Infrastructure Engineering - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    A predictive model for spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Bende-Michl, U ; Liu, S ; Western, AW ( 2019-07-23)
    Abstract. Degraded water quality in rivers and streams can have large economic, societal and ecological impacts. Stream water quality can be highly variable both over space and time. To develop effective management strategies for riverine water quality, it is critical to be able to predict these spatio-temporal variabilities. However, our current capacity to model stream water quality is limited, particularly at large spatial scales across multiple catchments. This is due to a lack of understanding of the key controls that drive spatio-temporal variabilities of stream water quality. To address this, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model to analyse the spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality across the state of Victoria, Australia. The model was developed based on monthly water quality monitoring data collected at 102 sites over 21 years. The modelling focused on six key water quality constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate-nitrite (NOx), and electrical conductivity (EC). Among the six constituents, the models explained varying proportions of variation in water quality. EC was the most predictable constituent (88.6 % variability explained) and FRP had the lowest predictive performance (19.9 % variability explained). The models were validated for multiple sets of calibration/validation sites and showed robust performance. Temporal validation revealed a systematic change in the TSS model performance across most catchments since an extended drought period in the study region, highlighting potential shifts in TSS dynamics over the drought. Further improvements in model performance need to focus on: (1) alternative statistical model structures to improve fitting for the low concentration data, especially records below the detection limit; and (2) better representation of non-conservative constituents by accounting for important biogeochemical processes. We also recommend future improvements in water quality monitoring programs which can potentially enhance the model capacity, via: (1) improving the monitoring and assimilation of high-frequency water quality data; and (2) improving the availability of data to capture land use and management changes over time.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space
    Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Bende-Michl, U ; Waters, D ; Leahy, P ; Wilson, P ; Western, AW (WILEY, 2018-01-01)
    Globally, many rivers are experiencing declining water quality, for example, with altered levels of sediments, salts, and nutrients. Effective water quality management requires a sound understanding of how and why water quality differs across space, both within and between river catchments. Land cover, land use, land management, atmospheric deposition, geology and soil type, climate, topography, and catchment hydrology are the key features of a catchment that affect: (1) the amount of suspended sediment, nutrient, and salt concentrations in catchments (i.e., the source), (2) the mobilization ,and (3) the delivery of these constituents to receiving waters. There are, however, complexities in the relationship between landscape characteristics and stream water quality. The strength of this relationship can be influenced by the distance and spatial arrangement of constituent sources within the catchment, cross correlations between landscape characteristics, and seasonality. A knowledge gap that should be addressed in future studies is that of interactions and cross correlations between landscape characteristics. There is currently limited understanding of how the relationships between landscape characteristics and water quality responses can shift based on the other characteristics of the catchment. Understanding the many forces driving stream water quality and the complexities and interactions in these forces is necessary for the development of successful water quality management strategies. This knowledge could be used to develop predictive models, which would aid in forecasting of riverine water quality. WIREs Water 2018, 5:e1260. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1260 This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Hydrological Processes Science of Water > Water Quality
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A bayesian hierarchical model to predict spatio-temporal variability in river water quality at 102 catchments
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, A ; Ryu, D ; Bende-Michl, U ; Liu, S ; Western, A (Copernicus GmbH, 2020)
    Our current capacity to model stream water quality is limited particularly at large spatial scales across multiple catchments. To address this, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model to simulate the spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality across the state of Victoria, Australia. The model was developed using monthly water quality monitoring data over 21 years, across 102 catchments, which span over 130,000 km2. The modelling focused on six key water quality constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate-nitrite (NOx), and electrical conductivity (EC). The model structure was informed by knowledge of the key factors driving water quality variation, which had been identified in two preceding studies using the same dataset. Apart from FRP, which is hardly explainable (19.9%), the model explains 38.2% (NOx) to 88.6% (EC) of total spatio-temporal variability in water quality. Across constituents, the model generally captures over half of the observed spatial variability; temporal variability remains largely unexplained across all catchments, while long-term trends are well captured. The model is best used to predict proportional changes in water quality in a Box-Cox transformed scale, but can have substantial bias if used to predict absolute values for high concentrations. This model can assist catchment management by (1) identifying hot-spots and hot moments for waterway pollution; (2) predicting effects of catchment changes on water quality e.g. urbanization or forestation; and (3) identifying and explaining major water quality trends and changes. Further model improvements should focus on: (1) alternative statistical model structures to improve fitting for truncated data, for constituents where a large amount of data below the detection-limit; and (2) better representation of non-conservative constituents (e.g. FRP) by accounting for important biogeochemical processes.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Supplementary material to: "A predictive model for spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality"
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Bende-Michl, U ; Liu, S ; Western, AW (Copernicus Publications, 2019)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A data-based predictive model for spatiotemporal variability in stream water quality
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Bende-Michl, U ; Liu, S ; Western, AW (COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH, 2020-02-24)
    Abstract. Our current capacity to model stream water quality is limited – particularly at large spatial scales across multiple catchments. To address this, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model to simulate the spatiotemporal variability in stream water quality across the state of Victoria, Australia. The model was developed using monthly water quality monitoring data over 21 years and across 102 catchments (which span over 130 000 km2). The modeling focused on six key water quality constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate–nitrite (NOx) and electrical conductivity (EC). The model structure was informed by knowledge of the key factors driving water quality variation, which were identified in two preceding studies using the same dataset. Apart from FRP, which is hardly explained (19.9 %), the model explains 38.2 % (NOx) to 88.6 % (EC) of the total spatiotemporal variability in water quality. Across constituents, the model generally captures over half of the observed spatial variability; the temporal variability remains largely unexplained across all catchments, although long-term trends are well captured. The model is best used to predict proportional changes in water quality on a Box–Cox-transformed scale, but it can have substantial bias if used to predict absolute values for high concentrations. This model can assist catchment management by (1) identifying hot spots and hot moments for waterway pollution; (2) predicting the effects of catchment changes on water quality, e.g., urbanization or forestation; and (3) identifying and explaining major water quality trends and changes. Further model improvements should focus on the following: (1) alternative statistical model structures to improve fitting for truncated data (for constituents where a large amount of data fall below the detection limit); and (2) better representation of nonconservative constituents (e.g., FRP) by accounting for important biogeochemical processes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A web-based interface to visualize and model spatio-temporal variability of stream water quality
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, J ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Bende-Michl, U ; Leahy, P ; Waters, D ; Watson, M ; Wilson, P ; Western, A ; Vietz, G ; Rutherfurd, I (River Basement Management Society, 2018)
    Understanding the spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality is critical for designing effective water quality management strategies. To facilitate this, we developed a web-based interface to visualize and model the spatio-temporal variability of stream water quality in Victoria. We used a dataset of long-term monthly water quality measurements from 102 monitoring sites in Victoria, focusing on six water quality constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjedahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate-nitrite (NOx), and electrical conductivity (EC). The interface models spatio-temporal variability in water quality via a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework, and produces summaries of (1) the key driving factors of spatio-temporal variability and (2) model performance assessed by multiple metrics. Additional features include predicting the time-averaged mean concentration at an un-sampled site, and testing the impact of land-use changes on the mean concentration at existing sites. This tool can be very useful in supporting the decision-making processes of catchment managers in (1) understanding the key drivers of changes in water quality and (2) designing water quality mitigation and restoration strategies.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    What Are the Key Catchment Characteristics Affecting Spatial Differences in Riverine Water Quality?
    Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Waters, D ; Leahy, P ; Bende-Michl, U ; Western, AW (AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 2018-10)
    Abstract This study uses water‐quality data collected over 20 years, from 102 predominantly rural sites across Victoria, Australia, to further our understanding of spatial variability in riverine water quality. We focus on concentrations of total suspended solids, total phosphorus, filterable reactive phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite (NOx), and electrical conductivity. We used an exhaustive search approach to identify the linear models that best link catchment characteristics to time‐averaged constituent concentrations. We ran additional analyses to (1) assess the performance of these models under drought conditions, and (2) understand the key drivers of site‐level variability (standard deviations) of constituent concentrations. Natural catchment characteristics appear to have a greater effect on spatial differences in average constituent concentrations. Performance of the statistical models of time‐averaged constituent concentrations varied, and spatial variability in mean electrical conductivity levels could be more readily explained by catchment characteristics compared to more reactive nutrients. Notwithstanding, the models performed relatively well under varying hydrologic conditions for most constituents. As such, these models provide an insight into the key factors affecting spatial variability in average stream water‐quality conditions. We also identified that hydrologic, climatic, and topographic characteristics of the catchment helped explain the spatial variability in temporal changes in constituents. After calibration and validation, these models of both average water quality and variability in water quality could be used to forecast stream water‐quality responses to future land use, climate, or soil and land management changes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Characterisation of spatial variability in water quality in the Great Barrier Reef catchments using multivariate statistical analysis
    Liu, S ; Ryu, D ; Webb, JA ; Lintern, A ; Waters, D ; Guo, D ; Western, AW (PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 2018-12)
    Water quality monitoring is important to assess changes in inland and coastal water quality. The focus of this study was to improve understanding of the spatial component of spatial-temporal water quality dynamics, particularly the spatial variability in water quality and the association between this spatial variability and catchment characteristics. A dataset of nine water quality constituents collected from 32 monitoring sites over a 11-year period (2006-2016), across the Great Barrier Reef catchments (Queensland, Australia), were evaluated by multivariate techniques. Two clusters were identified, which were strongly associated with catchment characteristics. A two-step Principal Component Analysis/Factor Analysis revealed four groupings of constituents with similar spatial pattern and allowed the key catchment characteristics affecting water quality to be determined. These findings provide a more nuanced view of spatial variations in water quality compared with previous understanding and an improved basis for water quality management to protect nearshore marine ecosystem.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Using a data-driven approach to understand the interaction between catchment characteristics and water quality responses
    Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Bende-Michl, U ; Leahy, P ; Wilson, P ; Western, A ; Vietz, G ; Flatley, A ; Rutherfurd, I (River Basin Management Society, 2016)