- School of Culture and Communication - Research Publications
School of Culture and Communication - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
4 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 4 of 4
-
ItemNow for the genetically modified PhDBROPHY, KJ ( 2004)
-
Item'Man-moth' and the flame of influence: A poet reading poetryBrophy, K (CENT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN LIT, 2004-11)
-
ItemRepulsion and Day-dreaming: Freud Writing FreudBrophy, K (ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2006)Beginning with a reflection on our helplessness in the face of our own discoveries about ourselves in the course of living, this paper outlines the several ways in which psychoanalysis has documented and constructed this helplessness; in turn, Freud’s own writings can be read as his own ‘helpless’ response to early experiences. This paper offers a reading of Freud’s 1907 essay, ‘Creative writers and day-dreaming’ as an unconscious expression of his fear of repulsion (in himself and from others), matched to a desire to seduce the reader. For Freud, though, repulsion is inescapable, for creative writing in his view is never more than foreplay. What then of writing that confronts and unsettles?
-
ItemThe prose poem: a short history, a brief reflection and a dose of the real thingBROPHY, KJ (Australasian Association of Writing Programs, 2002)The prose poem arrived as a new self-proclaimed literary form in France, through Charles Baudelaire with his 1861 collection, Petits poèmes en prose. In a preface to one of these small poems he acknowledged Aloysius Bertrand’s Gaspard de la Nuit (1842) as his model. The next generation of French poets, including Mallarmé, Rimbaud and Lautréamont, took up this new form in a spirit of revolt and freedom from the constraining traditions of French verse. Richard Terdiman has written that ‘at just the historical moment when the term “prosaic” was mutating into a pejorative, the prose poem sought to reevaluate the expressive possibilities, and the social functionality, of prose itself’ (Terdiman 261).