Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableCerebral Oxygenation during Neonatal Intubation with Nasal High Flow: A Sub-Study of the SHINE Randomized Trial(KARGER, 2023-08)INTRODUCTION: Nasal high flow (nHF) improves the likelihood of successful neonatal intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability. The effect of nHF on cerebral oxygenation is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare cerebral oxygenation during endotracheal intubation in neonates receiving nHF and those receiving standard care. METHODS: A sub-study of a multicentre randomized trial of nHF during neonatal endotracheal intubation. A subset of infants had near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring. Eligible infants were randomly assigned to nHF or standard care during the first intubation attempt. NIRS sensors provided continuous regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) monitoring. The procedure was video recorded, and peripheral oxygen saturation and rScO2 data were extracted at 2-second intervals. The primary outcome was the average difference in rScO2 from baseline during the first intubation attempt. Secondary outcomes included average rScO2 and rate of change of rScO2. RESULTS: Nineteen intubations were analyzed (11 nHF; 8 standard care). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) postmenstrual age was 27 (26.5-29) weeks, and weight was 828 (716-1,135) g. Median change in rScO2 from baseline was -1.5% (-5.3 to 0.0) in the nHF group and -9.4% (-19.6 to -4.5) in the standard care group. rScO2 fell more slowly in infants managed with nHF compared with standard care: median (IQR) rScO2 change -0.08 (-0.13 to 0.00) % per second and -0.36 (-0.66 to -0.22) % per second, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this small sub-study, regional cerebral oxygen saturation was more stable in neonates who received nHF during intubation compared with standard care.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableNasal High-Flow Therapy during Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation(MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC, 2022-04-28)BACKGROUND: Neonatal endotracheal intubation often involves more than one attempt, and oxygen desaturation is common. It is unclear whether nasal high-flow therapy, which extends the time to desaturation during elective intubation in children and adults receiving general anesthesia, can improve the likelihood of successful neonatal intubation on the first attempt. METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled trial to compare nasal high-flow therapy with standard care (no nasal high-flow therapy or supplemental oxygen) in neonates undergoing oral endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Randomization of intubations to the high-flow group or the standard-care group was stratified according to trial center, the use of premedication for intubation (yes or no), and postmenstrual age of the infant (≤28 or >28 weeks). The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability (defined as an absolute decrease in the peripheral oxygen saturation of >20% from the preintubation baseline level or bradycardia with a heart rate of <100 beats per minute) in the infant. RESULTS: The primary intention-to-treat analysis included the outcomes of 251 intubations in 202 infants; 124 intubations were assigned to the high-flow group and 127 to the standard-care group. The infants had a median postmenstrual age of 27.9 weeks and a median weight of 920 g at the time of intubation. A successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability was achieved in 62 of 124 intubations (50.0%) in the high-flow group and in 40 of 127 intubations (31.5%) in the standard-care group (adjusted risk difference, 17.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.0 to 29.2), for a number needed to treat of 6 (95% CI, 4 to 17) for 1 infant to benefit. Successful intubation on the first attempt regardless of physiological stability was accomplished in 68.5% of the intubations in the high-flow group and in 54.3% of the intubations in the standard-care group (adjusted risk difference, 15.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.3 to 27.3). CONCLUSIONS: Among infants undergoing endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units, nasal high-flow therapy during the procedure improved the likelihood of successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability in the infant. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618001498280.).
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableNasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome(W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC, 2021-12)Nasal or noninvaisve intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) refers to well-established noninvasive respiratory support strategies combining a continuous distending pressure with intermittent pressure increases. Uncertainty remains regarding the benefits provided by the various devices and techniques used to generate NIPPV. Our included meta-analyses of trials comparing NIPPV with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants demonstrate that both primary and postextubation NIPPV are superior to CPAP to prevent respiratory failure leading to additional ventilatory support. This short-term benefit is associated with a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia, but not with mortality. Benefits are greatest when ventilator-generated, synchronized NIPPV is used.
-
ItemNonpublication and discontinuation of randomised controlled trials in newborns(WILEY, 2017-12)AIM: To determine the rate of nonpublication and discontinuation of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in newborns. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of RCTs registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS: Fifty trials were identified, of which 23 (46%) were retrospectively registered. Thirty trials (60%) were published. After a median follow-up of 8.0 (range 4.6-17.4) years from Research Ethics Committee approval, 15 of 41 completed trials (37%) remained unpublished, representing 5422 neonatal trial participants. Nine trials (18%) were discontinued, including four that were published. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (n = 4). Sample size discrepancies between registration and publication were found in 17 (65%) of the 26 completed, published trials. In nine (35%) of these trials, the calculated sample size in the method section of the published article differed from the planned sample size in the trial registry (relative difference -20% to +33%). CONCLUSION: Nonpublication and discontinuation of RCTs conducted in newborns is common. Additional efforts are needed to minimise the number of neonatal trial participants that are exposed to interventions without subsequent publication.
-
ItemCord stripping in preterm neonates(WILEY, 2017-07)
-
ItemPersonal smartphones for neonatal diagnostic imaging: A prospective crossover study(WILEY, 2017-04)AIM: Neonatal clinicians may be asked to review X-ray images when unable to directly access the original image. Transmitting an X-ray image to a smartphone is a technique increasingly being used by clinicians in a number of settings. Minimal data exist on its use in the neonatal setting. Our aim was to compare the ability of neonatal clinicians to correctly diagnose a pneumothorax from a chest radiograph (CXR) viewed on a smartphone, paralleled with the same image viewed on a computer screen. METHODS: We investigated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predicative value of two methods of viewing CXR images to diagnose pneumothorax, compared with a gold standard radiologist report. Clinicians were presented with 40 CXR images on two occasions, at least 1 week apart. Images were viewed once on a smartphone and once on a computer screen. Both the viewing method and viewing order of the images were randomised. The clinical details of the infant at the time the CXR was taken were provided, and participants were asked if a pneumothorax was present. RESULTS: Twenty-one clinicians viewed all CXR images using both viewing methods (840 paired observations). There was no difference in accuracy of detecting pneumothorax between viewing methods, 81% correctly identified a pneumothorax using the smartphone, versus 80% using the computer screen (P = 0.40 (95% CI), difference -4 to 1.5%). CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of neonatal pneumothorax was as accurate using a smartphone as viewing CXR images displayed on a computer screen when clinicians were presented with X-rays with diagnosis of pneumothorax.
-
Item
-
ItemDeliveries at early term gestation: A view from the NICU(WILEY, 2019-04)
-
Item
-
ItemNasal high flow therapy for neonates: Current evidence and future directions(WILEY, 2019-03)Nasal high flow (nHF) therapy is a commonly used method of providing non-invasive respiratory support for neonates. It has several potential mechanisms of action: continuous distending pressure, nasopharyngeal dead space washout, provision of heated and humidified gases and reduction of work of breathing. nHF is used in a number of clinical scenarios for preterm and term infants, including primary respiratory and post-extubation support. In recent years, large trials have generated evidence pertinent to these indications. Novel applications for nHF in neonates warrant further research: during endotracheal intubation, for initial delivery room stabilisation of preterm infants and in conjunction with minimally invasive surfactant therapy.