Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 26
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    DNA methylation-based biological aging and cancer risk and survival: Pooled analysis of seven prospective studies
    Dugue, P-A ; Bassett, JK ; Joo, JE ; Jung, C-H ; Wong, EM ; Moreno-Betancur, M ; Schmidt, D ; Makalic, E ; Li, S ; Severi, G ; Hodge, AM ; Buchanan, DD ; English, DR ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Milne, RL (WILEY, 2018-04-15)
    The association between aging and cancer is complex. Recent studies have developed measures of biological aging based on DNA methylation and called them "age acceleration." We aimed to assess the associations of age acceleration with risk of and survival from seven common cancers. Seven case-control studies of DNA methylation and colorectal, gastric, kidney, lung, prostate and urothelial cancer and B-cell lymphoma nested in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study were conducted. Cancer cases, vital status and cause of death were ascertained through linkage with cancer and death registries. Conditional logistic regression and Cox models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of five age acceleration measures derived from the Human Methylation 450 K Beadchip assay with cancer risk (N = 3,216 cases) and survival (N = 1,726 deaths), respectively. Epigenetic aging was associated with increased cancer risk, ranging from 4% to 9% per five-year age acceleration for the 5 measures considered. Heterogeneity by study was observed, with stronger associations for risk of kidney cancer and B-cell lymphoma. An associated increased risk of death following cancer diagnosis ranged from 2% to 6% per five-year age acceleration, with no evidence of heterogeneity by cancer site. Cancer risk and mortality were increased by 15-30% for the fourth versus first quartile of age acceleration. DNA methylation-based measures of biological aging are associated with increased cancer risk and shorter cancer survival, independently of major health risk factors.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Genome-Wide Measures of Peripheral Blood Dna Methylation and Prostate Cancer Risk in a Prospective Nested Case-Control Study
    FitzGerald, LM ; Naeem, H ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Dowty, JG ; Joo, JE ; Jung, C-H ; Bassett, JK ; Dugue, P-A ; Chung, J ; Lonie, A ; Milne, RL ; Wong, EM ; Hopper, JL ; English, DR ; Severi, G ; Baglietto, L ; Pedersen, J ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC (WILEY, 2017-04-01)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Genome-wide association study of peripheral blood DNA methylation and conventional mammographic density measures
    Li, S ; Dugue, P-A ; Baglietto, L ; Severi, G ; Wong, EM ; Nguyen, TL ; Stone, J ; English, DR ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL ; Milne, RL (WILEY, 2019-10-01)
    Age- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted mammographic density is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. DNA methylation is a molecular mechanism that could underlie inter-individual variation in mammographic density. We aimed to investigate the association between breast cancer risk-predicting mammographic density measures and blood DNA methylation. For 436 women from the Australian Mammographic Density Twins and Sisters Study and 591 women from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, mammographic density (dense area, nondense area and percentage dense area) defined by the conventional brightness threshold was measured using the CUMULUS software, and peripheral blood DNA methylation was measured using the HumanMethylation450 (HM450) BeadChip assay. Associations between DNA methylation at >400,000 sites and mammographic density measures adjusted for age and BMI were assessed within each cohort and pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis. Associations with methylation at genetic loci known to be associated with mammographic density were also examined. We found no genome-wide significant (p < 10-7 ) association for any mammographic density measure from the meta-analysis, or from the cohort-specific analyses. None of the 299 methylation sites located at genetic loci associated with mammographic density was associated with any mammographic density measure after adjusting for multiple testing (all p > 0.05/299 = 1.7 × 10-4 ). In summary, our study did not find evidence for associations between blood DNA methylation, as measured by the HM450 assay, and conventional mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Heritable methylation marks associated with breast and prostate cancer risk
    Dugue, P-A ; Dowty, JG ; Joo, JE ; Wong, EM ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; English, DR ; Hopper, JL ; Pedersen, J ; Severi, G ; MacInnis, RJ ; Milne, RL ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC (WILEY, 2018-09-15)
    BACKGROUND: DNA methylation can mimic the effects of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. Recently, we identified twenty-four heritable methylation marks associated with breast cancer risk. As breast and prostate cancer share genetic risk factors, including rare, high-risk mutations (eg, in BRCA2), we hypothesized that some of these heritable methylation marks might also be associated with the risk of prostate cancer. METHODS: We studied 869 incident prostate cancers (430 aggressive and 439 non-aggressive) and 869 matched controls nested within a prospective cohort study. DNA methylation was measured in pre-diagnostic blood samples using the Illumina Infinium HM450K BeadChip. Conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for prostate cancer risk factors and blood cell composition, were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between the 24 methylation marks and the risk of prostate cancer. RESULTS: Five methylation marks within the VTRNA2-1 promoter region (cg06536614, cg00124993, cg26328633, cg25340688, and cg26896946), and one in the body of CLGN (cg22901919) were associated with the risk of prostate cancer. In stratified analyses, the five VTRNA2-1 marks were associated with the risk of aggressive prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights a potentially important new area of investigation for prostate cancer susceptibility and adds to our knowledge about shared risk factors for breast and prostate cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Identification of a novel prostate cancer susceptibility variant in the KLK3 gene transcript
    Kote-Jarai, Z ; Al Olama, AA ; Leongamornlert, D ; Tymrakiewicz, M ; Saunders, E ; Guy, M ; Giles, GG ; Severi, G ; Southey, M ; Hopper, JL ; Sit, KC ; Harris, JM ; Batra, J ; Spurdle, AB ; Clements, JA ; Hamdy, F ; Neal, D ; Donovan, J ; Muir, K ; Pharoah, PDP ; Chanock, SJ ; Brown, N ; Benlloch, S ; Castro, E ; Mahmud, N ; O'Brien, L ; Hall, A ; Sawyer, E ; Wilkinson, R ; Easton, DF ; Eeles, RA (SPRINGER, 2011-06)
    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 30 prostate cancer (PrCa) susceptibility loci. One of these (rs2735839) is located close to a plausible candidate susceptibility gene, KLK3, which encodes prostate-specific antigen (PSA). PSA is widely used as a biomarker for PrCa detection and disease monitoring. To refine the association between PrCa and variants in this region, we used genotyping data from a two-stage GWAS using samples from the UK and Australia, and the Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) study. Genotypes were imputed for 197 and 312 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from HapMap2 and the 1000 Genome Project, respectively. The most significant association with PrCa was with a previously unidentified SNP, rs17632542 (combined P = 3.9 × 10(-22)). This association was confirmed by direct genotyping in three stages of the UK/Australian GWAS, involving 10,405 cases and 10,681 controls (combined P = 1.9 × 10(-34)). rs17632542 is also shown to be associated with PSA levels and it is a non-synonymous coding SNP (Ile179Thr) in KLK3. Using molecular dynamic simulation, we showed evidence that this variant has the potential to introduce alterations in the protein or affect RNA splicing. We propose that rs17632542 may directly influence PrCa risk.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci
    Ghoussaini, M ; Fletcher, O ; Michailidou, K ; Turnbull, C ; Schmidt, MK ; Dicks, E ; Dennis, J ; Wang, Q ; Humphreys, MK ; Luccarini, C ; Baynes, C ; Conroy, D ; Maranian, M ; Ahmed, S ; Driver, K ; Johnson, N ; Orr, N ; Silva, IDS ; Waisfisz, Q ; Meijers-Heijboer, H ; Uitterlinden, AG ; Rivadeneira, F ; Hall, P ; Czene, K ; Irwanto, A ; Liu, J ; Nevanlinna, H ; Aittomaki, K ; Blomqvist, C ; Meindl, A ; Schmutzler, RK ; Mueller-Myhsok, B ; Lichtner, P ; Chang-Claude, J ; Hein, R ; Nickels, S ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Tsimiklis, H ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, D ; Bui, M ; Hopper, JL ; Apicella, C ; Park, DJ ; Southey, M ; Hunter, DJ ; Chanock, SJ ; Broeks, A ; Verhoef, S ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Fasching, PA ; Lux, MP ; Beckmann, MW ; Ekici, AB ; Sawyer, E ; Tomlinson, I ; Kerin, M ; Marme, F ; Schneeweiss, A ; Sohn, C ; Burwinkel, B ; Guenel, P ; Truong, T ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Menegaux, F ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Nielsen, SF ; Flyger, H ; Milne, RL ; Rosario Alonso, M ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Benitez, J ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Bernstein, L ; Dur, CC ; Brenner, H ; Mueller, H ; Arndt, V ; Stegmaier, C ; Justenhoven, C ; Brauch, H ; Bruening, T ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Eilber, U ; Doerk, T ; Schuermann, P ; Bremer, M ; Hillemanns, P ; Bogdanova, NV ; Antonenkova, NN ; Rogov, YI ; Karstens, JH ; Bermisheva, M ; Prokofieva, D ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Kataja, V ; Kosma, V-M ; Hartikainen, JM ; Lambrechts, D ; Yesilyurt, BT ; Floris, G ; Leunen, K ; Manoukian, S ; Bonanni, B ; Fortuzzi, S ; Peterlongo, P ; Couch, FJ ; Wang, X ; Stevens, K ; Lee, A ; Giles, GG ; Baglietto, L ; Severi, G ; McLean, C ; Alnaes, GG ; Kristensen, V ; Borrensen-Dale, A-L ; John, EM ; Miron, A ; Winqvist, R ; Pylkas, K ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Kauppila, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Glendon, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Devilee, P ; van Asperen, CJ ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Seynaeve, C ; Figueroa, JD ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Brinton, L ; Lissowska, J ; Hooning, MJ ; Hollestelle, A ; Oldenburg, RA ; van den Ouweland, AMW ; Cox, A ; Reed, MWR ; Shah, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Jaworska, K ; Durda, K ; Jones, M ; Schoemaker, M ; Ashworth, A ; Swerdlow, A ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; Muir, KR ; Lophatananon, A ; Rattanamongkongul, S ; Chaiwerawattana, A ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Shen, C-Y ; Yu, J-C ; Wu, P-E ; Hsiung, C-N ; Perkins, A ; Swann, R ; Velentzis, L ; Eccles, DM ; Tapper, WJ ; Gerty, SM ; Graham, NJ ; Ponder, BAJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Pharoah, PDP ; Lathrop, M ; Dunning, AM ; Rahman, N ; Peto, J ; Easton, DF (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2012-03)
    Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. To date, 22 common breast cancer susceptibility loci have been identified accounting for ∼8% of the heritability of the disease. We attempted to replicate 72 promising associations from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in ∼70,000 cases and ∼68,000 controls from 41 case-control studies and 9 breast cancer GWAS. We identified three new breast cancer risk loci at 12p11 (rs10771399; P = 2.7 × 10(-35)), 12q24 (rs1292011; P = 4.3 × 10(-19)) and 21q21 (rs2823093; P = 1.1 × 10(-12)). rs10771399 was associated with similar relative risks for both estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive breast cancer, whereas the other two loci were associated only with ER-positive disease. Two of the loci lie in regions that contain strong plausible candidate genes: PTHLH (12p11) has a crucial role in mammary gland development and the establishment of bone metastasis in breast cancer, and NRIP1 (21q21) encodes an ER cofactor and has a role in the regulation of breast cancer cell growth.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Evaluation of variation in the phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha oncogene and breast cancer risk
    Stevens, KN ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Fredericksen, Z ; Kosel, M ; Pankratz, VS ; Hopper, JL ; Dite, GS ; Apicella, C ; Southey, MC ; Schmidt, MK ; Broeks, A ; Van 't Veer, LJ ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Fasching, PA ; Beckmann, MW ; Hein, A ; Ekici, AB ; Johnson, N ; Peto, J ; Silva, IDS ; Gibson, L ; Sawyer, E ; Tomlinson, I ; Kerin, MJ ; Chanock, S ; Lissowska, J ; Hunter, DJ ; Hoover, RN ; Thomas, GD ; Milne, RL ; Perez, JIA ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Benitez, J ; Burwinkel, B ; Meindl, A ; Schmutzler, RK ; Bartrar, CR ; Hamann, U ; Ko, YD ; Bruening, T ; Chang-Claude, J ; Hein, R ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Doerk, T ; Schuermann, P ; Bremer, M ; Hillemanns, P ; Bogdanova, N ; Zalutsky, JV ; Rogov, YI ; Antonenkova, N ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Kataja, V ; Kosma, V-M ; Hartikainen, J ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Chen, X ; Peterlongo, P ; Bonanni, B ; Bernard, L ; Manoukian, S ; Wang, X ; Cerhan, J ; Vachon, CM ; Olson, J ; Giles, GG ; Baglietto, L ; McLean, CA ; Severi, G ; John, EM ; Miron, A ; Winqvist, R ; Pylkaes, K ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Grip, M ; Andrulis, I ; Knight, JA ; Glendon, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Cox, A ; Brock, IW ; Elliott, G ; Cross, SS ; Pharoah, PP ; Dunning, AM ; Pooley, KA ; Humphreys, MK ; Wang, J ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Sangrajrang, S ; Gabrieau, V ; Brennan, P ; Mckay, J ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Couch, FJ ; Easton, DF (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2011-12-06)
    BACKGROUND: Somatic mutations in phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) are frequent in breast tumours and have been associated with oestrogen receptor (ER) expression, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 overexpression, lymph node metastasis and poor survival. The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between inherited variation in this oncogene and risk of breast cancer. METHODS: A single-nucleotide polymorphism from the PIK3CA locus that was associated with breast cancer in a study of Caucasian breast cancer cases and controls from the Mayo Clinic (MCBCS) was genotyped in 5436 cases and 5280 controls from the Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) study and in 30 949 cases and 29 788 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). RESULTS: Rs1607237 was significantly associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer in MCBCS, CGEMS and all studies of white Europeans combined (odds ratio (OR)=0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-0.99, P=4.6 × 10(-3)), but did not reach significance in the BCAC replication study alone (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, P=0.139). CONCLUSION: Common germline variation in PIK3CA does not have a strong influence on the risk of breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Plasma concentration of Propionibacterium acnes antibodies and prostate cancer risk: results from an Australian population-based case-control study
    Severi, G ; Shannon, BA ; Hoang, HN ; Baglietto, L ; English, DR ; Hopper, JL ; Pedersen, J ; Southey, MC ; Sinclair, R ; Cohen, RJ ; Giles, GG (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2010-07-27)
    BACKGROUND: Recent studies in prostatic tissue suggest that Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes), a bacterium associated with acne that normally lives on the skin, is the most prevalent bacterium in the prostate and in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Its prevalence is higher in samples from patients subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. The aim of our study was to test whether circulating levels of P. acnes antibodies are associated with prostate cancer risk and tumour characteristics using plasma samples from a population-based case-control study. METHODS: We measured plasma concentration of P. acnes antibodies for 809 cases and 584 controls using a recently developed ELISA assay. We compared antibody titres between cases and controls using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for batch and variables associated with the study design (i.e., age, year of selection and centre). The primary analysis included P. acnes titres in the model as a dichotomous variable using the median value for controls as the cut-off value. RESULTS: P. acnes antibody titres for both cases and controls ranged from 1 : 16 (i.e., low concentration) to 1 : 65,536 (i.e., high concentration; median value=1 : 1024). The odds ratio for prostate cancer associated with titres at or above the median value was 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.91, P=0.005). The association appeared to be particularly strong for advanced prostate cancer (AJCC Stage grouping III-IV) for which the odds ratio was 0.59 (95% CI 0.43-0.81, P=0.001) but there was insufficient evidence that the association differed by tumour stage (p heterogeneity=0.07). CONCLUSION: These results need to be confirmed in prospective studies but they are consistent with the hypothesis that P. acnes has a role in prostate cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Breast Cancer Risk and 6q22.33: Combined Results from Breast Cancer Association Consortium and Consortium of Investigators on Modifiers of BRCA1/2
    Kirchhoff, T ; Gaudet, MM ; Antoniou, AC ; McGuffog, L ; Humphreys, MK ; Dunning, AM ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Flyger, H ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Ahn, S-H ; Dork, T ; Schuermann, P ; Karstens, JH ; Hillemanns, P ; Couch, FJ ; Olson, J ; Vachon, C ; Wang, X ; Cox, A ; Brock, I ; Elliott, G ; Reed, MWR ; Burwinkel, B ; Meindl, A ; Brauch, H ; Hamann, U ; Ko, Y-D ; Broeks, A ; Schmidt, MK ; Van 't Veer, LJ ; Braaf, LM ; Johnson, N ; Fletcher, O ; Gibson, L ; Peto, J ; Turnbull, C ; Seal, S ; Renwick, A ; Rahman, N ; Wu, P-E ; Yu, J-C ; Hsiung, C-N ; Shen, C-Y ; Southey, MC ; Hopper, JL ; Hammet, F ; Van Dorpe, T ; Dieudonne, A-S ; Hatse, S ; Lambrechts, D ; Andrulis, IL ; Bogdanova, N ; Antonenkova, N ; Rogov, JI ; Prokofieva, D ; Bermisheva, M ; Khusnutdinova, E ; van Asperen, CJ ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Hooning, MJ ; Devilee, P ; Margolin, S ; Lindblom, A ; Milne, RL ; Ignacio Arias, J ; Pilar Zamora, M ; Benitez, J ; Severi, G ; Baglietto, L ; Giles, GG ; Spurdle, AB ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; Holland, H ; Healey, S ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Chang-Claude, J ; Mannermaa, A ; Kosma, V-M ; Kauppinen, J ; Kataja, V ; Agnarsson, BA ; Caligo, MA ; Godwin, AK ; Nevanlinna, H ; Heikkinen, T ; Fredericksen, Z ; Lindor, N ; Nathanson, KL ; Domchek, SM ; Loman, N ; Karlsson, P ; Askmalm, MS ; Melin, B ; von Wachenfeldt, A ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Verheus, M ; Rookus, MA ; Seynaeve, C ; Oldenburg, RA ; Ligtenberg, MJ ; Ausems, MGEM ; Aalfs, CM ; Gille, HJP ; Wijnen, JT ; Garcia, EBG ; Peock, S ; Cook, M ; Oliver, CT ; Frost, D ; Luccarini, C ; Pichert, G ; Davidson, R ; Chu, C ; Eccles, D ; Ong, K-R ; Cook, J ; Douglas, F ; Hodgson, S ; Evans, DG ; Eeles, R ; Gold, B ; Pharoah, PDP ; Offit, K ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Easton, DF ; Prokunina-Olsson, L (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2012-06-29)
    Recently, a locus on chromosome 6q22.33 (rs2180341) was reported to be associated with increased breast cancer risk in the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population, and this association was also observed in populations of non-AJ European ancestry. In the present study, we performed a large replication analysis of rs2180341 using data from 31,428 invasive breast cancer cases and 34,700 controls collected from 25 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). In addition, we evaluated whether rs2180341 modifies breast cancer risk in 3,361 BRCA1 and 2,020 BRCA2 carriers from 11 centers in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Based on the BCAC data from women of European ancestry, we found evidence for a weak association with breast cancer risk for rs2180341 (per-allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.023). There was evidence for heterogeneity in the ORs among studies (I(2) = 49.3%; p = <0.004). In CIMBA, we observed an inverse association with the minor allele of rs2180341 and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele OR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.80-1.00, p = 0.048), indicating a potential protective effect of this allele. These data suggest that that 6q22.33 confers a weak effect on breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Assessing interactions between the associations of common genetic susceptibility variants, reproductive history and body mass index with breast cancer risk in the breast cancer association consortium: a combined case-control study
    Milne, RL ; Gaudet, MM ; Spurdle, AB ; Fasching, PA ; Couch, FJ ; Benitez, J ; Arias Perez, JI ; Pilar Zamora, M ; Malats, N ; dos Santos Silva, I ; Gibson, LJ ; Fletcher, O ; Johnson, N ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Figueroa, J ; Brinton, L ; Sherman, ME ; Lissowska, J ; Hopper, JL ; Dite, GS ; Apicella, C ; Southey, MC ; Sigurdson, AJ ; Linet, MS ; Schonfeld, SJ ; Freedman, DM ; Mannermaa, A ; Kosma, V-M ; Kataja, V ; Auvinen, P ; Andrulis, IL ; Glendon, G ; Knight, JA ; Weerasooriya, N ; Cox, A ; Reed, MWR ; Cross, SS ; Dunning, AM ; Ahmed, S ; Shah, M ; Brauch, H ; Ko, Y-D ; Bruening, T ; Lambrechts, D ; Reumers, J ; Smeets, A ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Hall, P ; Czene, K ; Liu, J ; Irwanto, AK ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Holland, H ; Giles, GG ; Baglietto, L ; Severi, G ; Bojensen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Flyger, H ; John, EM ; West, DW ; Whittemore, AS ; Vachon, C ; Olson, JE ; Fredericksen, Z ; Kosel, M ; Hein, R ; Vrieling, A ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Heinz, J ; Beckmann, MW ; Heusinger, K ; Ekici, AB ; Haeberle, L ; Humphreys, MK ; Morrison, J ; Easton, DF ; Pharoah, PD ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Goode, EL ; Chang-Claude, J (BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2010)
    INTRODUCTION: Several common breast cancer genetic susceptibility variants have recently been identified. We aimed to determine how these variants combine with a subset of other known risk factors to influence breast cancer risk in white women of European ancestry using case-control studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. METHODS: We evaluated two-way interactions between each of age at menarche, ever having had a live birth, number of live births, age at first birth and body mass index (BMI) and each of 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (10q26-rs2981582 (FGFR2), 8q24-rs13281615, 11p15-rs3817198 (LSP1), 5q11-rs889312 (MAP3K1), 16q12-rs3803662 (TOX3), 2q35-rs13387042, 5p12-rs10941679 (MRPS30), 17q23-rs6504950 (COX11), 3p24-rs4973768 (SLC4A7), CASP8-rs17468277, TGFB1-rs1982073 and ESR1-rs3020314). Interactions were tested for by fitting logistic regression models including per-allele and linear trend main effects for SNPs and risk factors, respectively, and single-parameter interaction terms for linear departure from independent multiplicative effects. RESULTS: These analyses were applied to data for up to 26,349 invasive breast cancer cases and up to 32,208 controls from 21 case-control studies. No statistical evidence of interaction was observed beyond that expected by chance. Analyses were repeated using data from 11 population-based studies, and results were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risks for breast cancer associated with the common susceptibility variants identified to date do not appear to vary across women with different reproductive histories or body mass index (BMI). The assumption of multiplicative combined effects for these established genetic and other risk factors in risk prediction models appears justified.