Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 53
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study
    Dixon-Suen, SC ; Lewis, SJ ; Martin, RM ; English, DR ; Boyle, T ; Giles, GG ; Michailidou, K ; Bolla, MK ; Wang, Q ; Dennis, J ; Lush, M ; Ahearn, TU ; Ambrosone, CB ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Augustinsson, A ; Auvinen, P ; Beane Freeman, LE ; Becher, H ; Beckmann, MW ; Behrens, S ; Bermisheva, M ; Blomqvist, C ; Bogdanova, N ; Bojesen, SE ; Bonanni, B ; Brenner, H ; Bruening, T ; Buys, SS ; Camp, NJ ; Campa, D ; Canzian, F ; Castelao, JE ; Cessna, MH ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chanock, SJ ; Clarke, CL ; Conroy, DM ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; Devilee, P ; Doerk, T ; Dwek, M ; Eccles, DM ; Eliassen, AH ; Engel, C ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Fletcher, O ; Flyger, H ; Fritschi, L ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Garcia-Saenz, JA ; Goldberg, MS ; Guenel, P ; Guendert, M ; Hahnen, E ; Haiman, CA ; Haeberle, L ; Hakansson, N ; Hall, P ; Hamann, U ; Hart, SN ; Harvie, M ; Hillemanns, P ; Hollestelle, A ; Hooning, MJ ; Hoppe, R ; Hopper, J ; Howell, A ; Hunter, DJ ; Jakubowska, A ; Janni, W ; John, EM ; Jung, A ; Kaaks, R ; Keeman, R ; Kitahara, CM ; Koutros, S ; Kraft, P ; Kristensen, VN ; Kubelka-Sabit, K ; Kurian, AW ; Lacey, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Le Marchand, L ; Lindblom, A ; Loibl, S ; Lubinski, J ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoochehri, M ; Margolin, S ; Martinez, ME ; Mavroudis, D ; Menon, U ; Mulligan, AM ; Murphy, RA ; Nevanlinna, H ; Nevelsteen, I ; Newman, WG ; Offit, K ; Olshan, AF ; Olsson, H ; Orr, N ; Patel, A ; Peto, J ; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D ; Presneau, N ; Rack, B ; Radice, P ; Rees-Punia, E ; Rennert, G ; Rennert, HS ; Romero, A ; Saloustros, E ; Sandler, DP ; Schmidt, MK ; Schmutzler, RK ; Schwentner, L ; Scott, C ; Shah, M ; Shu, X-O ; Simard, J ; Southey, MC ; Stone, J ; Surowy, H ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Tamimi, RM ; Tapper, WJ ; Taylor, JA ; Terry, MB ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Troester, MA ; Truong, T ; Untch, M ; Vachon, CM ; Joseph, V ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Weinberg, CR ; Wolk, A ; Yannoukakos, D ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PDP ; Easton, DF ; Milne, RL ; Lynch, BM (BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2022-10)
    OBJECTIVES: Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are associated with higher breast cancer risk in observational studies, but ascribing causality is difficult. Mendelian randomisation (MR) assesses causality by simulating randomised trial groups using genotype. We assessed whether lifelong physical activity or sedentary time, assessed using genotype, may be causally associated with breast cancer risk overall, pre/post-menopause, and by case-groups defined by tumour characteristics. METHODS: We performed two-sample inverse-variance-weighted MR using individual-level Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control data from 130 957 European-ancestry women (69 838 invasive cases), and published UK Biobank data (n=91 105-377 234). Genetic instruments were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated in UK Biobank with wrist-worn accelerometer-measured overall physical activity (nsnps=5) or sedentary time (nsnps=6), or accelerometer-measured (nsnps=1) or self-reported (nsnps=5) vigorous physical activity. RESULTS: Greater genetically-predicted overall activity was associated with lower breast cancer overall risk (OR=0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.83 per-standard deviation (SD;~8 milligravities acceleration)) and for most case-groups. Genetically-predicted vigorous activity was associated with lower risk of pre/perimenopausal breast cancer (OR=0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87,≥3 vs. 0 self-reported days/week), with consistent estimates for most case-groups. Greater genetically-predicted sedentary time was associated with higher hormone-receptor-negative tumour risk (OR=1.77; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.92 per-SD (~7% time spent sedentary)), with elevated estimates for most case-groups. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses examining pleiotropy (including weighted-median-MR, MR-Egger). CONCLUSION: Our study provides strong evidence that greater overall physical activity, greater vigorous activity, and lower sedentary time are likely to reduce breast cancer risk. More widespread adoption of active lifestyles may reduce the burden from the most common cancer in women.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Distinct Reproductive Risk Profiles for Intrinsic-Like Breast Cancer Subtypes: Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies
    Jung, AY ; Ahearn, TU ; Behrens, S ; Middha, P ; Bolla, MK ; Wang, Q ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Augustinsson, A ; Freeman, LEB ; Becher, H ; Brenner, H ; Canzian, F ; Carey, LA ; Consortium, C ; Czene, K ; Eliassen, AH ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Figueroa, JD ; Fritschi, L ; Gabrielson, M ; Giles, GG ; Guenel, P ; Hadjisavvas, A ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hall, P ; Hamann, U ; Hoppe, R ; Hopper, JL ; Howell, A ; Hunter, DJ ; Huesing, A ; Kaaks, R ; Kosma, V-M ; Koutros, S ; Kraft, P ; Lacey, J ; Le Marchand, L ; Lissowska, J ; Loizidou, MA ; Mannermaa, A ; Maurer, T ; Murphy, RA ; Olshan, AF ; Olsson, H ; Patel, A ; Perou, CM ; Rennert, G ; Shibli, R ; Shu, X-O ; Southey, MC ; Stone, J ; Tamimi, RM ; Teras, LR ; Troester, MA ; Truong, T ; Vachon, CM ; Wang, SS ; Wolk, A ; Wu, AH ; Yang, XR ; Zheng, W ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PDP ; Easton, DF ; Milne, RL ; Chatterjee, N ; Schmidt, MK ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Chang-Claude, J (OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2022-12)
    BACKGROUND: Reproductive factors have been shown to be differentially associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. However, their associations with intrinsic-like subtypes are less clear. METHODS: Analyses included up to 23 353 cases and 71 072 controls pooled from 31 population-based case-control or cohort studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium across 16 countries on 4 continents. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the association between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, HER2-enriched-like, and triple-negative breast cancer) and by invasiveness. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had a lower risk of luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, and HER2-enriched-like disease. This association was apparent only after approximately 10 years since last birth and became stronger with increasing time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.71; and OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.46 for multiparous women with luminal A-like tumors 20 to less than 25 years after last birth and 45 to less than 50 years after last birth, respectively). In contrast, parous women had a higher risk of triple-negative breast cancer right after their last birth (for multiparous women: OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.83) that was attenuated with time but persisted for decades (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.34, for multiparous women 25 to less than 30 years after last birth). Older age at first birth (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) and breastfeeding (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) were associated with lower risk of triple-negative breast cancer but not with other disease subtypes. Younger age at menarche was associated with higher risk of all subtypes; older age at menopause was associated with higher risk of luminal A-like but not triple-negative breast cancer. Associations for in situ tumors were similar to luminal A-like. CONCLUSIONS: This large and comprehensive study demonstrates a distinct reproductive risk factor profile for triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes, with implications for the understanding of disease etiology and risk prediction.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Does genetic predisposition modify the effect of lifestyle-related factors on DNA methylation?
    Yu, C ; Hodge, AM ; Wong, EM ; Joo, JE ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Buchanan, DD ; Severi, G ; Hopper, JL ; English, DR ; Giles, GG ; Milne, RL ; Southey, MC ; Dugue, P-A (TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 2022-12-02)
    Lifestyle-related phenotypes have been shown to be heritable and associated with DNA methylation. We aimed to investigate whether genetic predisposition to tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and higher body mass index (BMI) moderates the effect of these phenotypes on blood DNA methylation. We calculated polygenic scores (PGS) to quantify genetic predisposition to these phenotypes using training (N = 7,431) and validation (N = 4,307) samples. Using paired genetic-methylation data (N = 4,307), gene-environment interactions (i.e., PGS × lifestyle) were assessed using linear mixed-effects models with outcomes: 1) methylation at sites found to be strongly associated with smoking (1,061 CpGs), alcohol consumption (459 CpGs), and BMI (85 CpGs) and 2) two epigenetic ageing measures, PhenoAge and GrimAge. In the validation sample, PGS explained ~1.4% (P = 1 × 10-14), ~0.6% (P = 2 × 10-7), and ~8.7% (P = 7 × 10-87) of variance in smoking initiation, alcohol consumption, and BMI, respectively. Nominally significant interaction effects (P < 0.05) were found at 61, 14, and 7 CpGs for smoking, alcohol consumption, and BMI, respectively. There was strong evidence that all lifestyle-related phenotypes were positively associated with PhenoAge and GrimAge, except for alcohol consumption with PhenoAge. There was weak evidence that the association of smoking with GrimAge was attenuated in participants genetically predisposed to smoking (interaction term: -0.022, standard error [SE] = 0.012, P = 0.058) and that the association of alcohol consumption with PhenoAge was attenuated in those genetically predisposed to drink alcohol (interaction term: -0.030, SE = 0.015, P = 0.041). In conclusion, genetic susceptibility to unhealthy lifestyles did not strongly modify the association between observed lifestyle behaviour and blood DNA methylation. Potential associations were observed for epigenetic ageing measures, which should be replicated in additional studies.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Independent evaluation of melanoma polygenic risk scores in UK and Australian prospective cohorts
    Steinberg, J ; Lee, JY ; Wang, H ; Law, M ; Smit, A ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Giles, G ; Southey, M ; Milne, R ; Mann, G ; MacInnis, R ; Cust, A (OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2021-09)
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that polygenic risk scores (PRSs) may improve melanoma risk stratification. However, there has been limited independent validation of PRS-based risk prediction, particularly assessment of calibration (comparing predicted to observed risks). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PRS-based melanoma risk prediction in prospective UK and Australian cohorts with European ancestry. METHODS: We analysed invasive melanoma incidence in the UK Biobank (UKB; n = 395 647, 1651 cases) and a case-cohort nested within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS, Australia; n = 4765, 303 cases). Three PRSs were evaluated: 68 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 54 loci from a 2020 meta-analysis (PRS68), 50 SNPs significant in the 2020 meta-analysis excluding UKB (PRS50) and 45 SNPs at 21 loci known in 2018 (PRS45). Ten-year melanoma risks were calculated from population-level cancer registry data by age group and sex, with and without PRS adjustment. RESULTS: Predicted absolute melanoma risks based on age and sex alone underestimated melanoma incidence in the UKB [ratio of expected/observed cases: E/O = 0·65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·62-0·68] and MCCS (E/O = 0·63, 95% CI 0·56-0·72). For UKB, calibration was improved by PRS adjustment, with PRS50-adjusted risks E/O = 0·91, 95% CI 0·87-0·95. The discriminative ability for PRS68- and PRS50-adjusted absolute risks was higher than for risks based on age and sex alone (Δ area under the curve 0·07-0·10, P < 0·0001), and higher than for PRS45-adjusted risks (Δ area under the curve 0·02-0·04, P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: A PRS derived from a larger, more diverse meta-analysis improves risk prediction compared with an earlier PRS, and might help tailor melanoma prevention and early detection strategies to different risk levels. Recalibration of absolute risks may be necessary for application to specific populations.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Weight is More Informative than Body Mass Index for Predicting Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC)
    Ye, Z ; Li, S ; Dite, GS ; Nguyen, TL ; MacInnis, RJ ; Andrulis, IL ; Buys, SS ; Daly, MB ; John, EM ; Kurian, AW ; Genkinger, JM ; Chung, WK ; Phillips, K-A ; Thorne, H ; Winship, IM ; Milne, RL ; Dugue, P-A ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Terry, MB ; Hopper, JL (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2022-03)
    UNLABELLED: We considered whether weight is more informative than body mass index (BMI) = weight/height2 when predicting breast cancer risk for postmenopausal women, and if the weight association differs by underlying familial risk. We studied 6,761 women postmenopausal at baseline with a wide range of familial risk from 2,364 families in the Prospective Family Study Cohort. Participants were followed for on average 11.45 years and there were 416 incident breast cancers. We used Cox regression to estimate risk associations with log-transformed weight and BMI after adjusting for underlying familial risk. We compared model fits using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and nested models using the likelihood ratio test. The AIC for the weight-only model was 6.22 units lower than for the BMI-only model, and the log risk gradient was 23% greater. Adding BMI or height to weight did not improve fit (ΔAIC = 0.90 and 0.83, respectively; both P = 0.3). Conversely, adding weight to BMI or height gave better fits (ΔAIC = 5.32 and 11.64; P = 0.007 and 0.0002, respectively). Adding height improved only the BMI model (ΔAIC = 5.47; P = 0.006). There was no evidence that the BMI or weight associations differed by underlying familial risk (P > 0.2). Weight is more informative than BMI for predicting breast cancer risk, consistent with nonadipose as well as adipose tissue being etiologically relevant. The independent but multiplicative associations of weight and familial risk suggest that, in terms of absolute breast cancer risk, the association with weight is more important the greater a woman's underlying familial risk. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that the relationship between BMI and breast cancer could be due to a relationship between weight and breast cancer, downgraded by inappropriately adjusting for height; potential importance of anthropometric measures other than total body fat; breast cancer risk associations with BMI and weight are across a continuum.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Inflammation and Epigenetic Aging Are Largely Independent Markers of Biological Aging and Mortality
    Cribb, L ; Hodge, AM ; Yu, C ; Li, SX ; English, DR ; Makalic, E ; Southey, MC ; Milne, RL ; Giles, GG ; Dugue, P-A ; Le Couteur, D (OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC, 2022-12)
    Limited evidence exists on the link between inflammation and epigenetic aging. We aimed to (a) assess the cross-sectional and prospective associations of 22 inflammation-related plasma markers and a signature of inflammaging with epigenetic aging and (b) determine whether epigenetic aging and inflammaging are independently associated with mortality. Blood samples from 940 participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study collected at baseline (1990-1994) and follow-up (2003-2007) were assayed for DNA methylation and 22 inflammation-related markers, including well-established markers (eg, interleukins and C-reactive protein) and metabolites of the tryptophan-kynurenine pathway. Four measures of epigenetic aging (PhenoAge, GrimAge, DunedinPoAm, and Zhang) and a signature of inflammaging were considered, adjusted for age, and transformed to Z scores. Associations were assessed using linear regression, and mortality hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox regression. Cross-sectionally, most inflammation-related markers were associated with epigenetic aging measures, although with generally modest effect sizes (regression coefficients per SD ≤ 0.26) and explaining altogether between 1% and 11% of their variation. Prospectively, baseline inflammation-related markers were not, or only weakly, associated with epigenetic aging after 11 years of follow-up. Epigenetic aging and inflammaging were strongly and independently associated with mortality, for example, inflammaging: HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.27-1.56, p = 2 × 10-10, which was only slightly attenuated after adjustment for 4 epigenetic aging measures: HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22-1.51, p = 7 × 10-9). Although cross-sectionally associated with epigenetic aging, inflammation-related markers accounted for a modest proportion of its variation. Inflammaging and epigenetic aging are essentially nonoverlapping markers of biological aging and may be used jointly to predict mortality.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Segregation analysis of 17,425 population-based breast cancer families: Evidence for genetic susceptibility and risk prediction
    Li, S ; MacInnis, RJ ; Lee, A ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Dorling, L ; Carvalho, S ; Dite, GS ; Shah, M ; Luccarini, C ; Wang, Q ; Milne, RL ; Jenkins, MA ; Giles, GG ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PDP ; Southey, MC ; Easton, DF ; Hopper, JL ; Antoniou, AC (CELL PRESS, 2022-10-06)
    Rare pathogenic variants in known breast cancer-susceptibility genes and known common susceptibility variants do not fully explain the familial aggregation of breast cancer. To investigate plausible genetic models for the residual familial aggregation, we studied 17,425 families ascertained through population-based probands, 86% of whom were screened for pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, and TP53 via gene-panel sequencing. We conducted complex segregation analyses and fitted genetic models in which breast cancer incidence depended on the effects of known susceptibility genes and other unidentified major genes and a normally distributed polygenic component. The proportion of familial variance explained by the six genes was 46% at age 20-29 years and decreased steadily with age thereafter. After allowing for these genes, the best fitting model for the residual familial variance included a recessive risk component with a combined genotype frequency of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.3%-5.4%) and a penetrance to age 80 years of 69% (95% CI: 38%-95%) for homozygotes, which may reflect the combined effects of multiple variants acting in a recessive manner, and a polygenic variance of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.94%-1.65), which did not vary with age. The proportion of the residual familial variance explained by the recessive risk component was 40% at age 20-29 years and decreased with age thereafter. The model predicted age-specific familial relative risks consistent with those observed by large epidemiological studies. The findings have implications for strategies to identify new breast cancer-susceptibility genes and improve disease-risk prediction, especially at a young age.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Methylation-based markers of aging and lifestyle-related factors and risk of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four prospective studies
    Dugue, P-A ; Bodelon, C ; Chung, FF ; Brewer, HR ; Ambatipudi, S ; Sampson, JN ; Cuenin, C ; Chajes, V ; Romieu, I ; Fiorito, G ; Sacerdote, C ; Krogh, V ; Panico, S ; Tumino, R ; Vineis, P ; Polidoro, S ; Baglietto, L ; English, D ; Severi, G ; Giles, GG ; Milne, RL ; Herceg, Z ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Flanagan, JM ; Southey, MC (BMC, 2022-09-06)
    BACKGROUND: DNA methylation in blood may reflect adverse exposures accumulated over the lifetime and could therefore provide potential improvements in the prediction of cancer risk. A substantial body of research has shown associations between epigenetic aging and risk of disease, including cancer. Here we aimed to study epigenetic measures of aging and lifestyle-related factors in association with risk of breast cancer. METHODS: Using data from four prospective case-control studies nested in three cohorts of European ancestry participants, including a total of 1,655 breast cancer cases, we calculated three methylation-based measures of lifestyle factors (body mass index [BMI], tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption) and seven measures of epigenetic aging (Horvath-based, Hannum-based, PhenoAge and GrimAge). All measures were regression-adjusted for their respective risk factors and expressed per standard deviation (SD). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using conditional or unconditional logistic regression and pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age at blood draw, time from blood sample to diagnosis, oestrogen receptor-positivity status and tumour stage. RESULTS: None of the measures of epigenetic aging were associated with risk of breast cancer in the pooled analysis: Horvath 'age acceleration' (AA): OR per SD = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.95-1.10; AA-Hannum: OR = 1.03, 95%CI:0.95-1.12; PhenoAge: OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.94-1.09 and GrimAge: OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.94-1.12, in models adjusting for white blood cell proportions, body mass index, smoking and alcohol consumption. The BMI-adjusted predictor of BMI was associated with breast cancer risk, OR per SD = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.01-1.17. The results for the alcohol and smoking methylation-based predictors were consistent with a null association. Risk did not appear to substantially vary by age at blood draw, time to diagnosis or tumour characteristics. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that methylation-based measures of aging, smoking or alcohol consumption were associated with risk of breast cancer. A methylation-based marker of BMI was associated with risk and may provide insights into the underlying associations between BMI and breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes
    Dorling, L ; Carvalho, S ; Allen, J ; Parsons, MT ; Fortuno, C ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Heijl, SM ; Adank, MA ; Ahearn, TU ; Andrulis, IL ; Auvinen, P ; Becher, H ; Beckmann, MW ; Behrens, S ; Bermisheva, M ; Bogdanova, NV ; Bojesen, SE ; Bolla, MK ; Bremer, M ; Briceno, I ; Camp, NJ ; Campbell, A ; Castelao, JE ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chanock, SJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Collee, JM ; Czene, K ; Dennis, J ; Dork, T ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Figueroa, J ; Flyger, H ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Giles, GG ; Glendon, G ; Guenel, P ; Gundert, M ; Hadjisavvas, A ; Hahnen, E ; Hall, P ; Hamann, U ; Harkness, EF ; Hartman, M ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Hollestelle, A ; Hoppe, R ; Howell, A ; Jakubowska, A ; Jung, A ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Kim, S-W ; Ko, Y-D ; Kristensen, VN ; Lakeman, IMM ; Li, J ; Lindblom, A ; Loizidou, MA ; Lophatananon, A ; Lubinski, J ; Luccarini, C ; Madsen, MJ ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoochehri, M ; Margolin, S ; Mavroudis, D ; Milne, RL ; Mohd Taib, NA ; Muir, K ; Nevanlinna, H ; Newman, WG ; Oosterwijk, JC ; Park, SK ; Peterlongo, P ; Radice, P ; Saloustros, E ; Sawyer, EJ ; Schmutzler, RK ; Shah, M ; Sim, X ; Southey, MC ; Surowy, H ; Suvanto, M ; Tomlinson, I ; Torres, D ; Truong, T ; van Asperen, CJ ; Waltes, R ; Wang, Q ; Yang, XR ; Pharoah, PDP ; Schmidt, MK ; Benitez, J ; Vroling, B ; Dunning, AM ; Teo, SH ; Kvist, A ; de la Hoya, M ; Devilee, P ; Spurdle, AB ; Vreeswijk, MPG ; Easton, DF (BMC, 2022-05-18)
    BACKGROUND: Protein truncating variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with increased breast cancer risk, but risks associated with missense variants in these genes are uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed data on 59,639 breast cancer cases and 53,165 controls from studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium BRIDGES project. We sampled training (80%) and validation (20%) sets to analyze rare missense variants in ATM (1146 training variants), BRCA1 (644), BRCA2 (1425), CHEK2 (325), and PALB2 (472). We evaluated breast cancer risks according to five in silico prediction-of-deleteriousness algorithms, functional protein domain, and frequency, using logistic regression models and also mixture models in which a subset of variants was assumed to be risk-associated. RESULTS: The most predictive in silico algorithms were Helix (BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2) and CADD (ATM). Increased risks appeared restricted to functional protein domains for ATM (FAT and PIK domains) and BRCA1 (RING and BRCT domains). For ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2, data were compatible with small subsets (approximately 7%, 2%, and 0.6%, respectively) of rare missense variants giving similar risk to those of protein truncating variants in the same gene. For CHEK2, data were more consistent with a large fraction (approximately 60%) of rare missense variants giving a lower risk (OR 1.75, 95% CI (1.47-2.08)) than CHEK2 protein truncating variants. There was little evidence for an association with risk for missense variants in PALB2. The best fitting models were well calibrated in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: These results will inform risk prediction models and the selection of candidate variants for functional assays and could contribute to the clinical reporting of gene panel testing for breast cancer susceptibility.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing
    Ruth, KS ; Day, FR ; Hussain, J ; Martinez-Marchal, A ; Aiken, CE ; Azad, A ; Thompson, DJ ; Knoblochova, L ; Abe, H ; Tarry-Adkins, JL ; Gonzalez, JM ; Fontanillas, P ; Claringbould, A ; Bakker, OB ; Sulem, P ; Walters, RG ; Terao, C ; Turon, S ; Horikoshi, M ; Lin, K ; Onland-Moret, NC ; Sankar, A ; Hertz, EPT ; Timshel, PN ; Shukla, V ; Borup, R ; Olsen, KW ; Aguilera, P ; Ferrer-Roda, M ; Huang, Y ; Stankovic, S ; Timmers, PRHJ ; Ahearn, TU ; Alizadeh, BZ ; Naderi, E ; Andrulis, IL ; Arnold, AM ; Aronson, KJ ; Augustinsson, A ; Bandinelli, S ; Barbieri, CM ; Beaumont, RN ; Becher, H ; Beckmann, MW ; Benonisdottir, S ; Bergmann, S ; Bochud, M ; Boerwinkle, E ; Bojesen, SE ; Bolla, MK ; Boomsma, DI ; Bowker, N ; Brody, JA ; Broer, L ; Buring, JE ; Campbell, A ; Campbell, H ; Castelao, JE ; Catamo, E ; Chanock, SJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Ciullo, M ; Corre, T ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Crisponi, L ; Cross, SS ; Cucca, F ; Czene, K ; Smith, GD ; de Geus, EJCN ; de Mutsert, R ; De Vivo, I ; Demerath, EW ; Dennis, J ; Dunning, AM ; Dwek, M ; Eriksson, M ; Esko, T ; Fasching, PA ; Faul, JD ; Ferrucci, L ; Franceschini, N ; Frayling, TM ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Mezzavilla, M ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Gieger, C ; Giles, GG ; Grallert, H ; Gudbjartsson, DF ; Gudnason, V ; Guenel, P ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hall, P ; Hayward, C ; He, C ; He, W ; Heiss, G ; Hoffding, MK ; Hopper, JL ; Hottenga, JJ ; Hu, F ; Hunter, D ; Ikram, MA ; Jackson, RD ; Joaquim, MDR ; John, EM ; Joshi, PK ; Karasik, D ; Kardia, SLR ; Kartsonaki, C ; Karlsson, R ; Kitahara, CM ; Kolcic, I ; Kooperberg, C ; Kraft, P ; Kurian, AW ; Kutalik, Z ; La Bianca, M ; LaChance, G ; Langenberg, C ; Launer, LJ ; Laven, JSE ; Lawlor, DA ; Le Marchand, L ; Li, J ; Lindblom, A ; Lindstrom, S ; Lindstrom, T ; Linet, M ; Liu, Y ; Liu, S ; Luan, J ; Magi, R ; Magnusson, PKE ; Mangino, M ; Mannermaa, A ; Marco, B ; Marten, J ; Martin, NG ; Mbarek, H ; McKnight, B ; Medland, SE ; Meisinger, C ; Meitinger, T ; Menni, C ; Metspalu, A ; Milani, L ; Milne, RL ; Montgomery, GW ; Mook-Kanamori, DO ; Mulas, A ; Mulligan, AM ; Murray, A ; Nalls, MA ; Newman, A ; Noordam, R ; Nutile, T ; Nyholt, DR ; Olshan, AF ; Olsson, H ; Painter, JN ; Patel, AV ; Pedersen, NL ; Perjakova, N ; Peters, A ; Peters, U ; Pharoah, PDP ; Polasek, O ; Porcu, E ; Psaty, BM ; Rahman, I ; Rennert, G ; Rennert, HS ; Ridker, PM ; Ring, SM ; Robino, A ; Rose, LM ; Rosendaal, FR ; Rossouw, J ; Rudan, I ; Rueedi, R ; Ruggiero, D ; Sala, CF ; Saloustros, E ; Sandler, DP ; Sanna, S ; Sawyer, EJ ; Sarnowski, C ; Schlessinger, D ; Schmidt, MK ; Schoemaker, MJ ; Schraut, KE ; Scott, C ; Shekari, S ; Shrikhande, A ; Smith, AV ; Smith, BH ; Smith, JA ; Sorice, R ; Southey, MC ; Spector, TD ; Spinelli, JJ ; Stampfer, M ; Stoeckl, D ; van Meurs, JBJ ; Strauch, K ; Styrkarsdottir, U ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Tanaka, T ; Teras, LR ; Teumer, A ; thorsteinsdottir, U ; Timpson, NJ ; Toniolo, D ; Traglia, M ; Troester, MA ; Truong, T ; Tyrrell, J ; Uitterlinden, AG ; Ulivi, S ; Vachon, CM ; Vitart, V ; Voelker, U ; Vollenweider, P ; Voelzke, H ; Wang, Q ; Wareham, NJ ; Weinberg, CR ; Weir, DR ; Wilcox, AN ; van Dijk, KW ; Willemsen, G ; Wilson, JF ; Wolffenbuttel, BHR ; Wolk, A ; Wood, AR ; Zhao, W ; Zygmunt, M ; Chen, Z ; Li, L ; Franke, L ; Burgess, S ; Deelen, P ; Pers, TH ; Grondahl, ML ; Andersen, CY ; Pujol, A ; Lopez-Contreras, AJ ; Daniel, JA ; Stefansson, K ; Chang-Claude, J ; van der Schouw, YT ; Lunetta, KL ; Chasman, DI ; Easton, DF ; Visser, JA ; Ozanne, SE ; Namekawa, SH ; Solc, P ; Murabito, JM ; Ong, KK ; Hoffmann, ER ; Murray, A ; Roig, I ; Perry, JRB (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2021-08-19)
    Reproductive longevity is essential for fertility and influences healthy ageing in women1,2, but insights into its underlying biological mechanisms and treatments to preserve it are limited. Here we identify 290 genetic determinants of ovarian ageing, assessed using normal variation in age at natural menopause (ANM) in about 200,000 women of European ancestry. These common alleles were associated with clinical extremes of ANM; women in the top 1% of genetic susceptibility have an equivalent risk of premature ovarian insufficiency to those carrying monogenic FMR1 premutations3. The identified loci implicate a broad range of DNA damage response (DDR) processes and include loss-of-function variants in key DDR-associated genes. Integration with experimental models demonstrates that these DDR processes act across the life-course to shape the ovarian reserve and its rate of depletion. Furthermore, we demonstrate that experimental manipulation of DDR pathways highlighted by human genetics increases fertility and extends reproductive life in mice. Causal inference analyses using the identified genetic variants indicate that extending reproductive life in women improves bone health and reduces risk of type 2 diabetes, but increases the risk of hormone-sensitive cancers. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms that govern ovarian ageing, when they act, and how they might be targeted by therapeutic approaches to extend fertility and prevent disease.