Faculty of Education - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4
-
ItemTeachers & curriculum : personal mythopoesis and the practical in pedagogy(University of Melbourne, 1996)This study explores the dynamic between the person of the teacher and work with curriculum. The person is taken to be constituted in narratives. I have, accordingly, utilised a language of myth in order to speak of personhood. Myth is the collective or individual operation of imagination whereby experience is able to be intensely owned. It is this operation of mind that I relate to the ways in which curriculum might be experienced. At issue in this process is the capacity of the person of the teacher to illuminate curriculum material, or to make curriculum a living experience for students. Though my focus is imaginational and mythic, I seek to show - through an intimate study of the inner worlds of six teachers at one school site - that it is at this impalpable level lhat 'the practical' in pedagogy becomes most significant as a curriculum consideration. By linking the subtle work of imagination to the 'practical intelligence' access is gained to the significance and meaning of personal agency and, in particular, the nature of critique in teacher work with curriculum. This introduces to the familiar theory/practice dichotomy that pervades curriculum thinking, and which tends to disempower the teacher voice, a new and incommensurable perspective. The practical emphasis, by being linked to the personal imaginational work of teachers, breaks out of an encapsulation within the classroom and the profession. Knowledge, represented in microcosm in the curriculum, is shown, via this reconceptualisation of the practical, in its living dimensionality. The imperatives of this living aspect of curriculum experience, identified in source, process, operation, and direction, stand against the different imperatives of instrumental conceptions of curriculum.
-
ItemImplementation and implications of the National English Profile for improving assessment strategies in a primary classroom( 1996)The National English Profile provides the framework for teachers to use in assessing the literacy development of children in Australian schools. This study documents how one school and, in particular, one teacher, implemented the National English Profile. In order to place this initiative in the context of educational change in Victoria today, recent initiatives and changes to the teaching of language have been examined. Current literature in the field of literacy and assessment have been critically reviewed. As a foreground to the study, the process of educational change is examined in two interrelated case studies. The first looks at how the site school reviewed their Assessment and Reporting Policy. The second examines personal educational change of the researcher with regard to the teaching and assessment of literacy. Both of these case studies refer to current literature in the field and refined the focus of the research in one classroom. This research study draws on and investigates a national initiative in assessment. It traces the implementation and implications of the National English Profile on classroom based assessment strategies. It took place over two years, at a time of quite dramatic change in state education in Victoria. The study provides insight into how teachers managed and adjusted to these changes in one particular school. The research design is drawn from naturalistic inquiry methodology. Data were collected from teachers, parents and children of the site school through questionnaires and interviews. From an analysis of these data, generalisations were made about the understandings a group of teachers, parents and children have about the worth of the National English Profile and the usefulness of particular classroom based assessment strategies. The use of Portfolios as a system of work sample collection that is both manageable and purposeful for teachers and children has been examined in this study.
-
ItemCurriculum coordination in practice( 1996)The implementation of whole-school curriculum change is a challenge faced by principals and senior staff with curriculum leadership responsibilities. Success depends on the cooperation and commitment of all teachers in a school, so that curriculum leaders require skills for manoeuvring groups of teachers towards a common goal. In Victorian government secondary schools the Curriculum Coordinator, an experienced teacher, is charged with overseeing curriculum change, and this customarily entails chairing a Curriculum Committee, the composition of which is invariably dominated by teachers. Schwab (1983) writes about the creation of a similar role in American schools, and proffers suggestions for the role and training of a curriculum coordinator and the composition of a curriculum committee, in order to encourage a refocussing on the liberal democratic traditions of education. This study uses Schwab's views as a reference point for examining the work of three experienced Curriculum Coordinators in Victorian government schools, who shared their stories with the author, himself a practising Curriculum Coordinator. Each participant in the study was asked to reflect on a Critical Incident of whole-school curriculum change, for which they had responsibility, and which influenced the ways in which they carried out the role of Curriculum Coordinator. The sharing of these reflections benefits both researcher and participant alike (Tripp, (1994)) and can offer insights into the skills and knowledge employed by effective curriculum leaders. Interpretation of the Critical Incidents provided a framework by which curriculum change can be analysed. The effect of the educational culture of a school, the status of the Curriculum Coordinator in the school and the extent to which the proposed curriculum change affects existing participant areas cumulatively influence the successful implementation. A number of writers identify teachers as inhibitors of change (eg: Cowie (1995), Weiss (1995) and Little (1990)), and the management and communication skills of effective Curriculum Coordinators are tested by this resistance. The stories presented confirm the notion of curriculum leadership as a practical, multi-faceted activity, and each participant has developed professionally through the practical execution of their roles. While each story is unique, the participants shared a common view of whole-school curriculum leadership as a collaborative exercise, focussed on improving educational outcomes for their students.
-
ItemTeachers & curriculum: personal mythopoesis and the practical in pedagogy( 1996)This study explores the dynamic between the person of the teacher and work with curriculum. The person is taken to be constituted in narratives. I have, accordingly, utilised a language of myth in order to speak of personhood. Myth is the collective or individual operation of imagination whereby experience is able to be intensely owned. It is this operation of mind that I relate to the ways in which curriculum might be experienced. At issue in this process is the capacity of the person of the teacher to illuminate curriculum material, or to make curriculum a living experience for students. Though my focus is imaginational and mythic, I seek to show - through an intimate study of the inner worlds of six teachers at one school site - that it is at this impalpable level that 'the practical' in pedagogy becomes most significant as a curriculum consideration. By linking the subtle work of imagination to the 'practical intelligence' access is gained to the significance and meaning of personal agency and, in particular, the nature of critique in teacher work with curriculum. This introduces to the familiar theory/practice dichotomy that pervades curriculum thinking, and which tends to disempower the teacher voice, a new and incommensurable perspective. The practical emphasis, by being linked to the personal imaginational work of teachers, breaks out of an encapsulation within the classroom and the profession. Knowledge, represented in microcosm in the curriculum, is shown, via this reconceptualisation of the practical, in its living dimensionality. The imperatives of this living aspect of curriculum experience, identified in source, process, operation, and direction, stand against the different imperatives of instrumental conceptions of curriculum.