Nursing - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4
-
ItemResuscitation status and characteristics and outcomes of patients transferred from subacute care to acute care hospitals: A multi-site prospective cohort study(WILEY, 2020-04)AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between resuscitation status and (i) patient characteristics; (ii) transfer characteristics; and (iii) patient outcomes following an emergency inter-hospital transfer from a subacute to an acute care hospital. BACKGROUND: Patients who experience emergency inter-hospital transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals have high rates of acute care readmission (81%) and in-hospital mortality (15%). DESIGN: This prospective, exploratory cohort study was a subanalysis of data from a larger case-time-control study in five Health Services in Victoria, Australia. There were 603 transfers in 557 patients between August 2015 and October 2016. The study was conducted in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology guidelines. METHODS: Data were extracted by medical record audit. Three resuscitation categories (full resuscitation; limitation of medical treatment (LOMT) orders; or not-for-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) orders) were compared using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Stratified multivariable proportional hazard Cox regression models were used to account for health service clustering effect. FINDINGS: Resuscitation status was 63.5% full resuscitation; 23.1% LOMT order; and 13.4% not-for-CPR. Compared to patients for full resuscitation, patients with not-for-CPR or LOMT orders were more likely to have rapid response team calls during acute care readmission or to die during hospitalisation. Patients who were not-for-CPR were less likely to be readmitted to acute care and more likely to return to subacute care. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients in subacute care who experienced an emergency inter-hospital transfer were for full resuscitation. Although the proportion of patients with LOMT and not-for-CPR orders increased after transfer, there were deficiencies in the documentation of resuscitation status and planning for clinical deterioration for subacute care patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: As many subacute care patients experience clinical deterioration, patient preferences for care need to be discussed and documented early in the subacute care admission.
-
ItemNurses' role in recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in surgical patients(WILEY, 2018-05)AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To explore nurse' role in recognising and responding to deteriorating post-operative patients. BACKGROUND: Clinical deterioration is a significant problem in acute care settings. Nurses play a vital role in post-operative patient monitoring; however, there is limited understanding of the nurses' role in recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in surgical patients. METHODS: This qualitative exploratory study was conducted at a metropolitan teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected through focus groups from 1 September to 31 October 2014. Four focus groups of 2-5 surgical nurses (n = 14) were conducted to explore the nurses' perception of their role in managing deterioration over the first 72 hr postoperatively. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed and key themes identified. RESULTS: Nurses demonstrated a high level of awareness of their role in recognising and responding to early signs of deterioration. The themes that arose from the focus group interviews were "struggling with blood pressure," and "we know our patient is sick." The nurses were confident about the clinical indicators of deterioration and the appropriate channels to use to escalate care. Using track and trigger observation charts enabled nurses to identify deteriorating patients prior to the patient fulfilling rapid response system escalation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of a collective team approach to preventing, recognising and responding to clinical deterioration across the whole patient journey. Initiatives to ensure accurate written and verbal communication between medical and nursing staff warrants further assessment. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses working in acute surgical wards are highly engaged in the process of recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in post-operative patients. Many nurses reported being able to anticipate deterioration occurring but are required by current organisational frameworks to escalate care to rapid response systems. How nurses anticipate and manage deterioration prior to the patient fulfilling rapid response system criteria warrants further investigation.
-
ItemFrequency, nature and timing of clinical deterioration in the early postoperative period(WILEY, 2018-10)AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To establish the frequency of clinical deterioration in the early postoperative period in patients who have undergone general or orthopaedic surgery. BACKGROUND: Worldwide, clinical deterioration is a significant problem in acute care settings. Early recognition and response to clinical deterioration is one of the ten National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards in Australia. However, there is limited understanding of the frequency of clinical deterioration in surgical patients. METHODS: A point prevalence study was conducted from September-October 2014. The records of 100 consecutive in patients admitted for orthopaedic (n = 48) or general surgery (n = 52) to a health service in Melbourne, Australia, were audited. The frequency of clinical deterioration episodes was summarised using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two patient groups were equivalent except that orthopaedic patients were older than the general surgery patients (median age 71 [IQR 19] years vs. 62 [IQR 17] years). There were 17 medical emergency team calls and 23 calls for urgent clinical review in 28 patients. The main indications for emergency calls were hypotension (26%), fever (19%), hypoxia (15%), tachycardia (13%) and altered blood glucose level (11%). The majority of episodes were managed on the ward, and there were one ICU transfer and no cardiac arrest calls. CONCLUSION: One in four patients experienced early postoperative clinical deterioration. Hypotension was the most common trigger for escalation of care highlighting a need to optimise fluid and haemodynamic management of postoperative patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Haemodynamic instability leading to the activation of rapid response systems is very common in the immediate postoperative period. There is the need for locally tailored interventions to optimise fluid management and decrease incidence of further complications.
-
ItemSix-year trends in postoperative prescribing and use of multimodal analgesics following total hip and knee arthroplasty: A single-site observational study of pain management(WILEY, 2021-01)Background Guidelines for acute postoperative pain management recommend administering analgesics in multimodal combination to facilitate synergistic benefit, reduce opioid requirements and decrease side‐effects. However, limited observational research has examined the extent to which multimodal analgesics are prescribed and administered postoperatively following joint replacement. Methods In this longitudinal study, we used three‐point prevalence surveys to observe the 6‐year trends in prescribing and use of multimodal analgesics on the orthopaedic wards of a single Australian private hospital. We collected baseline postoperative data from total hip and knee arthroplasty patients in May/June 2010 (Time 1, n = 86), and follow‐up data at 1 year (Time 2, n = 199) and 5 years (Time 3, n = 188). During the follow‐up, data on prescribing practices were presented to anaesthetists. Results We found a statistically significant increase in the prescribing (p < 0.001) and use (p < 0.001) of multimodal analgesics over time. The use of multimodal analgesics was associated with lower rest pain (p = 0.027) and clinically significant reduction in interference with activities (p < 0.001) and sleep (p < 0.001). However, dynamic pain was high and rescue opioids were likely under‐administered at all time points. Furthermore, while patients reported high levels of side‐effects, use of adjuvant medications was low. Conclusions We observed significant practice change in inpatient analgesic prescribing in favour of multimodal analgesia, in keeping with contemporary recommendations. Surveys, however, appeared to identify a clinical gap in the bedside assessment and management of breakthrough pain and medication side‐effects, requiring additional targeted interventions. Significance Evaluation of 6‐year trends in a large Australian metropolitan private hospital indicated substantial growth in postoperative multimodal analgesic prescribing. In the context of growing global awareness concerning multimodal analgesia, findings suggested diffusion of best‐evidence prescribing into clinical practice. Findings indicated the effects of postoperative multimodal analgesia in real‐world conditions outside of experimental trials. Postoperative multimodal analgesia in the clinical setting was only associated with a modest reduction in rest pain, but substantially reduced interference from pain on activities and sleep.