Faculty of Education - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemSchool evaluation practice in Japan : case studies of four public schools in Hiroshima( 2006)This thesis analyses and discusses recent developments in the practice of school evaluation in Japan. Such an investigation was considered to be valuable because there appeared to be little research that had elucidated how Japanese schools actually set about self-evaluation. Therefore, this thesis aimed to identify ways in which school evaluation occurs and how it can be embedded in Japanese public schools. To achieve this aim, four questions were posed to find out: (a) how evaluations are carried out in Japanese schools, specifically in the Hiroshima Prefecture; (b) how such school evaluation contributes towards school improvement; (c) what constitutes 'best evaluation practice' in the Japanese school context; and (d) how other Japanese schools can be assisted to introduce best evaluation practice. To find answers to these questions, a qualitative case study approach was used and data were collected from four Japanese public schools (two primary and two middle schools) in Hiroshima City. The four case schools were selected because they had previously participated in a pilot project of school evaluation and, therefore, were considered to be exemplary. Other information was obtained from a local education board and an educational training centre. Findings from the data analysis demonstrated that: 1. School evaluation in Hiroshima involved a form of Action Research and comprised both school-self evaluation and external evaluation; 2. Positive impacts on teachers from the evaluation experience (both individually and collectively) were considered to contribute towards an evolving process that could eventually lead to overall improvements in the quality of school education in the Prefecture; and 3. 'Best evaluation practice' in the Japanese school context comprised: (1) Systematic planning and implementation of the evaluation; (2) A clear vision and relevant goals set by school principals in relation to all school activities; (3) Involvement of all school staff in undertaking evaluation tasks; (4) School evaluation models that were instigated by schools, rather than imposed by those outside the school; (5) The prioritisation of school goals and improvement strategies; and (6) Teachers who were motivated regarding improvement. It was also suggested that there was a particular local educational culture underlying the embedding of school evaluation in Hiroshima. Such a context was regarded as one of the enabling conditions related to the advancement of school evaluation in the Prefecture. Based on these findings, the research produced some useful lessons regarding how to introduce successful evaluation so that other Japanese schools might be encouraged to evaluate their own practices.
-
ItemMandated improvement: an examination of the impact of the school accountability framework in Victoria, Australia( 2002)This research set out to examine the impact of the Victorian Government's Accountability Framework, on three primary schools. Located within a naturalistic paradigm, this case study research focused on the understandings and experiences of principals, other school leaders and teachers, as they completed the first three-year cycle of implementation. Using the Hargreaves, Shaw and Fink (1997) Change Frames as the basis for interviews with participants, it was revealed that participants across the three schools faced many personal and professional challenges, as they engaged in processes of charter development, charter implementation and review. A mix of administrative, leadership, socio-cultural and educational factors impacted both positively and negatively on the implementation. A number of these factors were found to relate directly to political challenges of the period. The study reveals a key weakness in the Accountability Framework's capacity to translate findings arising from the self-evaluative components (Annual and Triennial Review) into teaching and learning practices. The findings suggest that there is a risk that some schools may `institutionalise' the practices of charter development, implementation and review, to meet Education Department of Education and Training expectations, but without significantly addressing the real needs of students within the Framework's processes, strategies and outcomes. A number of recommendations are offered to help strengthen the impact of the Framework on school improvement practices, and especially teaching and learning outcomes.