School of Culture and Communication - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 21
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    The Complexion of Compassion: The Face and Racial Difference in Scudéry’s Clélie
    Hughes, J (Australian and New Zealand Association for Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 2022)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Not Nearly Wrong Enough: Epistemontology as an Analogical Re-fusion of Real Abstraction
    Clemens, ; Hughes, (University of Minnesota Press, 2021-06-01)
    For the past two decades A. Kiarina Kordela has been working on a singular and difficult synthesis of Benedict Spinoza, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and Jacques Lacan. Her attempt is to construct a new form of historical materialism, transforming it into a rigorous monism for which the exemplarily modern--let's say, the seventeenth century--distinction between epistemology and ontology would no longer be able to be considered real. As Kordela puts it on the first page of her new, challenging book: "In spite of the incommensurable difference between ideas and things, their relations share the same structures, and both, ideas and things, express the same substance or being" (2018,1). Kordela gives two names to that substance which is expressed in the "parallelism" or "homology" of words and things: "structurality" (3) and the "unconscious" (2). The unconscious, then, is not simply a name for non-conscious mental processes or just an a-topic or ex-static locus established by the non-natural fact of language. It is the key support for any account of a "self-actualizing" universe at once secular, rationally accessible, yet without reduction to the concept. It is ultimately Kordela's commitment to a special kind of speculative psychoanalysis that links Marx to Spinoza and allows her to rebind philosophy with politics with psychology and that will reinstate in full ambition the powers of philosophy for our apocalyptic present age.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Rhetoric
    Hughes, J ; Ford, T (Oxford University Press, 2020)

    Rhetoric was—or is, and the uncertainty here is to the point—an unstable but hegemonic assemblage of categories, practices, doctrines, and institutions that endured from classical antiquity through to modernity. Rhetoric underwent radical transformations over this period of nearly three thousand years, entering into complex relationships with its discursive and educational others, including literature, philosophy, theology, and science. Rhetoric has variously been the pragmatic art of verbal action; the teachable (and so saleable) skill of persuasive speaking; an elite training in literary forms and genres inherited from ancient Rome and Greece; a set of protocols governing textual production and reception; the antiquarian collection of ornate and artificial modes of phraseology; a transcendent spirit of linguistic articulation and creation; and a branch of instruction in professional communication. This article presents five scenes—sometimes more tightly focused, sometimes more diffuse—drawn from the long history of rhetoric: a moment of rhetoric’s inception, in Syracuse in 466 bce; of its Christianization, in Milan, 387; of linguistic productivity, in Cambridge, 1511; of rhetorical transcendence, in Basel in 1872; and of social composition, in Minneapolis, 1968. In each of these moments, rhetoric’s conceptual, discursive, and institutional relations with literature were transfigured. They were scenes in which rhetoric was retied, so to speak, into a series of new knots with literature and philosophy. Other scenes and other itineraries would no doubt generate different stories—other knottings of rhetoric and its others.

  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Formal DestructIon: The Art of the Fugue in Destroy, She Said
    Hughes, J (S: Journal of the Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique, 2019)
    Marguerite Duras’ Destroy, She Said ends with an act of sovereign destruction. In the final pages of the text-play-film, music begins to sound. “Did you hear anything?” asks Max Thor. “Yes,” replies Stein. “A sort of crack in the air?” Alissa, who is sleeping, quietly moans. “She’s dreaming,” says Stein. “Or did she hear it too?” Thor asks.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Between Heidegger and Blanchot: Death, Transcendence and the Origin of Ideas in Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition
    Hughes, J (Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2021)
    This essay is concerned with an enigmatic passage at the heart of Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition which locates the origin of ideas in an “aleatory point”. Deleuze develops this claim through a series of allusions, some to Henry Corbin’s 1938 translation of Heidegger, others to the work of Maurice Blanchot. This essay reconstructs the context of those allusion, showing that Deleuze developed his central concepts by reworking Heidegger’s reflections on transcendence and Blanchot’s elaboration of a post-Hegelian form of transcendence. Deleuze’s thought in the late 60s, then, should be read as an intervention in postwar attempts to articulate a Hegel-Heidegger synthesis by determining the nature and structure of transcendence. Ultimately, the essay concludes, the origin of ideas in Difference and Repetition must be understood as a particular form of negation: the non-being or the ?-being by which thought transcends the given.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The greatest deception: fiction, falsity and manifestation in Spinoza’s Metaphysical Thoughts
    Hughes, J (Informa UK Limited, 2020-07-02)
    “The first meaning of true and false”, writes Spinoza in a neglected passage of the Metaphysical Thoughts, “seems to have had its origin in stories”. Ideas are true when they “show” us things as they are; they are false when they do not, when they are fictional. In this essay, I argue that what appears at first sight to be a simple assertion of a correspondence theory of truth in fact opens onto broad historical transformations in the nature of meaning that reshaped the very atmosphere of truth: the emergence of a new kind of fictionality, transformations in the sense of logical interpretation, and ultimately transformations in the structures and sources of the natural light, that “clarity” which constitutes for Spinoza, as for Descartes, an indispensable criterion for certainty.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Scenes of Post-War French Thought
    Hughes, J (Informa UK Limited, 2019-11-02)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Schizoanalysis and the Phenomenology of Cinema
    Hughes, J ; Ian, B ; Patricia, M (A&C Black, 2008-10-15)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Signs and Subjectivity in Proust and Signs and Cinema 1 and 2
    Hughes, J ; Bryden, M ; Topping, M (PALGRAVE, 2009)
  • Item