Melbourne School of Population and Global Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Identification of new breast cancer predisposition genes via whole exome sequencing
    Southey, MC ; Park, DJ ; Lesueur, F ; Odefrey, F ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Hammet, F ; Neuhausen, SL ; John, EM ; Andrulis, IL ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Baglietto, L ; Le Calvez-Kelm, F ; Pertesi, M ; Lonie, A ; Pope, B ; Sinilnikova, O ; Tsimiklis, H ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL ; Tavtigian, SV ; Goldgar, DE (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2012-01)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci
    Ghoussaini, M ; Fletcher, O ; Michailidou, K ; Turnbull, C ; Schmidt, MK ; Dicks, E ; Dennis, J ; Wang, Q ; Humphreys, MK ; Luccarini, C ; Baynes, C ; Conroy, D ; Maranian, M ; Ahmed, S ; Driver, K ; Johnson, N ; Orr, N ; Silva, IDS ; Waisfisz, Q ; Meijers-Heijboer, H ; Uitterlinden, AG ; Rivadeneira, F ; Hall, P ; Czene, K ; Irwanto, A ; Liu, J ; Nevanlinna, H ; Aittomaki, K ; Blomqvist, C ; Meindl, A ; Schmutzler, RK ; Mueller-Myhsok, B ; Lichtner, P ; Chang-Claude, J ; Hein, R ; Nickels, S ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Tsimiklis, H ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, D ; Bui, M ; Hopper, JL ; Apicella, C ; Park, DJ ; Southey, M ; Hunter, DJ ; Chanock, SJ ; Broeks, A ; Verhoef, S ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Fasching, PA ; Lux, MP ; Beckmann, MW ; Ekici, AB ; Sawyer, E ; Tomlinson, I ; Kerin, M ; Marme, F ; Schneeweiss, A ; Sohn, C ; Burwinkel, B ; Guenel, P ; Truong, T ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Menegaux, F ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Nielsen, SF ; Flyger, H ; Milne, RL ; Rosario Alonso, M ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Benitez, J ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Bernstein, L ; Dur, CC ; Brenner, H ; Mueller, H ; Arndt, V ; Stegmaier, C ; Justenhoven, C ; Brauch, H ; Bruening, T ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Eilber, U ; Doerk, T ; Schuermann, P ; Bremer, M ; Hillemanns, P ; Bogdanova, NV ; Antonenkova, NN ; Rogov, YI ; Karstens, JH ; Bermisheva, M ; Prokofieva, D ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Kataja, V ; Kosma, V-M ; Hartikainen, JM ; Lambrechts, D ; Yesilyurt, BT ; Floris, G ; Leunen, K ; Manoukian, S ; Bonanni, B ; Fortuzzi, S ; Peterlongo, P ; Couch, FJ ; Wang, X ; Stevens, K ; Lee, A ; Giles, GG ; Baglietto, L ; Severi, G ; McLean, C ; Alnaes, GG ; Kristensen, V ; Borrensen-Dale, A-L ; John, EM ; Miron, A ; Winqvist, R ; Pylkas, K ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Kauppila, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Glendon, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Devilee, P ; van Asperen, CJ ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Seynaeve, C ; Figueroa, JD ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Brinton, L ; Lissowska, J ; Hooning, MJ ; Hollestelle, A ; Oldenburg, RA ; van den Ouweland, AMW ; Cox, A ; Reed, MWR ; Shah, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Jaworska, K ; Durda, K ; Jones, M ; Schoemaker, M ; Ashworth, A ; Swerdlow, A ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; Muir, KR ; Lophatananon, A ; Rattanamongkongul, S ; Chaiwerawattana, A ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Shen, C-Y ; Yu, J-C ; Wu, P-E ; Hsiung, C-N ; Perkins, A ; Swann, R ; Velentzis, L ; Eccles, DM ; Tapper, WJ ; Gerty, SM ; Graham, NJ ; Ponder, BAJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Pharoah, PDP ; Lathrop, M ; Dunning, AM ; Rahman, N ; Peto, J ; Easton, DF (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2012-03)
    Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. To date, 22 common breast cancer susceptibility loci have been identified accounting for ∼8% of the heritability of the disease. We attempted to replicate 72 promising associations from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in ∼70,000 cases and ∼68,000 controls from 41 case-control studies and 9 breast cancer GWAS. We identified three new breast cancer risk loci at 12p11 (rs10771399; P = 2.7 × 10(-35)), 12q24 (rs1292011; P = 4.3 × 10(-19)) and 21q21 (rs2823093; P = 1.1 × 10(-12)). rs10771399 was associated with similar relative risks for both estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive breast cancer, whereas the other two loci were associated only with ER-positive disease. Two of the loci lie in regions that contain strong plausible candidate genes: PTHLH (12p11) has a crucial role in mammary gland development and the establishment of bone metastasis in breast cancer, and NRIP1 (21q21) encodes an ER cofactor and has a role in the regulation of breast cancer cell growth.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Common variants at 12p11, 12q24, 9p21, 9q31.2 and in ZNF365 are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Antoniou, AC ; Kuchenbaecker, KB ; Soucy, P ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; McGuffog, L ; Lee, A ; Barrowdale, D ; Healey, S ; Sinilnikova, OM ; Caligo, MA ; Loman, N ; Harbst, K ; Lindblom, A ; Arver, B ; Rosenquist, R ; Karlsson, P ; Nathanson, K ; Domchek, S ; Rebbeck, T ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Jaworska, K ; Durda, K ; Zlowowcka-Perlowska, E ; Osorio, A ; Duran, M ; Andres, R ; Benitez, J ; Hamann, U ; Hogervorst, FB ; van Os, TA ; Verhoef, S ; Meijers-Heijboer, HEJ ; Wijnen, J ; Garcia, EBG ; Ligtenberg, MJ ; Kriege, M ; Collee, M ; Ausems, MGEM ; Oosterwijk, JC ; Peock, S ; Frost, D ; Ellis, SD ; Platte, R ; Fineberg, E ; Evans, DG ; Lalloo, F ; Jacobs, C ; Eeles, R ; Adlard, J ; Davidson, R ; Cole, T ; Cook, J ; Paterson, J ; Douglas, F ; Brewer, C ; Hodgson, S ; Morrison, PJ ; Walker, L ; Rogers, MT ; Donaldson, A ; Dorkins, H ; Godwin, AK ; Bove, B ; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ; Houdayer, C ; Buecher, B ; de Pauw, A ; Mazoyer, S ; Calender, A ; Leone, M ; Bressac-de Paillerets, B ; Caron, O ; Sobol, H ; Frenay, M ; Prieur, F ; Ferrer, SF ; Mortemousque, I ; Buys, S ; Daly, M ; Miron, A ; Terry, MB ; Hopper, JL ; John, EM ; Southey, M ; Goldgar, D ; Singer, CF ; Fink-Retter, A ; Tea, M-K ; Kaulich, DG ; Hansen, TVO ; Nielsen, FC ; Barkardottir, RB ; Gaudet, M ; Kirchhoff, T ; Joseph, V ; Dutra-Clarke, A ; Offit, K ; Piedmonte, M ; Kirk, J ; Cohn, D ; Hurteau, J ; Byron, J ; Fiorica, J ; Toland, AE ; Montagna, M ; Oliani, C ; Imyanitov, E ; Isaacs, C ; Tihomirova, L ; Blanco, I ; Lazaro, C ; Teule, A ; Del Valle, J ; Gayther, SA ; Odunsi, K ; Gross, J ; Karlan, BY ; Olah, E ; Teo, S-H ; Ganz, PA ; Beattie, MS ; Dorfling, CM ; van Rensburg, EJ ; Diez, O ; Kwong, A ; Schmutzler, RK ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Engel, C ; Meindl, A ; Ditsch, N ; Arnold, N ; Heidemann, S ; Niederacher, D ; Preisler-Adams, S ; Gadzicki, D ; Varon-Mateeva, R ; Deissler, H ; Gehrig, A ; Sutter, C ; Kast, K ; Fiebig, B ; Schaefer, D ; Caldes, T ; de la Hoya, M ; Nevanlinna, H ; Muranen, TA ; Lesperance, B ; Spurdle, AB ; Neuhausen, SL ; Ding, YC ; Wang, X ; Fredericksen, Z ; Pankratz, VS ; Lindor, NM ; Peterlongo, P ; Manoukian, S ; Peissel, B ; Zaffaroni, D ; Bonanni, B ; Bernard, L ; Dolcetti, R ; Papi, L ; Ottini, L ; Radice, P ; Greene, MH ; Loud, JT ; Andrulis, IL ; Ozcelik, H ; Mulligan, AM ; Glendon, G ; Thomassen, M ; Gerdes, A-M ; Jensen, UB ; Skytte, A-B ; Kruse, TA ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Couch, FJ ; Simard, J ; Easton, DF (BMC, 2012)
    INTRODUCTION: Several common alleles have been shown to be associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Recent genome-wide association studies of breast cancer have identified eight additional breast cancer susceptibility loci: rs1011970 (9p21, CDKN2A/B), rs10995190 (ZNF365), rs704010 (ZMIZ1), rs2380205 (10p15), rs614367 (11q13), rs1292011 (12q24), rs10771399 (12p11 near PTHLH) and rs865686 (9q31.2). METHODS: To evaluate whether these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers and analysed the associations with breast cancer risk within a retrospective likelihood framework. RESULTS: Only SNP rs10771399 near PTHLH was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.94, P-trend = 3 × 10-4). The association was restricted to mutations proven or predicted to lead to absence of protein expression (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 3.1 × 10-5, P-difference = 0.03). Four SNPs were associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs10995190, P-trend = 0.015; rs1011970, P-trend = 0.048; rs865686, 2df-P = 0.007; rs1292011 2df-P = 0.03. rs10771399 (PTHLH) was predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 4 × 10-5) and there was marginal evidence of association with ER-negative breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings, in combination with previously identified modifiers of risk, will ultimately lead to more accurate risk prediction and an improved understanding of the disease etiology in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Breast Cancer Risk and 6q22.33: Combined Results from Breast Cancer Association Consortium and Consortium of Investigators on Modifiers of BRCA1/2
    Kirchhoff, T ; Gaudet, MM ; Antoniou, AC ; McGuffog, L ; Humphreys, MK ; Dunning, AM ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Flyger, H ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Ahn, S-H ; Dork, T ; Schuermann, P ; Karstens, JH ; Hillemanns, P ; Couch, FJ ; Olson, J ; Vachon, C ; Wang, X ; Cox, A ; Brock, I ; Elliott, G ; Reed, MWR ; Burwinkel, B ; Meindl, A ; Brauch, H ; Hamann, U ; Ko, Y-D ; Broeks, A ; Schmidt, MK ; Van 't Veer, LJ ; Braaf, LM ; Johnson, N ; Fletcher, O ; Gibson, L ; Peto, J ; Turnbull, C ; Seal, S ; Renwick, A ; Rahman, N ; Wu, P-E ; Yu, J-C ; Hsiung, C-N ; Shen, C-Y ; Southey, MC ; Hopper, JL ; Hammet, F ; Van Dorpe, T ; Dieudonne, A-S ; Hatse, S ; Lambrechts, D ; Andrulis, IL ; Bogdanova, N ; Antonenkova, N ; Rogov, JI ; Prokofieva, D ; Bermisheva, M ; Khusnutdinova, E ; van Asperen, CJ ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Hooning, MJ ; Devilee, P ; Margolin, S ; Lindblom, A ; Milne, RL ; Ignacio Arias, J ; Pilar Zamora, M ; Benitez, J ; Severi, G ; Baglietto, L ; Giles, GG ; Spurdle, AB ; Beesley, J ; Chen, X ; Holland, H ; Healey, S ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Chang-Claude, J ; Mannermaa, A ; Kosma, V-M ; Kauppinen, J ; Kataja, V ; Agnarsson, BA ; Caligo, MA ; Godwin, AK ; Nevanlinna, H ; Heikkinen, T ; Fredericksen, Z ; Lindor, N ; Nathanson, KL ; Domchek, SM ; Loman, N ; Karlsson, P ; Askmalm, MS ; Melin, B ; von Wachenfeldt, A ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Verheus, M ; Rookus, MA ; Seynaeve, C ; Oldenburg, RA ; Ligtenberg, MJ ; Ausems, MGEM ; Aalfs, CM ; Gille, HJP ; Wijnen, JT ; Garcia, EBG ; Peock, S ; Cook, M ; Oliver, CT ; Frost, D ; Luccarini, C ; Pichert, G ; Davidson, R ; Chu, C ; Eccles, D ; Ong, K-R ; Cook, J ; Douglas, F ; Hodgson, S ; Evans, DG ; Eeles, R ; Gold, B ; Pharoah, PDP ; Offit, K ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Easton, DF ; Prokunina-Olsson, L (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2012-06-29)
    Recently, a locus on chromosome 6q22.33 (rs2180341) was reported to be associated with increased breast cancer risk in the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population, and this association was also observed in populations of non-AJ European ancestry. In the present study, we performed a large replication analysis of rs2180341 using data from 31,428 invasive breast cancer cases and 34,700 controls collected from 25 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). In addition, we evaluated whether rs2180341 modifies breast cancer risk in 3,361 BRCA1 and 2,020 BRCA2 carriers from 11 centers in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Based on the BCAC data from women of European ancestry, we found evidence for a weak association with breast cancer risk for rs2180341 (per-allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.023). There was evidence for heterogeneity in the ORs among studies (I(2) = 49.3%; p = <0.004). In CIMBA, we observed an inverse association with the minor allele of rs2180341 and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele OR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.80-1.00, p = 0.048), indicating a potential protective effect of this allele. These data suggest that that 6q22.33 confers a weak effect on breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2
    Wishart, GC ; Bajdik, CD ; Dicks, E ; Provenzano, E ; Schmidt, MK ; Sherman, M ; Greenberg, DC ; Green, AR ; Gelmon, KA ; Kosma, V-M ; Olson, JE ; Beckmann, MW ; Winqvist, R ; Cross, SS ; Severi, G ; Huntsman, D ; Pylkas, K ; Ellis, I ; Nielsen, TO ; Giles, G ; Blomqvist, C ; Fasching, PA ; Couch, FJ ; Rakha, E ; Foulkes, WD ; Blows, FM ; Begin, LR ; van't Veer, LJ ; Southey, M ; Nevanlinna, H ; Mannermaa, A ; Cox, A ; Cheang, M ; Baglietto, L ; Caldas, C ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Pharoah, PDP (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2012-08-21)
    BACKGROUND: Predict (www.predict.nhs.uk) is an online, breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit tool. The aim of this study was to incorporate the prognostic effect of HER2 status in a new version (Predict+), and to compare its performance with the original Predict and Adjuvant!. METHODS: The prognostic effect of HER2 status was based on an analysis of data from 10 179 breast cancer patients from 14 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The hazard ratio estimates were incorporated into Predict. The validation study was based on 1653 patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer identified from the British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit. Predicted overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) for Predict+, Predict and Adjuvant! were compared with observed outcomes. RESULTS: All three models performed well for both OS and BCSS. Both Predict models provided better BCSS estimates than Adjuvant!. In the subset of patients with HER2-positive tumours, Predict+ performed substantially better than the other two models for both OS and BCSS. CONCLUSION: Predict+ is the first clinical breast cancer prognostication tool that includes tumour HER2 status. Use of the model might lead to more accurate absolute treatment benefit predictions for individual patients.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study
    Le Calvez-Kelm, F ; Oliver, J ; Damiola, F ; Forey, N ; Robinot, N ; Durand, G ; Voegele, C ; Vallee, MP ; Byrnes, G ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC ; Andrulis, IL ; John, EM ; Tavtigian, SV ; Lesueur, F ; Peterlongo, P (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2012-12-27)
    BACKGROUND: Although inherited breast cancer has been associated with germline mutations in genes that are functionally involved in the DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, including BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2 and PALB2, about 70% of breast cancer heritability remains unexplained. Because of their critical functions in maintaining genome integrity and already well-established associations with breast cancer susceptibility, it is likely that additional genes involved in the HRR pathway harbor sequence variants associated with increased risk of breast cancer. RAD51 plays a central biological function in DNA repair and despite the fact that rare, likely dysfunctional variants in three of its five paralogs, RAD51C, RAD51D, and XRCC2, have been associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk, no population-based case-control mutation screening data are available for the RAD51 gene. We thus postulated that RAD51 could harbor rare germline mutations that confer increased risk of breast cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We screened the coding exons and proximal splice junction regions of the gene for germline sequence variation in 1,330 early-onset breast cancer cases and 1,123 controls from the Breast Cancer Family Registry, using the same population-based sampling and analytical strategy that we developed for assessment of rare sequence variants in ATM and CHEK2. In total, 12 distinct very rare or private variants were characterized in RAD51, with 10 cases (0.75%) and 9 controls (0.80%) carrying such a variant. Variants were either likely neutral missense substitutions (3), silent substitutions (4) or non-coding substitutions (5) that were predicted to have little effect on efficiency of the splicing machinery. CONCLUSION: Altogether, our data suggest that RAD51 tolerates so little dysfunctional sequence variation that rare variants in the gene contribute little, if anything, to breast cancer susceptibility.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Tumour morphology of early-onset breast cancers predicts breast cancer risk for first-degree relatives: the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry
    Dite, GS ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC (BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2012)
    INTRODUCTION: We hypothesised that breast cancer risk for relatives of women with early-onset breast cancer could be predicted by tumour morphological features. METHODS: We studied female first-degree relatives of a population-based sample of 452 index cases with a first primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed before the age of 40 years. For the index cases, a standardised tumour morphology review had been conducted for all; estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status was available for 401 (89%), and 77 (17%) had a high-risk mutation in a breast cancer susceptibility gene or methylation of the BRCA1 promoter region in peripheral blood DNA. We calculated standardised incidence ratios (SIR) by comparing the number of mothers and sisters with breast cancer with the number expected based on Australian incidence rates specific for age and year of birth. RESULTS: Using Cox proportional hazards modelling, absence of extensive sclerosis, extensive intraductal carcinoma, absence of acinar and glandular growth patterns, and the presence of trabecular and lobular growth patterns were independent predictors with between a 1.8- and 3.1-fold increased risk for relatives (all P <0.02). Excluding index cases with known genetic predisposition or BRCA1 promoter methylation, absence of extensive sclerosis, circumscribed growth, extensive intraductal carcinoma and lobular growth pattern were independent predictors with between a 2.0- and 3.3-fold increased risk for relatives (all P <0.02). Relatives of the 128 (34%) index cases with none of these four features were at population risk (SIR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.85) while relatives of the 37 (10%) index cases with two or more features were at high risk (SIR = 5.18, 95% CI = 3.22 to 8.33). CONCLUSIONS: This wide variation in risks for relatives based on tumour characteristics could be of clinical value, help discover new breast cancer susceptibility genes and be an advance on the current clinical practice of using ER and PR as pathology-based predictors of familial and possibly genetic risks.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Comparison of 6q25 Breast Cancer Hits from Asian and European Genome Wide Association Studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC)
    Hein, R ; Maranian, M ; Hopper, JL ; Kapuscinski, MK ; Southey, MC ; Park, DJ ; Schmidt, MK ; Broeks, A ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Bueno-de-Mesquit, HB ; Muir, KR ; Lophatananon, A ; Rattanamongkongul, S ; Puttawibul, P ; Fasching, PA ; Hein, A ; Ekici, AB ; Beckmann, MW ; Fletcher, O ; Johnson, N ; Silva, IDS ; Peto, J ; Sawyer, E ; Tomlinson, I ; Kerin, M ; Miller, N ; Marmee, F ; Schneeweiss, A ; Sohn, C ; Burwinkel, B ; Guenel, P ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Menegaux, F ; Truong, T ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Flyger, H ; Milne, RL ; Arias Perez, JI ; Pilar Zamora, M ; Benitez, J ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Bernstein, L ; Clarke, CA ; Brenner, H ; Mueller, H ; Arndt, V ; Stegmaier, C ; Rahman, N ; Seal, S ; Turnbull, C ; Renwick, A ; Meindl, A ; Schott, S ; Bartram, CR ; Schmutzler, RK ; Brauch, H ; Hamann, U ; Ko, Y-D ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Doerk, T ; Schuermann, P ; Karstens, JH ; Hillemanns, P ; Nevanlinna, H ; Heikkinen, T ; Aittomaki, K ; Blomqvist, C ; Bogdanova, NV ; Zalutsky, IV ; Antonenkova, NN ; Bermisheva, M ; Prokovieva, D ; Farahtdinova, A ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Kataja, V ; Kosma, V-M ; Hartikainen, J ; Chen, X ; Beesley, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Zhao, H ; Neven, P ; Wildiers, H ; Nickels, S ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Radice, P ; Peterlongo, P ; Manoukian, S ; Barile, M ; Couch, FJ ; Olson, JE ; Wang, X ; Fredericksen, Z ; Giles, GG ; Baglietto, L ; McLean, CA ; Severi, G ; Offit, K ; Robson, M ; Gaudet, MM ; Vijai, J ; Alnaes, GG ; Kristensen, V ; Borresen-Dale, A-L ; John, EM ; Miron, A ; Winqvist, R ; Pylkas, K ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Grip, M ; Andrulis, IL ; Knight, JA ; Glendon, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Figueroa, JD ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Lissowska, J ; Sherman, ME ; Hooning, M ; Martens, JWM ; Seynaeve, C ; Collee, M ; Hall, P ; Humpreys, K ; Czene, K ; Liu, J ; Cox, A ; Brock, IW ; Cross, SS ; Reed, MWR ; Ahmed, S ; Ghoussaini, M ; Pharoah, PDP ; Kang, D ; Yoo, K-Y ; Noh, D-Y ; Jakubowska, A ; Jaworska, K ; Durda, K ; Zlowocka, E ; Sangrajrang, S ; Gaborieau, V ; Brennan, P ; McKay, J ; Shen, C-Y ; Yu, J-C ; Hsu, H-M ; Hou, M-F ; Orr, N ; Schoemaker, M ; Ashworth, A ; Swerdlow, A ; Trentham-Dietz, A ; Newcomb, PA ; Titus, L ; Egan, KM ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Antoniou, AC ; Humphreys, MK ; Morrison, J ; Chang-Claude, J ; Easton, DF ; Dunning, AM ; Chan, KYK (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2012-08-07)
    The 6q25.1 locus was first identified via a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in Chinese women and marked by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2046210, approximately 180 Kb upstream of ESR1. There have been conflicting reports about the association of this locus with breast cancer in Europeans, and a GWAS in Europeans identified a different SNP, tagged here by rs12662670. We examined the associations of both SNPs in up to 61,689 cases and 58,822 controls from forty-four studies collaborating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, of which four studies were of Asian and 39 of European descent. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Case-only analyses were used to compare SNP effects in Estrogen Receptor positive (ER+) versus negative (ER-) tumours. Models including both SNPs were fitted to investigate whether the SNP effects were independent. Both SNPs are significantly associated with breast cancer risk in both ethnic groups. Per-allele ORs are higher in Asian than in European studies [rs2046210: OR (A/G) = 1.36 (95% CI 1.26-1.48), p = 7.6 × 10(-14) in Asians and 1.09 (95% CI 1.07-1.11), p = 6.8 × 10(-18) in Europeans. rs12662670: OR (G/T) = 1.29 (95% CI 1.19-1.41), p = 1.2 × 10(-9) in Asians and 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), p = 3.8 × 10(-9) in Europeans]. SNP rs2046210 is associated with a significantly greater risk of ER- than ER+ tumours in Europeans [OR (ER-) = 1.20 (95% CI 1.15-1.25), p = 1.8 × 10(-17) versus OR (ER+) = 1.07 (95% CI 1.04-1.1), p = 1.3 × 10(-7), p(heterogeneity) = 5.1 × 10(-6)]. In these Asian studies, by contrast, there is no clear evidence of a differential association by tumour receptor status. Each SNP is associated with risk after adjustment for the other SNP. These results suggest the presence of two variants at 6q25.1 each independently associated with breast cancer risk in Asians and in Europeans. Of these two, the one tagged by rs2046210 is associated with a greater risk of ER- tumours.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    High and low mammographic density human breast tissues maintain histological differential in murine tissue engineering chambers
    Chew, GL ; Huang, D ; Lin, SJ ; Huo, C ; Blick, T ; Henderson, MA ; Hill, P ; Cawson, J ; Morrison, WA ; Campbell, IG ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC ; Haviv, I ; Thompson, EW (SPRINGER, 2012-08)
    Mammographic density (MD) is the area of breast tissue that appears radiologically white on mammography. Although high MD is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, independent of BRCA1/2 mutation status, the molecular basis of high MD and its associated breast cancer risk is poorly understood. MD studies will benefit from an animal model, where hormonal, gene and drug perturbations on MD can be measured in a preclinical context. High and low MD tissues were selectively sampled by stereotactic biopsy from operative specimens of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy. The high and low MD tissues were transferred into separate vascularised biochambers in the groins of SCID mice. Chamber material was harvested after 6 weeks for histological analyses and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins, vimentin and a human-specific mitochondrial antigen. Within-individual analysis was performed in replicate mice, eliminating confounding by age, body mass index and process-related factors, and comparisons were made to the parental human tissue. Maintenance of differential MD post-propagation was assessed radiographically. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed the preservation of human glandular and stromal components in the murine biochambers, with maintenance of radiographic MD differential. Propagated high MD regions had higher stromal (p = 0.0002) and lower adipose (p = 0.0006) composition, reflecting the findings in the original human breast tissue, although glands appeared small and non-complex in both high and low MD groups. No significant differences were observed in glandular area (p = 0.4) or count (p = 0.4) between high and low MD biochamber tissues. Human mammary glandular and stromal tissues were viably maintained in murine biochambers, with preservation of differential radiographic density and histological features. Our study provides a murine model for future studies into the biomolecular basis of MD as a risk factor for breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Risk factors for uncommon histologic subtypes of breast cancer using centralized pathology review in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
    Work, ME ; Andrulis, IL ; John, EM ; Hopper, JL ; Liao, Y ; Zhang, FF ; Knight, JA ; West, DW ; Milne, RL ; Giles, GG ; Longacre, TA ; O'Malley, F ; Mulligan, AM ; Southey, MC ; Hibshoosh, H ; Terry, MB (SPRINGER, 2012-08)
    Epidemiologic studies of histologic types of breast cancer including mucinous, medullary, and tubular carcinomas have primarily relied on International Classification of Diseases-Oncology (ICD-O) codes assigned by local pathologists to define histology. Using data from the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), we compared histologic agreement between centralized BCFR pathology review and ICD-O codes available from local tumor registries among 3,260 breast cancer cases. Agreement was low to moderate for less common histologies; for example, only 55 and 26 % of cases classified as mucinous and medullary, respectively, by centralized review were similarly classified using ICD-O coding. We then evaluated risk factors for each histologic subtype by comparing each histologic case group defined by centralized review with a common set of 2,997 population-based controls using polytomous logistic regression. Parity [odds ratio (OR) = 0.4, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.2-0.9, for parous vs. nulliparous], age at menarche (OR = 0.5, 95 % CI: 0.3-0.9, for age ≥13 vs. ≤11), and use of oral contraceptives (OCs) (OR = 0.5, 95 % CI: 0.2-0.8, OC use >5 years vs. never) were associated with mucinous carcinoma (N = 92 cases). Body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.05, 95 % CI: 1.0-1.1, per unit of BMI) and high parity (OR = 2.6, 95 % CI: 1.1-6.0 for ≥3 live births vs. nulliparous) were associated with medullary carcinoma (N = 90 cases). We did not find any associations between breast cancer risk factors and tubular carcinoma (N = 86 cases). Relative risk estimates from analyses using ICD-O classifications of histology, rather than centralized review, resulted in attenuated, and/or more imprecise, associations. These findings suggest risk factor heterogeneity across breast cancer tumor histologies, and demonstrate the value of centralized pathology review for classifying rarer tumor types.