Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 47
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Methylation-based markers of aging and lifestyle-related factors and risk of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four prospective studies
    Dugue, P-A ; Bodelon, C ; Chung, FF ; Brewer, HR ; Ambatipudi, S ; Sampson, JN ; Cuenin, C ; Chajes, V ; Romieu, I ; Fiorito, G ; Sacerdote, C ; Krogh, V ; Panico, S ; Tumino, R ; Vineis, P ; Polidoro, S ; Baglietto, L ; English, D ; Severi, G ; Giles, GG ; Milne, RL ; Herceg, Z ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Flanagan, JM ; Southey, MC (BMC, 2022-09-06)
    BACKGROUND: DNA methylation in blood may reflect adverse exposures accumulated over the lifetime and could therefore provide potential improvements in the prediction of cancer risk. A substantial body of research has shown associations between epigenetic aging and risk of disease, including cancer. Here we aimed to study epigenetic measures of aging and lifestyle-related factors in association with risk of breast cancer. METHODS: Using data from four prospective case-control studies nested in three cohorts of European ancestry participants, including a total of 1,655 breast cancer cases, we calculated three methylation-based measures of lifestyle factors (body mass index [BMI], tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption) and seven measures of epigenetic aging (Horvath-based, Hannum-based, PhenoAge and GrimAge). All measures were regression-adjusted for their respective risk factors and expressed per standard deviation (SD). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using conditional or unconditional logistic regression and pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age at blood draw, time from blood sample to diagnosis, oestrogen receptor-positivity status and tumour stage. RESULTS: None of the measures of epigenetic aging were associated with risk of breast cancer in the pooled analysis: Horvath 'age acceleration' (AA): OR per SD = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.95-1.10; AA-Hannum: OR = 1.03, 95%CI:0.95-1.12; PhenoAge: OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.94-1.09 and GrimAge: OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.94-1.12, in models adjusting for white blood cell proportions, body mass index, smoking and alcohol consumption. The BMI-adjusted predictor of BMI was associated with breast cancer risk, OR per SD = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.01-1.17. The results for the alcohol and smoking methylation-based predictors were consistent with a null association. Risk did not appear to substantially vary by age at blood draw, time to diagnosis or tumour characteristics. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that methylation-based measures of aging, smoking or alcohol consumption were associated with risk of breast cancer. A methylation-based marker of BMI was associated with risk and may provide insights into the underlying associations between BMI and breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Genome-Wide Measures of Peripheral Blood Dna Methylation and Prostate Cancer Risk in a Prospective Nested Case-Control Study
    FitzGerald, LM ; Naeem, H ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Dowty, JG ; Joo, JE ; Jung, C-H ; Bassett, JK ; Dugue, P-A ; Chung, J ; Lonie, A ; Milne, RL ; Wong, EM ; Hopper, JL ; English, DR ; Severi, G ; Baglietto, L ; Pedersen, J ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC (WILEY, 2017-04-01)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Genome-wide association study of peripheral blood DNA methylation and conventional mammographic density measures
    Li, S ; Dugue, P-A ; Baglietto, L ; Severi, G ; Wong, EM ; Nguyen, TL ; Stone, J ; English, DR ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL ; Milne, RL (WILEY, 2019-10-01)
    Age- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted mammographic density is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. DNA methylation is a molecular mechanism that could underlie inter-individual variation in mammographic density. We aimed to investigate the association between breast cancer risk-predicting mammographic density measures and blood DNA methylation. For 436 women from the Australian Mammographic Density Twins and Sisters Study and 591 women from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, mammographic density (dense area, nondense area and percentage dense area) defined by the conventional brightness threshold was measured using the CUMULUS software, and peripheral blood DNA methylation was measured using the HumanMethylation450 (HM450) BeadChip assay. Associations between DNA methylation at >400,000 sites and mammographic density measures adjusted for age and BMI were assessed within each cohort and pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis. Associations with methylation at genetic loci known to be associated with mammographic density were also examined. We found no genome-wide significant (p < 10-7 ) association for any mammographic density measure from the meta-analysis, or from the cohort-specific analyses. None of the 299 methylation sites located at genetic loci associated with mammographic density was associated with any mammographic density measure after adjusting for multiple testing (all p > 0.05/299 = 1.7 × 10-4 ). In summary, our study did not find evidence for associations between blood DNA methylation, as measured by the HM450 assay, and conventional mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure
    Nguyen, TL ; Schmidt, DF ; Makalic, E ; Maskarinec, G ; Li, S ; Dite, GS ; Aung, YK ; Evans, CF ; Trinh, HN ; Baglietto, L ; Stone, J ; Song, Y-M ; Sung, J ; MacInnis, RJ ; Dugue, P-A ; Dowty, JG ; Jenkins, MA ; Milne, RL ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL (WILEY, 2021-05-01)
    Mammograms contain information that predicts breast cancer risk. We developed two novel mammogram-based breast cancer risk measures based on image brightness (Cirrocumulus) and texture (Cirrus). Their risk prediction when fitted together, and with an established measure of conventional mammographic density (Cumulus), is not known. We used three studies consisting of: 168 interval cases and 498 matched controls; 422 screen-detected cases and 1197 matched controls; and 354 younger-diagnosis cases and 944 controls frequency-matched for age at mammogram. We conducted conditional and unconditional logistic regression analyses of individually- and frequency-matched studies, respectively. We estimated measure-specific risk gradients as the change in odds per standard deviation of controls after adjusting for age and body mass index (OPERA) and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). For interval, screen-detected and younger-diagnosis cancer risks, the best fitting models (OPERAs [95% confidence intervals]) involved: Cumulus (1.81 [1.41-2.31]) and Cirrus (1.72 [1.38-2.14]); Cirrus (1.49 [1.32-1.67]) and Cirrocumulus (1.16 [1.03 to 1.31]); and Cirrus (1.70 [1.48 to 1.94]) and Cirrocumulus (1.46 [1.27-1.68]), respectively. The AUCs were: 0.73 [0.68-0.77], 0.63 [0.60-0.66], and 0.72 [0.69-0.75], respectively. Combined, our new mammogram-based measures have twice the risk gradient for screen-detected and younger-diagnosis breast cancer (P ≤ 10-12 ), have at least the same discriminatory power as the current polygenic risk score, and are more correlated with causal factors than conventional mammographic density. Discovering more information about breast cancer risk from mammograms could help enable risk-based personalised breast screening.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genome-wide significant risk associations for mucinous ovarian carcinoma
    Kelemen, LE ; Lawrenson, K ; Tyrer, J ; Li, Q ; Lee, JM ; Seo, J-H ; Phelan, CM ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; Spindler, TJ ; Aben, KKH ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, N ; Baker, H ; Bandera, EV ; Bean, Y ; Beckmann, MW ; Bisogna, M ; Bjorge, L ; Bogdanova, N ; Brinton, LA ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Bruinsma, F ; Butzow, R ; Campbell, IG ; Carty, K ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chen, YA ; Chen, Z ; Cook, LS ; Cramer, DW ; Cunningham, JM ; Cybulski, C ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Dennis, J ; Dicks, E ; Doherty, JA ; Dicks, E ; Doherty, JA ; Doerk, T ; du Bois, A ; Duerst, M ; Eccles, D ; Easton, DT ; Edwards, RP ; Eilber, U ; Ekici, AB ; Engelholm, SA ; Fasching, PA ; Fridley, BL ; Gao, Y-T ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Giles, GG ; Glasspool, R ; Goode, EL ; Goodman, MT ; Grownwald, J ; Harrington, P ; Harter, P ; Hasmad, HN ; Hein, A ; Heitz, F ; Hildebrandt, MAT ; Hillemanns, P ; Hogdall, E ; Hogdall, C ; Hosono, S ; Iversen, ES ; Jakubowska, A ; Jensen, A ; Ji, B-T ; Karlan, BY ; Kellar, M ; Kelley, JL ; Kiemeney, LA ; Krakstad, C ; Kjaer, SK ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Lambrechts, S ; Le, ND ; Lee, AW ; Lele, S ; Leminen, A ; Lester, J ; Levine, DA ; Liang, D ; Lissowska, J ; Lu, K ; Lubinski, J ; Lundvall, L ; Massuger, LFAG ; Matsuo, K ; McGuire, V ; McLaughlin, JR ; McNeish, I ; Menon, U ; Modugno, F ; Moes-Sosnowska, J ; Moysich, KB ; Narod, SA ; Nedergaard, L ; Ness, RB ; Nevanlinna, H ; Adenan, NAM ; Odunsi, K ; Olson, SH ; Orlow, I ; Orsulic, S ; Weber, RP ; Paul, J ; Pearce, CL ; Pejovic, T ; Pelttari, LM ; Permuth-Wey, J ; Pike, MC ; Poole, EM ; Ramus, SJ ; Risch, HA ; Rosen, B ; Rossing, MA ; Rothstein, JH ; Rudolph, A ; Runnebaum, IB ; Rzepecka, IK ; Salvesen, HB ; Schildkraut, JM ; Schwaab, I ; Shu, X-O ; Shvetsov, YB ; Siddiqui, N ; Sieh, W ; Song, H ; Southey, MC ; Sucheston, L ; Tangen, IL ; Teo, S-H ; Terry, KL ; Thompson, PJ ; Tworoger, SS ; van Altena, AM ; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E ; Vergote, I ; Vierkant, RA ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Walsh, C ; Wentzensen, N ; Whittemore, AS ; Wicklund, KG ; Wilkens, LR ; Sawicki, W ; Woo, Y-L ; Wu, X ; Wu, AH ; Yang, H ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Sellers, TA ; Freedman, ML ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Pharoah, PDP ; Gayther, SA ; Berchuck, A (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2015-08)
    Genome-wide association studies have identified several risk associations for ovarian carcinomas but not for mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs). Our analysis of 1,644 MOC cases and 21,693 controls with imputation identified 3 new risk associations: rs752590 at 2q13 (P = 3.3 × 10(-8)), rs711830 at 2q31.1 (P = 7.5 × 10(-12)) and rs688187 at 19q13.2 (P = 6.8 × 10(-13)). We identified significant expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) associations for HOXD9 at 2q31.1 in ovarian (P = 4.95 × 10(-4), false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.003) and colorectal (P = 0.01, FDR = 0.09) tumors and for PAX8 at 2q13 in colorectal tumors (P = 0.03, FDR = 0.09). Chromosome conformation capture analysis identified interactions between the HOXD9 promoter and risk-associated SNPs at 2q31.1. Overexpressing HOXD9 in MOC cells augmented the neoplastic phenotype. These findings provide the first evidence for MOC susceptibility variants and insights into the underlying biology of the disease.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Identification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer
    Kuchenbaecker, KB ; Ramus, SJ ; Tyrer, J ; Lee, A ; Shen, HC ; Beesley, J ; Lawrenson, K ; McGuffog, L ; Healey, S ; Lee, JM ; Spindler, TJ ; Lin, YG ; Pejovic, T ; Bean, Y ; Li, Q ; Coetzee, S ; Hazelett, D ; Miron, A ; Southey, M ; Terry, MB ; Goldgar, DE ; Buys, SS ; Janavicius, R ; Dorfling, CM ; van Rensburg, EJ ; Neuhausen, SL ; Ding, YC ; Hansen, TVO ; Jonson, L ; Gerdes, A-M ; Ejlertsen, B ; Barrowdale, D ; Dennis, J ; Benitez, J ; Osorio, A ; Garcia, MJ ; Komenaka, I ; Weitzel, JN ; Ganschow, P ; Peterlongo, P ; Bernard, L ; Viel, A ; Bonanni, B ; Peissel, B ; Manoukian, S ; Radice, P ; Papi, L ; Ottini, L ; Fostira, F ; Konstantopoulou, I ; Garber, J ; Frost, D ; Perkins, J ; Platte, R ; Ellis, S ; Godwin, AK ; Schmutzler, RK ; Meindl, A ; Engel, C ; Sutter, C ; Sinilnikova, OM ; Damiola, F ; Mazoyer, S ; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ; Claes, K ; De Leeneer, K ; Kirk, J ; Rodriguez, GC ; Piedmonte, M ; O'Malley, DM ; de la Hoya, M ; Caldes, T ; Aittomaeki, K ; Nevanlinna, H ; Collee, JM ; Rookus, MA ; Oosterwijk, JC ; Tihomirova, L ; Tung, N ; Hamann, U ; Isaccs, C ; Tischkowitz, M ; Imyanitov, EN ; Caligo, MA ; Campbell, IG ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Olah, E ; Diez, O ; Blanco, I ; Brunet, J ; Lazaroso, C ; Angel Pujana, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Gronwald, J ; Lubinski, J ; Sukiennicki, G ; Barkardottir, RB ; Plante, M ; Simard, J ; Soucy, P ; Montagna, M ; Tognazzo, S ; Teixeira, MR ; Pankratz, VS ; Wang, X ; Lindor, N ; Szabo, CI ; Kauff, N ; Vijai, J ; Aghajanian, CA ; Pfeiler, G ; Berger, A ; Singer, CF ; Tea, M-K ; Phelan, CM ; Greene, MH ; Mai, PL ; Rennert, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Tchatchou, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Glendon, G ; Toland, AE ; Jensen, UB ; Kruse, TA ; Thomassen, M ; Bojesen, A ; Zidan, J ; Friedman, E ; Laitman, Y ; Soller, M ; Liljegren, A ; Arver, B ; Einbeigi, Z ; Stenmark-Askmalm, M ; Olopade, OI ; Nussbaum, RL ; Rebbeck, TR ; Nathanson, KL ; Domchek, SM ; Lu, KH ; Karlan, BY ; Walsh, C ; Lester, J ; Hein, A ; Ekici, AB ; Beckmann, MW ; Fasching, PA ; Lambrechts, D ; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E ; Vergote, I ; Lambrechts, S ; Dicks, E ; Doherty, JA ; Wicklund, KG ; Rossing, MA ; Rudolph, A ; Chang-Claude, J ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Eilber, U ; Moysich, KB ; Odunsi, K ; Sucheston, L ; Lele, S ; Wilkens, LR ; Goodman, MT ; Thompson, PJ ; Shvetsov, YB ; Runnebaum, IB ; Duerst, M ; Hillemanns, P ; Doerk, T ; Antonenkova, N ; Bogdanova, N ; Leminen, A ; Pelttari, LM ; Butzow, R ; Modugno, F ; Kelley, JL ; Edwards, RP ; Ness, RB ; du Bois, A ; Heitz, F ; Schwaab, I ; Harter, P ; Matsuo, K ; Hosono, S ; Orsulic, S ; Jensen, A ; Kjaer, SK ; Hogdall, E ; Hasmad, HN ; Azmi, MAN ; Teo, S-H ; Woo, Y-L ; Fridley, BL ; Goode, EL ; Cunningham, JM ; Vierkant, RA ; Bruinsma, F ; Giles, GG ; Liang, D ; Hildebrandt, MAT ; Wu, X ; Levine, DA ; Bisogna, M ; Berchuck, A ; Iversen, ES ; Schildkraut, JM ; Concannon, P ; Weber, RP ; Cramer, DW ; Terry, KL ; Poole, EM ; Tworoger, SS ; Bandera, EV ; Orlow, I ; Olson, SH ; Krakstad, C ; Salvesen, HB ; Tangen, IL ; Bjorge, L ; van Altena, AM ; Aben, KKH ; Kiemeney, LA ; Massuger, LFAG ; Kellar, M ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Kelemen, LE ; Cook, LS ; Le, ND ; Cybulski, C ; Yang, H ; Lissowska, J ; Brinton, LA ; Wentzensen, N ; Hogdall, C ; Lundvall, L ; Nedergaard, L ; Baker, H ; Song, H ; Eccles, D ; McNeish, I ; Paul, J ; Carty, K ; Siddiqui, N ; Glasspool, R ; Whittemore, AS ; Rothstein, JH ; McGuire, V ; Sieh, W ; Ji, B-T ; Zheng, W ; Shu, X-O ; Gao, Y-T ; Rosen, B ; Risch, HA ; McLaughlin, JR ; Narod, SA ; Monteiro, AN ; Chen, A ; Lin, H-Y ; Permuth-Wey, J ; Sellers, TA ; Tsai, Y-Y ; Chen, Z ; Ziogas, A ; Anton-Culver, H ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Menon, U ; Harrington, P ; Lee, AW ; Wu, AH ; Pearce, CL ; Coetzee, G ; Pike, MC ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Timorek, A ; Rzepecka, IK ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Freedman, M ; Noushmehr, H ; Easton, DF ; Offit, K ; Couch, FJ ; Gayther, S ; Pharoah, PP ; Antoniou, AC ; Chenevix-Trench, G (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2015-02)
    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 12 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility alleles. The pattern of association at these loci is consistent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who are at high risk of EOC. After imputation to 1000 Genomes Project data, we assessed associations of 11 million genetic variants with EOC risk from 15,437 cases unselected for family history and 30,845 controls and from 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers (3,096 with ovarian cancer), and we combined the results in a meta-analysis. This new study design yielded increased statistical power, leading to the discovery of six new EOC susceptibility loci. Variants at 1p36 (nearest gene, WNT4), 4q26 (SYNPO2), 9q34.2 (ABO) and 17q11.2 (ATAD5) were associated with EOC risk, and at 1p34.3 (RSPO1) and 6p22.1 (GPX6) variants were specifically associated with the serous EOC subtype, all with P < 5 × 10(-8). Incorporating these variants into risk assessment tools will improve clinical risk predictions for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk
    Lindstroem, S ; Thompson, DJ ; Paterson, AD ; Li, J ; Gierach, GL ; Scott, C ; Stone, J ; Douglas, JA ; dos-Santos-Silva, I ; Fernandez-Navarro, P ; Verghase, J ; Smith, P ; Brown, J ; Luben, R ; Wareham, NJ ; Loos, RJF ; Heit, JA ; Pankratz, VS ; Norman, A ; Goode, EL ; Cunningham, JM ; Deandrade, M ; Vierkant, RA ; Czene, K ; Fasching, PA ; Baglietto, L ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Shah, KP ; Chan, H-P ; Helvie, MA ; Beck, AH ; Knoblauch, NW ; Hazra, A ; Hunter, DJ ; Kraft, P ; Pollan, M ; Figueroa, JD ; Couch, FJ ; Hopper, JL ; Hall, P ; Easton, DF ; Boyd, NF ; Vachon, CM ; Tamimi, RM (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2014-10)
    Mammographic density reflects the amount of stromal and epithelial tissues in relation to adipose tissue in the breast and is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Here we report the results from meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of three mammographic density phenotypes: dense area, non-dense area and percent density in up to 7,916 women in stage 1 and an additional 10,379 women in stage 2. We identify genome-wide significant (P<5 × 10(-8)) loci for dense area (AREG, ESR1, ZNF365, LSP1/TNNT3, IGF1, TMEM184B and SGSM3/MKL1), non-dense area (8p11.23) and percent density (PRDM6, 8p11.23 and TMEM184B). Four of these regions are known breast cancer susceptibility loci, and four additional regions were found to be associated with breast cancer (P<0.05) in a large meta-analysis. These results provide further evidence of a shared genetic basis between mammographic density and breast cancer and illustrate the power of studying intermediate quantitative phenotypes to identify putative disease-susceptibility loci.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    GWAS meta-analysis and replication identifies three new susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer
    Pharoah, PDP ; Tsai, Y-Y ; Ramus, SJ ; Phelan, CM ; Goode, EL ; Lawrenson, K ; Buckley, M ; Fridley, BL ; Tyrer, JP ; Shen, H ; Weber, R ; Karevan, R ; Larson, MC ; Song, H ; Tessier, DC ; Bacot, F ; Vincent, D ; Cunningham, JM ; Dennis, J ; Dicks, E ; Aben, KK ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, N ; Armasu, SM ; Baglietto, L ; Bandera, EV ; Beckmann, MW ; Birrer, MJ ; Bloom, G ; Bogdanova, N ; Brenton, JD ; Brinton, LA ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Brown, R ; Butzow, R ; Campbell, I ; Carney, ME ; Carvalho, RS ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chen, YA ; Chen, Z ; Chow, W-H ; Cicek, MS ; Coetzee, G ; Cook, LS ; Cramer, DW ; Cybulski, C ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Despierre, E ; Doherty, JA ; Doerk, T ; du Bois, A ; Duerst, M ; Eccles, D ; Edwards, R ; Ekici, AB ; Fasching, PA ; Fenstermacher, D ; Flanagan, J ; Gao, Y-T ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Giles, G ; Gjyshi, A ; Gore, M ; Gronwald, J ; Guo, Q ; Halle, MK ; Harter, P ; Hein, A ; Heitz, F ; Hillemanns, P ; Hoatlin, M ; Hogdall, E ; Hogdall, CK ; Hosono, S ; Jakubowska, A ; Jensen, A ; Kalli, KR ; Karlan, BY ; Kelemen, LE ; Kiemeney, LA ; Kjaer, SK ; Konecny, GE ; Krakstad, C ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Lambrechts, S ; Le, ND ; Lee, N ; Lee, J ; Leminen, A ; Lim, BK ; Lissowska, J ; Lubinski, J ; Lundvall, L ; Lurie, G ; Massuger, LFAG ; Matsuo, K ; McGuire, V ; McLaughlin, JR ; Menon, U ; Modugno, F ; Moysich, KB ; Nakanishi, T ; Narod, SA ; Ness, RB ; Nevanlinna, H ; Nickels, S ; Noushmehr, H ; Odunsi, K ; Olson, S ; Orlow, I ; Paul, J ; Pejovic, T ; Pelttari, LM ; Permuth-Wey, J ; Pike, MC ; Poole, EM ; Qu, X ; Risch, HA ; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, L ; Rossing, MA ; Rudolph, A ; Runnebaum, I ; Rzepecka, IK ; Salvesen, HB ; Schwaab, I ; Severi, G ; Shen, H ; Shridhar, V ; Shu, X-O ; Sieh, W ; Southey, MC ; Spellman, P ; Tajima, K ; Teo, S-H ; Terry, KL ; Thompson, PJ ; Timorek, A ; Tworoger, SS ; van Altena, AM ; van den Berg, D ; Vergote, I ; Vierkant, RA ; Vitonis, AF ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Wentzensen, N ; Whittemore, AS ; Wik, E ; Winterhoff, B ; Woo, YL ; Wu, AH ; Yang, HP ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Zulkifli, F ; Goodman, MT ; Hall, P ; Easton, DF ; Pearce, CL ; Berchuck, A ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Iversen, E ; Monteiro, ANA ; Gayther, SA ; Schildkraut, JM ; Sellers, TA (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2013-04)
    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified four susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), with another two suggestive loci reaching near genome-wide significance. We pooled data from a GWAS conducted in North America with another GWAS from the UK. We selected the top 24,551 SNPs for inclusion on the iCOGS custom genotyping array. We performed follow-up genotyping in 18,174 individuals with EOC (cases) and 26,134 controls from 43 studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. We validated the two loci at 3q25 and 17q21 that were previously found to have associations close to genome-wide significance and identified three loci newly associated with risk: two loci associated with all EOC subtypes at 8q21 (rs11782652, P = 5.5 × 10(-9)) and 10p12 (rs1243180, P = 1.8 × 10(-8)) and another locus specific to the serous subtype at 17q12 (rs757210, P = 8.1 × 10(-10)). An integrated molecular analysis of genes and regulatory regions at these loci provided evidence for functional mechanisms underlying susceptibility and implicated CHMP4C in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Identification and molecular characterization of a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus at 17q21.31
    Permuth-Wey, J ; Lawrenson, K ; Shen, HC ; Velkova, A ; Tyrer, JP ; Chen, Z ; Lin, H-Y ; Chen, YA ; Tsai, Y-Y ; Qu, X ; Ramus, SJ ; Karevan, R ; Lee, J ; Lee, N ; Larson, MC ; Aben, KK ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, N ; Antoniou, AC ; Armasu, SM ; Bacot, F ; Baglietto, L ; Bandera, EV ; Barnholtz-Sloan, J ; Beckmann, MW ; Birrer, MJ ; Bloom, G ; Bogdanova, N ; Brinton, LA ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Brown, R ; Butzow, R ; Cai, Q ; Campbell, I ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chanock, S ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Cheng, JQ ; Cicek, MS ; Coetzee, GA ; Cook, LS ; Couch, FJ ; Cramer, DW ; Cunningham, JM ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Despierre, E ; Doherty, JA ; Doerk, T ; du Bois, A ; Duerst, M ; Easton, DF ; Eccles, D ; Edwards, R ; Ekici, AB ; Fasching, PA ; Fenstermacher, DA ; Flanagan, JM ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Giles, GG ; Glasspool, RM ; Gonzalez-Bosquet, J ; Goodman, MT ; Gore, M ; Gorski, B ; Gronwald, J ; Hall, P ; Halle, MK ; Harter, P ; Heitz, F ; Hillemanns, P ; Hoatlin, M ; Hogdall, CK ; Hogdall, E ; Hosono, S ; Jakubowska, A ; Jensen, A ; Jim, H ; Kalli, KR ; Karlan, BY ; Kaye, SB ; Kelemen, LE ; Kiemeney, LA ; Kikkawa, F ; Konecny, GE ; Krakstad, C ; Kjaer, SK ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Lambrechts, S ; Lancaster, JM ; Le, ND ; Leminen, A ; Levine, DA ; Liang, D ; Lim, BK ; Lin, J ; Lissowska, J ; Lu, KH ; Lubinski, J ; Lurie, G ; Massuger, LFAG ; Matsuo, K ; McGuire, V ; McLaughlin, JR ; Menon, U ; Modugno, F ; Moysich, KB ; Nakanishi, T ; Narod, SA ; Nedergaard, L ; Ness, RB ; Nevanlinna, H ; Nickels, S ; Noushmehr, H ; Odunsi, K ; Olson, SH ; Orlow, I ; Paul, J ; Pearce, CL ; Pejovic, T ; Pelttari, LM ; Pike, MC ; Poole, EM ; Raska, P ; Renner, SP ; Risch, HA ; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, L ; Rossing, MA ; Rudolph, A ; Runnebaum, IB ; Rzepecka, IK ; Salvesen, HB ; Schwaab, I ; Severi, G ; Shridhar, V ; Shu, X-O ; Shvetsov, YB ; Sieh, W ; Song, H ; Southey, MC ; Spiewankiewicz, B ; Stram, D ; Sutphen, R ; Teo, S-H ; Terry, KL ; Tessier, DC ; Thompson, PJ ; Tworoger, SS ; van Altena, AM ; Vergote, I ; Vierkant, RA ; Vincent, D ; Vitonis, AF ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Weber, RP ; Wentzensen, N ; Whittemore, AS ; Wik, E ; Wilkens, LR ; Winterhoff, B ; Woo, YL ; Wu, AH ; Xiang, Y-B ; Yang, HP ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Zulkifli, F ; Phelan, CM ; Iversen, E ; Schildkraut, JM ; Berchuck, A ; Fridley, BL ; Goode, EL ; Pharoah, PDP ; Monteiro, ANA ; Sellers, TA ; Gayther, SA (NATURE RESEARCH, 2013-03)
    Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a heritable component that remains to be fully characterized. Most identified common susceptibility variants lie in non-protein-coding sequences. We hypothesized that variants in the 3' untranslated region at putative microRNA (miRNA)-binding sites represent functional targets that influence EOC susceptibility. Here, we evaluate the association between 767 miRNA-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (miRSNPs) and EOC risk in 18,174 EOC cases and 26,134 controls from 43 studies genotyped through the Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study. We identify several miRSNPs associated with invasive serous EOC risk (odds ratio=1.12, P=10(-8)) mapping to an inversion polymorphism at 17q21.31. Additional genotyping of non-miRSNPs at 17q21.31 reveals stronger signals outside the inversion (P=10(-10)). Variation at 17q21.31 is associated with neurological diseases, and our collaboration is the first to report an association with EOC susceptibility. An integrated molecular analysis in this region provides evidence for ARHGAP27 and PLEKHM1 as candidate EOC susceptibility genes.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci
    Ghoussaini, M ; Fletcher, O ; Michailidou, K ; Turnbull, C ; Schmidt, MK ; Dicks, E ; Dennis, J ; Wang, Q ; Humphreys, MK ; Luccarini, C ; Baynes, C ; Conroy, D ; Maranian, M ; Ahmed, S ; Driver, K ; Johnson, N ; Orr, N ; Silva, IDS ; Waisfisz, Q ; Meijers-Heijboer, H ; Uitterlinden, AG ; Rivadeneira, F ; Hall, P ; Czene, K ; Irwanto, A ; Liu, J ; Nevanlinna, H ; Aittomaki, K ; Blomqvist, C ; Meindl, A ; Schmutzler, RK ; Mueller-Myhsok, B ; Lichtner, P ; Chang-Claude, J ; Hein, R ; Nickels, S ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Tsimiklis, H ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, D ; Bui, M ; Hopper, JL ; Apicella, C ; Park, DJ ; Southey, M ; Hunter, DJ ; Chanock, SJ ; Broeks, A ; Verhoef, S ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Fasching, PA ; Lux, MP ; Beckmann, MW ; Ekici, AB ; Sawyer, E ; Tomlinson, I ; Kerin, M ; Marme, F ; Schneeweiss, A ; Sohn, C ; Burwinkel, B ; Guenel, P ; Truong, T ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Menegaux, F ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Nielsen, SF ; Flyger, H ; Milne, RL ; Rosario Alonso, M ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Benitez, J ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Bernstein, L ; Dur, CC ; Brenner, H ; Mueller, H ; Arndt, V ; Stegmaier, C ; Justenhoven, C ; Brauch, H ; Bruening, T ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Eilber, U ; Doerk, T ; Schuermann, P ; Bremer, M ; Hillemanns, P ; Bogdanova, NV ; Antonenkova, NN ; Rogov, YI ; Karstens, JH ; Bermisheva, M ; Prokofieva, D ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Kataja, V ; Kosma, V-M ; Hartikainen, JM ; Lambrechts, D ; Yesilyurt, BT ; Floris, G ; Leunen, K ; Manoukian, S ; Bonanni, B ; Fortuzzi, S ; Peterlongo, P ; Couch, FJ ; Wang, X ; Stevens, K ; Lee, A ; Giles, GG ; Baglietto, L ; Severi, G ; McLean, C ; Alnaes, GG ; Kristensen, V ; Borrensen-Dale, A-L ; John, EM ; Miron, A ; Winqvist, R ; Pylkas, K ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Kauppila, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Glendon, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Devilee, P ; van Asperen, CJ ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Seynaeve, C ; Figueroa, JD ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Brinton, L ; Lissowska, J ; Hooning, MJ ; Hollestelle, A ; Oldenburg, RA ; van den Ouweland, AMW ; Cox, A ; Reed, MWR ; Shah, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Jaworska, K ; Durda, K ; Jones, M ; Schoemaker, M ; Ashworth, A ; Swerdlow, A ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; Muir, KR ; Lophatananon, A ; Rattanamongkongul, S ; Chaiwerawattana, A ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Shen, C-Y ; Yu, J-C ; Wu, P-E ; Hsiung, C-N ; Perkins, A ; Swann, R ; Velentzis, L ; Eccles, DM ; Tapper, WJ ; Gerty, SM ; Graham, NJ ; Ponder, BAJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Pharoah, PDP ; Lathrop, M ; Dunning, AM ; Rahman, N ; Peto, J ; Easton, DF (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2012-03)
    Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. To date, 22 common breast cancer susceptibility loci have been identified accounting for ∼8% of the heritability of the disease. We attempted to replicate 72 promising associations from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in ∼70,000 cases and ∼68,000 controls from 41 case-control studies and 9 breast cancer GWAS. We identified three new breast cancer risk loci at 12p11 (rs10771399; P = 2.7 × 10(-35)), 12q24 (rs1292011; P = 4.3 × 10(-19)) and 21q21 (rs2823093; P = 1.1 × 10(-12)). rs10771399 was associated with similar relative risks for both estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive breast cancer, whereas the other two loci were associated only with ER-positive disease. Two of the loci lie in regions that contain strong plausible candidate genes: PTHLH (12p11) has a crucial role in mammary gland development and the establishment of bone metastasis in breast cancer, and NRIP1 (21q21) encodes an ER cofactor and has a role in the regulation of breast cancer cell growth.