Infrastructure Engineering - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The value of water in storage: Implications for operational policies
    Western, AW ; Taylor, N ; Langford, J ; Azmi, M (Curran Associate Inc., 2018-01-01)
    With desalination plants becoming an increasingly common feature of water supply systems for major cities, the options for managing water security are now markedly different to past times when the short-term response to low water availability essentially revolved around reducing usage. The operation of desalination plants and other components of diversified water supply systems now enable operators to increase availability, essentially by producing water. The operation of such systems clearly impacts operational costs but, more subtly, also impacts future augmentation decisions. This can have major cost implications as there is a trade-off between the costs of operating a water supply system and the probability and timing of future augmentations that leads to important differences in the economics of reliably supplying water. This paper first summarises an economic analysis framework in which to explore the interaction of short (operational) and long (capital investment) term decisions towards maintaining water security. It then explores the implications of different operation approaches in Melbourne’s water supply system, assuming a planned augmentation pathway under conditions of low water availability. We assume augmentation decisions are prompted by critically low water availability events, rather than long-term reliability analysis. We show that the majority of the variation in cost of maintaining a reliable water supply is associated with impacts of operational rules on likely capital investment and that this results in a strong interaction between short and long-term decision making. The outcome of this work has implications for both operational decision making and augmentation planning for urban water supply systems. These implications are relevant to any water supply system where a climate independent water supply source, such as desalination, can be accessed.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Testing uncertainty in a model of stream bank erosion
    Jha, S ; Western, AW ; Rutherfurd, ID ; Grayson, RB ( 2020-01-01)
    Sediment and nutrient loads in Australian rivers are a significant management concern. The National Land and Water Audit (2002) identified bank erosion as a major source of sediment, particularly in southern Australian systems. This paper tests a method of incorporating uncertainty into and the up-scaling of a cross-section scale stream bank erosion model. The cross-section scale model is based on an understanding of fluvial erosion and mass failure processes in which fluvial erosion is estimated using an excess shear stress approach while mass failure is estimated using a limit equilibrium analysis at the cross-section scale. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the model. A Monte-Carlo framework is used to propagate input uncertainty to output uncertainty in the model and to scale up to the reach scale. Widely available databases are used to estimate variables for the two model components. A range of spatial information (GIS layers) is used to describe spatial variations in general properties such as soil type and catchment area. These are considered to be relatively well known (compared with cross-section geometry, geotechnical properties of the bank materials, riparian tree density, and hydrologic variables), although spatially coarse. A variety of empirical models and assumptions are used to transform the spatial information into model parameters, which are considered to be relatively poorly known. Two major challenges, which are related, involve incorporating the effects of natural variability along a river reach and estimating the uncertainty in the model inputs and the effect that this has on uncertainty in the model prediction. A Monte Carlo framework is used to achieve this. This involves developing a series of statistical models to predict the erosion model inputs and their (co)variability. A hierarchical approach is used to develop these input models. An attempt is first made to construct a statistical model that predicts each model parameter from available spatial information using multiple regressions. Uncertainty in these parameters is incorporated using the regression error statistics. Where cross-correlations were found to be important, these were incorporated in the generation models. Where it was not possible to develop empirical relationships with available spatial data sets, a suitable parametric distribution is fitted for those input variables for which some data is available. Where no data were available for fitting a distribution, a distribution was assumed with a shape and parameters based on heuristic consideration of the relevant processes. Once both the erosion model and the various input models were established, the Monte Carlo technique was applied. This involves generating sets of the input variables of the model from the respective stochastic input models and the running the erosion model. This allows the probability distribution for the model output to be estimated for a location in the stream network. The model is tested using historical records of plan form change from a 40km reach of the Goulburn River downstream of Eildon Dam in Victoria, Australia. The results obtained from the model are promising; with bank erosion rates being predicted within a factor of two without calibration. A series of sensitivity analyses (detail sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, and advance sensitivity analysis) were conducted to identify key variables for predicting bank erosion rates using this particular bank erosion model. This suggested that bank angle, bank material physical characteristics, stream bed slope, and the high-flow flow regime (bankfull duration) control the behaviour of the model for loam bank materials.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Equifinality and process-based modelling
    Khatami, S ; Peel, M ; Peterson, T ; Western, A (American Geophysical Union, 2018-11-26)
    Equifinality is understood as one of the fundamental difficulties in the study of open complex systems, including catchment hydrology. A review of the hydrologic literature reveals that the term equifinality has been widely used, but in many cases inconsistently and without coherent recognition of the various facets of equifinality, which can lead to ambiguity but also methodological fallacies. Therefore, in this study we first characterise the term equifinality within the context of hydrological modelling by reviewing the genesis of the concept of equifinality and then presenting a theoretical framework. During past decades, equifinality has mainly been studied as a subset of aleatory (arising due to randomness) uncertainty and for the assessment of model parameter uncertainty. Although the connection between parameter uncertainty and equifinality is undeniable, we argue there is more to equifinality than just aleatory parameter uncertainty. That is, the importance of equifinality and epistemic uncertainty (arising due to lack of knowledge) and their implications is overlooked in our current practice of model evaluation. Equifinality and epistemic uncertainty in studying, modelling, and evaluating hydrologic processes are treated as if they can be simply discussed in (or often reduced to) probabilistic terms (as for aleatory uncertainty). The deficiencies of this approach to conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling are demonstrated for selected Australian catchments by examination of parameter and internal flux distributions and interactions within SIMHYD. On this basis, we present a new approach that expands equifinality concept beyond model parameters to inform epistemic uncertainty. The new approach potentially facilitates the identification and development of more physically plausible models and model evaluation schemes particularly within the multiple working hypotheses framework, and is generalisable to other fields of environmental modelling as well.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A bayesian hierarchical model to predict spatio-temporal variability in river water quality at 102 catchments
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, A ; Ryu, D ; Bende-Michl, U ; Liu, S ; Western, A (Copernicus GmbH, 2020)
    Our current capacity to model stream water quality is limited particularly at large spatial scales across multiple catchments. To address this, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model to simulate the spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality across the state of Victoria, Australia. The model was developed using monthly water quality monitoring data over 21 years, across 102 catchments, which span over 130,000 km2. The modelling focused on six key water quality constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate-nitrite (NOx), and electrical conductivity (EC). The model structure was informed by knowledge of the key factors driving water quality variation, which had been identified in two preceding studies using the same dataset. Apart from FRP, which is hardly explainable (19.9%), the model explains 38.2% (NOx) to 88.6% (EC) of total spatio-temporal variability in water quality. Across constituents, the model generally captures over half of the observed spatial variability; temporal variability remains largely unexplained across all catchments, while long-term trends are well captured. The model is best used to predict proportional changes in water quality in a Box-Cox transformed scale, but can have substantial bias if used to predict absolute values for high concentrations. This model can assist catchment management by (1) identifying hot-spots and hot moments for waterway pollution; (2) predicting effects of catchment changes on water quality e.g. urbanization or forestation; and (3) identifying and explaining major water quality trends and changes. Further model improvements should focus on: (1) alternative statistical model structures to improve fitting for truncated data, for constituents where a large amount of data below the detection-limit; and (2) better representation of non-conservative constituents (e.g. FRP) by accounting for important biogeochemical processes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A web-based interface to visualize and model spatio-temporal variability of stream water quality
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, J ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Bende-Michl, U ; Leahy, P ; Waters, D ; Watson, M ; Wilson, P ; Western, A ; Vietz, G ; Rutherfurd, I (River Basement Management Society, 2018)
    Understanding the spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality is critical for designing effective water quality management strategies. To facilitate this, we developed a web-based interface to visualize and model the spatio-temporal variability of stream water quality in Victoria. We used a dataset of long-term monthly water quality measurements from 102 monitoring sites in Victoria, focusing on six water quality constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjedahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate-nitrite (NOx), and electrical conductivity (EC). The interface models spatio-temporal variability in water quality via a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework, and produces summaries of (1) the key driving factors of spatio-temporal variability and (2) model performance assessed by multiple metrics. Additional features include predicting the time-averaged mean concentration at an un-sampled site, and testing the impact of land-use changes on the mean concentration at existing sites. This tool can be very useful in supporting the decision-making processes of catchment managers in (1) understanding the key drivers of changes in water quality and (2) designing water quality mitigation and restoration strategies.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Integrated modelling of spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality across victorian catchments
    Guo, D ; Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Western, AW (Engineers Australia, 2018-01-01)
    Degraded water quality in rivers and streams can have large economical, societal and ecological impacts. Stream water quality can be highly variable both over space and time, so understanding and modelling these spatio-temporal variabilities is critical to developing management and mitigation strategies to improve riverine water quality. However, there is currently limited capacity to model stream water quality due to the lack of understanding of the key factors driving spatio-temporal variability in water quality. To address this, a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model has been developed to describe the spatio-temporal variability in stream water quality across multiple catchments in the state of Victoria, Australia. We used monthly water quality monitoring data collected at 102 sites over 20 years. The modelling focused on three key water quality indicators: total suspended solids (TSS), nitrate-nitrite (NOx) and salinity (EC). It was found that both human-influenced catchment characteristics (land use) and other natural characteristics such as climate or topography are important drivers of spatial variabilities. The key drivers of temporal variability are changes in streamflow, climate and vegetation cover. These key drivers have been integrated into a spatio-temporal modelling framwork. These models can be applied at different spatial and temporal scales, and explain a reasonable proportion of spatio-temporal variation in the different water quality constituents. The extension and adaption of these models is currently underway to create an operational tool to forecast stream water quality responses to potential land use and climatic changes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Using a data-driven approach to understand the interaction between catchment characteristics and water quality responses
    Lintern, A ; Webb, JA ; Ryu, D ; Liu, S ; Bende-Michl, U ; Leahy, P ; Wilson, P ; Western, A ; Vietz, G ; Flatley, A ; Rutherfurd, I (River Basin Management Society, 2016)