- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
5 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemMy Diabetes Coach User GuideO'NEIL, A ; Baptista, S ; Bird, D ; Cassimatis, M ; Cocker, F ; Oldenburg, B ( 2016)
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableHigh baseline prevalence of depression & HbA1c ≥ 6.5% in acute coronary syndrome: The ADVENT studyO'NEIL, A ; Oldroyd, J ; Oldenburg, B ; Cocker, F ; Bird, D ; Chatwick, V (Springer, 2015)
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableModifying lifestyle behaviours to improve the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseaseO'Neil, A ; Oldenburg, B ; Baptista, S ; Cassimatis, M ; COCKER, F ; Alvarenga, ME ; Byrne, D (Springer, 2017-11-11)This handbook brings together the full weight of contemporary evidence bearing on what is now commonly termed “psycho-cardiology”.
-
ItemDepression in Working Adults: Comparing the Costs and Health Outcomes of Working When IllCocker, F ; Nicholson, JM ; Graves, N ; Oldenburg, B ; Palmer, AJ ; Martin, A ; Scott, J ; Venn, A ; Sanderson, K ; Hakkaart, L (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2014-09-02)OBJECTIVE: Working through a depressive illness can improve mental health but also carries risks and costs from reduced concentration, fatigue, and poor on-the-job performance. However, evidence-based recommendations for managing work attendance decisions, which benefit individuals and employers, are lacking. Therefore, this study has compared the costs and health outcomes of short-term absenteeism versus working while ill ("presenteeism") amongst employed Australians reporting lifetime major depression. METHODS: Cohort simulation using state-transition Markov models simulated movement of a hypothetical cohort of workers, reporting lifetime major depression, between health states over one- and five-years according to probabilities derived from a quality epidemiological data source and existing clinical literature. Model outcomes were health service and employment-related costs, and quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs), captured for absenteeism relative to presenteeism, and stratified by occupation (blue versus white-collar). RESULTS: Per employee with depression, absenteeism produced higher mean costs than presenteeism over one- and five-years ($42,573/5-years for absenteeism, $37,791/5-years for presenteeism). However, overlapping confidence intervals rendered differences non-significant. Employment-related costs (lost productive time, job turnover), and antidepressant medication and service use costs of absenteeism and presenteeism were significantly higher for white-collar workers. Health outcomes differed for absenteeism versus presenteeism amongst white-collar workers only. CONCLUSIONS: Costs and health outcomes for absenteeism and presenteeism were not significantly different; service use costs excepted. Significant variation by occupation type was identified. These findings provide the first occupation-specific cost evidence which can be used by clinicians, employees, and employers to review their management of depression-related work attendance, and may suggest encouraging employees to continue working is warranted.
-
ItemA shared framework for the common mental disorders and Non-Communicable Disease: key considerations for disease prevention and controlO'Neil, A ; Jacka, FN ; Quirk, SE ; Cocker, F ; Taylor, CB ; Oldenburg, B ; Berk, M (BMC, 2015-02-05)BACKGROUND: Historically, the focus of Non Communicable Disease (NCD) prevention and control has been cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cancer and chronic respiratory diseases. Collectively, these account for more deaths than any other NCDs. Despite recent calls to include the common mental disorders (CMDs) of depression and anxiety under the NCD umbrella, prevention and control of these CMDs remain largely separate and independent. DISCUSSION: In order to address this gap, we apply a framework recently proposed by the Centers for Disease Control with three overarching objectives: (1) to obtain better scientific information through surveillance, epidemiology, and prevention research; (2) to disseminate this information to appropriate audiences through communication and education; and (3) to translate this information into action through programs, policies, and systems. We conclude that a shared framework of this type is warranted, but also identify opportunities within each objective to advance this agenda and consider the potential benefits of this approach that may exist beyond the health care system.