Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemMaternal sleep behaviours preceding fetal heart rate events on cardiotocography(WILEY, 2022-04)In Australia, a significant proportion of stillbirths remain unexplained. Recent research has highlighted nocturnal maternal behaviours as potentially modifiable contributors. This study determined whether sleep-related behaviours including sleep position and sleep-disordered breathing adversely affect fetuses overnight, in both uncomplicated pregnancies and those at increased risk due to hypertensive disorders or fetal growth restriction (FGR). All participants underwent polysomnography with time-synchronized fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring (cardiotocography - CTG) in late pregnancy. CTGs were analysed for abnormal FHR events, including decelerations and reduced variability, by two blinded observers and exported into the sleep study to temporally align FHR events with sleep behaviours. For each FHR event, 10 control epochs with normal FHR were randomly selected for the same participant. Conditional logistic regression assessed the relationships between FHR events and sleep behaviours. From 116 participants, 52 had a total of 129 FHR events overnight; namely prolonged decelerations and prolonged periods of reduced variability. Significantly more FHR events were observed in women with FGR and/or a hypertensive disorder compared with uncomplicated pregnancies (P = 0.006). FHR events were twice as likely to be preceded by a change in body position within the previous 5 min, compared with control epochs (P = 0.007), particularly in hypertensive pregnancies both with and without FGR. Overall, FHR events were not temporally related to supine body position, respiratory events or snoring. Our results indicate that most fetuses tolerate sleep-related stressors, but further research is needed to identify the interplay of maternal and fetal conditions putting the fetus at risk overnight. KEY POINTS: Maternal sleep behaviours including supine position and sleep-disordered breathing are potential contributors to stillbirth but much of this work is based on self-reported data. Using time-synchronized polysomnography and cardiotocography, we found that nocturnal fetal heart rate decelerations were more likely to be preceded by a change in body position compared with epochs containing normal fetal heart rate, particularly in hypertensive pregnancies with or without fetal growth restriction. There was no temporal relationship between maternal sleeping position, snoring or apnoeic events and an abnormal fetal heart rate overnight. We conclude that most fetuses can tolerate sleep-related stressors with no evidence of fetal heart rate changes indicating compromised wellbeing. Further work needs to identify how sleep behaviours contribute to stillbirth risk and how these intersect with underlying maternal and fetal conditions.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailablePolysomnographic analysis of maternal sleep position and its relationship to pregnancy complications and sleep-disordered breathing(OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2022-04-11)Links between supine "going to sleep" position and stillbirth risk have led to campaigns regarding safe maternal sleep position. This study profiles the distribution of sleep positions overnight and relationships to sleep onset position during pregnancy, and the relationships between supine sleep, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and pregnancy outcomes. Data from three prospective cohort studies evaluating SDB in healthy and complicated pregnancies were pooled. All participants underwent one night of polysomnography in late pregnancy and birth outcome data were collected. 187 women underwent polysomnography at a median gestation of 34 weeks'. The left lateral position was preferred for falling asleep (52%) compared to supine (14%), but sleep onset position was the dominant sleep position overnight in only half (54%) of women. The median percentage of sleep time in the supine position was 24.2%; women who fell asleep supine spent more time supine overnight compared to those who began non-supine (48.0% (30.0,65.9) vs. 22.6% (5.7,32.2), p < .001). Women with growth-restricted fetuses were more likely to fall asleep supine than those with well-grown fetuses (36.6% vs. 7.5%, p < .001). Positional SDB was observed in 46% of those with an RDI ≥ 5. Sleep onset position was the dominant position overnight for half of the sample, suggesting that sleep onset position is not always a reliable indicator of body position overnight. Supine sleep was related to fetal growth restriction and birthweight at delivery, though causality cannot be inferred. It is critical that we pursue research into verifying the important relationship between supine sleep and increased stillbirth risk, and the mechanisms behind it.
-
ItemP160 A trial of a position modification device for the prevention of supine sleep during pregnancy(Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021-10-07)Abstract Self-reported supine position at sleep onset during late pregnancy is related to a 2.6x increase in stillbirth risk, possibly due to the enlarged uterus compressing major blood vessels supplying the placenta. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of a pillow designed to decrease supine sleep in pregnant women. Twelve women in the third trimester of pregnancy used their own pillows for a control week and the intervention pillow for 1 week, in randomised order. Sleep position for each night of both weeks was monitored with the Night Shift Sleep Positioner, with a sleep study (WatchPat300) on the last night of each week to measure the impact of the intervention on SDB. During the control week, the women slept supine for a median of 19.9% (IQR = 11.6, 27.4) of total sleep time (TST), compared to a median of 20.4% (10.2, 31.0) TST using the intervention pillow (p = .64). Use of the intervention pillow did not impact sleep efficiency (control = 85.3% (80.7, 88.0) v. intervention = 85.2% (78.3, 89.0), p = .48). On the sleep study night, supine sleep was reduced in the intervention compared to control condition (12.9% vs. 17.7%, p = .04), but AHI did not differ (intervention = 2.6/hr (0.8, 6.7) vs. control = 1.5/hr (0.6, 3.6), p = .11). We found that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was not effective in late pregnancy. Considering the reasonably high amount of supine sleep in our participants, alternative devices should be investigated.
-
ItemSleep-disordered breathing does not impact maternal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy(PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2020-04-27)OBJECTIVE: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is characterised by intermittent hypoxemia, sympathetic activation and widespread endothelial dysfunction, sharing pathophysiologic features with the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We sought to determine whether coexisting SDB would adversely impact the outcomes of women with gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia (PE), and healthy matched controls. STUDY DESIGN: Women diagnosed with GH or PE along with BMI- and gestation-matched normotensive controls underwent polysomnography in late pregnancy to establish the presence or absence of SDB (RDI ≥ 5). Clinical outcomes of hypertensive disease severity were compared between groups, and venous blood samples were taken in the third trimester and at delivery to examine for any impact of SDB on the anti-angiogenic markers of PE. RESULTS: Data was available for 17 women with PE, 24 women with GH and 44 controls. SDB was diagnosed in 41% of the PE group, 63% of the GH group and 39% of the control group. Women with PE and co-existing SDB did not have worse outcomes in terms of gestation at diagnosis of PE (SDB = 29.1 (25.9, 32.1) weeks vs. no SDB = 32.0 (29.0, 33.9), p = n.s.) and days between diagnosis of PE and delivery (SDB = 20.0 (4.0, 35.0) days vs. no SDB = 10.5 (9.0, 14.0), p = n.s.). There were also no differences in severity of hypertension, antihypertensive treatment and biochemical, haematological and anti-angiogenic markers of PE between SDB and no SDB groups. Similar results were observed among women with GH. Healthy control women with SDB were no more likely to develop a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy in the later stages of pregnancy (SDB = 5.9% vs. no SDB = 7.4%, p = n.s.). Increasing the threshold for diagnosis of SDB to RDI ≥ 15 did not unmask a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: The presence of SDB during pregnancy did not worsen the disease course of GH or PE, and was not associated with high blood pressure or anti-angiogenic markers of hypertensive disease amongst healthy pregnant women. Given the numerous reports of the relationship between SDB and diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, it appears more work is required to distinguish causal, versus confounding, pathways.
-
ItemThe presence of coexisting sleep-disordered breathing among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy does not worsen perinatal outcome(PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2020-02-26)OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with worse perinatal outcomes among women diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), compared with normotensive controls. STUDY DESIGN: Women diagnosed with HDP (gestational hypertension or preeclampsia) and BMI- and gestation-matched controls underwent polysomnography in late pregnancy to determine if they had coexisting SDB. Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring accompanied the sleep study, and third trimester fetal growth velocity was assessed using ultrasound. Cord blood was taken at delivery to measure key regulators of fetal growth. RESULTS: SDB was diagnosed in 52.5% of the HDP group (n = 40) and 38.1% of the control group (n = 42); p = .19. FHR decelerations were commonly observed during sleep, but the presence of SDB did not increase this risk in either the HDP or control group (HDP group-SDB = 35.3% vs. No SDB = 40.0%, p = 1.0; control group-SDB = 41.7% vs. No SDB = 25.0%, p = .44), nor did SDB affect the total number of decelerations overnight (HDP group-SDB = 2.7 ± 1.0 vs. No SDB = 2.8 ± 2.1, p = .94; control group-SDB = 2.0 ± 0.8 vs. No SDB = 2.0 ± 0.7, p = 1.0). Fetal growth restriction was the strongest predictor of fetal heart rate events during sleep (aOR 5.31 (95% CI 1.26-22.26), p = .02). The presence of SDB also did not adversely affect fetal growth; in fact among women with HDP, SDB was associated with significantly larger customised birthweight centiles (43.2% ± 38.3 vs. 16.2% ± 27.0, p = .015) and fewer growth restricted babies at birth (30% vs. 68.4%, p = .026) compared to HDP women without SDB. There was no impact of SDB on measures of fetal growth for the control group. Cord blood measures of fetal growth did not show any adverse effect among women with SDB, either in the HDP or control group. CONCLUSION: We did not find that the presence of mild SDB worsened fetal acute or longitudinal outcomes, either among women with HDP or BMI-matched normotensive controls. Unexpectedly, we found the presence of SDB conferred a better prognosis in HDP in terms of fetal growth. The fetus has considerable adaptive capacity to withstand in utero hypoxia, which may explain our mostly negative findings. In addition, SDB in this cohort was mostly mild. It may be that fetal sequelae will only be unmasked in the setting of more severe degrees of SDB and/or underlying placental disease.