Optometry and Vision Sciences - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6
-
ItemAn Electrophysiological Comparison of Contrast Response Functions in Younger and Older Adults, and Those With Glaucoma(ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC, 2019-01)PURPOSE: Aging and glaucoma both result in contrast processing deficits. However, it is unclear the extent to which these functional deficits arise from retinal or post-retinal neuronal changes. This study aims to disentangle the effects of healthy human aging and glaucoma on retinal and post-retinal contrast processing using visual electrophysiology. METHODS: Steady-state pattern electroretinograms (PERG) and pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) were simultaneously recorded across a range of contrasts (0%, 4%, 9%, 18%, 39%, 73%, 97%; 0.8° diameter checks, 31° diameter checkerboard) in 13 glaucoma patients (67 ± 6 years), 15 older (63 ± 8 years) and 14 younger adults (27 ± 3 years). PERG and PVEP contrast response functions were fit with a linear and saturating hyperbolic model, respectively. PERG and PVEP magnitude, timing (phase), and model fit parameters (slope, semi-saturation constant) were compared between groups. RESULTS: PERG responses were reduced and delayed in older adults relative to younger adults, and further reduced and delayed in glaucoma patients across all contrasts. PVEP signals were also reduced and delayed in glaucoma patients, relative to age-similar (older) controls. However, despite having reduced PERG magnitudes, older adults did not demonstrate reduced PVEP magnitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with healthy vision demonstrate reduced magnitude and delayed timing in the PERG that is not reflected in the PVEP. In contrast, glaucoma produces functional deficits in both PERG and PVEP contrast response functions. Our results suggest that glaucomatous effects on contrast processing are not a simple extension of those that arise as part of the aging process.
-
ItemDaily vision testing can expose the prodromal phase of migraine(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2018-08)Background Several visual tasks have been proposed as indirect assays of the balance between cortical inhibition and excitation in migraine. This study aimed to determine whether daily measurement of performance on such tasks can reveal perceptual changes in the build up to migraine events. Methods Visual performance was measured daily at home in 16 non-headache controls and 18 individuals with migraine using a testing protocol on a portable tablet device. Observers performed two tasks: luminance increment detection in spatial luminance noise and centre surround contrast suppression. Results Luminance thresholds were reduced in migraine compared to control groups ( p < 0.05), but thresholds did not alter across the migraine cycle; while headache-free, centre-surround contrast suppression was stronger for the migraine group relative to controls ( p < 0.05). Surround suppression weakened at around 48 hours prior to a migraine attack and strengthened to approach their headache-free levels by 24 hours post-migraine (main effect of timing, p < 0.05). Conclusions Daily portable testing of vision enabled insight into perceptual performance in the lead up to migraine events, a time point that is typically difficult to capture experimentally. Perceptual surround suppression of contrast fluctuates during the migraine cycle, supporting the utility of this measure as an indirect, non-invasive assay of the balance between cortical inhibition and excitation.
-
ItemClinical impact of migraine for the management of glaucoma patients(PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 2016-03)Migraine is a common and debilitating primary headache disorder that affects 10-15% of the general population, particularly people of working age. Migraine is relevant to providers of clinical eye-care because migraine attacks are associated with a range of visual sensory symptoms, and because of growing evidence that the results of standard tests of visual function necessary for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma (visual fields, electrophysiology, ocular imaging) can be abnormal due to migraine. These abnormalities are measureable in-between migraine events (the interictal period), despite patients being asymptomatic and otherwise healthy. This picture is further complicated by epidemiological data that suggests an increased prevalence of migraine in patients with glaucoma, particularly in patients with normal tension glaucoma. We discuss how migraine, as a co-morbidity, can confound the results and interpretation of clinical tests that form part of contemporary glaucoma evaluation, and provide practical evidence-based recommendations for the clinical testing and management of patients with migraine who attend eye-care settings.
-
ItemAbnormal inhibition-excitation imbalance in migraine(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2016-01)BACKGROUND: People with migraine show increased surround suppression of perceived contrast, a perceptual analogue of centre-surround antagonistic interactions in visual cortex. A proposed mechanism is that cortical 'hyperexcitability' or 'hyperresponsivity', a prominent theory in the migraine literature, drives abnormal excitatory-inhibitory balance to give increased local inhibition. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine whether cortical hyperresponsivity and excitatory-inhibitory imbalance manifests in the visual cortical response of migraine sufferers. METHODS: Interictal steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in response to 0 to 97% contrast were recorded in 30 migraine participants (15 without aura, 15 with aura) and 21 non-headache controls. Monotonicity indices were calculated to determine response saturation or supersaturation. Contrast gain was modelled with a modified saturating hyperbolic function to allow for variation in excitation and inhibition. RESULTS: A greater proportion of migraine participants (43%) than controls (14%) exhibited significant VEP supersaturation at high contrast, based on monotonicity index (chi-square, p = 0.028). Supersaturation was also evident by the trend for greater suppressive exponent values in migraine compared to control individuals (Mann-Whitney rank sum, p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Supersaturation in migraine is consistent with excess excitation (hyperresponsivity) driving increased network inhibition and provides support for excitatory-inhibitory imbalance as a pathophysiological disturbance in migraine.
-
ItemSimultaneous retinal and cortical visually evoked electrophysiological responses in between migraine attacks(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2012-09)PURPOSE: People with migraine often report aversion to flickering lights and show abnormal results on behavioural tasks that require the processing of temporal visual information. Studies have reported that the cortically evoked electrophysiological response to a flickering visual stimulus is abnormal; however, none have considered whether there is an underlying pre-cortical abnormality. In this cross-sectional study, we consider whether people with migraine have retinal and cortical electrophysiological abnormalities to flickering stimuli. METHODS: Monocular transient (1 Hz) and steady-state (8.3 Hz) pattern reversal electroretinograms (PERGs) and pattern visual evoked responses (PVERs) were measured simultaneously in 45 people with migraine (26 without aura, 19 with aura) and 30 non-headache controls at a time between migraine attacks. RESULTS: PERG amplitude and timing did not differ significantly between groups. Transient PVER amplitude was significantly reduced (28%) in the migraine with aura group compared to the controls F(2,72) = 3.6, p = 0.03). Both migraine groups showed significant reductions (32%, 39%) in steady-state PVER amplitude relative to controls (F(2,70) = 4.3, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study finds normal retinal processing of flickering stimuli in the presence of abnormal cortical function between migraine attacks.
-
ItemThe effect of duration post-migraine on visual electrophysiology and visual field performance in people with migraine(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2014-01)PURPOSE: In between migraine attacks, some people show visual field defects that are worse when measured closer to the end of a migraine event. In this cohort study, we consider whether electrophysiological responses correlate with visual field performance at different times post-migraine, and explore evidence for cortical versus retinal origin. METHODS: Twenty-six non-headache controls and 17 people with migraine performed three types of perimetry (static, flicker and blue-on-yellow) to assess different aspects of visual function at two visits conducted at different durations post-migraine. On the same days, the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked response (PVER) were recorded. RESULTS: Migraine participants showed persistent, interictal, localised visual field loss, with greater deficits at the visit nearer to migraine offset. Spatial patterns of visual field defect consistent with retinal and cortical dysfunction were identified. The PERG was normal, whereas the PVER abnormality found did not change with time post-migraine and did not correlate with abnormal visual field performance. CONCLUSIONS: Dysfunction on clinical tests of vision is common in between migraine attacks; however, the nature of the defect varies between individuals and can change with time. People with migraine show markers of both retinal and/or cortical dysfunction. Abnormal visual field sensitivity does not predict abnormality on electrophysiological testing.