Nursing - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/257

Filters

2022 2
2
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Author: Drosdowsky, Allison × Author: Gough, Karla × Author: Schofield, Penelope × End date: 2022 × Start date: 2020 ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Women with gynaecological cancer awaiting radiotherapy: Self-reported wellbeing, general psychological distress, symptom distress, sexual function, and supportive care needs
    Gough, K ; Bergin, RJ ; Drosdowsky, A ; Aranda, S ; Mileshkin, L ; Jackson, M ; Kinnane, N ; Bernshaw, D ; Juraskova, I ; White, K ; Mohamed, M ; Schofield, P (ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2022-10)
    OBJECTIVE: To better serve women with gynaecological cancers, we need a sound understanding of their health, wellbeing and needs. This study sought to explore these issues in a sample of Australian women before commencing curative radiotherapy. METHODS: We undertook a secondary analysis of baseline data from a supportive care trial (n = 311). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise responses to measures of wellbeing, general psychological distress, symptom distress, sexual function and vaginal changes, and supportive care needs. Pre-specified regression models were used to examine sources of variation in wellbeing and sexual function. RESULTS: Women reported lower emotional, functional and physical wellbeing than population norms (all p < 0.001). The prevalence of general psychological distress was 31% (95% CI 26-36%). Distress caused by physical symptoms was typically low. Health system and information needs comprised eight of the top ten moderate-to-high supportive care needs. Most women reported no change in interest for physical contact or sex compared to pre-diagnosis, but some sexually active women (16-24%) reported smaller vaginal size, increased dryness, and more pain on intercourse. General psychological distress was a robust marker of poorer wellbeing and sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Before radiotherapy, a substantial minority of women with gynaecological cancers experience general psychological distress, reduced wellbeing and moderate-to-high health system and information needs. A model of comprehensive care incorporating assessment of unmet needs, general psychological distress, and sexual issues is recommended. Healthcare providers may require training to elicit and respond to a constellation of interrelated issues and access relevant services for women requiring additional support.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Differential adherence to peer and nurse components of a supportive care package-The appeal of peer support may be related to women's health and psychological status
    Gough, K ; Pascoe, MC ; Bergin, R ; Drosdowsky, A ; Schofield, P (ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2022-03)
    OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of factors associated with intervention non-adherence may provide insights into the clinical utility of non-pharmacologic interventions. METHODS: This study compared complete and incomplete adherers to two separate components of a novel intervention package for women undergoing curative intent radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer on socio-demographic, clinical and pre-radiotherapy patient-reported outcomes data. RESULTS: Adherence to the tailored specialist nurse consultations was satisfactory (71% participated in all available sessions, 19% participated in all but one). Adherence to the telephone peer support sessions was less satisfactory (47% participated in all available sessions, 24% participated in all but one session). Complete adherers to the peer sessions reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress and significantly higher levels of physical, emotional and functional wellbeing before radiotherapy. No other statistically significant differences were observed between complete and incomplete adherers to the nurse- or peer-led sessions. CONCLUSION: Women's ability or motivation to engage with peer support may be influenced by their health and psychological status. Further, the extent of intervention non-adherence to the peer-led component may have compromised the assessment of its efficacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Peer support may be less acceptable or appropriate for women with more complex care needs. Such women may prefer specialised care from trained professionals.