Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
  • Item
  • Item
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Nasal High-Flow Therapy during Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation
    Hodgson, KA ; Owen, LS ; Kamlin, COF ; Roberts, CT ; Newman, SE ; Francis, KL ; Donath, SM ; Davis, PG ; Manley, BJ (MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC, 2022-04-28)
    BACKGROUND: Neonatal endotracheal intubation often involves more than one attempt, and oxygen desaturation is common. It is unclear whether nasal high-flow therapy, which extends the time to desaturation during elective intubation in children and adults receiving general anesthesia, can improve the likelihood of successful neonatal intubation on the first attempt. METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled trial to compare nasal high-flow therapy with standard care (no nasal high-flow therapy or supplemental oxygen) in neonates undergoing oral endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Randomization of intubations to the high-flow group or the standard-care group was stratified according to trial center, the use of premedication for intubation (yes or no), and postmenstrual age of the infant (≤28 or >28 weeks). The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability (defined as an absolute decrease in the peripheral oxygen saturation of >20% from the preintubation baseline level or bradycardia with a heart rate of <100 beats per minute) in the infant. RESULTS: The primary intention-to-treat analysis included the outcomes of 251 intubations in 202 infants; 124 intubations were assigned to the high-flow group and 127 to the standard-care group. The infants had a median postmenstrual age of 27.9 weeks and a median weight of 920 g at the time of intubation. A successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability was achieved in 62 of 124 intubations (50.0%) in the high-flow group and in 40 of 127 intubations (31.5%) in the standard-care group (adjusted risk difference, 17.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.0 to 29.2), for a number needed to treat of 6 (95% CI, 4 to 17) for 1 infant to benefit. Successful intubation on the first attempt regardless of physiological stability was accomplished in 68.5% of the intubations in the high-flow group and in 54.3% of the intubations in the standard-care group (adjusted risk difference, 15.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.3 to 27.3). CONCLUSIONS: Among infants undergoing endotracheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units, nasal high-flow therapy during the procedure improved the likelihood of successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability in the infant. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618001498280.).
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Rapid centralised randomisation in emergency setting trials using a smartphone
    Badurdeen, S ; Hodgson, KA ; Santomartino, GA ; Stevens, L ; Donath, S ; Roberts, CT ; Manley, BJ ; Polglase, GR ; Hooper, SB ; Davis, PG ; Blank, DA (SPRINGER, 2022-08)
    Randomised trials in emergency settings must quickly confirm eligibility and allocate participants to an intervention group without delaying treatment. We report rapid randomisation during two neonatal resuscitation trials using the non-commercial REDCap platform accessed via smartphone. This simple, reliable method has wide applicability for trials in emergency settings. What is Known: • Randomised trials in emergency settings need to rapidly allocate participants to an intervention group. • This process should not delay treatment. What is New: • This non-commercial, smartphone-accessible application enabled rapid, accurate randomisation at the bedside. • This has broad applicability for emergency setting trials.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Predictors and outcomes of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
    Kidman, AM ; Manley, BJ ; Boland, RA ; Davis, PG ; Bhatia, R (WILEY, 2021-06)
    AIM: To determine predictors and outcomes of extubation failure in extremely preterm (EP) infants born <28 weeks' gestational age (GA). METHODS: Retrospective clinical audit across two tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia. Two-hundred and four EP infants who survived to their first extubation from mechanical ventilation. Extubation failure (re-intubation) within 7 days after the first extubation. RESULTS: Lower GA (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.89, P < 0.001) and higher pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure (MAP) on the mechanical ventilator (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.41-2.51], P < 0.001) predicted extubation failure. The area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for GA and MAP was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.82). After adjustment for GA, infants who experienced extubation failure had higher rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P < 0.001), post-natal systemic corticosteroid treatment (P < 0.001), airway trauma (P < 0.003), longer durations of treatment with mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001), non-invasive respiratory support (P < 0.001), supplemental oxygen therapy (P = 0.05) and longer hospitalisation (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Lower GA and higher pre-extubation measured MAP were predictive of extubation failure within 7 days in extremely preterm infants. Extubation failure was associated with increased morbidity and extended periods of respiratory support and hospitalisation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The SHINE trial (a multicentre, randomised trial of stabilisation with nasal high flow during neonatal endotracheal intubation): statistical analysis plan
    Hodgson, K ; Manley, B ; Kamlin, O ; Owen, L ; Roberts, C ; Francis, K ; Davis, P ; Donath, S (BMC, 2021-08-24)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing two CPAP levels to prevent extubation failure in extremely preterm infants
    Kidman, AM ; Manley, BJ ; Boland, RA ; Malhotra, A ; Donath, SM ; Davis, PG ; Bhatia, R (BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2021)
    INTRODUCTION: Respiratory distress syndrome is a complication of prematurity and extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks' gestation often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. In this high-risk population, mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury and contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Therefore, clinicians attempt to extubate infants as quickly and use non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to facilitate the transition. However, approximately 60% of extremely preterm infants experience 'extubation failure' and require reintubation. While CPAP pressures of 5-8 cm H2O are commonly used, the optimal CPAP pressure is unknown, and higher pressures may be beneficial in avoiding extubation failure. Our trial is the Extubation CPAP Level Assessment Trial (ÉCLAT). The aim of this trial is to compare higher CPAP pressures 9-11 cm H2O with a current standard pressures of 6-8 cmH2O on extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 200 extremely preterm infants will be recruited prior to their first extubation from mechanical ventilation to CPAP. This is a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Infants will be randomised to one of two set CPAP pressures: CPAP 10 cmH2O (intervention) or CPAP 7 cmH2O (control). The primary outcome will be extubation failure (reintubation) within 7 days. Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials on an intention to treat basis. For the primary outcome, this will be by intention to treat, adjusted for the prerandomisation strata (GA and centre). We will use the appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committees. Amendments to the trial protocol will be submitted for approval. The findings of this study will be written into a clinical trial report manuscript and disseminated via peer-reviewed journals (on-line or in press) and presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberACTRN12618001638224; pre-results.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Time to desaturation in preterm infants undergoing endotracheal intubation
    Kothari, R ; Hodgson, KA ; Davis, PG ; Thio, M ; Manley, BJ ; O'Currain, E (BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2021-11)
    BACKGROUND: Neonatal endotracheal intubation is often associated with physiological instability. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommends a time-based limit (30 s) for intubation attempts in the delivery room, but there are limited physiological data to support recommendations in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We aimed to determine the time to desaturation after ceasing spontaneous or assisted breathing in preterm infants undergoing elective endotracheal intubation in the NICU. METHODS: Observational study at The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne. A secondary analysis was performed of video recordings of neonates ≤32 weeks' postmenstrual age undergoing elective intubation. Infants received premedication including atropine, a sedative and muscle relaxant. Apnoeic oxygenation time (AOT) was defined as the time from the last positive pressure or spontaneous breath until desaturation (SpO2 <90%). RESULTS: Seventy-eight infants were included. The median (IQR) gestational age at birth was 27 (26-29) weeks and birth weight 946 (773-1216) g. All but five neonates desaturated to SpO2 <90% (73/78, 94%). The median (IQR) AOT was 22 (14-32) s. The median (IQR) time from ceasing positive pressure ventilation to desaturation <80% was 35 (24-44) s and to desaturation <60% was 56 (42-68) s. No episodes of bradycardia were seen. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report AOT in preterm infants. During intubation of preterm infants in the NICU, desaturation occurs quickly after cessation of positive pressure ventilation. These data are important for the development of clinical guidelines for neonatal intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000709640.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A multicentre, randomised trial of stabilisation with nasal high flow during neonatal endotracheal intubation (the SHINE trial): a study protocol
    Hodgson, KA ; Owen, LS ; Kamlin, CO ; Roberts, CT ; Donath, SM ; Davis, PG ; Manley, BJ (BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2020)
    INTRODUCTION: Neonatal endotracheal intubation is an essential but potentially destabilising procedure. With an increased focus on avoiding mechanical ventilation, particularly in preterm infants, there are fewer opportunities for clinicians to gain proficiency in this important emergency skill. Rates of successful intubation at the first attempt are relatively low, and adverse event rates are high, when compared with intubations in paediatric and adult populations. Interventions to improve operator success and patient stability during neonatal endotracheal intubations are needed. Using nasal high flow therapy extends the safe apnoea time of adults undergoing upper airway surgery and during endotracheal intubation. This technique is untested in neonates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Stabilisation with nasal High flow during Intubation of NEonates (SHINE) trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing the use of nasal high flow during neonatal intubation with standard care (no nasal high flow). Intubations are randomised individually, and stratified by site, use of premedications, and postmenstrual age (<28 weeks' gestation; ≥28 weeks' gestation). The primary outcome is the incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability of the infant. Physiological instability is defined as an absolute decrease in peripheral oxygen saturation >20% from preintubation baseline and/or bradycardia (<100 beats per minute). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The SHINE trial received ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committees of The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. The trial is currently recruiting in these two sites. The findings of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618001498280.
  • Item