Paediatrics (RCH) - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 1 of 1
-
ItemAppearance-altering facial surgery on children: An empirically informed ethical analysis( 2015)Using empirically informed ethical analysis, this thesis investigates the ethics of appearance-altering facial surgeries performed on children. These surgeries have attracted controversy in the media and ethics literature and are the subject of legislation and professional guidelines, which leave much to individual practitioners’ discretion. Despite their contentious nature, very little is known about surgeons’ practices and decision-making processes regarding these surgeries. This thesis is ‘empirically informed’ in two different ways: (1) by existing empirical data on psychosocial outcomes of children with facial differences and children who have undergone appearance-altering facial surgeries and (2) by new interview data from 22 surgeons who encounter requests for these surgeries. Using reflective equilibrium as my method of ethical analysis, these two kinds of empirical data are combined with established paediatric bioethical principles and concepts, including the zone of parental discretion and children’s assent and dissent, to arrive at a comprehensive position on the ethics of performing these surgeries. Using reflective equilibrium, I found some aspects of surgeons’ decision-making processes and practices diverged from existing ethical understandings about the relative roles of children and parents in medical decisions. One such area related to the ethical weight surgeons attach to children’s refusals. While most ethicists in the literature advocate including children in decisions, they do not necessarily recommend giving them decision-making authority. In contrast, most surgeons tended to give children a larger role in decisions about appearance-altering facial surgeries, viewing them as ultimate decision makers. In this thesis, I make normative claims about the relative levels of ethical weight surgeons should place on children’s and parents’ wishes when making decisions about these surgeries. Using the established ethical framework of the zone of parental discretion and related ethical concepts of harm and benefit, I claim that several morally relevant differences exist between these surgeries and other medical procedures requested for children. These include their uncertain risk-benefit ratio, their elective nature, uncertainty as to how the child will later perceive their facial difference and the acceptability of surgery, and the existence of alternative, less risky and invasive psychosocial interventions for alleviating appearance-related psychosocial harm. I argue these differences warrant placing greater (even absolute) ethical weight on children’s wishes, especially when children refuse these surgeries, and comparably less ethical weight on parents’ wishes, when making these decisions. Although my ethical position is similar to most of the surgeons’ judgments, I argue it would be worthwhile for surgeons to know about and use ethical principles and concepts more explicitly when making decisions and communicating with children and/or their parents. I also claim that surgeons ought to make more of a considered effort to ascertain children’s actual wishes and inform parents and/or children about non-surgical options for alleviating appearance-related psychosocial distress, and be taught strategies for saying no and how to articulate their ethical reasoning. These findings have significant implications for clinical practice, raise questions for further ethical analysis and contribute to refinement of existing understandings of children’s assent and dissent and parents’ role as proxy decision makers for their children.