Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 449
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Causation and familial confounding as explanations for the associations of polygenic risk scores with breast cancer: Evidence from innovative ICE FALCON and ICE CRISTAL analyses
    Li, S ; Dite, GS ; Macinnis, RJ ; Bui, M ; Nguyen, TL ; Esser, VFC ; Ye, Z ; Dowty, JG ; Makalic, E ; Sung, J ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC ; Hopper, JL (WILEY, 2024-03-12)
    A polygenic risk score (PRS) combines the associations of multiple genetic variants that could be due to direct causal effects, indirect genetic effects, or other sources of familial confounding. We have developed new approaches to assess evidence for and against causation by using family data for pairs of relatives (Inference about Causation from Examination of FAmiliaL CONfounding [ICE FALCON]) or measures of family history (Inference about Causation from Examining Changes in Regression coefficients and Innovative STatistical AnaLyses [ICE CRISTAL]). Inference is made from the changes in regression coefficients of relatives' PRSs or PRS and family history before and after adjusting for each other. We applied these approaches to two breast cancer PRSs and multiple studies and found that (a) for breast cancer diagnosed at a young age, for example, <50 years, there was no evidence that the PRSs were causal, while (b) for breast cancer diagnosed at later ages, there was consistent evidence for causation explaining increasing amounts of the PRS-disease association. The genetic variants in the PRS might be in linkage disequilibrium with truly causal variants and not causal themselves. These PRSs cause minimal heritability of breast cancer at younger ages. There is also evidence for nongenetic factors shared by first-degree relatives that explain breast cancer familial aggregation. Familial associations are not necessarily due to genes, and genetic associations are not necessarily causal.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Breast and bowel cancers diagnosed in people 'too young to have cancer': A blueprint for research using family and twin studies
    Hopper, JL ; Li, S ; MacInnis, RJ ; Dowty, JG ; Nguyen, TL ; Bui, M ; Dite, GS ; Esser, VFC ; Ye, Z ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Goudey, B ; Alpen, K ; Kapuscinski, M ; Win, AK ; Dugue, P-A ; Milne, RL ; Jayasekara, H ; Brooks, JD ; Malta, S ; Calais-Ferreira, L ; Campbell, AC ; Young, JT ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Sung, J ; Giles, GG ; Buchanan, D ; Winship, I ; Terry, MB ; Southey, MC ; Jenkins, MA (WILEY, 2024-03-19)
    Young breast and bowel cancers (e.g., those diagnosed before age 40 or 50 years) have far greater morbidity and mortality in terms of years of life lost, and are increasing in incidence, but have been less studied. For breast and bowel cancers, the familial relative risks, and therefore the familial variances in age-specific log(incidence), are much greater at younger ages, but little of these familial variances has been explained. Studies of families and twins can address questions not easily answered by studies of unrelated individuals alone. We describe existing and emerging family and twin data that can provide special opportunities for discovery. We present designs and statistical analyses, including novel ideas such as the VALID (Variance in Age-specific Log Incidence Decomposition) model for causes of variation in risk, the DEPTH (DEPendency of association on the number of Top Hits) and other approaches to analyse genome-wide association study data, and the within-pair, ICE FALCON (Inference about Causation from Examining FAmiliaL CONfounding) and ICE CRISTAL (Inference about Causation from Examining Changes in Regression coefficients and Innovative STatistical AnaLysis) approaches to causation and familial confounding. Example applications to breast and colorectal cancer are presented. Motivated by the availability of the resources of the Breast and Colon Cancer Family Registries, we also present some ideas for future studies that could be applied to, and compared with, cancers diagnosed at older ages and address the challenges posed by young breast and bowel cancers.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer-specific survival
    Morra, A ; Schreurs, MAC ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Augustinsson, A ; Beckmann, MW ; Behrens, S ; Bojesen, SE ; Bolla, MK ; Brauch, H ; Broeks, A ; Buys, SS ; Camp, NJ ; Castelao, JE ; Cessna, MH ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chung, WK ; Colonna, S ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; Dennis, J ; Devilee, P ; Doerk, T ; Dunning, AM ; Dwek, M ; Easton, DF ; Eccles, DM ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Fehm, TN ; Figueroa, JD ; Flyger, H ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Garcia-Saenz, JA ; Genkinger, JA ; Grassmann, F ; Guendert, M ; Hahnen, E ; Haiman, C ; Hamann, U ; Harrington, PA ; Hartikainen, JM ; Hoppe, R ; Hopper, JL ; Houlston, RS ; Howell, A ; Jakubowska, A ; Janni, W ; Jernstroem, H ; John, EM ; Johnson, N ; Jones, ME ; Kristensen, VN ; Kurian, AW ; Lambrechts, D ; Le Marchand, L ; Lindblom, A ; Lubinski, J ; Lux, MP ; Mannermaa, A ; Mavroudis, D ; Mulligan, AM ; Muranen, TA ; Nevanlinna, H ; Nevelsteen, I ; Neven, P ; Newman, WG ; Obi, N ; Offit, K ; Olshan, AF ; Park-Simon, T-W ; Patel, A ; Peterlongo, P ; Phillips, K-A ; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D ; Polley, EC ; Presneau, N ; Pylkas, K ; Rack, B ; Radice, P ; Rashid, MU ; Rhenius, V ; Robson, M ; Romero, A ; Saloustros, E ; Sawyer, EJ ; Schmutzler, RK ; Schuetze, S ; Scott, C ; Shah, MT ; Smichkoska, S ; Southey, MC ; Tapper, WJ ; Teras, LR ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Tomczyk, K ; Tomlinson, I ; Troester, M ; Vachon, C ; van Veen, E ; Wang, Q ; Wendt, C ; Wildiers, H ; Winqvist, RA ; Ziogas, A ; Hall, P ; Pharoah, PDP ; Adank, M ; Hollestelle, A ; Schmidt, MK ; Hooning, MJ (WILEY, 2023-08)
    BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC-specific survival (BCSS) compared to non-carriers. AIM: To assessed the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS. METHODS: Analyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with a first primary invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow-up was 9.1 years. Differential associations with treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi-state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death. RESULTS: There was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status. The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.55-0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi-state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non-carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR (95% CI): 1.30 (1.09-1.56)]. CONCLUSION: Systemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Polymorphisms in genes of melatonin biosynthesis and signaling support the light-at-night hypothesis for breast cancer
    Wichert, K ; Hoppe, R ; Ickstadt, K ; Behrens, T ; Winter, S ; Herold, R ; Terschueren, C ; Lo, W-Y ; Guenel, P ; Truong, T ; Bolla, MK ; Wang, Q ; Dennis, J ; Michailidou, K ; Lush, M ; Andrulis, IL ; Brenner, H ; Chang-Claude, J ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Czene, K ; Eriksson, M ; Figueroa, JD ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Goldberg, MS ; Hamann, U ; He, W ; Holleczek, B ; Hopper, JL ; Jakubowska, A ; Ko, Y-D ; Lubinski, J ; Mulligan, AM ; Obi, N ; Rhenius, V ; Shah, M ; Shu, X-O ; Simard, J ; Southey, MC ; Zheng, W ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PDP ; Hall, P ; Easton, DF ; Bruening, T ; Brauch, H ; Harth, V ; Rabstein, S (Springer, 2023-10)
    Light-at-night triggers the decline of pineal gland melatonin biosynthesis and secretion and is an IARC-classified probable breast-cancer risk factor. We applied a large-scale molecular epidemiology approach to shed light on the putative role of melatonin in breast cancer. We investigated associations between breast-cancer risk and polymorphisms at genes of melatonin biosynthesis/signaling using a study population of 44,405 women from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (22,992 cases, 21,413 population-based controls). Genotype data of 97 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 18 defined gene regions were investigated for breast-cancer risk effects. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by logistic regression for the main-effect analysis as well as stratified analyses by estrogen- and progesterone-receptor (ER, PR) status. SNP-SNP interactions were analyzed via a two-step procedure based on logic regression. The Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP) was used for all analyses to account for multiple testing. Noteworthy associations (BFDP < 0.8) included 10 linked SNPs in tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) (e.g. rs1386492: OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12), and a SNP in the mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 (MAPK8) (rs10857561: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.18). The SNP-SNP interaction analysis revealed noteworthy interaction terms with TPH2- and MAPK-related SNPs (e.g. rs1386483R ∧ rs1473473D ∧ rs3729931D: OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32). In line with the light-at-night hypothesis that links shift work with elevated breast-cancer risks our results point to SNPs in TPH2 and MAPK-genes that may impact the intricate network of circadian regulation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Aggregation tests identify new gene associations with breast cancer in populations with diverse ancestry
    Mueller, SH ; Lai, AG ; Valkovskaya, M ; Michailidou, K ; Bolla, MK ; Wang, Q ; Dennis, J ; Lush, M ; Abu-Ful, Z ; Ahearn, TU ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, NN ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Augustinsson, A ; Baert, T ; Freeman, LEB ; Beckmann, MW ; Behrens, S ; Benitez, J ; Bermisheva, M ; Blomqvist, C ; Bogdanova, N ; Bojesen, SE ; Bonanni, B ; Brenner, H ; Brucker, SY ; Buys, SS ; Castelao, JE ; Chan, TL ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chanock, SJ ; Choi, J-Y ; Chung, WK ; Colonna, S ; Cornelissen, S ; Couch, FJ ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; Devilee, P ; Dork, T ; Dossus, L ; Dwek, M ; Eccles, DM ; Ekici, AB ; Eliassen, AH ; Engel, C ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Fletcher, O ; Flyger, H ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Gao, Y-T ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Garcia-Saenz, JA ; Genkinger, J ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Grassmann, F ; Guenel, P ; Gundert, M ; Haeberle, L ; Hahnen, E ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hall, P ; Harkness, EF ; Harrington, PA ; Hartikainen, JM ; Hartman, M ; Hein, A ; Ho, W-K ; Hooning, MJ ; Hoppe, R ; Hopper, JL ; Houlston, RS ; Howell, A ; Hunter, DJ ; Huo, D ; Investigators, A ; Ito, H ; Iwasaki, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Janni, W ; John, EM ; Jones, ME ; Jung, A ; Kaaks, R ; Kang, D ; Khusnutdinova, EK ; Kim, S-W ; Kitahara, CM ; Koutros, S ; Kraft, P ; Kristensen, VN ; Kubelka-Sabit, K ; Kurian, AW ; Kwong, A ; Lacey, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Le Marchand, L ; Li, J ; Linet, M ; Lo, W-Y ; Long, J ; Lophatananon, A ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoochehri, M ; Margolin, S ; Matsuo, K ; Mavroudis, D ; Menon, U ; Muir, K ; Murphy, RA ; Nevanlinna, H ; Newman, WG ; Niederacher, D ; O'Brien, KM ; Obi, N ; Offit, K ; Olopade, O ; Olshan, AF ; Olsson, H ; Park, SK ; Patel, A ; Patel, A ; Perou, CM ; Peto, J ; Pharoah, PDP ; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D ; Presneau, N ; Rack, B ; Radice, P ; Ramachandran, D ; Rashid, MU ; Rennert, G ; Romero, A ; Ruddy, KJ ; Ruebner, M ; Saloustros, E ; Sandler, DP ; Sawyer, EJ ; Schmidt, MK ; Schmutzler, RK ; Schneider, MO ; Scott, C ; Shah, M ; Sharma, P ; Shen, C-Y ; Shu, X-O ; Simard, J ; Surowy, H ; Tamimi, RM ; Tapper, WJ ; Taylor, JA ; Teo, SH ; Teras, LR ; Toland, AE ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Torres, D ; Torres-Mejia, G ; Troester, MA ; Truong, T ; Vachon, CM ; Vijai, J ; Weinberg, CR ; Wendt, C ; Winqvist, R ; Wolk, A ; Wu, AH ; Yamaji, T ; Yang, XR ; Yu, J-C ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Ziv, E ; Dunning, AM ; Easton, DF ; Hemingway, H ; Hamann, U ; Kuchenbaecker, KB (BMC, 2023-01-26)
    BACKGROUND: Low-frequency variants play an important role in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility. Gene-based methods can increase power by combining multiple variants in the same gene and help identify target genes. METHODS: We evaluated the potential of gene-based aggregation in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium cohorts including 83,471 cases and 59,199 controls. Low-frequency variants were aggregated for individual genes' coding and regulatory regions. Association results in European ancestry samples were compared to single-marker association results in the same cohort. Gene-based associations were also combined in meta-analysis across individuals with European, Asian, African, and Latin American and Hispanic ancestry. RESULTS: In European ancestry samples, 14 genes were significantly associated (q < 0.05) with BC. Of those, two genes, FMNL3 (P = 6.11 × 10-6) and AC058822.1 (P = 1.47 × 10-4), represent new associations. High FMNL3 expression has previously been linked to poor prognosis in several other cancers. Meta-analysis of samples with diverse ancestry discovered further associations including established candidate genes ESR1 and CBLB. Furthermore, literature review and database query found further support for a biologically plausible link with cancer for genes CBLB, FMNL3, FGFR2, LSP1, MAP3K1, and SRGAP2C. CONCLUSIONS: Using extended gene-based aggregation tests including coding and regulatory variation, we report identification of plausible target genes for previously identified single-marker associations with BC as well as the discovery of novel genes implicated in BC development. Including multi ancestral cohorts in this study enabled the identification of otherwise missed disease associations as ESR1 (P = 1.31 × 10-5), demonstrating the importance of diversifying study cohorts.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A genome-wide gene-environment interaction study of breast cancer risk for women of European ancestry
    Middha, PK ; Wang, X ; Behrens, S ; Bolla, MK ; Wang, Q ; Dennis, J ; Michailidou, K ; Ahearn, TU ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Auer, PL ; Augustinsson, A ; Baert, T ; Freeman, LEB ; Becher, H ; Beckmann, MW ; Benitez, J ; Bojesen, SE ; Brauch, H ; Brenner, H ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Campa, D ; Canzian, F ; Carracedo, A ; Castelao, JE ; Chanock, SJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Czene, K ; Dossus, L ; Dugue, P-A ; Eliassen, AH ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Figueroa, J ; Fletcher, O ; Flyger, H ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Giles, GG ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Grassmann, F ; Grundy, A ; Guenel, P ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hall, P ; Hamann, U ; Hankinson, SE ; Harkness, EF ; Holleczek, B ; Hoppe, R ; Hopper, JL ; Houlston, RS ; Howell, A ; Hunter, DJ ; Ingvar, C ; Isaksson, K ; Jernstroem, H ; John, EM ; Jones, ME ; Kaaks, R ; Keeman, R ; Kitahara, CM ; Ko, Y-D ; Koutros, S ; Kurian, AW ; Lacey, JV ; Lambrechts, D ; Larson, NL ; Larsson, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Lejbkowicz, F ; Li, S ; Linet, M ; Lissowska, J ; Martinez, ME ; Maurer, T ; Mulligan, AM ; Mulot, C ; Murphy, RA ; Newman, WG ; Nielsen, SF ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Norman, A ; O'Brien, KM ; Olson, JE ; Patel, AV ; Prentice, R ; Rees-Punia, E ; Rennert, G ; Rhenius, V ; Ruddy, KJ ; Sandler, DP ; Scott, CG ; Shah, MT ; Shu, X-O ; Smeets, A ; Southey, MC ; Stone, J ; Tamimi, RM ; Taylor, JA ; Teras, LR ; Tomczyk, K ; Troester, MA ; Truong, T ; Vachon, CM ; Wang, SS ; Weinberg, CR ; Wildiers, H ; Willett, W ; Winham, SJ ; Wolk, A ; Yang, X ; Zamora, MP ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PDP ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Schmidt, MK ; Kraft, P ; Milne, RL ; Lindstroem, S ; Easton, DF ; Chang-Claude, J (BMC, 2023-08-09)
    BACKGROUND: Genome-wide studies of gene-environment interactions (G×E) may identify variants associated with disease risk in conjunction with lifestyle/environmental exposures. We conducted a genome-wide G×E analysis of ~ 7.6 million common variants and seven lifestyle/environmental risk factors for breast cancer risk overall and for estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using 72,285 breast cancer cases and 80,354 controls of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Gene-environment interactions were evaluated using standard unconditional logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and for ER + breast cancer. Bayesian False Discovery Probability was employed to assess the noteworthiness of each SNP-risk factor pairs. RESULTS: Assuming a 1 × 10-5 prior probability of a true association for each SNP-risk factor pairs and a Bayesian False Discovery Probability < 15%, we identified two independent SNP-risk factor pairs: rs80018847(9p13)-LINGO2 and adult height in association with overall breast cancer risk (ORint = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96), and rs4770552(13q12)-SPATA13 and age at menarche for ER + breast cancer risk (ORint = 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the contribution of G×E interactions to the heritability of breast cancer is very small. At the population level, multiplicative G×E interactions do not make an important contribution to risk prediction in breast cancer.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Using DEPendency of Association on the Number of Top Hits (DEPTH) as a Complementary Tool to Identify Novel Colorectal Cancer Loci
    Lai, J ; Wong, CK ; Schmidt, DF ; Kapuscinski, MK ; Alpen, K ; Macinnis, RJ ; Buchanan, DD ; Win, AK ; Figueiredo, JC ; Chan, AT ; Harrison, TA ; Hoffmeister, M ; White, E ; Le Marchand, L ; Pai, RK ; Peters, U ; Hopper, JL ; Jenkins, MA ; Makalic, E (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2023-09)
    BACKGROUND: DEPendency of association on the number of Top Hits (DEPTH) is an approach to identify candidate susceptibility regions by considering the risk signals from overlapping groups of sequential variants across the genome. METHODS: We applied a DEPTH analysis using a sliding window of 200 SNPs to colorectal cancer data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR; 5,735 cases and 3,688 controls), and Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO; 8,865 cases and 10,285 controls) studies. A DEPTH score > 1 was used to identify candidate susceptibility regions common to both analyses. We compared DEPTH results against those from conventional genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses of these two studies as well as against 132 published susceptibility regions. RESULTS: Initial DEPTH analysis revealed 2,622 (CCFR) and 3,686 (GECCO) candidate susceptibility regions, of which 569 were common to both studies. Bootstrapping revealed 40 and 49 candidate susceptibility regions in the CCFR and GECCO data sets, respectively. Notably, DEPTH identified at least 82 regions that would not be detected using conventional GWAS methods, nor had they been identified by previous colorectal cancer GWASs. We found four reproducible candidate susceptibility regions (2q22.2, 2q33.1, 6p21.32, 13q14.3). The highest DEPTH scores were in the human leukocyte antigen locus at 6p21 where the strongest associated SNPs were rs762216297, rs149490268, rs114741460, and rs199707618 for the CCFR data, and rs9270761 for the GECCO data. CONCLUSIONS: DEPTH can identify candidate susceptibility regions for colorectal cancer not identified using conventional analyses of larger datasets. IMPACT: DEPTH has potential as a powerful complementary tool to conventional GWAS analyses for discovering susceptibility regions within the genome.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Familial confounding of internalising symptoms and obesity in adolescents and young adults; a co-twin analysis
    Campbell, AC ; Calais-Ferreira, L ; Hahn, E ; Spinath, FM ; Hopper, JL ; Young, JT (SPRINGERNATURE, 2024-02-15)
    BACKGROUND: Obesity and internalising disorders, including depression and anxiety, often co-occur. There is evidence that familial confounding contributes to the co-occurrence of internalising disorders and obesity in adults. However, its impact on this association among young people is unclear. Our study investigated the extent to which familial factors confound the association between internalising disorders and obesity in adolescents and young adults. SUBJECTS/METHODS: We used a matched co-twin design to investigate the impact of confounding by familial factors on associations between internalising symptoms and obesity in a sample of 4018 twins aged 16 to 27 years. RESULTS: High levels of internalising symptoms compared to low levels increased the odds of obesity for the whole cohort (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5, 6.8), and in females (AOR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.5, 11.1), but not in males (AOR = 2.8 95% CI 0.8, 10.0). We found evidence that internalising symptoms were associated with an increased between-pair odds of obesity (AOR 6.2, 95% CI 1.7, 22.8), using the paired analysis but not using a within-pair association, which controls for familial confounding. Sex-stratified analyses indicated high internalising symptoms were associated with increased between-pair odds of obesity for females (AOR 12.9, 95% CI 2.2, 76.8), but this attenuated to the null using within-pair analysis. We found no evidence of between or within-pair associations for males and weak evidence that sex modified the association between internalising symptoms and obesity (likelihood ratio test p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Some familial factors shared by twins confound the association between internalising symptoms and obesity in adolescent and young adult females. Internalising symptoms and obesity were not associated for adolescent and young adult males. Therefore, prevention and treatment efforts should especially address familial shared determinants of obesity, particularly targeted at female adolescents and young adults with internalising symptoms and those with a family history of these disorders.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Mental disorders and discrimination: A prospective cohort study of young twin pairs in Germany
    Calais-Ferreira, L ; Armstrong, G ; Hahn, E ; Newton-Howes, G ; Foulds, J ; Hopper, JL ; Spinath, FM ; Kurdyak, P ; Young, JT (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2024-03)
    BACKGROUND: Mental disorders and perceived discrimination share common risk factors. The association between having a mental disorder and experiencing discrimination is well-known, but the extent to which familial factors, such as genetic and shared environmental factors, might confound this association, including sex differences in familial confounding, remains unexplored. AIMS: We investigated potential unmeasured familial confounding in the association between mental disorders and perceived discrimination using a matched twin study design. METHOD: We examined data from 2044 same-sex twin pairs (n = 4088) aged 16-25 years from the German population-based study 'TwinLife'. We applied random-effects logistic regression to within-individual and within-and-between pair models of the association between mental disorder and perceived discrimination, and used likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) to compare these models. Multivariable models were adjusted for body mass index, educational attainment, and life satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 322 (8.1%) participants with a diagnosed mental disorder, and 15% (n = 604) of the cohort reported having experienced discrimination in the previous 12 months. Mental disorder and discrimination were associated in the adjusted within-individual model (adjusted odds ratio = 2.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-3.39, P<0.001). However, the within-and-between pair model showed that this association was explained by the within-pair mean (aOR = 4.24, 95% CI: 2.17-8.29, P<0.001) and not the within-pair difference (aOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.70-2.28, P = 0.4) of mental disorder. Therefore, this association was mostly explained by familial confounding, which is also supported by the LRTs for the unadjusted and adjusted models (P<0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). This familial confounding was more prominent for males than females. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the association between mental disorder and discrimination is at least partially explained by unmeasured familial factors. Designing family-based healthcare models and incorporating family members in interventions targeted at ameliorating mental ill-health and experiences of discrimination among adolescents may improve efficacy.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Adherence to 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations and Risk of Cancer: The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study
    Peng, Y ; Bassett, JK ; Hodge, AM ; Melaku, YA ; Afshar, N ; Hopper, JL ; Macinnis, RJ ; Lynch, BM ; Smith-Warner, SA ; Giles, GG ; Milne, RL ; Jayasekara, H (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2024-01-09)
    BACKGROUND: We examined associations between adherence to adaptations of the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations and total, exposure-related and site-specific cancer risk. METHODS: A total of 20,001 participants ages 40 to 69 years at enrollment into the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study in 1990 to 1994, who had diet, body size, and lifestyle reassessed in 2003 to 2007 ("baseline"), were followed-up through June 2021. We constructed diet and standardized lifestyle scores based on core WCRF/AICR recommendations on diet, alcohol intake, body size and physical activity, and additional scores incorporating weight change, sedentary behavior, and smoking. Associations with cancer risk were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: During follow-up (mean = 16 years), 4,710 incident cancers were diagnosed. For highest quintile ("most adherent") of the standardized lifestyle score, compared with lowest ("least adherent"), a HR of 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.92] was observed for total cancer. This association was stronger with smoking included in the score (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.81). A higher score was associated with lower breast and prostate cancer risk for the standardized score, and with lung, stomach, rectal, and pancreatic cancer risk when the score included smoking. Our analyses identified alcohol use, waist circumference and smoking as key drivers of associations with total cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations is associated with lower cancer risk. IMPACT: With <0.2% of our sample fully adherent to the recommendations, the study emphasizes the vast potential for preventing cancer through modulation of lifestyle habits.