Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19
-
ItemInner ear implants(Dekker, 2004)The cochlear implant is an electronic device that brings useful hearing to severely to profoundly deaf people through multiple-channel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerves in the inner ear. This is required if their inner ears are so badly damaged by injury and disease, or so inadequately developed, that they cannot provide sufficient hearing for communication, even when the sound is amplified with a hearing aid. By stimulating the nerve directly with patterns of electrical pulses, the implant bypasses the normal function of the sense organ of hearing in the inner ear to partially reproduce the coding of sound. It consists of a wearable speech processor that picks up sound with a microphone, analyzes the signal, and then sends it by radio waves to the implanted receiver stimulator, which decodes the message and stimulates the electrode wires inserted into the inner ear.
-
Item
-
ItemIntracellular responses of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus to intracochlear electrical stimulation( 1998)Unavailable due to copyright.
-
ItemControl strategies for neurons modeled by self-exciting point processes( 1996)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemReduction in excitability of the auditory nerve in guinea pigs following acute high rate electrical stimulation [Abstract]( 1996)Electrical stimulation of neural tissue involves the transfer of charge to tissue via electrodes. Safe charge transfer can be achieved using biphasic current pulses designed to reduce the generation of direct current (DC) or the production of electrochemical products. However, neural stimulators must also use capacitors in series with electrodes, or electrode shorting between current pulses, to further minimize DC due to electrode polarization.
-
ItemElectrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the coding of frequency, the perception of pitch and the development of cochlear implant speech processing strategies for profoundly deaf people( 1996)1. The development of speech processing strategies for multiple-channel cochlear implants has depended on encoding sound frequencies and intensities as temporal and spatial patterns of electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve fibres so that speech information of most importance for intelligibility could be transmitted. 2. Initial physiological studies showed that rate encoding of electrical stimulation above 200 pulses/s could not reproduce the normal response patterns in auditory neurons for acoustic stimulation in the speech frequency range above 200 Hz and suggested that place coding was appropriate for the higher frequencies. 3. Rate difference limens in the experimental animal were only similar to those for sound up to 200 Hz. 4. Rate difference limens in implant patients were similar to those obtained in the experimental animal. 5. Satisfactory rate discrimination could be made for durations of 50 and 100 ms, but not 25 ms. This made rate suitable for encoding longer duration suprasegmental speech information, but not segmental information, such as consonants. The rate of stimulation could also be perceived as pitch, discriminated at different electrode sites along the cochlea and discriminated for stimuli across electrodes. 6. Place pitch could be scaled according to the site of stimulation in the cochlea so that a frequency scale was preserved and it also had a different quality from rate pitch and was described as tonality. Place pitch could also be discriminated for the shorter durations (25 ms) required for identifying consonants. 8. As additional speech frequencies have been encoded as place of stimulation, the mean speech perception scores have continued to increase and are now better than the average scores that severely-profoundly deaf adults and children with some residual hearing obtain with a hearing aid.
-
ItemDischarge rate-level functions from dorsal cochlear nucleus single units in response to acoustic and electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve( 1995)Discharge rate-level (I/O) functions possessed by dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) units were examined, in response to bipolar electrical stimulation of the cochlea of the barbiturate-anesthetized cat. Spontaneously active units usually possessed nonmonotonic functions with a minimum, and spontaneously inactive units usually possessed monotonic functions or nonmonotonic functions with a maximum (NM+). In response to acoustic high-pass filtered noise, the function relating discharge rate and cut off frequency resembled the same unit's I/O function to electrical stimulation. The I/O functions to acoustic characteristic tones were usually monotonic or NM+. These results suggest that in the DCN, a prerequisite for the generation of acoustic-like responses with an electrical stimulus may be the matching of the cochlear place and spatial extent activated by each stimulus.
-
ItemPsychophysics of electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: implications for coding of sound and speech processing for cochlear implants [Keynote address]( 1994)Psychophysical studies on electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve have contributed to our understanding of the coding of sound and speech signals. Those studies have also helped establish speech processing strategies for multiple-electrode cochlear implant patients. The first studies were on temporal coding of frequency and pitch perception to help determine whether a single or multiple electrode implant would be preferable for the coding of speech frequencies. Temporal frequency coding was initially studied in the experimental animal by measuring difference limens for frequency of stimulus rate. The results showed that rate coding occurs for low frequencies up to 200 or even 600 pulses per second. It was concluded that higher speech frequencies cannot be conveyed by variations in stimulus rate but require multiple-electrode stimulation. These studies in experimental animals were essentially confirmed in the human.
-
ItemChronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: preliminary results( 1994)The present preliminary report describes the electrophysiological response of the cochlea during long-term stimulation. The data indicate that electrical stimulation at a rate of 1000 pulses per second does not appear to adversely affect the implanted cochlea.
-
ItemNeural processes in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised cat investigated from unit responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve( 1994)Extracellular responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus single units were recorded in response to biphasic, bipolar electrical stimulation of spiral ganglion cells and their peripheral processes using a banded electrode array in the scala tympani of the barbiturate anaesthetised cat. The DCN responses to this stimulus were the result of excitatory and suppressive (including inhibitory) processes. The excitatory responses from DCN units were usually within a range of 1.8-2.8 ms and these responses were probably the result of monosynaptic input from the auditory nerve. Latencies > 2.8 ms were most likely due to activation of di- and poly-synaptic pathways from auditory nerve fibres, except that latencies between 3.5-4.75 in hearing animals could have arisen from electrophonic mechanisms. Suppression of spontaneous activity was usually long acting, lasting > 70 ms following each pulse of the pulse train, but short acting suppression with a latency of 3.5-4.75 ms and a duration of < 10 ms was occasionally observed. These suppressive responses probably resulted from synaptic inhibitory input, but neural membrane properties may have contributed. In hearing animals, excitatory latencies within the range 1.8-5.2 ms were similar for units with different response area types or different PSTH patterns in response to acoustic CF tones or noise.