Nursing - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 293
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    A multicentre point prevalence study of delirium assessment and management in patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
    Ankravs, MJ ; Udy, AA ; Byrne, K ; Knowles, S ; Hammond, N ; Saxena, MK ; Reade, MC ; Bailey, M ; Bellomo, R ; Deane, AM (AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD, 2020-12)
    Objective: To characterise the assessment and management of delirium in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: We conducted a multicentre observational point prevalence study across 44 adult Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Data were extracted for all patients in the ICU in terms of assessment and treatment of delirium. ICU-level data were collected regarding the use of explicit protocols related to delirium. Results: We studied 627 patients, with 54% (336/627) having at least one delirium screening assessment performed. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) was the most frequently used tool (88%, 296/336). Of patients assessed, 20% (68) were identified to have delirium. Eighteen per cent (111) of patients were administered a drug to manage delirium, with 41% (46) of those receiving a drug having no recorded assessment for delirium on that day. Of the drugs used to treat delirium, quetiapine was the most frequently administered. Physical restraints were applied to 8% (48/626) of patients, but only 17% (8/48) of such patients had been diagnosed with delirium. Most physically restrained patients either did not have delirium diagnosed (31%, 15/48) or had no formal assessment recorded (52%, 25/48) on that day. Conclusions: On the study day, more than 50% of patients had a delirium screening assessment performed, with 20% of screened patients deemed to have delirium. Drugs that are prescribed to treat delirium and physical restraints were frequently used in the absence of delirium or the formal assessment for its presence.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Safewards in Acute Care: Evaluation of the adaptation and impact of Safewards in Acute Care wards
    Yap, C ; Daniel, C ; Gerdtz, M (Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, 2022)
    Safewards is a model of practice improvement that has previously been trialled to promote a therapeutic response to minimise conflict events in mental health in-patient wards and emergency departments. This project (Safewards Acute Care) piloted the innovative strategies to implement Safewards interventions in four acute care wards within two metropolitan health services in Victoria, Australia. Due to workforce shortages and increased staff pressure caused by Omicron outbreak during project implementation phase, four instead of ten Safewards interventions were selected to be trialled in this pilot project. These four interventions (Know Each Other, Neat, Smart and Tidy, Calming Methods, and Meaningful Messages) were considered most relevant to both patients and staff, and highly favourable based on the feedback received from staff focus group. The evaluation was conducted to examine how four Safewards interventions including the design and implementation strategies were relevant, acceptable, feasible, impactful, and sustainable in acute care wards. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected using mixed-method approach.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Safewards in Three Emergency Departments: Evaluation of the adaptation and impact of the Safewards Model in Emergency Departments
    Gerdtz, M ; Daniel, C ; Yap, C ; Knott, J ; Hamilton, B ( 2021-02-01)
    Safewards is a model of practice improvement that has been used to promote a therapeutic response to minimise conflict events in mental health in-patient settings. This pilot project (Safewards ED) evaluated the impact of nine modified Safewards interventions in three emergency departments (EDs) within 2 health services in Victoria, Australia. A mixed method approach including: (a) questionnaire, (b) focus groups, and (c) observational cohort studies of conflict events (code grey) and coercive interventions (restraint and medication used to manage patient behaviour); was used to evaluate the Safewards ED interventions 12 months before and 6 months after the implementation. The aim of the evaluation was to explore the applicability and impact of Safewards ED interventions.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Processes underpinning survival in gay men living with HIV and a history of suicidality
    Handlovsky, I ; Ferlatte, O ; Kia, H ; Knight, R ; Broom, A ; Oliffe, J (WILEY, 2022-07)
    Gay men living with HIV represent a particularly high risk group for suicide; however, little is known about suicidality, specifically, resiliencies in the context of suicidality among this particular group of men. The current study draws on photovoice and grounded theory methods to examine the processes that underpin survival for gay men living with HIV who have experienced suicidality. Twenty-two Canadian-based gay men participated, taking photographs to depict and discuss their perspectives on resiliencies. Analyses revealed three processes that supported men's survival: (1) connecting to key supports, (2) finding sanctity in the outdoors, and (3) giving help as purposeful value-adding. Connecting to key supports highlighted the utility of connection and therapeutic communication, listening and support provided by friends, family and professionals. Finding sanctity in the outdoors emphasised the healing capacity of outdoor green spaces, and giving help as purposeful value-adding illustrated the meaning and purpose men derived from supporting others. These findings can inform public health and primary care interventions to foster gay men's resilience and coping, and ultimately suicide prevention efforts.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prevalence of malnutrition and nutrition-related complications in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
    Laing, E ; Gough, K ; Krishnasamy, M ; Michael, M ; Kiss, N (WILEY, 2022-06)
    Cross-sectional studies report that up to 25% of people with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NET) are malnourished. However, the changes in nutritional status and dietary intake over time are unknown. The present study aimed to comprehensively describe the impact of a GEP NET on nutritional status and quality of life (QOL). Patients diagnosed with a GEP NET were recruited to this prospective longitudinal study on initial attendance to the NET Unit at two tertiary hospitals in Melbourne (VIC, Australia). Patient self-reported QOL measures (European Organisation for Research and Treatment Cancer QLC-C30 and QLC-GINET21) and nutritional outcomes (nutritional status, weight change, fat-free mass [FFM], dietary change, dietitian contact) were collected bi-monthly for six months. Sixty-one patients were recruited (66% male) with a mean ± SD age of 62 ± 12 years, predominantly diagnosed with small intestinal NET and Grade 1/2 disease. Commonly reported symptoms were fatigue (79%), abdominal discomfort (75%) and pain (68%). More patients were malnourished at baseline than at 6 months (29% vs. 13%). Over this 6 months, 48% lost weight, 20% lost ≥ 5% of their body weight, and 62% lost FFM with an average FFM loss of 2.8 kg (95% confidence interval = 2.0, 3.6), consistent with altered body composition. Dietary change was reported by 56% at baseline and 53% at six months, but only 21% consulted a dietitian at baseline and 18% at 6 months. Clinically significant loss of weight and FFM affected many patients with a GEP NET; however, few patients were referred to/or received a consultation with a dietitian. Valid screening practices are needed to identify weight loss and nutrition issues in GEP NET patients, and to facilitate referral to dietitian services.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Healthcare providers' experiences with advance care planning and goals of patient care medical treatment orders in residential aged care facilities: an explanatory descriptive study
    Martin, RS ; Hayes, BJ ; Hutchinson, A ; Yates, P ; Lim, WK (WILEY, 2022-05)
    BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is a process by which people communicate their healthcare preferences and values, planning for a time when they are unable to voice them. Within residential aged care facilities (RACF), both the completion and the clarity of ACP documents are varied and, internationally, medical treatment orders have been used to address these issues. AIMS: In this study, goals of patient care (GOPC) medical treatment orders were introduced alongside usual ACP in three RACF to improve healthcare decision-making for residents. This study explored the experiences of RACF healthcare providers with ACP and GOPC medical treatment orders. METHODS: The study used an explanatory descriptive approach. Within three RACF where the GOPC medical treatment orders had been introduced, focus groups and interviews with healthcare providers were performed. The transcribed interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Healthcare providers not only reported support for ACP and GOPC but also discussed many problematic issues. Analysis of the data identified four main themes: enablers, barriers, resident autonomy and advance documentation (ACP and GOPC). CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers identified ACP and GOPC as positive tools for assisting with medical decision-making for residents. Although barriers exist in completion and activation of plans, healthcare providers described them as progressing resident-centred care. Willingness to follow ACP instructions was reported to be reduced by lack of trust by clinicians. Families were also reported to change their views from those documented in family-completed ACP, attributed to poor understanding of their purpose. Participants reported that GOPC led to clearer documentation of residents' medical treatment plans rather than relying on ACP documents alone.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Social return on investment economic evaluation of supportive care for lung cancer patients in acute care settings in Australia
    Hyatt, A ; Chung, H ; Aston, R ; Gough, K ; Krishnasamy, M (BMC, 2022-11-23)
    BACKGROUND: Unmanaged consequences of cancer and its treatment are high among patients with lung cancer and their informal carers, resulting in avoidable healthcare use and financial burden. Provision of cancer supportive care addressing the impacts of cancer and its treatment has demonstrated efficacy in mitigating these consequences; however, globally, there is a lack of investment in these services. Paucity of robust economic evidence regarding benefit of cancer supportive care has limited policy impact and allocation of resources. This study therefore utilised a Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to conduct a forecast evaluation of lung cancer supportive care services, to ascertain potential social value and return on investment. METHODS: An SROI economic evaluation model was developed using qualitative stakeholder consultations synthesised with published evidence to develop the inputs, outcomes and financial value associated with the delivery of a hypothetical model of quality lung cancer supportive care services over a one and five year period. SROI ratios were generated to determine the social value and cost savings associated per every $1AUD invested in cancer supportive care for both the healthcare system and patients. Deadweight, drop off and attribution were calculated, and sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the stability of the model. RESULTS: The value generated from modelled supportive care service investments in a one-year period resulted in an SROI ratio of 1:9; that is, for every dollar invested in supportive care, AUD$9.00 social return is obtained when savings to the healthcare system and benefits to the patients are combined. At five-years, these same investments resulted in greater cumulative value generated for both the patient and the healthcare system, with a SROI ratio of 1:11. CONCLUSION: Our study provides strong evidence for policy makers, clinicians and consumers to advocate for further investment in cancer supportive care, as demonstrated cost savings could be achieved through implementation of the proposed supportive care service model, with these accruing over a five-year period. The SROI model provides a comprehensive framework detailing supportive care services and the health workforce necessary to achieve value-based outcomes for patients and the healthcare system.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Exploring the Public Health and Social Implications of Future Curative Hepatitis B Interventions
    Wallace, J ; Richmond, J ; Howell, J ; Hajarizadeh, B ; Power, J ; Treloar, C ; Revill, PA ; Cowie, B ; Wang, S ; Stoove, M ; Pedrana, A ; Hellard, M (MDPI, 2022-11)
    Hepatitis B is a significant global health issue where the 296 million people estimated to live with the infection risk liver disease or cancer without clinical intervention. The World Health Organization has committed to eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030, with future curative hepatitis B interventions potentially revolutionizing public health responses to hepatitis B, and being essential for viral hepatitis elimination. Understanding the social and public health implications of any cure is imperative for its successful implementation. This exploratory research, using semi-structured qualitative interviews with a broad range of professional stakeholders identifies the public health elements needed to ensure that a hepatitis B cure can be accessed by all people with hepatitis B. Issues highlighted by the experience of hepatitis C cure access include preparatory work to reorientate policy settings, develop resourcing options, and the appropriateness of health service delivery models. While the form and complexity of curative hepatitis B interventions are to be determined, addressing current disparities in cascade of care figures is imperative with implementation models needing to respond to the cultural contexts, social implications, and health needs of people with hepatitis B, with cure endpoints and discourse being contested.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Connecting and Healing: The Role of Existential Isolation in Mediating the Impact of the Therapeutic Relationship on Canadian Men's Mental Health Outcomes
    Storey, QK ; Kealy, D ; Seidler, ZE ; Oliffe, JL ; Rice, SM ; Ogrodniczuk, JS (SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2022-11)
    The therapeutic relationship has emerged as one of the most important components of successful treatment outcomes, regardless of the specific form of therapy. Research has now turned its attention to better understanding how the therapeutic relationship contributes to patient improvement. Extant literature contends that a strong therapeutic relationship may help reduce a patient's sense of existential isolation (i.e., a sense of not feeling understood by others). Research indicates that existential isolation might be especially problematic for men, potentially increasing their risk for suicidality. This study investigated the association between strength of the therapeutic relationship and psychological distress and suicidality among men who received psychotherapy, and whether existential isolation mediated this association. A total of 204 Canadian men who had previously attended psychotherapy participated in a cross-sectional survey, completing measures of the quality of their most recent therapeutic relationship, existential isolation, depression and anxiety symptoms, and suicidality. Regression with mediation analysis was conducted. Two models were tested; one with depression/anxiety symptoms as the dependent variable and the other with suicidality as the dependent variable. Both mediation models emerged as significant, indicating an indirect effect for quality of the therapeutic relationship on symptoms of anxiety/depression and suicidality through existential isolation. The findings suggest that a positive therapeutic relationship can contribute to men feeling less isolated in their experiences in life (i.e., less existentially isolated), thereby helping mitigate psychological distress and suicidality.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Assessing the environment for engagement in health services: The Audit for Consumer Engagement (ACE) tool.
    Chauhan, A ; Newman, B ; Walpola, RL ; Seale, H ; Manias, E ; Wilson, C ; Harrison, R (Wiley, 2022-12)
    INTRODUCTION: Although it is widely accepted that the physical environment can impact health quality and care outcomes, its impact on consumer engagement with health services has not been examined. Currently, no tools exist that assess the opportunities for consumer engagement offered within the physical environment. We aimed to develop and validate an environmental audit tool to assist health services and researchers to assess the extent to which the physical environment in health services creates and supports opportunities for consumer engagement. METHOD: An iterative, team-based approach in partnership with diverse stakeholders was used to develop the Audit for Consumer Engagement (ACE) tool. A four-stage process consisting of desktop review, concept clarification, identification of domains and validation was implemented. The tool was validated in one cancer service via face and content validation and inter-rater reliability was also assessed. RESULTS: The ACE tool was demonstrated to comprise four main domains (access and signage information; resources for consumers; resources to support diversity; and consumer engagement events or activities) measured with 17 items. Face and content validity was achieved, and preliminary reliability analysis indicated substantial agreement between the two researchers for all four domains with an average of 86% agreement. CONCLUSION: The ACE is a novel tool that is practical, relevant and reliable, and developed in partnership with consumers and health service providers. The tool can be used by health service providers, researchers and consumer agency groups to assess opportunities for consumer engagement offered within the physical environment of cancer services. The ACE tool has the potential to be used as a guide for enhancing consumer engagement opportunities and for research purposes. Further evidence about the validity of the tool is required, including criterion-related validity and utility in other health settings. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project is part of a wider 'CanEngage' project that includes a consumer investigator and is supported by a consumer advisory group. This study was completed in active partnership with members of a consumer advisory group from diverse backgrounds. Feedback was sought from the members throughout the development process of the tool with findings discussed with the CanEngage group members in scheduled meetings.