Melbourne Business School - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The relationship between quality management strategies and organisational performance in manufacturing firms
    TERZIOVSKI, MILE ( 1997)
    Higher requirements for improved quality of products and services have led to three important changes in international business over the last decade. These changes include: • The growing recognition of the strategic importance of Total Quality Management (TQM) philosophy and methods. • A major push by organisations worldwide to seek certification to the ISO 9000 quality standards. • The growing recognition and application of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA), the Australian Quality Award (AQA), and the European Quality Award (EQA). Although there are many cases where the above quality strategies have been successfully applied, there is still considerable confusion, frustration and uncertainty surrounding the applied role and business value of TQM and ISO 9000 certification. For example, many managers believe that gaining certification to the ISO 9000 standards is synonymous with adopting the TQM philosophy or winning a quality award. Anecdotal evidence and the limited number of empirical studies in the literature suggest considerable variability in the performance of TQM, ranging from unprecedented successes to abandonment of TQM, and even bankruptcy. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to address the gaps and contradictions in the literature. This was achieved by investigating the relationship between TQM philosophy and ISO 9000 certification (individually and in combination) with organisational performance. An Integrated Continuous Improvement Framework (ICIF) was developed from the literature to show the theoretical relationship between TQM, ISO 9000 certification, and organisational performance. The TQM component of the framework was developed as a surrogate MBNQA (S-MBNQA) model. This model allowed comparison of the S-MBNQA scoring criteria with the 1995 MBNQA criteria. Hypotheses were developed based on relationships within the integrated framework. The relationships were tested using a large data base consisting of 962 responses from Australian manufacturing firms and 379 responses from New Zealand manufacturing firms. The tested hypotheses were further explained by utilising six case studies of Australian manufacturing organisations that had been implementing TQM and ISO 9000 certification as part of the Australian Best Practice Demonstration Program. The first major finding of the study was that the MBNQA criteria are a generally valid and reliable model for measuring and predicting the relationship between TQM practice and organisational performance. For example, specific dimensions of the TQM philosophy: leadership commitment, people management, and customer focus, were significantly related to organisational performance. These dimensions were also significant differentiators between high, medium, and low performing firms. The second major finding was that ISO 9000 certification was not significantly related to organisational performance. Both high and low performing firms seek ISO 9000 certification in roughly equal proportions, within strong and weak TQM environments, without any significant effect on performance outcomes. The study concluded that adopting TQM philosophy and gaining ISO 9000 certification are not synonymous. However, ISO 9000 certification and TQM can complement each other as part of an Integrated Quality Strategy. The limitations of the study and the implications of the research findings are reviewed, along with the directions for future research.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Best practice, employee performance and manufacturing performance
    Challis, David T. ( 1996)
    This research is concerned with the relationships between various technological, organisational and human resource investments, commonly termed Best Practices, and employee performance and manufacturing performance. Best Practices considered include: Total Quality Management (TOM), Just In Time (JIT), Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT), Strategic Planning, Leadership, Teams, Benchmarking and Training. The research uses two major pieces of field work. First, it analyses the practices and performance of 1024 Australian and New Zealand Manufacturing firms with a view to identifying "what works". This element of the research project tests a range of propositions concerned with the associations between Best Practices and measures of employee and manufacturing performance. Second, a detailed suite of case studies describing the Best Practice experiences of twelve Australian Manufacturers are analysed to assess "how it works". In particular, this area of research seeks to gain insights into how Best Practices relate to improvements in performance. Key findings include: • a moderated to strong association between employee performance and manufacturing performance, • TQM, JIT and leadership are key differentiators of employee performance and manufacturing performance, • AMT is positively associated with manufacturing performance but only in a strong TQM environment, • the strength of the associations between TQM, JIT and manufacturing performance increases with strength of AMT environment, • TQM explains approximately twice the variance in performance in weak manufacturing performance environments compared to strong manufacturing performance environments. The implications of these findings for existing conceptual theories, current research methodologies, theory development and practitioners are discussed in considerable detail. Although the research concludes that firms investing in Best Practices generally outperform those which do not, it also provides a number of salient notes of caution. In particular, it was found that firms need to introduce these investments within a strategic context that provides a demonstrable link to competitive and performance requirements otherwise, investments risk becoming “flavours of the month” rather than building blocks that contribute to the development of key organisational capabilities. This approach also helps to ensure that firms introduce interventions using a structured planning process, thereby avoiding resource crises and the confusion that can be created by an excessive number of fragmented interventions.