997)Since the first child was implanted with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, the number of implanted children world-wide has rapidly expanded. Over this period, more effective paediatric assessment and management procedures have developed, allowing cochlear implants to be offered to children under the age of 2 years. In addition, a succession of improved speech processing strategies have been implemented in the Nucleus implant system, resulting in increased mean speech perception benefits for implanted adults. Research in the Melbourne and Sydney Cochlear Implant Clinics has also demonstrated that young children can adapt to and benefit from improved speech processing strategies such as the Speak strategy. Reported speech perception results for implanted children show that a considerable proportion (60%) of paediatric patients in the Melbourne and Sydney clinics are able to understand some open set speech using electrical stimulation alone. These results, and the upward trend of speech perception benefits to improve over time with advances in speech processing. have raised questions as to whether severely, or severely-to-profoundly deaf children currently using hearing aids would in fact benefit more from a cochlear implant. To investigate the potential effect of the level of preoperative residual hearing on postoperative speech perception. results for all implanted children in the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant programs were analysed. Results showed that as 8 group, children with higher levels of preoperative residual hearing were consistently more likely to achieve open-set speech perception benefits. Potential factors in this finding could be higher levels of ganglion cell survival or greater patterning of the auditory pathways using conventional hearing aids prior to implantation. Conversely, children with the least preoperative residual hearing were less predictable, with some children achieving open-set perception, and others showing more limited closed-set benefits to perception. For these children, it is likely that preoperative residual hearing is of less significance than other factors in outcomes.
-
ItemSpeech perception benefits for children using an advanced cochlear implant speech processing strategy in quiet and in noise [Abstract]( 1994)A new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) has been developed by the University of Melbourne and Cochlear Pty Ltd for use with the Nucleus 22-channel electrode array. In this strategy, 20 programmable filters are repetitively scanned at an average rate of 250Hz and the largest spectral components or maxima are selected from the incoming speech signal. This new speech processing strategy has been shown to provide significantly improved benefits in adult implant patients, particularly in the presence of background noise. This report presents data of a preliminary paediatric clinical trial of the new SPEAK speech processing strategy.
-
ItemPreliminary speech perception results for children with the 22-electrode Melbourne / cochlear hearing prosthesis( 1992)The Cochlear 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis was first implanted in a child at the Cochlear Implant Clinic at the University of. Melbourne and Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital in 1985. Since that time 42 children have received the device in Melbourne. Analysis of patient details shows that the majority of these children have a congenital as opposed to on acquired aetiology of hearing loss. In all but 3 cases, the children use 15 or more electrodes. In order to assist with evaluation of, benefits to speech perception across the very heterogeneous group of children, a six level hierarchical classification scheme for speech perception performance levels was created. All of the children achieved a minimum of Category 2 (discrimination of suprasegmental information). In total, 59 % of the children achieved Category 5 or 6 (open set recognition for unfamiliar materials). Analysis showed that the majority of these children had more than one year of experience. In contrast, the majority of children in Category 2 are those with less than one year of experience with the device.