Paediatrics (RCH) - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemUrinary tract infection in children – changing the management paradigm so more children can be treated at home( 2023-07)Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a common reason for paediatric emergency department (ED) presentations. Although most children are successfully treated with oral antibiotics, approximately one-third receive intravenous (IV) antibiotics and hospital admission. However, there is limited evidence supporting these decisions, and consequently an opportunity to approach antibiotic use differently to potentially treat more children out of hospital. Guidelines recommend most patients can be treated with oral antibiotics, but the studies used to support these guidelines excluded several cohorts. The aims of this thesis were to investigate current UTI management, particularly use of antibiotics and Hospital-in-the-Home (HITH), to define which children actually need IV antibiotics, and to explore the feasibility of using shorter IV antibiotic durations. The initial study focused on use of HITH for IV antibiotics for UTI. The study found that 90% of patients successfully completed treatment without readmission to hospital, and none became severely unwell at home. However, HITH was underused, with only 8% of patients on IV antibiotics using this model. The study supports home IV antibiotics for selected UTI management. The next study used a wider lens, examining all current UTI management in ED and found little variation in antibiotic route, choice, and duration for lower UTIs and uncomplicated upper UTIs. However, complicated upper UTIs, where there is less evidence, showed more variation. No single feature reliably predicted use of IV antibiotics, but multiple complicating factors were associated with their initiation, suggesting they represent ‘red flags’ for clinicians. In the following study, clinicians were asked why they used IV antibiotics for UTI and admitted children to hospital. Although they had defined reasons for using IV, objective clinical evidence did not always support their reasons. The study hypothesised that multiple features lead to the decision to prescribe IV antibiotics and that these features may group together. Given the finding that multiple but not always the same features led to IV antibiotic initiation, the next study aimed to develop a clinical score to determine which children need IV antibiotics. The Melbourne RUPERT score was successfully developed and tested on patients with confirmed and probable UTI. Using six clinical features, the score is straightforward, easily attainable, reproducible and aids consistent stratification of patients to determine route of initial antibiotic treatment. Finally, using outcomes and learnings from the preceding studies, a randomised control trial protocol was developed. This trial aims to investigate whether an ultra-short IV duration (1 day) is non-inferior to the standard duration for children requiring IV antibiotics. If a single daily dose of IV antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics proves sufficient, patients could be discharged home from the ED on oral antibiotics, eliminating the need for hospital admission. In questioning whether more children with UTI could be treated out of hospital, this thesis found that indeed they can, through delivering IV antibiotics at home, treating more children with oral antibiotics, and investigating an identified practice of earlier switch from IV to oral. This has the potential for major impacts on patient care and hospital sustainability.
-
ItemAppearance-altering facial surgery on children: An empirically informed ethical analysis( 2015)Using empirically informed ethical analysis, this thesis investigates the ethics of appearance-altering facial surgeries performed on children. These surgeries have attracted controversy in the media and ethics literature and are the subject of legislation and professional guidelines, which leave much to individual practitioners’ discretion. Despite their contentious nature, very little is known about surgeons’ practices and decision-making processes regarding these surgeries. This thesis is ‘empirically informed’ in two different ways: (1) by existing empirical data on psychosocial outcomes of children with facial differences and children who have undergone appearance-altering facial surgeries and (2) by new interview data from 22 surgeons who encounter requests for these surgeries. Using reflective equilibrium as my method of ethical analysis, these two kinds of empirical data are combined with established paediatric bioethical principles and concepts, including the zone of parental discretion and children’s assent and dissent, to arrive at a comprehensive position on the ethics of performing these surgeries. Using reflective equilibrium, I found some aspects of surgeons’ decision-making processes and practices diverged from existing ethical understandings about the relative roles of children and parents in medical decisions. One such area related to the ethical weight surgeons attach to children’s refusals. While most ethicists in the literature advocate including children in decisions, they do not necessarily recommend giving them decision-making authority. In contrast, most surgeons tended to give children a larger role in decisions about appearance-altering facial surgeries, viewing them as ultimate decision makers. In this thesis, I make normative claims about the relative levels of ethical weight surgeons should place on children’s and parents’ wishes when making decisions about these surgeries. Using the established ethical framework of the zone of parental discretion and related ethical concepts of harm and benefit, I claim that several morally relevant differences exist between these surgeries and other medical procedures requested for children. These include their uncertain risk-benefit ratio, their elective nature, uncertainty as to how the child will later perceive their facial difference and the acceptability of surgery, and the existence of alternative, less risky and invasive psychosocial interventions for alleviating appearance-related psychosocial harm. I argue these differences warrant placing greater (even absolute) ethical weight on children’s wishes, especially when children refuse these surgeries, and comparably less ethical weight on parents’ wishes, when making these decisions. Although my ethical position is similar to most of the surgeons’ judgments, I argue it would be worthwhile for surgeons to know about and use ethical principles and concepts more explicitly when making decisions and communicating with children and/or their parents. I also claim that surgeons ought to make more of a considered effort to ascertain children’s actual wishes and inform parents and/or children about non-surgical options for alleviating appearance-related psychosocial distress, and be taught strategies for saying no and how to articulate their ethical reasoning. These findings have significant implications for clinical practice, raise questions for further ethical analysis and contribute to refinement of existing understandings of children’s assent and dissent and parents’ role as proxy decision makers for their children.