Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemSleep-disordered breathing does not impact maternal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy(PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2020-04-27)OBJECTIVE: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is characterised by intermittent hypoxemia, sympathetic activation and widespread endothelial dysfunction, sharing pathophysiologic features with the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We sought to determine whether coexisting SDB would adversely impact the outcomes of women with gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia (PE), and healthy matched controls. STUDY DESIGN: Women diagnosed with GH or PE along with BMI- and gestation-matched normotensive controls underwent polysomnography in late pregnancy to establish the presence or absence of SDB (RDI ≥ 5). Clinical outcomes of hypertensive disease severity were compared between groups, and venous blood samples were taken in the third trimester and at delivery to examine for any impact of SDB on the anti-angiogenic markers of PE. RESULTS: Data was available for 17 women with PE, 24 women with GH and 44 controls. SDB was diagnosed in 41% of the PE group, 63% of the GH group and 39% of the control group. Women with PE and co-existing SDB did not have worse outcomes in terms of gestation at diagnosis of PE (SDB = 29.1 (25.9, 32.1) weeks vs. no SDB = 32.0 (29.0, 33.9), p = n.s.) and days between diagnosis of PE and delivery (SDB = 20.0 (4.0, 35.0) days vs. no SDB = 10.5 (9.0, 14.0), p = n.s.). There were also no differences in severity of hypertension, antihypertensive treatment and biochemical, haematological and anti-angiogenic markers of PE between SDB and no SDB groups. Similar results were observed among women with GH. Healthy control women with SDB were no more likely to develop a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy in the later stages of pregnancy (SDB = 5.9% vs. no SDB = 7.4%, p = n.s.). Increasing the threshold for diagnosis of SDB to RDI ≥ 15 did not unmask a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: The presence of SDB during pregnancy did not worsen the disease course of GH or PE, and was not associated with high blood pressure or anti-angiogenic markers of hypertensive disease amongst healthy pregnant women. Given the numerous reports of the relationship between SDB and diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, it appears more work is required to distinguish causal, versus confounding, pathways.
-
ItemThe presence of coexisting sleep-disordered breathing among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy does not worsen perinatal outcome(PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2020-02-26)OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with worse perinatal outcomes among women diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), compared with normotensive controls. STUDY DESIGN: Women diagnosed with HDP (gestational hypertension or preeclampsia) and BMI- and gestation-matched controls underwent polysomnography in late pregnancy to determine if they had coexisting SDB. Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring accompanied the sleep study, and third trimester fetal growth velocity was assessed using ultrasound. Cord blood was taken at delivery to measure key regulators of fetal growth. RESULTS: SDB was diagnosed in 52.5% of the HDP group (n = 40) and 38.1% of the control group (n = 42); p = .19. FHR decelerations were commonly observed during sleep, but the presence of SDB did not increase this risk in either the HDP or control group (HDP group-SDB = 35.3% vs. No SDB = 40.0%, p = 1.0; control group-SDB = 41.7% vs. No SDB = 25.0%, p = .44), nor did SDB affect the total number of decelerations overnight (HDP group-SDB = 2.7 ± 1.0 vs. No SDB = 2.8 ± 2.1, p = .94; control group-SDB = 2.0 ± 0.8 vs. No SDB = 2.0 ± 0.7, p = 1.0). Fetal growth restriction was the strongest predictor of fetal heart rate events during sleep (aOR 5.31 (95% CI 1.26-22.26), p = .02). The presence of SDB also did not adversely affect fetal growth; in fact among women with HDP, SDB was associated with significantly larger customised birthweight centiles (43.2% ± 38.3 vs. 16.2% ± 27.0, p = .015) and fewer growth restricted babies at birth (30% vs. 68.4%, p = .026) compared to HDP women without SDB. There was no impact of SDB on measures of fetal growth for the control group. Cord blood measures of fetal growth did not show any adverse effect among women with SDB, either in the HDP or control group. CONCLUSION: We did not find that the presence of mild SDB worsened fetal acute or longitudinal outcomes, either among women with HDP or BMI-matched normotensive controls. Unexpectedly, we found the presence of SDB conferred a better prognosis in HDP in terms of fetal growth. The fetus has considerable adaptive capacity to withstand in utero hypoxia, which may explain our mostly negative findings. In addition, SDB in this cohort was mostly mild. It may be that fetal sequelae will only be unmasked in the setting of more severe degrees of SDB and/or underlying placental disease.