Optometry and Vision Sciences - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 1 of 1
-
ItemClinical audit as an educative tool for optometrists: an intervention study in age-related macular degeneration(WILEY, 2021-01)Purpose Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of vision loss. This study investigated whether performing clinical audit and receiving analytical performance feedback altered documentation of the AMD care provided by optometrists. Methods Australian optometrists were recruited and completed a survey about their demographics and confidence in AMD care, and a three‐month audit of their practice records using an AMD audit tool (termed the pre‐audit evaluation). After receiving analytical feedback, participants identified areas for improvement and re‐audited their practices after three months to analyse changes in performance (termed the post‐audit evaluation). Paired t‐tests and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, as appropriate, were used to compare pre‐ and post‐audit data. Results Twenty optometrists, most practising in Victoria, Australia, completed the study. Participants primarily worked in corporate practice and/or rural settings and had a range of optometric experience (2–40 years). At baseline, participants felt confident in their: knowledge of AMD risk factors (65%), advice to patients about these factors (55%) and management of earlier stages of AMD (55%). Each clinician completed (median [IQR]): 15 [IQR: 10–19] and 12 [IQR: 8–16] audits of unique patient records, pre‐ and post‐audit, respectively. Post‐audit, average record documentation (per optometrist) improved for asking about: AMD family history (94% to 100%, p = 0.03), smoking status (21% to 58%, p < 0.01), diet (11% to 29%, p < 0.01) and nutritional supplementation (20% to 51%, p < 0.01). For clinical examination, compliance with documenting pinhole visual acuity, performing an in‐office Amsler grid (upon indication) and using optical coherence tomography improved post‐audit (p < 0.05). Accuracy of severity documentation improved for earlier stages of AMD (p < 0.05). For earlier stages of AMD, documentation of counselling about modifiable risk factors significantly improved post‐audit (p < 0.05). Aspects well‐performed pre‐audit that did not change included documenting: medical histories (100% at both time points, p = 0.06) and retinal imaging (77% at both time points, p = 0.97). Conclusions Self‐audit with analytical feedback improved clinical record documentation of: AMD risk factors, clinical examination, AMD severity classification and management advice. These findings support a role for audit to improve optometric clinical care of AMD, as evidenced by improved documentation of the AMD care delivered.